Skip to main content

The relationship between preference-based health-related quality of life and lifestyle behavior: a cross-sectional study on a community sample of adults who had undergone a health check-up

Abstract

Background

Preference-based Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) is one of the most important indicators for calculating QALY (Quality-Adjusted Life Years) in a cost-effectiveness analysis. This study aimed to collect data on healthy individuals’ HRQL based on the preferences of Japanese people who had undergone a comprehensive health check-up, and to examine the influence of relevant factors, such as blood biochemical data and lifestyle behavior.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional study targeting people who had undergone a comprehensive health check-up in 2015. Participants were asked to respond to a medical interview sheet. We then examined the utility value, as well as lifestyle habits such as alcohol intake, smoking, and exercise. HRQL was examined using EQ-5D-5L. Using a multiple regression analysis, we examined the influence of related factors, such as lifestyle and biochemical test data.

Results

We collected 2037 responses (mean age = 54.98 years; 55.0% female). The average preference-based health-related HRQL was 0.936 ± 0.087. A total of 1167 people (57.2%) responded that they were completely healthy. The biochemical test data that were recognized to correlate with HRQL were hemoglobin, total cholesterol, creatinine, all of which were weak (r = − 0.045–0.113). The results of multiple regression analysis showed that significant facts were: being female, age (70 year-old), drinking alcohol (sometimes), activity (very often), and lack of sleep.

Conclusions

The HRQL of participants who had undergone a comprehensive health check-up was generally high, and only declined for those over 70 years of age. It is suggested that preference-based HRQL is related to physical activity, and that decrease of activity and lack of sleep leads to a decrease in HRQL.

Introduction

Preference-based Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) is one of the most important indicators, along with cost, for calculating QALY (Quality-Adjusted Life Years) in a cost-effectiveness analysis. Due to its application in the Health Technology Assessment (HTA) policy, its importance has increased. Since the HTA began in Japan in 2017, guidelines have been developed [1], according to which the evaluation tool recommended for Japan requires a scoring algorithm based on data investigated domestically. Currently, only EQ-5D satisfies this guideline.

EQ-5D was developed by the EuroQol Group, and two scoring algorithms, EQ-5D-3L [2] and EQ-5D-5L [3], have been developed for Japan. Since EQ-5D-5L is said to be less susceptible to the ceiling effect recognized in EQ-5D-3L [4,5,6], EQ-5D-5L is expected to be utilized. However, there is little norm data on healthy subjects. In a survey of healthy subjects, it has been reported that factors such as, being over 70 -years -old, having low-income, and a short education period, decrease HRQL [7]. However, other factors, such as age, income, and education, have not been shown to affect HRQL. If the relationship between lifestyle factors and HRQL is clarified, it can be used as basic data to judge the economic effects of public health policy in Japan, such as prevention of long-term care and medical examinations in the future. In addition, since this study is being conducted in Tokyo, the capital city, in the future it will be possible to compare assessment study populations with community populations.

In Japan, it is common practice for healthy people to check their health status annually by participating in a comprehensive health check-up [8]. This check-up includes a blood biochemical test as well as a chest X-ray, confirmation of lifestyle behavior, medical interview, etc. In this study, our aim was to examine HRQL by applying EQ-5D-5L to people who had undergone the above-mentioned comprehensive health check-up, and to investigate its relationship to lifestyle and blood biochemical data.

Methods

Sampling design

We targeted people who had undergone a comprehensive health check-up from January to March 2015, at the Clinic and Center for Preventive Medicine affiliated with St. Luke’s International Hospital in Tokyo. The hospital was located in the center of the capital, so the population surveyed was mostly urban residents. A total of 3800 participants had undergone the health check-up. Prior to the examination, medical interview sheets were sent to the subjects by mail. The sheets included a lifestyle survey and an EQ-5D-5L. These sheets were then collected on the day of the examination. Subjects had to be over 21 years of age and able to answer the medical interview sheet on their own.

EQ-5D-5L

The EQ-5D-5L is a generic preference-based measure of HRQL developed by the EuroQol Group [7]. The five dimensions are as follows: mobility (MO), self-care (SC), usual activities (UA), pain/discomfort (PD), and anxiety/depression (AD). Each has five levels [9]. The Japanese version of the EQ-5D-5L was used in this study; therefore, the responses obtained were converted to HRQL scores based on Japanese value sets [3].

Medical interview sheet

Through self-report, the medical interview sheet confirmed whether or not the person was currently undergoing treatment for a disease (Hypertension, Hyperlipidemia, Diabetes, Gout, Glaucoma, Cataract, Depression, Reflux Esophagitis, Osteoporosis, Fibroid, and/or Breast Cancer). Furthermore, people were asked about the following lifestyle habits: alcohol intake, 3 levels, (level 1, “Never (not drink at all),” level 2, “Sometimes (2-3 times a week),” level 3, “Habitually”); smoking, 3 levels (level 1, “Never (have never smoked at all),” level 2, “Active (smoke on a daily basis),” level 3, “Former smoker”); lack of exercise, 2 levels (level 1, “No,” level 2, “Yes”); physical activity, 4 levels (level 1, “Very often,” level 2, “Usually,” level 3, “Not so active,” level 4, “Too little”); exercise habit, 4 levels (level 1, “Almost daily,” level 2, “3-5times/week,” level 3, “1-2times/week,” level 4, “Too little”); and sleep, 2 levels (level 1, “Well,” level 2, “Lack of sleep”). Physical activity comprises subjective activity in daily life, while exercise habit comprises sweaty exercise for more than 20 min.

Health check-up

In the comprehensive health checkup, body mass index (BMI), body fat, blood pressure was measured, and biochemical examination of blood was performed. The blood biochemical test examined the hemoglobin, blood glucose, HbA1c, low-density lipoprotein (LDL), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), total cholesterol, neutral fat, thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), free thyroxine 4 (FT4), glutamate oxaloacetate transaminase (GOT), glutamate pyruvate transaminase (GPT), creatinine, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (EGFR). These blood biochemical examination findings were related to lifestyle-related diseases such as hypertension and heart disease. These series of examinations comprised the basic elements of the complete health checkup and were performed by the clinician, with the cost borne by the study subjects.

Statistical analysis

A summary of HRQL scores was calculated by gender, age group (21–39, 40–49, 50–59, 60–69, and 70 year-old) and lifestyle factors, and scores were then compared using variance analysis. To detect the influence of demographic factors and lifestyle factors on the HRQL scores, these variables were added to an analysis of variance (ANOVA). The influence of demographic characteristics and lifestyle factors on HRQL was determined using multiple regression analyses. Sex, age, drinking, smoking, physical activity and sleep, with the relevant dummy variables, were included as covariates in a multiple regression model with total HRQL score as the outcome. Exercise habit was not included in this model due to potential collinearity with physical activity. The significance level was set at 0.05. Statistical analyses were performed using STATA 14.0. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Niigata University of Health and Welfare (No. 17560–150,205) and the Institutional Review Board of St. Luke’s International Hospital (No.15-R086). Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Results

Demographic and health characteristics

Table 1 shows the demographic and health characteristics of the subjects. Of the 3800 people who mailed medical interview sheets, 2104 (response rate: 55.0%) were collected, of which 67 were found to be incomplete, and 2037 were included in the analysis. Of the total, 55% were female subjects (mean age = 54.98 years). The average BMI was 22.5 ± 3.3 kg/m2 and the average Body Fat was 24.3 ± 6.5%. Blood pressure and blood biochemical data were all within the standard value as average. Regarding self-reported chronic diseases, 300 people (14.7%) reported having high blood pressure, 276 (13.5%) reported having hyperlipidemia, 105 (5.1%) reported diabetes, 98 (4.8%) reported having uterine myoma, and 86 (4.2%) had gout.

Table 1 Demographic and health characteristics of the study participants

HRQL score and relation to demographic and lifestyle factors

Table 2 shows the EQ-5D-5L score for each demographic characteristic and health habit. The average EQ-5D-5L index score of male subjects was 0.946 ± 0.081, which was higher than that of female subjects at 0.927 ± 0.090 (p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference regarding age group (p = 0.067).

Table 2 EQ-5D-5L index score by characteristics and lifestyle factors of the study participants

We further examined the relationship between lifestyle and HRQL score. Regarding alcohol intake, the mean score for “never” was 0.923 ± 0.098, while higher values were shown (p < 0.001) for who drank alcohol “sometimes” (0.943 ± 0.076) and “habitually” (0.944 ± 0.079) (p < 0.001). Regarding lack of exercise, the highest mean scores were for “no” at 0.956 ± 0.069, with “yes” at 0.928 ± 0.092 (p < 0.001). A difference was also observed for daily activities, with a mean score of 0.967 ± 0.062 for “very often” in contrast to 0.912 ± 0.111 for “too little.” Finally, differences were found in exercise habit (p = 0.0011) and lack of sleep (p < 0.001).

Data of the visual analogue scale (VAS) were also analyzed. There were no differences in gender (p = 0.774), but differences were observed among age groups (p < 0.001), lack of exercise (p < 0.001), exercise habit (p < 0.001), and sleep patterns (p < 0.001).

Correlation with HRQL scores and health check-up data

Table 3 shows the correlation between EQ-5D-5L index scores and blood biochemical data. A statistically significant correlation was observed for body fat (r = − 0.077), hemoglobin (r = 0.113), total cholesterol (r = − 0.045) and creatinine (r = 0.089), but the correlation was weak for all of them. BMI, body fat, HDL, GPT, and EGFR were also observed to have a correlation to VAS.

Table 3 Correlation between EQ-5D-5L index score and medical checkup data

HRQL score and relation to socio-demographic and lifestyle factors

Finally, Table 4 shows the relationship between EQ-5D-5L scores, demographic characteristics, and lifestyle habits as determined by the multiple regression analysis. Female subjects had lower HRQL scores than males (coefficient − 0.019, p < 0.001). Moreover, subjects over 70 years of age had lower scores than those under 70 years of age (coefficient − 0.036, p < 0.001). Regarding alcohol intake, both “sometimes” (coefficient 0.014, p < 0.001) and “habitually” (coefficient 0.012, p < 0.001) scored higher than “never.” Additionally, daily activities were indicated as factors causing a decrease, in contrast with “very often,” “usually” (coefficient − 0.018, p = 0.011), “not so active” (coefficient − 0.042, p < 0.001), and “too little” (coefficient − 0.046, p < 0.001). Lack of sleep was also indicated as a factor that lowers HRQL scores (coefficient − 0.039, p < 0.001).

Table 4 Relationship between EQ-5D-5L index score and demographic characteristics and health customs

Discussion

The results of this study demonstrated that the preference-based HRQL of healthy subjects who had undergone health checkups is related to demographic characteristics and lifestyle factors and is influenced by blood biochemical data. First, it was clear that the factor of aging did not lower the HRQL of people who live independently and receive health examinations. A medical check-up is a comprehensive test that uses blood biochemical tests to check for the onset of disease, so those who receive it are basically healthy. However, HRQL declines for the elderly over 70 years old. This is similar to the findings of Shiroiwa et al. [7]. Regarding differences due to gender, women showed lower values than their male counterparts. This is also similar to finding of Shiroiwa et al. [7]. This trend has been confirmed in South Korea [10], Germany [11], Poland [12], and Spain [13], but gender differences have not been observed in the US [14], Singapore [15], or southern Australia [16]. However, there are few research results showing low values for men, which may reflect men’s tendency to respond optimistically, at least to the HRQL using EQ-5D.

There was no strong influence on the relationship between the health data collected by the comprehensive health check-up and HRQL indicated by EQ-5D-5L. It can be considered that blood biochemical data do not directly affect the five dimensions of mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression, as indicated by EQ-5D.

The relationship between lifestyle and HRQL does have an impact, particularly alcohol intake, daily physical activity, exercise habit, and sleep patterns. Regarding alcohol intake, since people with drinking habits showed higher HRQL scores, this indicates that drinking does not lower HRQL. Drinking can be considered to have a positive influence on HRQL, since as indicated in several previous studies [17,18,19], moderate alcohol consumption has an effect of preventing cardiac disease. In South Korea, abstinence from alcohol consumption resulted in a higher quality of life for elderly people living in the community [20], while people in NYHA class I who consume moderate amounts of alcohol tend to have a better quality of life [21]. Since the present study targeted adults over 21 years old, moderate alcohol intake is considered to have a positive influence on HRQL for all generations. Paradoxically, however, there may have been some factors that lower HRQL more for non-drinkers than for those who do drink. The relationship between alcohol consumption and HRQL requires further investigation because there is insufficient evidence. In addition, an examination of daily physical activity shows that HRQL is lower for those who do not move their bodies often compared with those who do. Past studies and reviews have reported that physical activity produces a high quality of life [22,23,24,25,26]. However, many of these were profile-type scales, such as SF-36 and WHOQOL. Therefore, it is meaningful that this has also been confirmed for preference-based HRQL. Finally, lack of proper sleep was shown to lower HRQL. The relationship between sleep and HRQL has shown that moderate sleep of approximately 7 h brings a high quality of life, but HRQL declines with either too much or too little sleeping [27, 28]. In this study, we only investigated lack of sleep, but the results are similar to previous studies. As described above, various lifestyle factors are related to the HRQL score indicated by EQ-5D- 5 L, but their causal relationships could not be clarified. In the future, it is considered that it is necessary to verify of lifestyle factors on future HRQL, while clarifying the causal relation between lifestyle factors and HRQL in more detail.

One of the limitations of this study is that the sample size is small compared to other studies targeting healthy subjects. Moreover, the study was only conducted in one hospital. Further research should clarify the relationship between chronic disease and HRQL scores, by increasing the sample size and conducting a longer-term survey. We would also like to reduce any possible bias that may accrue from including so few participating facilities by conducting a multi-facilities collaborative research project.

Conclusions

In this study, we showed the HRQL of healthy subjects as indicated by EQ-5D-5L through a comprehensive health check-up, and clarified the relationship between demographic characteristics, blood biochemical data, and lifestyle behavior. It was shown that the factors leading to a decline of HRQL are being female and over 70 years of age, while factors that keep HRQL high are alcohol intake, high levels of physical activity in daily life, and adequate sleep. The results of this study will provide good suggestions for public health policies, including care prevention.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to reasons of data protection but are available from the Institute of Occupational Therapy, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, on reasonable request.

References

  1. 1.

    Shiroiwa T, Fukuda T, Ikeda S, et al. Development of an official guideline for the economic evaluation of drugs/medical devices in Japan. Value Health. 2017;20(3):372–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Tsuchiya A, Ikeda S, Ikegami N, et al. Estimating an EQ-5D population value set: the case of Japan. Health Econ. 2002;11(4):341–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Ikeda S, Shiroiwa T, Igarashi I, et al. Developing a Japanese version of the EQ-5D-5L value set. J Nat Inst Public Health. 2015;64(1):47–55 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Kim SH, Kim HJ, Lee SI, Jo MW. Comparing the psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L in cancer patients in Korea. Qual Life Res. 2012;21(6):1065–73.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Feng Y, Devlin N, Herdman M. Assessing the health of the general population in England: how do the three- and five-level versions of EQ-5D compare? Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015;13:171. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-015-0356-8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Poór AK, Rencz F, Brodszky V, et al. Measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L compared to the EQ-5D-3L in psoriasis patients. Qual Life Res. 2017;26(12):3409–19.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Shiroiwa T, Fukuda T, Ikeda S, et al. Japanese population norms for preference-based measures: Eq-5d-3l, Eq-5d-5l, and Sf-6d. Qual Life Res. 2016;25(3):707–19.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Ide M, Suzuki Y. A window of Japan. Eur J Nucl Med. 1996;23:1677–9.

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, et al. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res. 2011;20(10):1727–36.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Kim TH, Jo MW, Lee SI, et al. Psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L in the general population of South Korea. Qual Life Res. 2013;22(8):2245–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Hinz A, Kohlmann T, Stöbel-Richter Y, et al. The quality of life questionnaire EQ-5D-5L: psychometric properties and normative values for the general German population. Qual Life Res. 2014;23(2):443–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Golicki D, Niewada M. EQ-5D-5L Polish population norms. Arch Med Sci. 2017;13(1):191–200.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Garcia-Gordillo MA, Adsuar JC, Olivares PR. Normative values of EQ-5D-5L: in a Spanish representative population sample from Spanish Health Survey, 2011. Qual Life Res. 2016;25(5):1313–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Luo N, Ko Y, Johnson JA, Coons SJ. The association of survey language (Spanish vs. English) with Health Utilities Index and EQ-5D index scores in a United States population sample. Qual Life Res. 2009;18(10):1377–85.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Abdin E, Subramaniam M, Vaingankar JA, Luo N, Chong SA. Population norms for the EQ-5D index scores using Singapore preference weights. Qual Life Res. 2014;24(6):1545–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    McCaffrey N, Kaambwa B, Currow DC, et al. Health-related quality of life measured using the EQ-5D-5L: South Australian population norms. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016;14(1):133.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Abramson JL, Williams SA, Krumholz HM, et al. Moderate alcohol consumption and risk of heart failure among older persons. JAMA. 2001;285(15):1971–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Djoussé L, Gaziano JM. Alcohol consumption and risk of heart failure in the physicians’ health study I. Circulation. 2007;115(1):34–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Padilla H, Michael Gaziano J, et al. Alcohol consumption and risk of heart failure: a meta-analysis. Phys Sportsmed. 2010;38(3):84–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Lee TW, Ko IS, Lee KJ. Health promotion behaviors and quality of life among community-dwelling elderly in Korea: a cross-sectional survey. Int J Nurs Stud. 2006;43(3):293–300.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Lee H, Park G, Lee KS, et al. Knowledge, adherence to lifestyle recommendations, and quality of life among Koreans with heart failure. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2020;1:1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Shaku F, Tsutsumi M, Miyazawa A, et al. Self-care behavior when suffering from the common cold and health-related quality of life in individuals attending an annual checkup in Japan: a cross-sectional study. BMC Fam Pract. 2015;16:91. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-015-0300-3.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Bize R, Johnson JA, Plotnikoff RC. Physical activity level and health-related quality of life in the general adult population: a systematic review. Prev Med. 2007;45(6):401–15.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Brown DW, Brown DR, Heath GW, et al. Associations between physical activity dose and health-related quality of life. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36(5):890–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Gill DL, Hammond CC, Reifsteck EJ, et al. Physical activity and quality of life. J Prev Med Public Health. 2013;46(Suppl 1):S28–34. https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.2013.46.S.S28.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Pucci GC, Rech CR, Fermino RC, et al. Association between physical activity and quality of life in adults. Rev Saude Publica. 2012;46(1):166–79.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Kim JH, Park EC, Yoo KB, et al. The association between short or long sleep times and Quality of Life (QOL): results of the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES IV-V). J Clin Sleep Med. 2015;11(6):625–34.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Faubel R, Lopez-Garcia E, Guallar-Castillón P, et al. Sleep duration and health-related quality of life among older adults: a population-based cohort in Spain. Sleep. 2009;32(8):1059–68.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all the respondents of this study.

Funding

This study was funded by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (KAKENHI) from Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (26293116).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SN, OT, TK, and KeM conceived the study and participated in its design. SN performed the statistical analysis and drafted the manuscript. SN, OT, and TK examined and revised the manuscript. KeM, and KaM read and approved the final manuscript. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shinichi Noto.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not describe any studies with animals performed by any of the authors. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Niigata University of Health and Welfare (No. 17560–150205) and the institutional Review Board of St.Luke’s International Hospital (No.15-R086) and informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Noto, S., Takahashi, O., Kimura, T. et al. The relationship between preference-based health-related quality of life and lifestyle behavior: a cross-sectional study on a community sample of adults who had undergone a health check-up. Health Qual Life Outcomes 18, 267 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-020-01518-6

Download citation