Skip to main content

Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Herth Hope Index in Kinyarwanda: adapting a positive psychosocial tool for healthcare recipients and providers in the Rwandan setting

Abstract

Background

The lack of culturally appropriate instruments to measure hope across cultural settings is a barrier to assessing and addressing the relationship between hope and health outcomes. The study aim was to adapt and evaluate the psychometric properties of the Herth Hope Index (HHI) in Kinyarwanda in a population of healthcare recipients and healthcare workers in Rwanda.

Methods

A transcultural translation and adaptation of the HHI was conducted using qualitative methods (n = 43) to achieve semantic, content, and technical equivalence. The adapted instrument was administered to a purposive sample (n = 206) of Rwandan healthcare patients and providers. Temporal reliability, internal reliability using Cronbach’s alpha, and construct validity using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were assessed.

Results

The Herth Hope Index-Kinyarwanda (HHI-K) was found to have strong internal consistency (α = 0.85) and test-retest reliability (r = 0.85). The original HHI three-factor structure fit the data well in CFA (normed chi-square = 1.53; root mean square error of approximation = 0.05; standardized root mean square residual = 0.05; comparative fit index = 0.96; Tucker-Lewis Index = 0.95).

Conclusion

This article presents the first rigorous cultural adaptation of the HHI in a low-income country. The HHI-K has acceptable psychometric properties, resulting in a new useful tool for research, program development, and evaluation in Rwandan healthcare settings. The HHI-K instrument can be used to assess the effectiveness of programs that aim to promote hope and health outcomes across health system- and individual-levels. The process also provides a feasible model for adaptation of a positive psychosocial tool for both patients and providers in low-resource settings.

Background

Hope is the desire for and belief in a positive future, defined as “a multidimensional, dynamic, empowering state of being that is central to life, related to external help and caring, oriented towards the future and highly personalized to each individual.” [1] Hope is theorized as motivating individuals to act towards reaching a future goal, manifesting emotionally and behaviorally, and relating to both abstract future expectations and expectations of concrete outcomes [2, 3].

Hope has been conceptualized as a positive psychosocial strength influenced by the social environment while protecting against risk, making it relevant to the context of healthcare [4]. Hope is also considered an important mediator between risk factors in low-resource settings and engagement in risky health behaviors [5]. While long-term illnesses like HIV can induce hopelessness, research has shown that modest interventions that instill a sense of hope can lead to improvements in related health and education outcomes [6, 7]. Hope has been measured in relation to a variety of physical and psychological factors, including pain, fatigue, psychological distress, quality of life, and family support [8,9,10]. Although a lack of hope is associated with depression and anxiety, hope as a multidimensional concept represents more than the absence of clinically-relevant depressive and anxious symptoms [11, 12]. Loss of hope has been correlated with lower functioning in both physical and psychological domains [13,14,15]. Hope is therefore a key indicator for understanding patient wellbeing and an important target for intervention outcomes.

Hope has increasingly been shown have significant importance to healthcare workers as well. The wellbeing of healthcare workers is critical to the effective functioning of healthcare systems. High levels of stress can negatively affect the wellbeing of healthcare workers and lead to burnout, in which they experience emotional exhaustion, depersonalization from patients, and reduced personal accomplishment [16, 17]. For example, a study conducted in Zimbabwe considered the motivations and frustrations among healthcare workers after the rollout of antiretrovirals for HIV-positive individuals. Although access to antiretrovirals initially improved optimism among healthcare workers, the intermittent shortages of medications mitigated the initial increase [18]. Another study in Malawi found that both individual-level vulnerabilities along with work-related modifiable factors, such as the lack of a supportive supervisor and dissatisfaction with team interactions, are associated with higher rates of burnout [19]. To better understand and address the role of hope related to health-promoting behaviors among patients and service provision by frontline health workers, valid and reliable instruments to measure hope in a variety of cultural settings are needed.

Instruments to measure hope have mainly been developed in high-income countries and in clinical settings [20, 21]. One commonly used instrument to measure hope is the Herth Hope Scale (HHS) and its abbreviated version, the Herth Hope Index (HHI) [22, 23]. The HHI is a 12-item instrument designed to measure hope based on the multidimensional concept of hope as theorized by Dufault and Martocchio. The three dimensions are 1) inner sense of temporality and future, 2) inner positive readiness and expectancy, and 3) interconnectedness with self and others [23]. The concurrent criterion-related validity of HHI to HHS is high (0.92). The HHI maintained the three-factor structure of the HHS, which accounted for 61% of the total variance [23]. The answers are given on a 4-point Likert-type scale (1 = strongly disagree to 4 = strongly agree). The score is calculated by summing each item’s score, with items #3 and #6 reverse-scored. Scores range from 4 to 48, and a higher value signifies higher hope. HHI items #2 and #4 were reworded in 1999 to make their meanings clearer [24]. In a sample of 172 adult patients, its psychometric features were excellent, with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.97 and a test-retest reliability after 2 weeks of 0.91 [23]. Concurrent validity with other scales ranged from 0.92 with the Nowotny Hope Scale, which measures hope among cancer patients, to − 0.73 with Beck’s Hopelessness Scale, which measures suicidal tendency [25, 26].

The HHI has been widely used in research and clinical practice in different cultural settings for various health areas [27]. Translations of the HHI into Chinese [28], Dutch [29], German [30], Italian [31], Japanese [32], Norwegian [33], Persian [34], Portuguese [35], Spanish [36], and Swedish [37] have been published with satisfactory psychometric properties.

No translation or cross-cultural evaluation of the HHI in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) has yet been published. Given the importance of hopefulness to poverty alleviation and health interventions, reliable and validated instruments to measure hope across cultural contexts are needed to better understand and address the relationship between hope and health.

Aims

The aims of this study were to transculturally adapt the Herth Hope Index to Kinyarwanda and evaluate its psychometric properties, specifically examining reliability and construct validity. The study also sought to demonstrate the feasibility of cross-culturally adapting and validating a positive psychological measure simultaneously for healthcare workers and recipients and to serve as a model for such adaptations in low-resource settings.

Methods

Setting

Rwanda, has achieved major development gains in the last decade with widespread health improvements among its 12 million people [38, 39]. However, in part due to the historical context of the 1994 genocide and its lasting effects, hope and mental health are important considerations when creating, implementing, and evaluating health programs [40, 41]. Depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder are prevalent in Rwanda, with rates twice as high in women compared with men [42]. Further, Rwanda’s community-based health insurance scheme covers over 81.6% of the population and continues to grow—a successful step towards universal health coverage (UHC) and the Sustainable Development Goals [43]. As health coverage expands, frontline healthcare workers must provide a growing number of services to an increasing proportion of the population. A well-supported, trained, equipped, and paid health workforce—linked to hopefulness—will better enable the country’s efforts to achieve UHC [44].

The research took place in the Ruli District Hospital catchment area, located in Gakenke District in the Northern Province of Rwanda, which includes nine health centers and serves about 130,000 individuals. In Ruli Catchment area in 2018, there were 54 maternal and child healthcare workers, 144 total healthcare workers, and 3308 women newly enrolled in antenatal care. The research was conducted by TIP Global Health (TIP), a Rwandan non-governmental community health organization based in Ruli, Rwanda. TIP works with pregnant women and mothers, many of whom are living with HIV, as well as other healthcare recipients and their healthcare workers to create community-driven health programs that strengthen national health systems. TIP plans to develop and implement a program to promote hope for the healthcare workers and recipients who are supported by TIP’s interventions; TIP conducted this research to better understand and address the critical influence of hope among healthcare workers and recipients, including assessing the impact and effectiveness of relevant interventions.

Transcultural translation and adaptation

A systematic approach for transcultural translation and adaptation was developed in Nepal and has been widely used as part of cross-cultural mental health studies [45,46,47]. The approach uses qualitative methods to optimize semantic, technical, content, and conceptual equivalence of a culturally adapted tool with the original tool. The process to transculturally translate and adapt the HHI to Kinyarwanda, creating the Herth Hope Index – Kinyarwanda (HHI-K), was derived from the tool developed by van Ommeren and colleagues and involved three main steps [45]. A team of five bilingual translators at TIP with extensive experience in rural Rwandan health settings created the first draft of the Kinyarwanda tool. Next, a series of focus group discussions and cognitive interviews were conducted by the research team with healthcare workers and healthcare recipients. Adjustments were made based on the feedback of participants. Lastly, two blind back-translations were completed. Both the pre- and post-translation English versions were reviewed, and final modifications were made to the instrument to meet the original conceptual objectives. The approach optimized equivalence by evaluating four criteria at each step using a transcultural monitoring form: comprehensibility, acceptability, relevance, and completeness [41, 44].

  1. 1.

    Comprehensibility of an item is a measure of semantic equivalence and relates to using appropriate terminology, such as idioms of distress [48]. If an item is deemed comprehensible by a focus group or individual, it is assumed to be understandable by a general audience in the local context [49].

  2. 2.

    Acceptability reflects that an item is not overly sensitive for people to endorse (e.g., items about sex or alcohol). This section also considers technical equivalence in how data are collected across cultures. Likert scales in particular require assessment to determine if they are understood across cultures. If an item is deemed to have an acceptable response set, it suggests that respondents will rate items similarly to the original intention of the instrument [49].

  3. 3.

    Relevance pertains to content equivalence. If an item is relevant, it has significant meaning in the cultural setting [49]. For example, difficulty concentrating on television or distracted driving are relevant to symptoms of depression in some cultural settings but not others.

  4. 4.

    Completeness, which addresses semantic and conceptual equivalence, refers to whether a question relates to the same concepts as the original item. Completeness accounts for cultural norms in relation to markers of distress [49]. In this study, completeness refers to whether the item reflects the experience of hopefulness.

Participants for transcultural translation

Participants for the focus group discussions, which included both healthcare recipients and workers, were purposively sampled from nine community health centers in the Ruli catchment area. Participants were selected according to their alignment with the population TIP works with through its community health programs and resembles the anticipated population of TIP’s future intervention to promote hope.

Participants for psychometric evaluation

For the psychometric evaluation, participants, including both healthcare recipients and healthcare workers, were purposively sampled from nine community health centers in the Ruli District Hospital catchment area. Participants were eligible if they were older than 18 years of age, spoke Kinyarwanda, could complete the consent process, and did not have any issues preventing them from hearing or responding to questions read to them.

Psychometric evaluation

Reliability is the capacity of an instrument to produce consistent results internally (across items) and in different situations. Reliability was measured with internal consistency to assess the general agreement between all items in the instrument [50]. To measure the internal consistency of the HHI-K, Cronbach’s alpha was calculated [51, 52]. Cronbach’s alpha is a measure of internal consistency based on the degree of inter-correlation among all items on a scale. Internal consistency estimates of .70 or higher are considered sufficient [50]. Test-retest reliability at 1 week (n = 48) was assessed by the same survey enumerators to measure the reliability of the instrument across time. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to estimate the test-retest reliability coefficient; estimates above 0.70 are considered acceptable [53].

Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), using the estimator of maximum likelihood, was used to verify the construct validity of the instrument by determining whether the original factor structure of the HHI generalizes to the HHI-K. Construct validity refers to the degree to which a tool measures what it claims to be measuring [54]. The following indices were examined to assess the goodness-of-fit between the original model and the study sample data: the normed chi square (chi-square index divided by the degrees of freedom), the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), the standardized root mean square residual (SRMR), the comparative fit index (CFI), and the Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI). The following criteria were used for evaluation: normed chi-square < 5.0 and preferably < 2.0, RMSEA < 0.08, SRMR < 0.08, CFI > 0.90, and TLI > 0.90. These indices demonstrate whether the model shows a good fit to the data [55, 56]. Statistical analyses were performed using R version 3.5.3, with lavaan version 0.6–3 for CFA modeling.

Results

Transcultural translation and adaptation

After completion of the translation by bilingual speakers, the draft of the HHI-K was reviewed by nine focus groups with healthcare recipients, and six focus groups and two interviews with healthcare workers (Table 1). The age of respondents ranged from 22 to 51 years old with a mean of 34. Almost all participants were female (98%), as expected given the target population. Most were married (72%), though legally married and cohabitating participants were not disaggregated for this phase of the research.

Table 1 Demographics of focus groups and interviews

Comprehensibility (semantic equivalence)

In focus group discussions and interviews, participants evaluated the Kinyarwanda terminology used to describe each item. When participants identified terms that were difficult to understand, alternative phrasing was developed. For example, in item #3 (“I feel all alone”), participants answered with specific people in mind who had or had not abandoned them. To address this, language was added to describe a more general feeling of abandonment. Because of the importance of religious faith in Rwandan culture, items #5 (“faith that gives comfort”) and #8 (“deep inner strength”) originally had similar meanings when directly translated into Kinyarwanda. To differentiate the two items, both items were reworded and subsequently correctly interpreted by participants and accurately back-translated. Similarly, some participants asked for clarification about the difference between item #2 (“goals”) and item #10 (“sense of direction”), but ultimately the majority of participants deemed the questions sufficiently distinct. With the initial translation of item #7 (“recall joyful times”), participants interpreted the question as asking them to compare present times to past times, so the language was adjusted to focus on the ability to remember joyful memories. The original translation of item #9 (“give and receive care and love”) elicited responses about whether or not participants had specific people to love currently in their lives, as opposed to having a general capacity to love and to be loved. The Kinyarwanda phrasing was changed to address this. See Additional file 1 for the final HHI-K and Additional file 2 for the English back-translation.

Acceptability and other response set issues (technical equivalence)

In the first step of the translation, the structure of the response set was revised. In the original English HHI, the response options are “strongly disagree,” “disagree,” “agree,” and “strongly agree,” correlating to scores of 1, 2, 3, and 4 respectively. Because of the varying education levels of the target population, translators deemed the Likert scale format difficult to interpret for participants when distinguishing between response options. As described in the cross-cultural mental health literature, technical equivalence is achieved when “the method of assessment … is comparable in each culture with respect to the data it yields.” [57] In Nepal and Afghanistan, water glasses filled to different levels have been used to represent response categories [58, 59]. Translators built on these previous adaptations to create a new visual response set featuring water cups (Fig. 1). Participants’ interpretations of the visual response set were comparable to the meaning of the data obtained through the original Likert scale.

Fig. 1
figure1

Visual response set of HHI-K

Because of the varying literacy levels of the target population, questions were adapted to be asked verbally by survey enumerators, as opposed to being completed by participants on paper. This made declarative phrases difficult to understand. For example, enumerators reading item #1–“I have a positive outlook towards life”–confused respondents. Therefore, each HHI item was rephrased as a question: “Do you have a positive outlook towards life?” Additionally, during focus groups, participants expressed that answering on a scale from 1 to 4 in response to a yes or no question made it difficult to distinguish among response options. However, participants also found it confusing to immediately respond to “To what extent do you have a positive outlook towards life?” Participants explained that an initial yes or no question, followed by a second question that clarified to what degree the sentiment was endorsed, would be easiest to interpret. Each survey item was rephrased to include both questions. Questions were also modified to match the visual response set. For example, item #1 became “Do you believe that your life will be better in the future? Compare your belief with the cup illustration to indicate which cup best fits your answer choice.”

During focus group discussions, participants identified the order of the questions as a barrier to understanding. Item #3 (“I feel all alone”) and #6 (“I feel scared about my future”) are reverse scored, meaning that “strongly agree” corresponds to a score of 1. Because a full cup implies the most positive, or hopeful, response for all other items, focus group participants still considered the full cup to be positive when answering the reverse score questions. To address this, items #3 and #6 were moved to the end of the survey and became items #11 and #12, with additional explanations added to each. For example, after asking item #11, survey enumerators add, “Note: This question is different from the other questions. The full cup means that you have been abandoned and no one cares about you (4), whereas the empty cup means you have not been abandoned at all and you are generally cared for (1).” After adding these notes, participants interpreted and responded to the reverse scored questions correctly.

Relevance and completeness (content and conceptual equivalence)

In the focus group discussions and interviews, all items were deemed relevant to the Rwandan context. Item #2 originally asked if respondents have “short and/or long-range goals,” but the difference between short and long-term goals was not directly translatable into Kinyarwanda. To keep the item as clear as possible, the final Kinyarwanda item #2 asks only about general goals without the specificity of short-term or long-term.

After revisions based on the results of the focus groups and interviews, the HHI-K underwent blind back-translation in which two fluent English and Kinyarwanda speakers unfamiliar with the HHI translated the HHI-K back to English. Minor edits were made after the black-translations and the tool was finalized for use in the psychometric evaluation.

Psychometric properties

The HHI-K was administered to a sample of 206 participants (Table 2). For CFA, 10 participants per variable (including latent variables) are generally considered sufficient [60]. In this study, there were 15 variables, including the 12 indicator (observed) variables and 3 latent (unobserved) variables tested in CFA.

Table 2 Demographics of psychometric evaluation sample

The age of respondents ranged from 19 to 59 years old with a mean of 32. As in the translation and adaptation portion of the study, almost all participants were female (98%) and most were married or living with their partner (71%). The HHI-K had a mean of 37.87 out of 48 and a standard deviation of 6.17, slightly higher than the original HHI’s mean of 34.49 and standard deviation of 9.61 [23].

Reliability

Cronbach’s alpha (CI 95%) for the HHI-K was 0.85 [0.82–0.88], demonstrating high internal consistency of the scale as a whole. The test-retest reliability coefficient (CI 95%) within 2 weeks was 0.85 [0.74–0.91] (ICC value). These results suggest that the HHI-K is a reliable instrument.

Factor structure

The original HHI three-factor model was tested with CFA using a maximum likelihood estimation [23]. A correlation table is shown in Table 3, while standardized and unstandardized parameter estimates are provided in Table 4. Using five commonly reported fit statistics, CFA demonstrated that the three-factor model had adequate fitness indicators (Table 5). All indicator variable factor loadings were above 0.30, significant in the CFA literature [61, 62]. The squared multiple correlation (SMC) values are included in the three-factor model in Fig. 2 in italics. These values were used to determine the reliability of the latent variables because they represent the percentage of variance accounted for by a corresponding latent variable per indicator variable [61]. Across all indicator variables, the highest SMC was 0.471 (HHI-K8 for readiness) and the lowest was 0.129 (HHI-K11 for interconnectedness).

Table 3 Empirical Data Correlation Matrix
Table 4 Standardized and Unstandardized Coefficients for CFA Analysis
Table 5 Fit statistics for confirmatory factor analysis of the HHI-K
Fig. 2
figure2

The Herth Hope Index-Kinyarwanda Measurement Model for the Three-Factor Model. a: Measurement Error. b: Squared Multiple Correlation (SMC) value. c: Standardized Factor Loadings. d: Latent Variable Covariance

Discussion

The HHI-K demonstrates values of reliability similar to those shown in previous HHI studies [27, 63]. The original three-factor model of the HHI fits the HHI-K well. Other dimensionality and factor analysis models of HHI translations in the literature showed some instability across patient groups and cultures. Rustøen et al. reviewed the results of studies that utilized HHI factor analyses and found that in the 11 total studies that have examined the factor structure of the HHI in different languages, one, two, and three factor structures were identified [27]. These different results are likely due to the fact that hope as a construct varies in different samples, contexts, and countries, which should be further examined in different settings and analytic approaches.

This is the first study to conduct a cross-cultural validation of the Herth Hope Index to Kinyarwanda. The HHI-K showed satisfactory psychometric properties, with adequate reliability, as demonstrated by satisfactory internal consistency and test-retest reliability, and construct validity, as demonstrated by factor analysis. As the first published translation and evaluation of the HHI in an LMIC setting, the study’s results also illustrate that the construct of hope as measured by the HHI is relevant in various cultural contexts. With overall adequate psychometric properties, the HHI-K is a useful tool for research and program development in Rwandan healthcare settings. While there are many existing examples of cross-cultural translation and adaptation survey processes, the HHI-K is unique in that it provides a feasible model for adaptation of a positive tool for both patients and providers in low-resource settings. Further, building on the growing evidence base of the importance of hope to poverty alleviation, the HHI-K can be used to assess the effectiveness of programs that aim to promote hope and health outcomes at the health system-level, such as continuous quality improvement [64], ongoing training [65], mHealth [66], and improved inventory management [67], and at the individual level, such as peer support groups [68], stress management, motivational interviewing [69], mindfulness interventions [70], and cognitive-behavioral skills [71]. By using the HHI-K, health interventions can better understand and address hope and its role in provider burnout, quality of care, treatment uptake, and other program outcomes, ultimately helping to make aspirations towards UHC more attainable.

It is important to recognize that hope is not a cure-all for health disparities, and instilling hope without resources is unlikely to improve related health outcomes. However, there is promising research that health and poverty-alleviation programs can amplify their impact by showing people that a better life is attainable [6, 7], and the HHI-K is a valid tool to be used as part of such work.

Limitations

Limitations related to the study design should be taken into account. This study used a purposive sample size to include participants represented in current TIP programs in Gakenke District, Rwanda, which are composed of predominantly female patients and providers. The nonprobability sample provides a limited perspective within the general population in Rwanda and thus the results presented should be considered within this scope; the survey might need to be adjusted for other Rwandan settings. Further, response bias could have influenced the results. Since the HHI-K is verbally enumerated, participants may have inflated their answers due to social desirability bias, meaning that participants answered sensitive questions with socially desirable, rather than truthful, answers. This risk was addressed by ensuring that participants did not know survey enumerators before answering the survey and that the survey was administered in private spaces. If participants asked clarifying questions about the meaning of survey items, enumerators were trained to reread each item so that responses would not be biased due to potentially different explanations from enumerators.

Conclusion

The HHI-K is a reliable and valid instrument to measure hope in Rwanda. The study also demonstrates that it is feasible to cross-culturally adapt and validate a positive psychosocial measure for healthcare workers and recipients, and the process used can serve as a model for future adaptations in low-resource settings. Given its satisfactory psychometric properties, the HHI-K can be used to provide relevant information to support global health practitioners in understanding the role of hope among healthcare patients and providers in Rwanda, aiding evaluations of relevant health programs. Further studies should conduct adaptations and evaluations of the HHI in other samples and contexts to further confirm the factor stability found in the results. This initial report on the psychometric properties of the HHI-K should be used to generate further research on the capacity to measure and influence hope in LMICs, allowing for more evidence-based programs to influence hope and improve health going forward.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

CFA:

Confirmatory factor analysis

CFI:

Comparative fix index

LMIC:

Low- and middle-income country

HHI-K:

Herth Hope Index-Kinyarwanda

ICC:

Intraclass correlation coefficient

RMSEA:

Root mean square error of approximation

SD:

Standard deviation

SE:

Standard error

SMC:

Squared multiple correlation

SRMR:

Standardized root mean square residual

TIP:

TIP Global Health

TLI:

Tucker-Lewis Index

UHC:

Universal health coverage

References

  1. 1.

    Cutcliffe J. Towards a definition of Hope. Int J Psychiatr Nurs Res. 1997;3(2):319–32.

  2. 2.

    Stotland E. The psychology of Hope an integration of experimental clinical and social approaches. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Dufault K, Martocchio BC. Symposium on compassionate care and the dying experience. Hope: its spheres and dimensions. Nurs Clin North Am. 1985;20(2):379–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Snyder CR, Harris C, Anderson JR, Holleran SA, Irving LM, Sigmon ST, et al. The will and the ways: development and validation of an individual-differences measure of hope. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1991;60(4):570–85.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Bernays S, Rhodes T, Barnett T. Hope: a new way to look at the HIV epidemic. AIDS. 2007 Oct;21(Suppl 5):S5–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Ghosal S, Jana S, Mani A, Mitra S, Roy S. Sex workers, self-image and stigma: evidence from Kolkata brothels. In: Competitive advantage in the global economy (CAGE); 2016. (CAGE Online Working Paper Series). Report No.: 302. Available from: https://ideas.repec.org/p/cge/wacage/302.html.

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Riley E. Role models in movies: the impact of queen of Katwe on students’ educational attainment: Centre for the Study of African Economies, University of Oxford; 2017. Report No.: 2017. Available from: https://econpapers.repec.org/paper/csawpaper/2017-13.htm.

  8. 8.

    Rawdin B, Evans C, Rabow MW. The relationships among hope, pain, psychological distress, and spiritual well-being in oncology outpatients. J Palliat Med. 2013;16(2):167–72.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Schjolberg TK, Dodd M, Henriksen N, Rustoen T. Factors affecting hope in a sample of fatigued breast cancer outpatients. Palliat Support Care. 2011;9(1):63–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Phillips-Salimi CR, Haase JE, Kintner EK, Monahan PO, Azzouz F. Psychometric properties of the Herth Hope index in adolescents and young adults with cancer. J Nurs Meas. 2007;15(1):3–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Utne I, Miaskowski C, Bjordal K, Paul SM, Rustoen T. The relationships between mood disturbances and pain, hope, and quality of life in hospitalized cancer patients with pain on regularly scheduled opioid analgesic. J Palliat Med. 2010;13(3):311–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Yang Y-L, Liu L, Wang X-X, Wang Y, Wang L. Prevalence and associated positive psychological variables of depression and anxiety among Chinese cervical cancer patients: a cross-sectional study. PLoS One. 2014;9(4):e94804.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Brothers BM, Andersen BL. Hopelessness as a predictor of depressive symptoms for breast cancer patients coping with recurrence. Psychooncology. 2009;18(3):267–75.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Duggleby WD, Williams A, Holstlander L, Thomas R, Cooper D, Hallstrom LK, et al. Hope of rural women caregivers of persons with advanced cancer: guilt, self-efficacy and mental health. Rural Remote Health. 2014;14:2561.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Berendes D, Keefe FJ, Somers TJ, Kothadia SM, Porter LS, Cheavens JS. Hope in the context of lung cancer: relationships of hope to symptoms and psychological distress. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2010;40(2):174–82.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Maslach C, Leiter MP. Understanding the burnout experience: recent research and its implications for psychiatry. World Psychiatry. 2016;15(2):103–11.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Selamu M, Thornicroft G, Fekadu A, Hanlon C. Conceptualisation of job-related wellbeing, stress and burnout among healthcare workers in rural Ethiopia: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Campbell C, Scott K, Madenhire C, Nyamukapa C, Gregson S. Sources of motivation and frustration among healthcare workers administering antiretroviral treatment for HIV in rural Zimbabwe. AIDS Care. 2011;23(7):797–802.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Kim MH, Mazenga AC, Yu X, Simon K, Nyasulu P, Kazembe PN, et al. Factors associated with burnout amongst healthcare workers providing HIV care in Malawi. PLoS One. 2019;14(9) Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6759146/.

  20. 20.

    Miller JF, Powers MJ. Development of an instrument to measure hope. Nurs Res. 1988;37(1):6–10.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Nunn KP, Lewin TJ, Walton JM, Carr VJ. The construction and characteristics of an instrument to measure personal hopefulness. Psychol Med. 1996;26(3):531–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Herth K. Development and refinement of an instrument to measure hope. Sch Inq Nurs Pract. 1991;5(1):39–51 discussion 53-56.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Herth K. Abbreviated instrument to measure hope: development and psychometric evaluation. J Adv Nurs. 1992;17(10):1251–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Domestic Violence Evidence Project. Herth Hope Index. Available from: https://www.dvevidenceproject.org/wp-content/uploads/Hope-Index1.pdf.

  25. 25.

    Nowotny ML. Assessment of hope in patients with cancer: development of an instrument. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1989;16(1):57–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Beck AT, Weissman A, Lester D, Trexler L. The measurement of pessimism: the hopelessness scale. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1974;42(6):861–5.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Rustøen T, Lerdal A, Gay C, Kottorp A. Rasch analysis of the Herth Hope index in cancer patients. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018;16(1):196.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Chan KS, Li HCW, Chan SW-C, Lopez V. Herth hope index: psychometric testing of the Chinese version. J Adv Nurs. 2012;68(9):2079–85.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Van Gestel-Timmermans H, Van Den Bogaard J, Brouwers E, Herth K, Van Nieuwenhuizen C. Hope as a determinant of mental health recovery: a psychometric evaluation of the Herth Hope index-Dutch version. Scand J Caring Sci. 2010;24:67–74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Geiser F, Zajackowski K, Conrad R, Imbierowicz K, Wegener I, Herth KA, et al. The German version of the Herth Hope index (HHI-D): development and psychometric properties. Oncol Res Treat. 2015;38(7–8):356–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Ripamonti CI, Buonaccorso L, Maruelli A, Bandieri E, Boldini S, Pessi MA, et al. Hope Herth index (HHI): a validation study in Italian patients with solid and hematological malignancies on active cancer treatment. Tumori. 2012;98(3):385–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Koizumi M, Ito M, Mori Y, Miyamoto M. Development of a Japanese version of the Herth Hope index. KITAKANTO Med J. 1999;49(4):277–82.

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Wahl AK, Rustøen T, Lerdal A, Hanestad BR, Knudsen O, Moum T. The Norwegian version of the Herth Hope index (HHI-N): a psychometric study. Palliat Support Care. 2004;2(3):255–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Yaghoobzadeh A, Pahlevan Sharif S, Ong FS, Soundy A, Sharif Nia H, Moradi Bagloee M, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the Herth Hope index within a sample of Iranian older peoples. Int J Aging Hum Dev. 2018;89(4):356–71.

  35. 35.

    Balsanelli ACS, Aurora Alves Grossi S, Herth K. Cultural adaptation and validation of the herth hope index for Portuguese language: study in patients with chronic illness. Texto Contexto - Enfermagem. 2010;19:754–61.

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Arnau RC, Martinez P, de Guzmán IN, Herth K, Konishi CY. A Spanish-language version of the Herth Hope scale: development and psychometric evaluation in a Peruvian sample. Educ Psychol Meas. 2010;70(5):808–24.

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Benzein E, Berg A. The Swedish version of Herth Hope index--an instrument for palliative care. Scand J Caring Sci. 2003 Dec;17(4):409–15.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    World Health Organization. Rwanda Country Profile; 2018. Available from: https://www.who.int/countries/rwa/en/.

  39. 39.

    United Nations Development Programme. Human development indices and indicators: 2018 statistical update - briefing note for countries on the 2018 statistical update; 2018. Available from: http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/Country-Profiles/RWA.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Rwanda Biomedical Center, Republic of Rwanda Ministry of Health. Rwanda global AIDS response Progress report (GARPR) 2014; 2014. (2014 Progress reports submitted by countries). Available from: https://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/country/documents/RWA_narrative_report_2014.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Betancourt TS, Ng LC, Kirk CM, Munyanah M, Mushashi C, Ingabire C, et al. Family-based prevention of mental health problems in children affected by HIV and AIDS: an open trial. AIDS. 2014;28(0 3):S359–68.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Rugema L, Mogren I, Ntaganira J, Krantz G. Traumatic episodes and mental health effects in young men and women in Rwanda, 17 years after the genocide. BMJ Open. 2015;5(6) Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4480039/.

  43. 43.

    Chemouni B. The political path to universal health coverage: power, ideas and community-based health insurance in Rwanda. World Dev. 2018;106:87–98.

    Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    WHO | What is Universal health coverage? What is the impact of the health workforce crisis on universal health coverage?. WHO. Available from: https://www.who.int/workforcealliance/media/qa/01/en/.

  45. 45.

    van Ommeren M, Sharma B, Thapa S, Makaju R, Prasain D, Bhattarai R, et al. Preparing instruments for transcultural research: use of the translation monitoring form with Nepali-speaking Bhutanese refugees. Transcult Psychiatry. 1999;36(3):285–301.

    Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Kaiser BN, Kohrt BA, Keys HM, Khoury NM, Brewster A-RT. Strategies for assessing mental health in Haiti: local instrument development and transcultural translation. Transcult Psychiatry. 2013;50(4):532–58.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Ventevogel P, Komproe IH, Jordans MJ, Feo P, De Jong JTVM. Validation of the Kirundi versions of brief self-rating scales for common mental disorders among children in Burundi. BMC Psychiatry. 2014;14:36.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Cork C, Kaiser BN, White RG. The integration of idioms of distress into mental health assessments and interventions: a systematic review. Glob Ment Health (Camb). 2019;6 Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6521171/.

  49. 49.

    Kohrt BA, Luitel NP, Acharya P, Jordans MJD. Detection of depression in low resource settings: validation of the patient health questionnaire (PHQ-9) and cultural concepts of distress in Nepal. BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Mar 8;16:58.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    DeVellis RF. Scale development: theory and applications, vol. 26. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE; 2019. Available from: https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/scale-development/book246123.

    Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951;16(3):297–334.

    Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Cronbach LJ, Shavelson RJ. My current thoughts on coefficient Alpha and successor procedures. Educ Psychol Meas. 2004;64(3):391–418.

    Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge; 2013. Available from: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780203771587.

    Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Polit DF. Nursing research: generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. Ninth. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, third edition. 3rd ed. New York: The Guilford Press; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Hooper D, Coughlan J, Mullen M. Structural equation modelling: guidelines for determining model fit. Electron J Bus Res Methods. 2008;6(1):53–60.

    Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Flaherty JA, Gaviria FM, Pathak D, Mitchell T, Wintrob R, Richman JA, et al. Developing instruments for cross-cultural psychiatric research. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1988;176(5):257–63.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Kohrt BA, Jordans MJD, Tol WA, Luitel NP, Maharjan SM, Upadhaya N. Validation of cross-cultural child mental health and psychosocial research instruments: adapting the depression self-rating scale and child PTSD symptom scale in Nepal. BMC Psychiatry. 2011;11(1):127.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Miller KE, Omidian P, Quraishy AS, Quraishy N, Nasiry MN, Nasiry S, et al. The afghan symptom checklist: a culturally grounded approach to mental health assessment in a conflict zone. Am J Orthop. 2006;76(4):423–33.

    Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Wolf EJ, Harrington KM, Clark SL, Miller MW. Sample size requirements for structural equation models: an evaluation of power, bias, and solution propriety. Educ Psychol Meas. 2013;76(6):913–34.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Jackson DL, Gillaspy JA, Purc-Stephenson R. Reporting practices in confirmatory factor analysis: an overview and some recommendations. Psychol Methods. 2009;14(1):6–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Schreiber JB, Nora A, Stage FK, Barlow EA, King J. Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: a review. J Educ Res. 2006;99(6):323–38.

    Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Hunsaker AE, Terhorst L, Gentry A, Lingler JH. Measuring hope among families impacted by cognitive impairment. Dementia (London). 2016;15(4):596–608.

    Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Quality of Care – The Ihangane Project. Available from: https://www.theihanganeproject.com/quality-of-care/.

  65. 65.

    O’Donovan J, O’Donovan C, Kuhn I, Sachs SE, Winters N. Ongoing training of community health workers in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic scoping review of the literature. BMJ Open. 2018;8(4) Available from: https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/8/4/e021467.

  66. 66.

    Zakus D, Moise M, Mahamane E, Paulus YJ, Patsy O, Caroline D, et al. Clinical evaluation of the use of an mhealth intervention on quality of care provided by community health workers in Southwest Niger. J Glob Health. 2019;9(1) Available from: http://search.proquest.com/docview/2267411459/abstract/A13C2140F5E64BC5PQ/1.

  67. 67.

    Kahn R, Sheriff B, Hann K, Ameet S, Gassimu J, Alpha K, et al. Strengthening provision of essential medicines to women and children in post-Ebola Sierra Leone. J Glob Health. 2019;9(1) Available from: http://search.proquest.com/docview/2249785659/abstract/2ADE3480A35947E9PQ/1.

  68. 68.

    Prost A, Colbourn T, Seward N, Azad K, Coomarasamy A, Copas A, et al. Women’s groups practising participatory learning and action to improve maternal and newborn health in low-resource settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2013;381(9879):1736–46.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Lundahl B, Moleni T, Burke BL, Butters R, Tollefson D, Butler C, et al. Motivational interviewing in medical care settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Patient Educ Couns. 2013;93(2):157–68.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Shawyer F, Enticott JC, Özmen M, Inder B, Meadows GN. Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for recurrent major depression: a ‘best buy’ for health care? Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2016;50(10):1001–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Hinton DE, Patel A. Cultural adaptations of cognitive behavioral therapy. Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2017;40(4):701–14.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all participants for their participation. The authors also thank Angelique Kanzayire, Gratien Mukeshimana, Marlene Mumukunde, Jean Pierre Ndikubwayo, Valentin Uwayo, and Soline Uwingabiye for their assistance throughout the translation and adaptation process. Lastly, the authors thank Bonnie Kaiser, Eve Puffer, and Eric Green for their advice. The study would not have been possible without the guidance and collaboration of these individuals.

Funding

This project was made possible by Suzanne Skees in honor of Jonah Hinman, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, and Johnson & Johnson’s Africa Innovation Challenge 2.0. Funders had no role in the study design, data collection, analysis, or manuscript production.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AI, JK, WL, and DU conceived of and designed the project. KH, EC, and JN advised on the development of the project idea and design. AI and WL supervised overall study implementation. AI and JK performed qualitative analysis. JK and JTW performed quantitative analysis. AI and JK drafted the manuscript. The authors reviewed and approved the final version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angele Bienvenue Ishimwe.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval was obtained from the Rwanda National Ethics Committee (IRB 00001497 of IORG0001100). Data were collected in the period of February 2019 to April 2019. All participants completed a consent process in which they read a consent form and provided informed consent. All but one individual approached for consent agreed to participate in the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1.

Herth Hope Index-Kinyarwanda.

Additional file 2.

English back-translation of the Herth Hope Index-Kinyarwanda.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ishimwe, A.B., Kaufman, J., Uwamahoro, D. et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Herth Hope Index in Kinyarwanda: adapting a positive psychosocial tool for healthcare recipients and providers in the Rwandan setting. Health Qual Life Outcomes 18, 286 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-020-01537-3

Download citation

Keywords

  • Hope
  • Cross-cultural
  • Positive instrument development
  • Psychometrics
  • Frontline healthcare