Open Access

Gender differences in health-related quality of life of adolescents with cystic fibrosis

  • Renata Arrington-Sanders1Email author,
  • Michael S Yi2, 4,
  • Joel Tsevat2, 3, 4,
  • Robert W Wilmott6,
  • Joseph M Mrus2, 3, 4, 7 and
  • Maria T Britto5, 4
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes20064:5

https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-4-5

Received: 18 October 2005

Accepted: 24 January 2006

Published: 24 January 2006

Abstract

Background

Female patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) have consistently poorer survival rates than males across all ages. To determine if gender differences exist in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of adolescent patients with CF, we performed a cross-section analysis of CF patients recruited from 2 medical centers in 2 cities during 1997–2001.

Methods

We used the 87-item child self-report form of the Child Health Questionnaire to measure 12 health domains. Data was also collected on age and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1). We analyzed data from 98 subjects and performed univariate analyses and linear regression or ordinal logistic regression for multivariable analyses.

Results

The mean (SD) age was 14.6 (2.5) years; 50 (51.0%) were female; and mean FEV1 was 71.6% (25.6%) of predicted. There were no statistically significant gender differences in age or FEV1. In univariate analyses, females reported significantly poorer HRQOL in 5 of the 12 domains. In multivariable analyses controlling for FEV1 and age, we found that female gender was associated with significantly lower global health (p < 0.05), mental health (p < 0.01), and general health perceptions (p < 0.05) scores.

Conclusion

Further research will need to focus on the causes of these differences in HRQOL and on potential interventions to improve HRQOL of adolescent patients with CF.

Background

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a genetic disorder that affects multiple organ systems. Treatments have improved overall survival so that those born today have a median life expectancy of approximately 40 years [1]. Much of the morbidity and mortality associated with cystic fibrosis is due to pulmonary disease, and investigations have shown that early, aggressive, and center-based care improves prognosis [2]. Objective clinical parameters, such as aerobic fitness, pulmonary function, nutritional status, and aggressive treatment with antibiotics, are associated with improved health outcomes [2]. In the past, clinical morbidity and mortality rates in children and adolescents were monitored as primary outcomes [3], but more recently, to provide the scientific basis for practice guidelines and to measure treatment effectiveness from patients' perspectives, there has been increasing focus on the examination of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) [4, 5], Thus, the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute recommend incorporating quality of life as an outcome measure for patients with CF [6]. In CF populations, the measurement of HRQOL is one approach that has been used to correlate clinical outcomes and the impact of both disease progression and treatments from patients' perspectives [79].

Many factors have been shown to influence survival in patients with CF. Biologic and physiologic factors such as pancreatic insufficiency and pseudomonas infections, and socioeconomic factors such as inadequate or no health insurance are associated with decreased survival rates [2, 10, 11]. Britto found that, compared with the general population, patients with CF report lower physical health scores, independent of lung function, nutritional status or demographic factors [12]. Moreover, female patients with CF have been shown across age strata to have a shorter life expectancy, more serious respiratory infections, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections at a younger age than male patients, although the etiology of gender differences is unclear [1315]. Also, higher health values, including higher time tradeoff (TTO) scores, have been linked to male gender in patients with CF [16].

In other populations, studies have shown that gender plays a part in the way patients – including adolescents – perceive their own HRQOL and health status [1721, 30]. Adult female patients with chronic illnesses have reported poorer HRQOL than males in prior studies [2225]. Evidence suggests that, in general, men and women may respond differently to poor health and women may, in turn, report poorer general health than men [2630]. This difference has also been seen among adolescents. In one European study, adolescent females reported lower HRQOL with regard to physical health, mood, and self perception than adolescent males. [31] This difference was noted to have developed around age 12 and persisted through late adolescence.

Few studies have examined how the gender of patients with CF may impact their HRQOL when accounting for the severity of illness [3235]. With this investigation, we wanted to determine if gender differences exist in self-reported HRQOL in adolescents with CF. Our specific objectives were: 1) to determine if there are gender differences in HRQOL in adolescent patients with CF; and 2) to determine which HRQOL domains are associated with differences when stratified by gender, after controlling for markers of disease severity. We hypothesized that gender differences exist, with female adolescents reporting poorer HRQOL than males.

Methods

Study design

We performed analyses of data from two previously published cross-sectional questionnaire studies of adolescent outpatients with CF [12, 16]. The combined datasets were used to evaluate for gender differences in adolescents with CF.

Recruitment and data collection

In each of the prior studies, subjects previously diagnosed with CF were recruited from Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center in Cincinnati, Ohio and The Children's Medical Center in Dayton, Ohio between 1997–2001. Patients and their families were invited to participate in each of the prior studies by either a physician or a research coordinator at the time of their regularly scheduled quarterly clinic appointment, by telephone, or by mail. Patients in each study were recruited and completed the questionnaire in the same manner. Patients between 10 and 18 years of age were recruited, and we excluded patients with CF who had undergone lung transplantation. Informed consent was obtained from the patient. If the patient was younger than 18 years, informed consent was obtained from the parent or guardian and assent was obtained from the patient. The study was approved by the institutional review boards at both participating sites.

Health-related quality of life measures

The Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) was used to measure the adolescent's HRQOL in each of the prior studies [36]. The CHQ is a generic health status instrument that has been validated, used in a number of populations with chronic illness, including adolescents with CF, and found to be reliable [12, 16, 3739]. The Child Form-87 (CF-87) of the CHQ was designed to measure 12 health domains: global health – subjective overall health; physical functioning – physical limitations due to health-related problems; bodily pain – intensity and frequency of general pain and discomfort; behavior – aggression, delinquency, hyperactivity/impulsivity and social withdrawal; mental health – anxiety, depression and positive affect; self esteem – satisfaction with school and athletic ability, looks/appearance, ability to get along with others and family, and life overall; general health perceptions – subjective assessment of past, future and current health and resistance/susceptibility to sickness; family cohesion – how well the patient's family gets along with one another; family activities – frequency of family activities; role limitations due to physical, emotional, and behavioral problems; and change in health in the past year. On each subscale, a score of 0 represents worst functioning and 100 represents best functioning, except for a change in health, where "1" represents health much worse than 1 year ago, "2" represents health somewhat worse than 1 year ago, "3" represents health about the same as 1 year ago, "4" represents health somewhat better than 1 year ago, and "5" represents health much better than 1 year ago. The highest possible score indicates the absence of a negative state, whereas lower scores indicate greater limitations in the HRQOL domain.

Clinical measures

Data were collected on age, gender, and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1). Pulmonary function and exacerbations have been associated with differences in HRQOL in adults and older adolescents [12]. Pulmonary function was determined by using spirometry and total body plethysmography according to American Thoracic Society Standards (American Thoracic Society 1991). Demographic data and clinical data were obtained from the CHQ or clinic chart review.

Statistical analysis

All analysis were performed with SAS software, version 8.0 (SAS Institute, Inc, Cary, NC). Comparisons between continuous variables were conducted using two-tailed t tests and comparisons between categorical variables were conducted using χ2 tests. We used multivariable linear regression analysis to determine if the independent variable (gender) was associated with the outcome variable (each CHQ subscale), controlling for FEV1 and age. Because of the categorical nature of the GH outcome variable, we performed multivariable analysis by using ordinal logistic regression. Each variable was entered into multivariable linear regression if in univariate analysis it had a significance level equal to or greater than 0.20. Because some the variables were not normally distributed, to assess the robustness of our results, we repeated all of the comparisons using non-parametric methods and the results were qualitatively the same. We found the parametric univariate comparisons to be consistent with the parametric multivariable methods. We also performed the regressions with the outcome log transformed and the results were qualitatively identical. The non-transformed results are presented for ease of interpretation.

Although there is currently no "gold standard" or consensus by which the clinical importance of differences HRQOL scores can be determined, methods have been proposed to estimate clinically important differences (CID) in HRQOL [4043]. In one approach, the minimal clinically important difference [MCID] is defined by an effect size of >0.20, where effect size = [meanM-meanF]/[SDM] [40]. In this schema, effect sizes of 0.20–0.49 indicate 'small' effect sizes, 0.50–0.79 indicate 'moderate' effect sizes, and >0.80 indicate 'large' effect sizes. We used effect sizes of differences in HRQOL between males (M) and females (F) to assess for clinically important differences.

Results

Ninety-eight adolescents aged 10–18 years completed the CF-87 (Table 1). The mean (SD) age was 14.6 (2.5) years; 50 (51.0%) were female; and the mean (SD) FEV1 was 71.6% (25.6%) of predicted. There were no significant differences between males and females for age or FEV1. Table 2 summarizes the mean, SD, range, and percent at the floor and ceiling for each scale.
Table 1

Characteristics of Participants

Gender

Patients, # (%)

Age, yr (SD)

FEV1, %predicted(SD)

Female

50 (51%)

14.5 (2.8)

67 (26)

Male

48 (49%)

14.6 (2.2)

76 (25)

P-Value

 

0.80

0.07

Table 2

Health-related quality of life by gender

Domain

Mean (SD)

Median

Interquartile range (IQR)

 

Females

    

Global Health*

65 (23)

60

60

85

Physical Functioning*

86 (17)

92.6

81.5

100

Bodily Pain

67 (24)

70

50

80

Behavior*

79 (15)

83.6

72

88

Mental Health*

70 (19)

76.6

61.7

85.2

Self-esteem*

77 (16)

78.6

66.1

89.3

General Health Perception*

49 (20)

49.8

34.6

63.3

Family Cohesion*

74 (23)

85

60

85

Family Activities*

71 (21)

75

50

87.5

Role/social Emotional

86 (18)

100

77.8

100

Role/social Physical

92 (18)

100

66.7

100

Role/social Behavioral

87 (20)

100

100

100

Change in Health

3.6 (1.2)

4.0

3.0

5.0

Males

    

Global Health*

79 (24)

85

60

100

Physical Functioning*

91 (14)

100

87.0

100

Bodily Pain

71 (22)

80

60

80

Behavior*

84 (11)

87.1

78.5

92.2

Mental Health*

80 (13)

82.8

70.3

90.3

Self-esteem*

82 (18)

87.5

67.9

96.4

General Health Perception*

62 (21)

61.3

48.3

77.9

Family Cohesion*

81 (16)

85

60

92.5

Family Activities*

80 (21)

83.3

70.8

95.8

Role/social Emotional

90 (20)

100

88.9

100

Role/social Physical

90 (21)

100

88.9

100

Role/social Behavioral

91 (19)

100

94.4

100

Change in Health

3.7 (1.0)

4

3

5

*P value < 0.05 in univariate analysis comparing males and females

Health status

Female adolescents with CF reported poorer HRQOL than males in all 12 of the domains except for the role behavioral domain (Table 2). In univariate analysis, females reported significantly poorer health in the global health, physical functioning, mental health, general health perceptions, and family activity domains (p < 0.05; Figure 1; Table 2). There were no significant differences noted between males and females for the change in health domain.
Figure 1

Health-Related Quality of Life by Domain and Gender. Health scores ranging from 0–100 are shown on the Y-axis and domains on the X-axis. The asterix (*) indicates p-value < 0.05 for the difference between males and females. Domains: Global Health (GH); Physical Functioning (PF); Bodily Pain (BP); Behavior (BE); Mental Health (MH); Self-esteem (SE); General Health Perception (GP); Family Cohesion (FC); Family Activities (FA); Role/social Physical; Role/social Emotional (RE); Role/social Behavioral (RB).

Three health domains of the CHQ showing statistically significant gender differences in the multivariate models demonstrate an effect size that is moderately clinically important between males and females: the global health, mental health and general health perception scales (Figure 2). The difference in role physical domain was negative because males reported poorer HRQOL in the role physical domain than females.
Figure 2

Effect Sizes for Gender Differences in HRQOL. The domains of HRQOL are shown on the X-axis and the effect size on the Y-axis where effect size = [meanM-meanF]/SDM. Effect sizes between 0.2 and 0.5 are felt to be minimally clinically important and those between 0.5 and 0.8 are felt to be moderately clinically important. Positive effect sizes indicate better HRQOL for males than females. Role physical (RP) domain is negative because males reported worse HRQOL than females. Domains: Global Health (GH); Physical Functioning (PF); Bodily Pain (BP); Behavior (BE); Mental Health (MH); Self-esteem (SE); General Health Perception (GP); Family Cohesion (FC); Family Activities (FA); Role/social Physical; Role/social Emotional (RE); Role/social Behavioral (RB).

In multivariable analyses controlling for age and FEV1, females reported poorer global health, mental health, and general health perceptions (p < 0.05; Table 3). Gender was no longer significantly associated with physical functioning and family activities when controlling for age and FEV1.
Table 3

Domains with significant gender differences in multivariable models

 

β-Coefficient

P value

R2

Global Health (GH)

1.1

<0.05

0.44*

Mental Health (MH)

10.4

<0.01

0.09

General Health Perception (GP)

9.7

<0.05

0.21

* Somers' D, used for logistic procedure; multivariable model controlling for age and FEV1

Discussion

Female patients with CF have been shown to have much shorter life expectancies than males with CF, with a median decrease of 4 years until the age of 20 [14, 44]. We sought to determine if gender differences exist for HRQOL for adolescent patients with CF.

In our cohort of adolescents with CF, significant gender differences in HRQOL existed between males and females. On average, female adolescents with CF scored lower on all health domains with the exception of the role behavior domain. Even when controlling for age and lung disease severity, female adolescents had significantly lower scores in mental health, global health, and perceptions of general health. Physical functioning was not related to gender when controlling for age and lung disease severity. This may indicate that age and disease severity is more important than gender in predicting physical aspects of HRQOL. In addition, the level of family activities, which may also be influenced by age of the patient and severity of lung disease, were no longer significant when controlling for those factors.

Previous research has found that female adolescents with CF have a more accurate perception of objective clinical health status than male adolescents [26], but rely more on denial to cope [45]. Such negative ways of coping can result in poor correlation between pulmonary function and general health perceptions. When compared to adolescent males, adolescent women, have also been found to use more of both positive and negative coping strategies to withstand pain [34, 46, 47]. Avoidance strategies may be viewed as 'negative' or maladaptive by health professionals if it means that patients avoid doing their treatments, but from the perspective of patients may be psychologically adaptive as a means to escape the world of CF for a while. Additionally, some studies have found that adolescent females report more physical health symptoms, psychological symptoms and use more emotion-oriented and problem oriented coping strategies than adolescent males. [48] Because coping styles may be associated with medication adherence, gender differences and coping skills need to be considered when correlating clinical markers with changes in HRQOL.

From a developmental psychology perspective, changes in HRQOL may be explained by hormonal development as well as a physical and social transition from childhood to adulthood. As adolescents transition, peer and social groups emerge, cognitive abilities develop, and they become more independent from their families. This stage of development may affect perceived physical health. Some have described that perceived health is determined by personal factors such as gender, school achievement, drug use, health behaviors, and the adolescents' environment, such as peer/parent relationships and the family's income [49]. Others have linked risk-taking behaviors to lower family income [50]. However, some data suggest that gender differences play a more significant role than class differences with regard to differences in health [51]. Similar to studies done in non-CF populations [31], we found gender differences among adolescents with CF in the areas of mental health and general health perceptions. Differences in physical functioning did not persist in this study possibly because body image also contributes to one's perception of physical health and physical functioning is linked to pulmonary function. Studies have shown little difference in body image between patients with CF and healthy age-matched controls [52]. Females more often overestimate their weight, while males underestimate their weight. A significantly greater proportion of males than females perceived their weight status as underweight and therefore, were more likely to take enteral supplements [53]. Willis and colleagues [54], found that young men and women with CF identify first as young men and women, rather than adults with CF. This combined with social desires to stay slender, has been suggested to contribute to non-adherence.

Powers [55] found that adolescents reported strong relationships between pulmonary function and self-reports of pain, general health, and school-activity limitations, but pulmonary function was not related to physical functioning, emotional or behavioral health. Perhaps because gender differences factor into global health, physical function, and general health perception among adolescents, such a relationship with pulmonary function is not established. In this study, female adolescents with CF reported poorer mental health, global health, and general health perceptions. Such gender differences might limit associations between pulmonary function and certain health domains when the effect of gender is not taken into account.

There are some limitations of this study. Although we recruited patients from 2 CF centers, the sample size was relatively small. A few of the health domains exhibited ceiling effects. The CHQ is a generic questionnaire used to measure HRQOL in diverse pediatric populations and may not have been able to detect small differences in HRQOL in patients with CF. Accordingly, the generalizability of our findings is uncertain. Because we examined HRQOL in two prior completed studies, we were unable to examine HRQOL differences in those who refused and those who agreed to participate. Patients with more severe disease (with greater likelihood of being females) may have participated in the study at disproportionately low rates when compared with healthier counterparts. For example, in our population, the overall FEV1 was reflective of mild disease. Clinical variables, such as pseudomonal infection, nutrition status, and history of co morbidities such as diabetes, and social variables such as socioeconomic or insurance status, were not available for many observations and thus were not controlled for, which may partially explain the HRQOL differences we found between genders.

Multiple studies have shown that females, including adolescents, report poorer HRQOL than males [8, 18, 20, 56], often despite having similar objective clinical measures like pulmonary function. It is possible that such differences were based on perception of health, rather than actual health status. Females had poorer HRQOL in primarily the psychological domains of health, when controlling for disease severity and age. The psychological domains of health may potentially affect therapy and should be considered when treating female adolescents with cystic fibrosis. Other social constructs that affect adolescent skill building, including self-construct, self-efficacy, identity formation and social support may be responsible for overall health perceptions in adolescent males and females.

Conclusion

Gender differences in HRQOL appear to exist between adolescent males and females with CF. Further research will need to focus on the causes of such gender differences in HRQOL and on potential interventions to improve HRQOL for all adolescents living with CF.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Dr. Yi is supported by a National Institute of Child and Human Development Career Development Award. (K23HD046690). Dr. Tsevat is supported by a National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine award (K24 AT001676). Dr. Mrus was a recipient of a Career Development Award (RCD 01011-2) from the Department of Veterans Affairs, Health Services Research and Development Service. Dr. Britto was funded by Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Grant (BRITTO98A0).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Adolescent Medicine Fellow, Division of General Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University
(2)
Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati
(3)
Veterans Healthcare System of Ohio (VISN 10)
(4)
Institute for the Study of Health, University of Cincinnati
(5)
Division of Adolescent Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
(6)
Department of Pediatrics, Saint Louis University
(7)
GlaxoSmithKline

References

  1. Elborn JS, Shale DJ, Britton JR: Cystic fibrosis: current survival and population estimates to the year 2000. Thorax 1991, 46: 881–885.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Orenstein DM, Winnie GB, Altman H: Cystic fibrosis: A 2002 update. J Pediatr 2002, 140: 156–164. 10.1067/mpd.2002.120269PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. American Medical Association: Profiles of Adolescent Health Series. Chicago, IL: American Medical Association; 1990.Google Scholar
  4. Newacheck PW, Taylor WR: Childhood chronic illness: prevalence, severity and impact. Am J Public Health 1992, 82: 364–371.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Koppleman J: Meeting the needs of chronically disabled children in changing health care system. National Health Policy Forum Issue Brief 1994, 651: 1–9.Google Scholar
  6. Eigen H, Clark NM, Wolle JM: NHLBI Workshop summary: clinical behavioral aspects of cystic fibrosis; directions for future research. Am Rev Respir Dis 1987, 136: 1509–1513.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Orenstein DM, Nixon PA, Ross EA, Kaplan RM: The quality of well-being in cystic fibrosis. Chest 1989, 95: 344–347.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Gee L, Abbott J, Conway SP, Etherington C, Webb AK: Development of disease specific health related quality of life measure for adults and adolescents with cystic fibrosis. Thorax 2000, 55: 946–954. 10.1136/thorax.55.11.946PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Busschbach JJ, Horikx PE, van den Bosch JM, de la Riviere A, de Charro FT: Measuring the quality of life before and after bilateral lung transplantation in patients with cystic fibrosis. Chest 1994, 105: 911–917.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Curtis JR, Burke W, Kassner AW, Aitken ML: Absence of health insurance is associated with decreased life expectancy in patients with cystic fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997, 155: 1921–1924.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Schechter MS, Margolis PA: Relationship between socioeconomic status and disease severity in cystic fibrosis. J Pediatr 1998, 132: 260–264. 10.1016/S0022-3476(98)70442-1PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Britto MT, Kotagal UR, Hornung RW, Atherton HD, Tsevat J, Wilmott R: Impact of recent pulmonary exacerbations on quality of life in patients with cystic fibrosis. Chest 2001, 121: 64–72. 10.1378/chest.121.1.64View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Rosenfeld M, Davis R, FitzSimmons S, Pepe M, Ramsey B: Gender gap in cystic fibrosis mortality. Am J Epidemiol 1997, 145: 794–803.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. FitzSimmons SC: The changing epidemiology of cystic fibrosis. J Pediatr 1993, 122: 1–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Demko CA: Gender differences in cystic fibrosis: Pseudomonas aeurginosa infection. J Clin Epidemiol 1995, 48: 1041–1049. 10.1016/0895-4356(94)00230-NPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Yi MS, Britto MT, Wilmott RW, Kotagal UR, Eckman MH, Nielson DW, Kociela VL, Tsevat J: Health values of adolescents with cystic fibrosis. J Pediatr 2003, 142: 133–40. 10.1067/mpd.2003.51PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Sawyer SM, Rosier MJ, Phelam PD, Bowes G: The self-image of adolescents with cystic fibrosis. J Adolesc Health 1995, 16: 204–208. 10.1016/1054-139X(94)00071-LPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Wijnhoven HA, Kriegsman DM, Snoek FJ, Hesselink AE, de Haan M: Gender differences in health-related quality of life among asthma patients. J Asthma 2003, 40: 189–199. 10.1081/JAS-120017990PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Vingilis ER, Wade TJ, Seeley JS: Predictors of adolescent self-rated health: analysis of the National Population Health Survey. Can J Public Health 2002, 93: 193–197.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Goodman E, Amick BC, Rezendes MO, Tarlov AR, Rogers WH, Kagan J: Influences on gender and social class on adolescents' perceptions of health. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1997, 151: 899–904.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Heinonen H, Volin L, Uutela A, Zevon M, Barrick C, Ruutu T: Gender-associated differences in quality of life after allogenic BMT. Bone Marrow Transplant 2001, 28: 503–509. 10.1038/sj.bmt.1703158PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. De Vries J, Van Heck GL, Drent M: Gender differences in sarcoidosis: symptoms, quality of life, and medical consumption. Women Health 1999, 30: 99–114. 10.1300/J013v30n02_07PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Riedinger MS, Dracup KA, Brecht ML, Padilla G, Sarna L, Ganz PA: Quality of life in patients with heart failure: Do gender differences exist? Heart Lung 2001, 30: 105–116. 10.1067/mhl.2001.114140PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Westbrook JI, Talley NJ, Westbrook MT: Gender differences in the symptoms and physical and mental well-being of dyspeptics: a population based study. Qual Life Res 2002, 11: 283–291. 10.1023/A:1015239020403PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Mrus JM, Williams P, Tsevat J, Cohn SE, Wu AW: Gender differences in health-related quality of life in patients with HIV/AIDS. Qual Life Res 2005, 14: 479–491. 10.1007/s11136-004-4693-zPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Mechanic D: Sex illness behaviour and the use of health services. Social Sci Med 1978, 128: 207–214.Google Scholar
  27. Merrill SS, Seeman TE, Kasl SV, Berkman LF: Gender differences in the comparison of self reported disability and performance measures. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 1997, 52: M19-M26.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Piccinelli M, Simon G: Gender and cross-cultural differences in somatic symptoms in association with emotional distress: an international study in primary care. Psychol Med 1997, 27: 433–44. 10.1017/S0033291796004539PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Unruh AM: Gender variations in clinical pain experience. Pain 1997, 65: 123–67. 10.1016/0304-3959(95)00214-6View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Macintyre S, Hunt K, Sweeting H: GenderDifferences in health are things really as simple as they seem? Soc Sci & Med 1996, 42: 617–24. 10.1016/0277-9536(95)00335-5View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Bisegger C, Cloetta B, von Rueden U, Abel T, Ravens-Sieberer U: Health-related quality of life: gender differences in childhood and adolescence. Soz Praventivmed 2005, 50: 281–91. 10.1007/s00038-005-4094-2PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Ruiz MT, Verbrugge LM: A two way view of gender bias in medicine. J Epidemiol Community Health 1997, 51: 106–9.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Gee L, Abbott J: Quality of Life in cystic fibrosis: the impact of gender, general health perceptions and disease severity. J Cyst Fibros 2003, 2: 206–213. 10.1016/S1569-1993(03)00093-6PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Congleton J, Hodson ME, Duncan-Skingle F: Quality of Life in adults with cystic fibrosis. Thorax 1996, 51: 936–940.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Congleton J, Hodson ME, Duncan-Skingle F: Quality of life in adults with cystic fibrosis. Thorax 1997, 52: 397–400.Google Scholar
  36. Landgraf JM, Abetz L, Ware JE, Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ): A User's Manual. First edition. Boston, MA: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center; 1996.Google Scholar
  37. Landgraf JM: Measuring Health Outcomes in Pediatric Populations: Issues in Psychometrics and Application. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven; 1996.Google Scholar
  38. Sawyer M, Antoniou G, Toogood I, Rice M: A comparison of parent and adolescent reports describing the health-related quality of life of adolescents treated for cancer. Int J Cancer Suppl 1999, 12: 39–45. Publisher Full Text 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(1999)83:12+<39::AID-IJC8>3.0.CO;2-7PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Homer C, Susskind O, Alpert HR, Owusu M, Schneider L, Rappaport LA, Rubin DH: An evaluation of an innovative multimedia educational software program for asthma management: report of a randomized, controlled trial. Pediatrics 2000, 106: 210–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Hays RD, Woolley JM: The concept of clinically meaningful difference in health-related quality-of-life research. How meaningful is it? Pharmacoeconomics 2000, 18: 419–423. 10.2165/00019053-200018050-00001PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Samsa G, Edelman D, Rothman ML, Williams GR, Lipscomb J, Matchar D: Determining clinically important differences in health status measures: a general approach with illustration to the Health Utilities Index Mark II. Pharmacoeconomics 1999, 15: 141–155. 10.2165/00019053-199915020-00003PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Norman GR, Sloan JA, Wyrwich KW: Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Med Care 2003, 41: 582–92. 10.1097/00005650-200305000-00004PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Farivar SS, Liu H, Hays RD: Half standard deviation estimate of the minimally important difference in HRQOL scores? Expert Review Pharmacoeconomics Outcomes Res 2004, 4: 515–523. 10.1586/14737167.4.5.515View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Davis PB: The gender gap in cystic fibrosis survival. J Gend Specif Med 1999, 2: 47–51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Simmons RJ, Corey M, Cowen L, Keenan N, Robertson J, Levinson H: Emotional adjustment of early adolescents with cystic fibrosis. Psychosom Med 1985, 47: 111–121.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Keefe FJ, Lefebvre JC, Egert J, Affleck G, Sullivan MJ, Caldwell DS: The relationship of gender to pain, pain behavior, and disability in osteoarthritis patients: the role of catastrophizing. Pain 2000, 87: 325–334. 10.1016/S0304-3959(00)00296-7PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Keefe FJ, Affleck G, France CR, Emery CF, Waters S, Caldwell DS, Stainbrook D, Hackshaw KV, Fox LC, Wilson K: Gender differences in pain, coping, and mood in individuals having osteoarthritic knee pain: a within-day analysis. Pain 2004, 110: 571–577. 10.1016/j.pain.2004.03.028PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Wilson G, Pritchard ME, Revalee B: Individual differences in adolescent health symptoms: the effects of gender and coping. J Adolesc 2005, 28: 369–79. 10.1016/j.adolescence.2004.08.004PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Wade TJ, Pevalin DJ, Vingilis E: Revisting student self-rated physical health. J Adolesc 2000, 23: 785–791. 10.1006/jado.2000.0359PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Lowry R, Kann L, Collins JL, Kolbe LJ: The effect of socioeconomic status on chronic disease behaviors among U.S. adolescents. JAMA 1996, 276: 792–797. 10.1001/jama.276.10.792PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. West P, Macintyre S, Annadale E, Hunt K: Social class and health in youth: findings from the west of Scotland twenty-07 study. Soc Sci Med 1990, 30: 665–673. 10.1016/0277-9536(88)90252-3PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Abbott J, Conway S, Etherington C, Fitzjohn J, Gee L, Morton A, Musson H, Webb AK: Perceived body image and eating behavior in young adults with cystic fibrosis and their healthy peers. J Behav Med 2000, 23: 501–517. 10.1023/A:1005532602084PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Walters S: Sex differences in weight perception and nutritional behaviour in adults with cystic fibrosis. J Hum Nutr Diet 2001, 14: 83–91. 10.1046/j.1365-277X.2001.00274.xPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Willis E, Miller R, Wyn J: Gendered embodiment and survival for young people with cystic fibrosis. Soc Sci Med 2001, 53: 1163–1174. 10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00416-0PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Powers PM: Adolescents with cystic fibrosis: family reports of adolescent health-related quality of life and forced expiratory volume in one second. Pediatrics 2001, 107: e70. 10.1542/peds.107.5.e70PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Barr RD, Sek J, Horsman J, Forlong W, Saleh M, Pai M, Walker I: Health status and health-related quality of life associated with von Willebrand disease. Am J Hematol 2003, 73: 108–114. 10.1002/ajh.10327PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Arrington-Sanders et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement