Open Access

Assessment of psychosocial functioning and its risk factors in children with pectus excavatum

  • Yi Ji1, 2,
  • Wenying Liu1Email author,
  • Siyuan Chen3,
  • Bing Xu1,
  • Yunman Tang1,
  • Xuejun Wang1,
  • Gang Yang1 and
  • Liming Cao1
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes20119:28

https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-9-28

Received: 1 November 2010

Accepted: 4 May 2011

Published: 4 May 2011

Abstract

Background

Psychosocial functioning is poor in patients with pectus excavatum (PE). However, a comprehensive understanding of this issue does not exist. The aim of this study was to assess the severity of psychosocial problems as associated with PE, as well as to identify its risk factors.

Methods

A comparative study was performed at the Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences/Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital in Chengdu, China. Patients age 6 to 16 who admitted to the outpatient department for the evaluation or treatment for PE were included in the study. In addition to parental reports of child psychosocial problems on the Achenbach Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL), parents also filled in other structured questionnaires, including socio-demographic variables, patients' medical and psychological characteristics. The severity of malformation was assessed by CT scan. For comparison, an age- and gender- matched control group was recruited from the general population. The socio-demographic and scores on CBCL were compared between patients and control subjects. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to examine risk factors for psychosocial problems in patients.

Results

No statistically significant differences were found with respect to social-demographic variables between children with PE and control subjects. Compared with control subjects, children with PE displayed higher prevalence of psychosocial problems in the different scales of the CBCL questionnaire such as 'withdraw', 'anxious-depressed', 'social problems' and 'total problems'. Both univariate and multivariate analyses suggested that age, severity of malformation, and being teased about PE were significantly associated with patients' psychosocial problems.

Conclusions

The information derived from this study supports the opinion that children with PE have more psychosocial problems than children from the general population. Multiple medical and psychosocial factors were associated with patients' impairment of psychosocial functioning.

Background

Pectus excavatum (PE) is the most common chest wall malformation and one of the most frequent major congenital anomalies. It approximately occurs in up to 1 in 300 to 1 in 1000 births, with a 4:1 male predominance [1, 2]. In patients with PE, the sternum and adjacent chest wall are displaced posteriorly toward the spine, creating a depression of the anterior chest wall (Figure 1). Clinically, in many patients with PE, the deformity does not cause significant physiological dysfunction. However, the cosmetic disfigurement can cause a serious loss of self-esteem and affect social behaviour. Precisely when the patient is establishing an independent identity, choosing a trade, or beginning involvement with the opposite sex, he or she is afflicted with a deformity that reduces his or her capacity to do those things.
Figure 1

Chest of a 8-years-old boy with asymptomatic PE.

Yet, despite well documented [39] importance of surgery to improve psychological distress and self-esteem in patients with PE, the psychosocial status has not been systematically studied in patients who are not currently undergoing surgical treatment. Additionally, questions exist as to whether clinical features are associated with psychosocial problems in PE patients. To address these issues, the current study examined the emotional and behavioural problems of PE patients by using Chinese Mandarin version of the CBCL, and investigated the risk factors of psychosocial problems by using univariate and multivariate analysis. It was anticipated that children in the control group would report lower frequency of psychosocial difficulties than children with PE. We believe that a better understanding of the features associated with psychosocial problems might improve assessment of emotional risk and assist in the development of intervention and prevention strategies.

Methods

Subjects

The study was conducted in Department of Pediatric Surgery & Center of Children Medicine, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital between June 2007 and August 2010. The patient group contained 415 children between 6 years and 16 years who had PE. They came to our outpatient department, for the evaluation or treatment of PE. Exclusion criteria for subjects included the presence of recurrent PE, pectus carinatum, plat chest, Poland syndrome, or other complex anomaly. For comparison, 400 age- and gender- matched peers were selected from the general population.

This study was approved by the facility ethics committee. Children and parents were informed about the study and written informed consent form was obtained from parents.

Measurement

The profiles of the patients and their parents were assembled by authors during clinical interviews. Parents were interviewed first, after which they were asked whether they would agree to their children participating in the study. If the parent agreed, the interviewer talked with the child and his/her parent about the study. The child's verbal consent was obtained and audio recorded after it was determined that the child understood what he/she was consenting to. For control group, the questionnaires interviews were conducted at schools or in the participants' own houses, according to the participants' request.

Psychosocial functioning was assessed in detail by Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) [10]. The CBCL for ages 4 to 18 years (CBCL/4-18) includes competence items and problems items. The problems items can be completed by most parents in about 10 minutes so as to give a description of their children's behavior problems. For each problem item, parents circle 0 if the item is not true, 1 if the item is somewhat or sometimes true, and 2 if the item is very true or often true. The problem items yield scores on three broad band scales and eight narrow band subscales (syndromes). The total problems scale, the externalizing behavior problems scale, and the internalizing behavior scale are broad band dimensions. The narrow band subscales are withdrawn, somatic complaints, anxious/depressed, social problems, thought problems, attention problems, delinquent behavior, and aggressive behavior. A Chinese Mandarin version of the 1991 CBCL/4-18 was used in this study. Previous studies confirmed its acceptable reliability and discriminant validity in Chinese children [11, 12]. Here, the total problems scale and all narrow band subscales were used. Children received scores in the clinical range are considered clinical. Reference values are provided by a healthy community sample of 24013 Chinese children and adolescents between the age of 4 and 16 years. The cutting points for clinical designation are based on raw scores. 12.9% of the children had scores in the clinical range for total problems [13].

Parents of all children also filled out a questionnaire on family socio-demographic characteristics, including their gender, age, education, marital status and household income. Information gathered from patients and their parents included severity of malformation and the age which an awareness of the depression arose in the child (patient first perceived his/her deformity). The relationship of appearance-related teasing and poor psychosocial functioning has been documented in the literature: the experience of teasing in particular appears to have a detrimental effect on the young person's psychosocial functioning [14]. Therefore, they also answered questions about whether they had been teased about their chest wall deformity. If the patients and parents gave the same answer, at least that information could be included. All of the interviews were conducted by authors. They had been trained in interviewing and administering questionnaires. Answers were recorded and collected after a consensus conference.

The severity of malformation in patients with PE was assessed by Haller Index. It's a severity index, based on measurements obtained from a CT scan of the chest, has been advocated as an objective method of determining the depth of the deformity in PE patients [15]. This index is derived, as shown in Figure 2, by dividing the maximum internal transverse diameter of the thorax (A) by the vertebral-sternal distance at the most depressed position of the deformity (B). It can accurately reflect the true degree of depression in the patients. Several studies have used it to assess the severity of malformation in PE patients [8, 16]. Referring to Malek's classification which based on Haller Index [17], the severity of deformity is classed grade 1 to 4.
Figure 2

Haller Index. The Haller Index (HI) is defined as the ratio of the maximum internal transverse diameter of the chest (A) and the minimum anteroposterior diameter at the same level (B).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS13.0 (SPSS, Inc, Chicago, Ill) and Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corp, Pedmond, Wash) in this study. For categorical variables, data were compiled as frequency and percent, and the difference between patient and control groups were compared by χ2 test. For continuous variables, data were calculated as mean ± standard deviation, and the 2 groups were compared by independent t test. In order to clarify the risk factors for the development of psychosocial problems, χ2 test was used to evaluate the correlation between psychosocial problems and independent variables. Significant risk factors were entered into a forward selection multivariate logistic regression analysis. The multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to calculate the odds ratio and to examine the effect of each factor on the risk for psychosocial problems. A value of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Sample Characteristics

The material is described with frequencies, percent and mean values. Of the 415 PE patients, 38 patients discontinued due to non-compliance, 40 patients were later found to be ineligible and excluded from analysis, leaving 337 eligible patients. Of the control group, 370 children were found to be eligible for further study. Table 1 summarized the demographic variables of the children and parents in 2 groups. No statistically significant were found with respect to age, gender, education, marital status, and household income.
Table 1

Demographic Characteristics of Children and Their Parents

Variables

Patient group

Control group

P

 

n =337

n =370

 

Children

   

   Age*

10.9(2.8)

11.0(2.5)

0.61

   Gender†

   

Male

266(78.9)

290(78.4)

0.95

Female

71(21.1)

80(21.6)

 

   Education†‡

   

Non-attendance

10(3.0)

6(1.6)

0.68

Primary school

232(68.8)

253(68.4)

 

Secondary school

95(28.2)

111(30.0)

 

Parents

   

   Age*

38.1(6.6)

38.5(7.4)

0.45

   Gender†

   

Male

143(42.4)

148(40.0)

0.51

Female

194 (57.6)

222(60.0)

 

   Marital status†

   

Marries

306(90.8)

332(89.7)

0.78

Divorced

30(8.9)

35(9.5)

 

Widowed

1(0.3)

3(0.8)

 

   Education†‡

   

Lower education

96(28.5)

101(27.3)

0.86

Intermediate education

138(40.9)

150(40.5)

 

Higher education

103(30.6)

119(32.2)

 

   Household income per year (RMB) †

   

<20000

72(21.4)

69(18.6)

0.67

20000-30000

185(54.9)

193(52.2)

 

>30000

80(23.7)

108(29.2)

 

*Data given as mean (SD)

†Values are presented as number (percentage)

‡Children's education in the Mainland China is a state-run system of public education. The government provides primary education for six years, starting at age 6 or 7, followed by six years of secondary education for ages 12 to 18. Some of the children aged 6 did not attend school.

Parents' educational level is divided into lower, intermediate and higher education. Lower education then involves elementary education, general secondary education junior-level, lower vocational education; Intermediate education involves general secondary education-senior level, and vocational education-junior level; Higher education involves vocational education-senior level and university education.

The majority patients had no obvious physiological dysfunction in daily life. 21 (6.2%) patients reported shortness of breath, chest pain, and other similar symptoms that affect their activity level or occur with mild exertion and limited exercise performance. Computed tomography (CT) scans were performed in all patients to document the severity of the deformity. 50 patients had grade 1 deformity with a HI of 3.0 to 3.9, 149 patients had grade 2 deformity with a HI of 4.0 to 4.9, 68 patients had grade 3 deformity with a HI of 5.0 to 5.9, and 70 patients had grade 4 deformity with a HI ≥ 6.0. Finally, 56 patients refused to have surgical repair for a lack of physical symptom or a fear of surgery. The HI in patients who did not want surgery (4.3 ± 1.2) was significant lower than that in those who did (4.8 ± 1.1). (P < 0.01)

Psychosocial problems in relation to PE

252 (74.8%) patients first perceived their deformity when they were 4, 5 or 6 years old. Only a few patients recalled that their chest depression was not obvious when they were young, and they didn't notice their deformity before the age of 10 (Figure 3). According to parental and patient recall, 198 patients (58.8%) found their deformation by themselves, 139 (41.2%) patients were told about their chest deformation by others, mainly their parents. Dissatisfaction and being teased about their deformity were the motivation factors for treatment among patients: 125 (37.1%) patients admitted that they had asked their parents to take them to hospital at least once in the past year, most of them are older than 10. 147 (43.6%) patients said they had tried hard to avoid exposing their chest in public places. 77 (22.8%) patients reported that they had been teased about their chest deformity, "often or sometimes", with 97.4% teasing done by peers and 2.6% by adults outside the family. No one had experienced this kind of behavior from family members or extended family.

Figure 3

Frequency distribution of patients' age. Of all patients, 252 patients first perceived their deformity when they were 4, 5 or 6 years old. Only 3 patients first perceived the chest wall deformity older than 10 years. A: Patients' age at time of the study. B: Age at which patient became aware of pectus excavatum.

We calculated the scores of related items with CBCL scales for each child. Table 2 presents the prevalence of psychosocial problems of patient group and control group. At the subscale level, from 4.45% to 8.01% of patients generally received scores in the clinical range in each subscale. The prevalence of withdrawn, anxious-depressed, social problems was significantly higher among patients than control subjects. For total problems scale, the corresponding data of patients group and control group were 19.58% and 12.70% respectively. No difference was found with respect to prevalence of total problems between children in the general population and control subjects (P > 0.05). Patients group were significantly more likely than the control group to demonstrate total problems (P < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in other scales between two groups.
Table 2

Prevalence of psychosocial problems in patient group and control group

CBCL scale

Patient group

Control group

χ2

P

 

n = 337

n = 370

  

Withdrawn

23(6.82)

12(3.24)

4.808

0.028*

Somatic complaints

15(4.45)

8(2.16)

2.692

0.087

Anxious/depressed

27(8.01)

15(4.05)

4.944

0.026*

Social problems

21(6.23)

9(2.43)

6.264

0.012*

Thought problems

17(5.04)

12(3.24)

1.455

0.228

Attention problems

16(4.75)

13(3.51)

0.683

0.409

Delinquent behavior

19(5. 64)

11(2.97)

3.038

0.079

Aggressive behavior

21(6.23)

13(3.51)

2.846

0.092

Total problem

66(19.58)

47(12.70)

6.220

0.013*

Data are presented as number (percentage).

*The differences are statistical significant if P < 0.05.

Factors associated with psychosocial problems

Table 3 summarise the univariate analyses examining relationships between patients' characteristics (gender, age, severity of malformation, first perceived age, perceived approach, being teased, whether had surgical repair or not, parents' education level, and household income) and prevalence of the psychosocial problems (total problems). These analyses highlight the apparently significant impact of patient characteristics on poor psychosocial functioning: compared with the age group under 9 years, the age group12-16 was at higher risk for psychosocial problems; the patients with severe deformity (HI ≥ 6.0) were significantly more likely than the patients with mild deformity (3.0 ≤ HI ≤ 3.9) to have psychosocial problems; patients with lower maternal education were significantly more likely than patients with higher maternal education to have psychological symptoms; the frequency of psychosocial problems was significant greater in patients who have been teased by others. Based on the statistically significant difference uncovered in univariate analysis, the results of multivariate regression analysis indicated that age of patients (OR 1.565, CI 1.080-2.269), severity of malformation (OR 1.414, CI 1.067-1.875), and being teased (OR 2.941, CI 1.528-5.659) were associated with psychosocial problems. Mother's education (OR 0.015, CI 0.949-2.038) was not a significant predictor of psychosocial problems of PE patients (Table 4), even if it exhibited a significant association on univariate analysis.
Table 3

Risk factors for the psychosocial disorder derived from univariate analysis

Variable

n

Total problems

χ2

P

Odds ratio

95%Confidence Interval

  

No.

(%)

    

Age

       

   6-8 years

109

16

14.7

    

   9-11 years

121

21

17.4

0.304

0.581

1.221

0.601-2.480

   12-16 years

107

29

27.1

5.053

0.025*

2.161

1.094-4.268

Gender

       

   Male

266

49

18.4

1.085

0.298

1.394

0.745-2.610

   Female

71

17

23.9

    

Severity

       

   I Degree

50

7

14.0

    

   II Degree

149

24

16.1

0.126

0.722

1.179

0.475-2.931

   III Degree

68

14

20.6

0.855

0.355

1.539

0.591-4.294

   IV Degree

70

21

30.0

4.174

0.041*

2.633

1.020-6.796

Perceived age†

       

   ≤ 6

271

50

18.5

1.131

0.288

0.707

0.372-1.342

   ≥ 7

66

16

24.2

    

Perceived approach

       

   By themselves

186

39

21.0

0.504

0.478

1.218

0.706-2.103

   By others

151

27

17.9

    

Being teased

       

   Yes

77

22

28.6

5.118

0.024*

1.964

1.087-3.547

   No

260

44

16.9

    

Had surgical repair

       

   Yes

281

57

20.3

    

   No

56

9

16.1

0.526

0.468

0.573

0.348-1.625

Father's education

       

   Higher

115

19

16.5

    

   Intermediate

134

26

19.4

0.347

0.556

1.216

0.634-2.335

   Lower

86

21

24.4

1.925

0.165

1.632

0.814-3.274

Mother's education

       

   Higher

92

14

15.2

    

   Intermediate

143

25

17.5

0.241

0.624

1.196

0.586-2.440

   Lower

100

27

27.0

3.961

0.047*

2.061

1.003-4.234

Household income

per year (RMB)

       

   >30000

80

14

17.5

    

   20000-30000

185

34

18.4

0.029

0.865

1.061

0.534-2.109

   <20000

72

18

25.0

1.283

0.257

1.571

0.716-3.447

Note: Some parents did not answer all questions, resulting in different totals.

*The differences are statistical significant if P < 0.05.

† The age which an awareness of the depression arose in the child.

Table 4

Multivariate regression analysis to identify risk factors associated with psychosocial disorder

Variables

OR

CI (95%)

β

S.E. (β)

Wald χ2

P

Age

1.565

1.080-2.269

0.448

0.189

5.598

0.018*

Severity

1.414

1.067-1.875

0.346

0.144

5.803

0.016*

Being teased

2.941

1.528-5.659

1.079

0.195

10.435

0.001*

Mother's education

0.015

0.949-2.038

0.330

0.195

2.864

0.091

*The differences are statistical significant if P < 0.05.

Discussion

We studied the psychosocial functioning of 337 children aged 6 to 16 years old who were born in China. The subjects included not only the children who would choose the surgery but also the children who would not. Our findings demonstrated that 74.8% of children with PE discovered they were different around the age of 4 to 6. This is when name-calling and teasing begins, and the children learn what it means to be different. Their first problem tended to be not an organic but a psychosocial one, caused by self-awareness of the deformity and/or by being teased by others. Many children, especially some older children want the deformity corrected as soon as possible.

As identified by Lavigne et al [18], there is wide variation in the psychosocial functioning of children with a chronic illness. In this study, assessment of psychosocial functioning was achieved by CBCL. We found that children with PE had significantly more emotional and social problems as reported by their parents on standardized question, in comparison with children in the general population. This result is comparable with previous reports of PE-induced deterioration of psychosocial functioning across a wide age range [6, 19]. Meanwhile, we found that children with PE did not have more behavioural problems than control group. This finding is also in line with studies of psychosocial functioning in children with PE [8, 19], but contradictory to studies on children with congenital microtia or hypospadias [20, 21]. We presume that this may be attributed to the different diseases have different risk factors, which have different relative impacts on psychosocial functioning [18].

However, one limitation of the study was that the study sample was entirely composed of patients seeking medical evaluation or treatment for PE and cannot be considered representative of the general population of PE subjects. In this respect, poor psychosocial functioning could be a motivation for referral and higher scores are usually observed in clinical-based samples when compared with population-based surveys. Another limitation of the study is that there had no reference values for externalizing problems and internalizing problems in our community [12, 13]. For this reason, we can not present the prevalence of psychosocial problems which are based on these two scales. Although the CBCL can be complemented by the Youth Self-Report form (YSR), the YSR is only constructed for children aged 11 years and older, and thus would not be suitable for use in the current study focused on children from age 6. Furthermore, the information on child emotional and behaviroal problems was obtained by questionnaires, and not by semi-structured clinical interviews conducted by clinical professionals. Although the patients who had higher scores on CBCL scales were recommended for further assessment in psychiatric outpatient department, identification of children in control group is typically impossible due to ethical reasons for protecting anonymity.

On the other hand, this study provided one of very few representative samples of PE patients. Information from a standardized behavioural checklist provided a wealth of information about the psychosocial status of children with PE. Moreover, we compared the patients with normal children matched for sex and age, and all subjects resided in the same health care catchment areas and assessment were carried out in closely related time periods in both groups. Therefore, the study of these children could provide a more accurate picture of PE individuals referring to clinical practices, and provide relevant clues for treatment programs. We, like others, believe that poor body image and impaired psychosocial functioning should be an enormously important concern for surgical repaired and/or psychosocial intervention [8, 22, 23].

This study showed a tendency for the prevalence of psychosocial difficulties to increase with age in patients who have not had surgery. It would seem to reflect the increasing burden of psychosocial trials which individuals face as they grow older. In other words, if PE patients do not have psychotherapeutic help or surgical repair, if they are left alone with their difficulties, psychosocial problems may increase with age. From the psychological point of view, the early surgery is ideal. Additionally, mounting evidence has emerged to suggest that many patients who do not undergo repair of severe PE deformities in childhood will experience worsening symptom in their adult lives [24, 25]. However, there is debate in the literature regarding the best age for repair. Some authors argued that repair at too early of an age may result in improper growth of the chest wall and other complications, so the surgery should be performed during the stage of teenage (close to the age of skeletal maturity) when the operation for correction of PE can be readily accomplished [26]. In contrast, a vast amount of research has shown that continuous technical refinements have significantly decreased the complication rates and postoperative morbidity, and Nuss procedure has been demonstrated to be effective for quality repair of PE patients aged from 3 to 50 years [7, 2731].

Within the study of visible or invisible (i.e.: normally hidden by clothing) difference or deformity, the presumption that more significant pathology is associated with greater psychological distress is strongly held. It is reasonable to expect that a person with extensive scarring, for example, may experience greater difficulty than a similar person with fewer scars [32, 33]. In our study, univariate analysis showed that the severity of PE was significant associated with psychosocial adjustment. Multivariate logistic regression analysis also identified it as a risk factor for psychosocial adjustment. This is a fascinating finding, providing very strong support for the inclusion of objective measures of appearance in studies exploring the psychosocial impact of PE, particularly where this includes an evaluation of treatment. The result is consistent with finding from Ohno et al.'s study [16] which included a group of PE patients who have not undergone the surgery. However, this finding stands into contrast with another finding that there was no significant relationship between the severity of PE and mental health [8]. We presumed that contradictory results may be attributed to the following reasons: first, in previous study, patients who did not undergo surgery were excluded from the psychosocial study. In fact, patients with mild/moderate deformations are associated with small loss of function and little focus on the appearance related aspects of the PE, their parents may be reluctant to take the risk of surgery unless the symptoms seem to be getting worse. This may lead to the reduction in psychosocial morbidity of the patients with mild/moderate PE in clinical research. Second, the psychometric testing tools in previous study were distinctly different from ours: in previous study, parents were interviewed by the Pectus Excavatum Evaluation Questionnaire (PEEQ). However, the PEEQ was developed not for the detection of psychosocial problems but mainly for the assessment of impact of surgical repair [4, 5].

Teasing is seen as a negative and repetitive action committed by one or more person and is associated with a host of negative consequences for children. The results of current study indicate that approximately 22.8% of patients had been teased about their PE by others, mainly their peers. We find that children with PE report having been teased less frequently than children with facial anomalies [34]. This may due to the fact that the upper part of the body is expected to be covered with clothes. Furthermore, many children with PE tried to avoid exposing their chest in public places because of the fear of being teased, and 'an unwillingness to be seen without a shirt while swimming and participating in sport or social activities' is the most frequently quoted complaint [22]. Unfortunately, researchers have found that the experience of being teased and the fear of being teased can result in anxiety, emotional distress, and difficulties with social integration [14, 35, 36]. In this study, teasing was associated with significantly higher prevalence of psychosocial difficulties in patients. This finding is not surprising given that our results indicate teasing history is greater for PE children with psychosocial problems. Surgeons and pediatricians need to be aware that psychosocial functioning of children with PE might be impaired by teasing remarks from peers.

Conclusions

In summary, this study examines a relatively large sample of patients with mild to very severe PE. The result shows that children with PE experience significantly decreased psychosocial functioning in emotional and social domains of the CBCL. Moreover, we find that age, severity of malformation, and being teased about PE has significant effects on psychosocial problems. Thus, a better understanding of the influence of PE on psychosocial functioning, including the identification of patients most vulnerable to psychosocial impairment, is acquired. This improved understanding could enable the application of strategies in both clinical practice and public health that seek to prevent further psychosocial problems associated with PE patients. Clinicians involved in care for patients with PE should be aware of the potential factors associated with psychosocial functioning. Studies looking at psychological intervention to ameliorate psychosocial problems in these patients are also warranted.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from the Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences/Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital. No institution was involved in the collection, analysis of interpretation of data, in writing the article, or in the decision to submit the paper for publication. The authors are indebted to all participating practitioners and doctors' assistant for their participation in the study. The patient's eyes are not shown in photograph. Written consent for publication was obtained from his parents.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Pediatric Surgery & Center of Children Medicine, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences/Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital
(2)
Department of Pediatric Surgery, Children's hospital of Fudan University
(3)
Research Institute of Pediatrics, Children's hospital of Fudan University

References

  1. Feng J, Hu T, Liu W, Zhang S, Tang Y, Chen R, Jiang X, Wei F: The biomechanical, morphologic, and histochemical properties of the costal cartilages in children with pectus excavatum. J Pediatr Surg 2001,36(12):1770–1776. 10.1053/jpsu.2001.28820PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Fokin AA, Steuerwald NM, Ahrens WA, Allen KE: Anatomical, histologic, and genetic characteristics of congenital chest wall deformities. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009,21(1):44–57. 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2009.03.001PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Roberts J, Hayashi A, Anderson JO, Martin JM, Maxwell LL: Quality of life of patients who have undergone the Nuss procedure for pectus excavatum: Preliminary findings. J Pediatr Surg 2003,38(5):779–783. 10.1016/jpsu.2003.50166PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Lawson ML, Cash TF, Akers R, Vasser E, Burke B, Tabangin M, Welch C, Croitoru DP, Goretsky MJ, Nuss D, et al.: A pilot study of the impact of surgical repair on disease-specific quality of life among patients with pectus excavatum. J Pediatr Surg 2003,38(6):916–918. 10.1016/S0022-3468(03)00123-4PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Krasopoulos G, Dusmet M, Ladas G, Goldstraw P: Nuss procedure improves the quality of life in young male adults with pectus excavatum deformity. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006,29(1):1–5. 10.1016/j.ejcts.2005.09.018PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Metzelder ML, Kuebler JF, Leonhardt J, Ure BM, Petersen C: Self and parental assessment after minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum: lasting satisfaction after bar removal. Ann Thorac Surg 2007,83(5):1844–1849. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.12.064PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Lam MW, Klassen AF, Montgomery CJ, LeBlanc JG, Skarsgard ED: Quality-of-life outcomes after surgical correction of pectus excavatum: a comparison of the Ravitch and Nuss procedures. J Pediatr Surg 2008,43(5):819–825. 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.12.020PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Kelly RJ, Cash TF, Shamberger RC, Mitchell KK, Mellins RB, Lawson ML, Oldham K, Azizkhan RG, Hebra AV, Nuss D, et al.: Surgical repair of pectus excavatum markedly improves body image and perceived ability for physical activity: multicenter study. Pediatrics 2008,122(6):1218–1222. 10.1542/peds.2007-2723PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Jacobsen EB, Thastum M, Jeppesen JH, Pilegaard HK: Health-related quality of life in children and adolescents undergoing surgery for pectus excavatum. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2010,20(2):85–91. 10.1055/s-0029-1243621PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Achenbach TM: Manual for the Revised Child Behavior Checklist/4–18 and 1991 Profile. Burlington (VT): University of Vernont Department of Psychiatry; 1991.Google Scholar
  11. Bai Y, Yuan Z, Wang W, Zhao Y, Wang H, Wang W: Quality of life for children with fecal incontinence after surgically corrected anorectal malformation. J Pediatr Surg 2000,35(3):462–464. 10.1016/S0022-3468(00)90215-XPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Bao QS, Lu CY, Song H, Wang M, Ling W, Chen WQ, Deng XQ, Hao YT, Rao S: Behavioural development of school-aged children who live around a multi-metal sulphide mine in Guangdong province, China: a cross-sectional study. Bmc Public Health 2009, 9: 217. 10.1186/1471-2458-9-217PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. QI R, Tang H, Zhang Z: Emotional and behavioral problem survey for 24013 school aged children in 22 provinces, China. Shanghai Archives of Psychiatry 1992,4(1):45–47.Google Scholar
  14. Keery H, Boutelle K, van den Berg P, Thompson JK: The impact of appearance-related teasing by family members. J Adolesc Health 2005,37(2):120–127. 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2004.08.015PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Haller JJ, Kramer SS, Lietman SA: Use of CT scans in selection of patients for pectus excavatum surgery: a preliminary report. J Pediatr Surg 1987,22(10):904–906. 10.1016/S0022-3468(87)80585-7PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Ohno K, Morotomi Y, Nakahira M, Takeuchi S, Shiokawa C, Moriuchi T, Harumoto K, Nakaoka T, Ueda M, Yoshida T, et al.: Indications for surgical repair of funnel chest based on indices of chest wall deformity and psychological state. Surg Today 2003,33(9):662–665. 10.1007/s00595-003-2575-6PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Malek MH, Fonkalsrud EW, Cooper CB: Ventilatory and cardiovascular responses to exercise in patients with pectus excavatum. Chest 2003,124(3):870–882. 10.1378/chest.124.3.870PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Lavigne JV, Faier-Routman J: Correlates of psychological adjustment to pediatric physical disorders: a meta-analytic review and comparison with existing models. J Dev Behav Pediatr 1993,14(2):117–123.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Einsiedel E, Clausner A: Funnel chest. Psychological and psychosomatic aspects in children, youngsters, and young adults. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 1999,40(5):733–736.Google Scholar
  20. Horlock N, Vogelin E, Bradbury ET, Grobbelaar AO, Gault DT: Psychosocial outcome of patients after ear reconstruction: a retrospective study of 62 patients. Ann Plast Surg 2005,54(5):517–524. 10.1097/01.sap.0000155284.96308.32PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Schonbucher VB, Landolt MA, Gobet R, Weber DM: Health-related quality of life and psychological adjustment of children and adolescents with hypospadias. J Pediatr 2008,152(6):865–872. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.11.036PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Jaroszewski D, Notrica D, McMahon L, Steidley DE, Deschamps C: Current management of pectus excavatum: a review and update of therapy and treatment recommendations. J Am Board Fam Med 2010,23(2):230–239. 10.3122/jabfm.2010.02.090234PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Kelly RJ: Pectus excavatum: historical background, clinical picture, preoperative evaluation and criteria for operation. Semin Pediatr Surg 2008,17(3):181–193. 10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2008.03.002PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Fonkalsrud EW, Dunn JC, Atkinson JB: Repair of pectus excavatum deformities: 30 years of experience with 375 patients. Ann Surg 2000,231(3):443–448. 10.1097/00000658-200003000-00019PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Hebra A, Jacobs JP, Feliz A, Arenas J, Moore CB, Larson S: Minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum in adult patients. Am Surg 2006,72(9):837–842.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Colombani PM: Preoperative assessment of chest wall deformities. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009,21(1):58–63. 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2009.04.003PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Kelly RJ, Shamberger RC, Mellins RB, Mitchell KK, Lawson ML, Oldham K, Azizkhan RG, Hebra AV, Nuss D, Goretsky MJ, et al.: Prospective multicenter study of surgical correction of pectus excavatum: design, perioperative complications, pain, and baseline pulmonary function facilitated by internet-based data collection. J Am Coll Surg 2007,205(2):205–216. 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.03.027PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Aronson DC, Bosgraaf RP, van der Horst C, Ekkelkamp S: Nuss procedure: pediatric surgical solution for adults with pectus excavatum. World J Surg 2007,31(1):26–29. 30 10.1007/s00268-005-0779-1PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Liu WY, Xu B, Ji Y, Wang YX, Qin DR: [Non-thoracoscopic Nuss procedure for correction operation of pectus excavatum]. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi 2008,46(8):567–569.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Pilegaard HK, Licht PB: Routine use of minimally invasive surgery for pectus excavatum in adults. Ann Thorac Surg 2008,86(3):952–956. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.04.078PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Fonkalsrud EW: 912 open pectus excavatum repairs: changing trends, lessons learned: one surgeon's experience. World J Surg 2009,33(2):180–190. 10.1007/s00268-008-9793-4PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Moss TP: The relationships between objective and subjective ratings of disfigurement severity, and psychological adjustment. Body Image 2005,2(2):151–159. 10.1016/j.bodyim.2005.03.004PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Sarwer DB, Pruzinsky T: Psychological aspects of reconstructive and cosmetic plastic surgery: clinical, empirical, and ethical perspectives. Philadelphia, Pa.: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006.Google Scholar
  34. Horlock N, Vogelin E, Bradbury ET, Grobbelaar AO, Gault DT: Psychosocial outcome of patients after ear reconstruction: a retrospective study of 62 patients. Ann Plast Surg 2005,54(5):517–524. 10.1097/01.sap.0000155284.96308.32PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Bollmer JM, Harris MJ, Milich R, Georgesen JC: Taking offense: effects of personality and teasing history on behavioral and emotional reactions to teasing. J Pers 2003,71(4):557–603. 10.1111/1467-6494.7104003PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. McCabe RE, Miller JL, Laugesen N, Antony MM, Young L: The relationship between anxiety disorders in adults and recalled childhood teasing. J Anxiety Disord 2010,24(2):238–243. 10.1016/j.janxdis.2009.11.002PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Ji et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement