Skip to main content

Vision-related quality of life in patients with glaucoma: the role of illness perceptions



To explore the predictive effects of illness perceptions on vision-related quality of life (VRQoL) in Chinese glaucoma patients.


In this cross-sectional study, 97 patients with glaucoma completed the brief illness perception questionnaire (BIPQ), the glaucoma quality of life-15 (GQL-15) questionnaire, and a questionnaire regarding sociodemographic and clinical information. A correlation analysis and hierarchical linear regression analysis were performed.


The BIPQ total score was positively correlated with the total score of the GQL-15 questionnaire and the scores of its four dimensions. Chronic comorbidities, the type of glaucoma, the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), the mean defect (MD) of visual field in the better eye, and identity in the BIPQ were critical predictors of VRQoL. Illness perceptions independently accounted for 7.8% of the variance in the VRQoL of glaucoma patients.


Patients with stronger illness perceptions and those who perceive themselves as having more glaucoma symptoms are likely to experience worse VRQoL. Illness perceptions in glaucoma patients deserve clinical attention, and further studies are needed to examine whether cognitive interventions targeting illness perceptions can improve VRQoL.

Plain English summary

Glaucoma is the leading cause of irreversible blindness worldwide. Visual acuity loss and visual field defects caused by pathological high intraocular pressure are the main features of the disease. The quality of life of patients with glaucoma is often affected by the impairment of visual function. Illness perceptions (how patients perceive their disease) have been shown to be closely related to self-reported quality of life in other chronic diseases and seem to affect disease progression and prognosis. In this study, we explored the impact of illness perceptions on vision-related quality of life in Chinese glaucoma patients. Perception questionnaires were used to record patients’ self-reported outcomes. The results of this study indicate that patients with more self-perceived glaucoma symptoms tend to have a lower level of vision-related quality of life. This study highlights the importance of illness perceptions in glaucoma patients and provides a theoretical basis for improving vision-related quality of life in glaucoma patients according to psychological cognitive interventions.


As the most frequent cause of irreversible blindness [1], glaucoma has become one of the major diseases affecting national visual health and quality of life (QoL) in China [2, 3]. Due to rapid ageing trends [4], it is estimated that the total number of glaucoma cases in China will be 25.16 million by 2050, which will undoubtedly put a heavy burden on the social economy and healthcare systems [5].

In clinical practice, glaucoma patients have lower QoL than the general population, and many studies have reported that glaucoma patients with worse vision acuity (VA) and greater visual field (VF) loss have poorer QoL [6,7,8]. In addition, limited vision-related movement, the very large economic and psychological burden of lifelong treatment and follow-up were also important factors contributing to the impairment of QoL [5, 9, 10]. Poor QoL affects patients' confidence in glaucoma treatment and incentives for self-management, resulting in a vicious cycle. Therefore, maintaining visual function and related QoL is a critical goal of glaucoma treatment.

Many studies have confirmed that illness perceptions play an important role in explaining chronic disease patients' QoL [11]. For instance, high levels of illness perceptions are linked to poor health-related QoL in patients with breast cancer [12]. It has also been reported that different aspects of illness perceptions account for varying degrees of variance in both physical and mental QoL [13]. Most of these studies have obtained perception measurements via patient-reported outcome instruments. Positive illness perceptions are beneficial in the context of disease prevention, treatment and prognosis [14, 15]. Illness perception is a psychological concept based on the common sense model (CSM) of self-regulation proposed by Leventhal et al. [16], which emphasizes patients' lay perspective towards disease. In the CSM, patients' cognitive representations of illness were conceptualized into the following components: identity (the symptoms experienced by the individual), timeline (the duration of the illness), consequence (the extent to which the illness affects daily life), course (the perceived causal antecedents of the illness), perceived control (individuals' belief in the controllability and curability of the illness) and coherence (individuals’ understanding of their illness). Emotional representations (individuals' emotional responses to the illness) were also included as an additional component of the model [17]. Generally, patients' subjective views may lead to changes in their coping strategies and psychological states and then exert direct or indirect influences on disease progression through a self-regulatory system [18]. Some research evidence indicates that targeted interventions aimed at improving patients' illness perceptions can also have significant implications for their clinical outcomes [19,20,21,22]. Accordingly, as a typical chronic psychosomatic disease in the field of ophthalmology, glaucoma deserves attention in the context of illness perceptions of patients.

To the best of our knowledge, few studies have investigated the association between illness perceptions and QoL in patients with glaucoma. Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore the predictive value of illness perceptions for vision-related quality of life (VRQoL) in Chinese glaucoma patients, hoping to understand how patients with glaucoma make sense of their illness and to shed new light on approaches to increase VRQoL.


Participants and setting

This cross-sectional survey was conducted in an ophthalmic hospital in Zhejiang Province, southern China, between September 2020 and March 2021. A total of 97 glaucoma patients were recruited. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) diagnosed with glaucoma, including primary and secondary glaucoma; (2) used topical ocular medications to reduce intraocular pressure (IOP) for at least 2 weeks; and (3) aged 18 years or older. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) patients with any other ocular diseases that might affect the retinal nerve fibre layer or the VF; (2) patients with severe diseases of the heart, liver, kidney or nervous system; and (3) patients diagnosed with a psychiatric disorder or severe cognitive impairment.

Data collection

Individual face-to-face interviews were conducted by a trained interviewer. Patients were asked to complete the questionnaire by themselves. For those who had difficulty reading or writing, the questionnaire was completed by the interviewer based on the patient's oral answers. All questionnaires were immediately collected and reviewed to confirm consistency and completeness.

The ophthalmological examination results of VA and VF were obtained from the hospital electronic medical system and were recorded by trained ophthalmologists at the clinical research and examination centre of the hospital.


Sociodemographic and clinical data

The information provided by patients included the following: age, gender, educational level, monthly per capita income (calculated as family income divided by the number of family members), chronic comorbidities (including hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidaemia, cardiovascular disease and chronic pulmonary/kidney/liver disease), smoking history (defined as current smoking or smoking cessation), type of glaucoma, duration of glaucoma, glaucoma family history, number of antiglaucoma medications used, the mean defect (MD) of VF, and the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA, determined using the Snellen visual acuity chart, and converted to a logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution score (logMAR)). VF testing was performed with the Humphrey Field Analyzer 750i (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc., Dublin, CA, USA) using the Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm (SITA) standard central 24-2 program. The reliability parameters of fixation losses < 20% and false positives/negatives < 15% were used.

The brief illness perception questionnaire (BIPQ)

The Chinese version of the BIPQ (Broadbent et al. [23]) was used to measure 3 dimensions of illness perception: illness comprehensibility, illness cognitive representations and emotional representations. A previous study reported acceptable reliability and validity of this scale among a Chinese glaucoma population [24]. The scale consists of 8 scoring items. Items 1 to 8 correspond to consequences, timeline, amount of perceived personal control, treatment control, identity (symptoms), illness concern, illness coherence and emotional representation. Each item is rated on a scale from 0 to 10. A total score is calculated by summing all the item scores (items 3, 4, and 7 are reverse scored) with a potential range between 0 and 80, with higher scores indicating a more threatening perception of illness.

The glaucoma quality of life-15 (GQL-15) questionnaire

The GQL-15 questionnaire was developed by Nelson et al. [25] and translated into Chinese by Zhou et al. to measure VRQoL in patients with glaucoma. The Chinese version of the GQL-15 (GQL-15-CHI) showed psychometric properties comparable to the original English version, with an overall Cronbach's alpha of 0.96 [26]. The scale contains 15 items covering 4 dimensions: central and near vision (two items), peripheral vision (six items), glare and dark adaptation (six items), and outdoor mobility (one item). Responses are provided on a Likert-type scale from 1 (no difficulty) to 5 (severe difficulty), with an additional option of “not applicable” included. The total possible score ranges from 15 to 75. For the scores of each dimension, the raw scores of these items are first transformed into a 0–100 scale (1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 were converted into 0, 25, 50, 75 and 100, respectively), and then an average score was calculated by summing up the item scores in that domain and dividing by the total number of items, with higher scores indicating worse functioning and poorer VRQoL.

Ethical considerations

This study complied with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Affiliated Ophthalmology and Optometry Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University (Project Number: 2020-180-K-163-01). Patients were informed that the purpose of the study and that any details of their responses would be kept confidential. All enrolled patients signed a written informed consent form.

Power calculation

For the hierarchical linear regression analysis approach in this study, a sample size of 97 achieves 84% power using a two-sided F test with a significance level of 0.05 and a conventional effect size of 0.25.

Statistical analyses

In the descriptive analysis, scale scores and continuous variables of demographic data are summarized as the mean (standard deviation, SD), whereas categorical variables are shown as the frequency and percentage. T-tests and one-way ANOVA were performed to evaluate differences between and among independent groups. Pearson's correlation analysis and canonical correlation analysis (CCA) were used to determine the association between each item of the BIPQ and GQL-15 domain scores. Multiple comparisons were performed by Bonferroni post-hoc test to evaluate between-group differences in mean scores. Furthermore, hierarchical linear regression was conducted to explore the effect of illness perceptions on VRQoL after controlling for sociodemographic variables and disease characteristics. Only variables that had a significant effect on VRQoL were candidates for inclusion in the regression analysis. The level of statistical significance was set at P < 0.05 for all analyses. All statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS software version 25.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, United States).


Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics

A total of 105 eligible patients were initially recruited in the study. The data from 8 participants were excluded from analysis because the participants failed to cooperate with the eye examination and their VF test results were unreliable. Of the remaining 97 subjects, 44 (45.4%) were male and 53 (54.6%) were female, and the average age was 54.87 (SD = 14.06, range 24–80) years. The sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of the sample are shown in Table 1. Most of the patients (72.2%) were diagnosed with primary glaucoma, and nearly half of them (47.4%) were treated with three kinds of topical drugs to lower IOP. The average logMAR BCVA in the better eye and worse eye were 0.30 (SD = 0.71) and 0.84 (SD = 1.02), respectively. The average MD was − 10.85 (SD = 9.85) dB in the better eye and − 20.48 (SD = 10.30) dB in the worse eye. The most frequent chronic comorbidity observed in participants was hypertension followed by diabetes.

Table 1 Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics (n = 97)

BIPQ and GQL-15 scores and Pearson's correlation analysis

The BIPQ and GQL-15 scores for different categories of variables are presented in Table 1. Of all the variables, both total scores showed significant differences between groups with regard to the type of glaucoma and chronic comorbidities. According to the GQL-15 scores, gender and smoking history also showed significant differences between groups. There was no significant difference between groups for the other variables.

Correlation analyses showed that the BIPQ total score was positively correlated with the total GQL-15 and its four dimensions. This finding indicates that a more negative perception of illness was related to worse VRQoL. The specific values of the subscales and correlation coefficients are shown in Table 2. Specifically, the score assigned to illness concern (item 6 = 9.79 ± 0.88) was the highest among the items of BIPQ, while treatment control (item 4 = 3.64 ± 2.20) was the lowest. The subscale scores of the GQL-15 indicated that the patients generally had worse function in the glare and dark adaptation domain (25.08 ± 23.26) followed by the central vision and near vision domain (23.71 ± 27.75) and relatively good function in outdoor mobility (14.95 ± 28.10). Except for scores on the timeline, treatment control, illness concern, illness coherence, and emotional representation items of the BIPQ, which had no significant relationship with the GQL-15, consequences, personal control, and identity were all significantly positively correlated with the GQL-15.

Table 2 BIPQ and GQL-15 scores: correlation coefficient values (Pearson r) between BIPQ and GQL-15

Furthermore, there were positive correlations between logMAR BCVA in the better eye (r = 0.579, P < 0.01) and the worse eye (r = 0.459, P < 0.01) and overall GQL-15, while MD was negatively correlated with GQL-15 (MD in the better eye r = − 0.644, P < 0.01; MD in the worse eye r = − 0.249, P < 0.05).


CCA was introduced to study the correlation of two sets of variables [27]. The first set of variables consisted of 4 dimensions in the GQL-15 questionnaire, Y1–Y4, which correspond to GQL1501, GQL1502, GQL1503, and GQL1504. The second set contained 8 items in the BIPQ, X1–X8, which correspond to BIPQ1, BIPQ2, BIPQ3, BIPQ4, BIPQ5, BIPQ6, BIPQ7, and BIPQ8. Two multivariate variables, V and U, were extracted from the above two sets of variables. The results showed that there were four pairs of canonical correlation variables (V1–V4 and U1–U4). We focused on the first pair of canonical variables (V1 and U1), which had a significant correlation (P < 0.05) and captured the largest proportion of the variation shared between the BIPQ and GQL-15; the correlation coefficient was 0.586. The standardized canonical correlation coefficients and canonical loading coefficients of sets V1 and U1 are shown in Table 3.

Table 3 Canonical correlation coefficients for GQL-15 and BIPQ scores

Hierarchical linear regression analysis

As shown in Table 4, only variables with a P value < 0.05 in univariate analysis were entered into the hierarchical linear regression model. In Model 1, demographic covariates such as gender, chronic comorbidities, and smoking history were evaluated as potential confounders. After controlling for the above three variables, chronic comorbidities, type of glaucoma, logMAR BCVA in the better eye, and MD in the better eye still exerted significant effects on VRQoL in Model 2, and the explanatory power of the model improved by 38.7% (ΔR2 = 0.387). Model 3 included each item of the BIPQ, and the standardized regression coefficient of identity was positive and statistically significant, indicating that higher identity beliefs predict lower VRQoL. This model explained 70.1% of the total variance in VRQoL, and illness perceptions independently accounted for 7.8% of the variance in VRQoL. All models achieved statistical significance.

Table 4 Predictors of VRQoL in patients with glaucoma (n = 97)

In summary, the results from the hierarchical linear regression model demonstrated that poor VA, severe VF defects in the better eye, and a strong identity are closely related to poor VRQoL in patients with glaucoma.


This was the first study to investigate the relationship between illness perceptions and VRQoL in a Chinese glaucoma population. The hierarchical linear regression model explained up to 70.1% of the variance in VRQoL, and the clinical variables accounted for the greatest variance in the model. Chronic comorbidities, type of glaucoma, BCVA and MD in the better eye, and identity (symptoms) of illness perceptions are the critical predictors of VRQoL according to our data. These findings suggest that primary glaucoma patients without chronic disease have better BCVA and fewer VF defects in their better eye, while those who perceive fewer symptoms attributable to glaucoma are likely to experience higher VRQoL.

Our study highlights the specific contributions of illness perceptions to glaucoma patients' VRQoL after controlling for demographic and clinical variables. Illness perception has been considered an important psychological factor affecting adherence and QoL in patients with some chronic diseases, such as cancer [28], chronic kidney disease [29], diabetes [30], cardiovascular disease [31] and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) [32]. Specifically, previous studies have reported that higher identity was a strong predictor of outcomes, predicting lower QoL in coronary heart disease (CHD) patients [15], which is consistent with our findings. However, existing studies in the field of glaucoma have tended to analyse the relationship between illness perceptions and adherence or between adherence and QoL; thus, their results only briefly mention a univariate association between illness perceptions and QoL without further exploration [33,34,35]. Studies have suggested that identity has a significant impact on medication adherence [36] and that glaucoma patients with better adherence tend to report a better perceived QoL [33]; given these findings and the results of the present study, we speculate that interventions targeted at identity may improve QoL. A randomized controlled trial (RCT) revealed a reduction in identity scores, corresponding to significantly fewer complaints of symptoms in the cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) intervention group [37]. Another RCT that used psychological family-based interventions for patients with type 2 diabetes also reported statistically significant improvements in health outcomes, including glycaemic control (a decrease in glycated haemoglobin) and diabetes identity (a reduction in perceived symptom burdens) [38]. These examples imply that identity, as one of the core cognitive dimensions in CSM, is modifiable through psychological interventions such as CBT. Therefore, subsequent studies could try to examine whether cognitive interventions are equally effective in glaucoma patients.

The total BIPQ score in our sample population was higher than that among patients with diabetes and COPD [39,40,41]. Glaucoma patients are more likely to perceive the threat of illness, possibly because the impairment of visual function caused by disease progression can severely affect the patient's mobility and cause them to lose independence. We ranked the item scores from highest to lowest and compared the ranking of each item in our study with that in other studies. The results showed that the “consequence” and “identity” items ranked higher in our study than in other studies of glaucoma populations in other countries [42,43,44,45]. The rank of the “concern” item in our study was similar to that in studies of Singaporean (of Chinese descent) populations [44, 45], but higher than that in some studies in European countries [42, 43]. In addition, the rank of the “timeline” and “treatment control” items were lower in our study than in other studies. On the one hand, this difference might partly be attributed to diverse cultural backgrounds and inclusion criteria. On the other hand, the low timeline and treatment control scores indicate that most Chinese patients are not conscious of the chronic and permanent characteristics of glaucoma, are less likely to recognize the effectiveness of treatment and more likely to consider the disease hard to control. We speculate that these differences may exist because glaucoma is not as common as other chronic diseases, such as diabetes and hypertension, and because public awareness of this eye disease is low. In addition, our sample mainly comprised elderly individuals with a primary educational level, whose capability and channels to receive reliable information about glaucoma are limited. When patients have an insufficient understanding of the disease (including difficulty in recognizing symptoms and unawareness of the consequences of the disease), the visual field loss caused by glaucoma, which is irreversible even after treatment, is likely to increase patient concern over the illness, thus leading to high scores for illness consequence, identity and concern on the BIPQ. Our CCA results confirmed the significant positive correlations between illness perceptions and VRQoL, especially the effects of consequence and identity on the glare and dark adaptation dimensions. The results also provide new ideas for improving the QoL of glaucoma patients; perhaps helping them correctly identify the characteristics and consequences of glaucoma could be an important starting point for interventions. Of course, intervention studies are required to confirm the validity and feasibility of such measures.

One of the important results of our study was that clinical parameters such as VA and VF could explain the most variance in VRQoL in the model. LogMAR BCVA and MD of the better eye were independent predictors of VRQoL. This finding suggests that the condition of the better eye was more important for glaucoma patients' VRQoL than that of the worse eye, which is in line with previous studies [6, 8, 46]. Epidemiological studies show that diagnosis and treatment are often delayed due to the relatively asymptomatic damage caused by glaucoma in the early stages, and the majority of patients do not realize they have glaucoma until their condition deteriorates to the point where their bilateral vision is severely impaired. Therefore, early identification and treatment are the key to maintaining VRQoL [10]. Nevertheless, ophthalmic examinations, surgeries, medications, and other treatments aimed at reducing IOP are usually concentrated on the worse eye. The results of our study emphasize the importance of monitoring the visual function of the better eye as early as possible. Noticeably, chronic comorbidities and the type of glaucoma were identified as predictors affecting VRQoL in our sample. This finding indicates that patients with other chronic comorbidities and patients with secondary glaucoma have a poorer VRQoL. However, a study of Chinese glaucoma patients conducted by Zhou et al. [46] concluded that VRQoL was associated with economic burden, VA, VF, number of glaucoma surgeries and depression and did not mention the two factors we identified. This difference could be explained by the varied types of grouping and the different proportions of patients in each group; in addition, chronic comorbidities were not taken into account in their study. Unlike primary glaucoma, which has a covert onset, most of the secondary glaucoma patients included in our study had a specific cause of elevated IOP, such as trauma, certain medications (e.g., corticosteroids) or other diseases (e.g., tumour). We speculate that in addition to the primary disease, patients' illness perceptions over time that are potentially amenable to dynamic change related to the complex treatment experience, along with the increase in BIPQ scores, have a direct or indirect impact on VRQoL [47, 48]. We used the bootstrap approach based on the Preacher and Hayes [49] procedure to conduct an additional mediation analysis and used the PROCESS macro provided by SPSS (the number of bootstrap samples was 5000) for the bias-corrected bootstrap confidence interval, which is considered to be more powerful than the Sobel test for smaller samples [50, 51]. The BIPQ measuring illness perceptions was entered as a potential mediator in two simple mediation models with VRQoL as the dependent variable, and chronic comorbidities and the type of glaucoma as the independent variables. The result showed that illness perceptions partially mediated the relationship between chronic comorbidities and VRQoL, whereas completely mediated the relationship between the type of glaucoma and VRQoL (see Additional file 1). This result indicates that conducting a cognitive assessment of illness (such as illness perceptions) may be necessary for patients with different illness backgrounds and treatment experiences, as illness perceptions play an important role in determining patients’ VRQoL. Some studies on other diseases have also found a significant mediating role of illness perceptions in affecting patients' physical and mental health [52, 53]. Perhaps follow-up longitudinal studies (or qualitative interviews) can help us better understand and explain the reasons behind this mediating effect. However, the above findings seem to lend credence to our result that patients with chronic comorbidities and secondary glaucoma are anticipated to have worse VRQoL; for this reason, more attention and support should be given to these patients.

As a cross-sectional study, this study inevitably has some limitations. We cannot confirm the specific causal relationships between predictors and outcomes. In addition, the study population was recruited from a single medical centre, and the sample size was relatively small, which limits our power and generalizability. Further longitudinal studies or RCTs are necessary. We also expect that future studies will include more potential psychological variables that might influence patients' behaviour and QoL to deeply explore the functional routes of each factor and provide more empirical evidence for clinical psychological cognitive interventions.


Illness perceptions have a stable effect on VRQoL in Chinese glaucoma patients, and patients with stronger illness perceptions have poorer VRQoL. Moreover, among illness perceptions, identity was identified as an important predictor of VRQoL after controlling for sociodemographic and clinical variables. The more symptoms patients perceived related to their glaucoma, the worse their VRQoL. Our study highlights the importance of paying attention to the subjective views of glaucoma patients and their perceptions of illness in clinical practice, and our results provide a theoretical basis for improving the VRQoL of glaucoma patients from the perspective of cognition. Further evaluations are required to explore whether cognitive interventions that target illness perceptions can improve VRQoL in patients with glaucoma.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.



Quality of life


Vision-related quality of life


Common sense model


Brief illness perception questionnaire


Glaucoma quality of life-15


Best-corrected visual acuity


Vision acuity


Visual field


Mean defect


Intraocular pressure


Logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution score


Canonical correlation analysis


  1. Bourne RRA, Stevens GA, White RA, Smith JL, Flaxman SR, Price H, et al. Causes of vision loss worldwide, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2013;1(6):e339–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tham YC, Li X, Wong TY, Quigley HA, Aung T, Cheng CY. Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology. 2014;121(11):2081–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sun XH. Focus on popular science education of glaucoma and reduce glaucomatous low vision and blindness. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2017;53(2):81–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chan EW, Li X, Tham YC, Liao J, Wong TY, Aung T, et al. Glaucoma in Asia: regional prevalence variations and future projections. Br J Ophthalmol. 2016;100(1):78–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Song P, Wang J, Bucan K, Theodoratou E, Rudan I, Chan KY. National and subnational prevalence and burden of glaucoma in China: a systematic analysis. J Glob Health. 2017;7(2):020705.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. van Gestel A, Webers CA, Beckers HJ, van Dongen MC, Severens JL, Hendrikse F, et al. The relationship between visual field loss in glaucoma and health-related quality-of-life. Eye (Lond). 2010;24(12):1759–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. McKean-Cowdin R, Varma R, Wu J, Hays RD, Azen SP, Los Angeles Latino Eye Study G. Severity of visual field loss and health-related quality of life. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;143(6):1013–23.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Chun YS, Sung KR, Park CK, Kim HK, Yoo C, Kim YY, et al. Factors influencing vision-related quality of life according to glaucoma severity. Acta Ophthalmol. 2019;97(2):e216–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Quaranta L, Riva I, Gerardi C, Oddone F, Floriani I, Konstas AG. Quality of life in glaucoma: a review of the literature. Adv Ther. 2016;33(6):959–81.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Varma R, Lee PP, Goldberg I, Kotak S. An assessment of the health and economic burdens of glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;152(4):515–22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Cheng C, Yang CY, Inder K, Chan SW. Illness perceptions, coping strategies, and quality of life in people with multiple chronic conditions. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2020;52(2):145–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fanakidou I, Zyga S, Alikari V, Tsironi M, Stathoulis J, Theofilou P. Mental health, loneliness, and illness perception outcomes in quality of life among young breast cancer patients after mastectomy: the role of breast reconstruction. Qual Life Res. 2018;27(2):539–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Berner C, Erlacher L, Fenzl KH, Dorner TE. A cross-sectional study on self-reported physical and mental health-related quality of life in rheumatoid arthritis and the role of illness perception. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018;16(1):238.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Lu Q, Zeng L, Gong MF, Zhu XP. Research progress on disease perception in chronic disease management. Chin Nurs Res. 2016;30(11):1288–91.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Broadbent E, Wilkes C, Koschwanez H, Weinman J, Norton S, Petrie KJ. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the brief illness perception questionnaire. Psychol Health. 2015;30(11):1361–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Leventhal H, Brissette I, Leventhal EA. The common-sense model of self-regulation of health and illness. In: Cameron LD, Leventhal H, editors. The self-regulation of health and illness behaviour. London: Routledge; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Leventhal H, Phillips LA, Burns E. The common-sense model of self-regulation (CSM): a dynamic framework for understanding illness self-management. J Behav Med. 2016;39(6):935–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hagger MS, Koch S, Chatzisarantis NLD, Orbell S. The common sense model of self-regulation: meta-analysis and test of a process model. Psychol Bull. 2017;143(11):1117–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Petrie KJ, Cameron LD, Ellis CJ, Buick D, Weinman J. Changing illness perceptions after myocardial infarction: an early intervention randomized controlled trial. Psychosom Med. 2002;64(4):580–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Broadbent E, Ellis CJ, Thomas J, Gamble G, Petrie KJ. Further development of an illness perception intervention for myocardial infarction patients: a randomized controlled trial. J Psychosom Res. 2009;67(1):17–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mc Sharry J, Moss-Morris R, Kendrick T. Illness perceptions and glycaemic control in diabetes: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Diabet Med. 2011;28(11):1300–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Siemonsma PC, Stuive I, Roorda LD, Vollebregt JA, Walker MF, Lankhorst GJ, et al. Cognitive treatment of illness perceptions in patients with chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Phys Ther. 2013;93(4):435–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Broadbent E, Petrie KJ, Main J, Weinman J. The brief illness perception questionnaire. J Psychosom Res. 2006;60(6):631–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Jiang H, Zhao L, Yang L, Cai HY. Relationships among illness perceptions, medication beliefs and medication adherence in primary angle closure glaucoma patients. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2017;53(2):109–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Nelson P, Aspinall P, Papasouliotis O, Worton B, O’Brien C. Quality of life in glaucoma and its relationship with visual function. J Glaucoma. 2003;12(2):139–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhou C, Yao J, Qian S, Wu P. Linguistic and psychometric validation of the Chinese version of the glaucoma quality of life-15 (GQL-15-CHI): a cross-sectional study. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013;11:188.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Tang L, Fritzsche K, Leonhart R, Pang Y, Li J, Song L, et al. Emotional distress and dysfunctional illness perception are associated with low mental and physical quality of life in Chinese breast cancer patients. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017;15(1):231.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Kaptein AA, Yamaoka K, Snoei L, Kobayashi K, Uchida Y, van der Kloot WA, et al. Illness perceptions and quality of life in Japanese and Dutch patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2011;72(3):384–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Nabolsi MM, Wardam L, Al-Halabi JO. Quality of life, depression, adherence to treatment and illness perception of patients on haemodialysis. Int J Nurs Pract. 2015;21(1):1–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Scollan-Koliopoulos M, Bleich D, Rapp KJ, Wong P, Hofmann CJ, Raghuwanshi M. Health-related quality of life, disease severity, and anticipated trajectory of diabetes. Diabetes Educ. 2013;39(1):83–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lotfi-Tokaldany M, Shahmansouri N, Karimi A, Sadeghian S, Saadat S, Abbasi SH, et al. Association between illness perception and health-related quality of life in patients with preexisting premature coronary artery disease. J Psychosom Res. 2019;120:118–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Tiemensma J, Gaab E, Voorhaar M, Asijee G, Kaptein AA. Illness perceptions and coping determine quality of life in COPD patients. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2016;11:2001–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Loon SC, Jin J, Jin Goh M. The relationship between quality of life and adherence to medication in glaucoma patients in Singapore. J Glaucoma. 2015;24(5):e36-42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. McDonald S, Ferguson E, Hagger MS, Foss AJE, King AJ. A theory-driven qualitative study exploring issues relating to adherence to topical glaucoma medications. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2019;13:819–28.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. McDonald L, Boodhna T, Ajtony C, Turnbull P, Bourne RRA, Crabb DP. Illness perceptions in people newly diagnosed with glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Br J Ophthalmol. 2020;104(1):110–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Kucukarslan SN. A review of published studies of patients’ illness perceptions and medication adherence: lessons learned and future directions. Res Soc Adm Pharm. 2012;8(5):371–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Jonsbu E, Martinsen EW, Morken G, Moum T, Dammen T. Change and impact of illness perceptions among patients with non-cardiac chest pain or benign palpitations following three sessions of CBT. Behav Cognit Psychother. 2013;41(4):398–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Keogh KM, Smith SM, White P, McGilloway S, Kelly A, Gibney J, et al. Psychological family intervention for poorly controlled type 2 diabetes. Am J Manag Care. 2011;17(2):105–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Bean D, Cundy T, Petrie KJ. Ethnic differences in illness perceptions, self-efficacy and diabetes self-care. Psychol Health. 2007;22(7):787–811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Kibbey KJ, Speight J, Wong JLA, Smith LA, Teede HJ. Diabetes care provision: barriers, enablers and service needs of young adults with Type 1 diabetes from a region of social disadvantage. Diabet Med. 2013;30(7):878–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Goodridge D, Nicol J, Horvey K, Butcher S. Therapeutic singing as an adjunct for pulmonary rehabilitation participants with COPD outcomes of a feasibility study. Music Med. 2013;5:169–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Guven S, Koylu MT, Mumcuoglu T. Adherence to glaucoma medication, illness perceptions, and beliefs about glaucoma: attitudinal perspectives among Turkish population. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2020.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Rees G, Chong XL, Cheung CY, Aung T, Friedman DS, Crowston JG, et al. Beliefs and adherence to glaucoma treatment: a comparison of patients from diverse cultures. J Glaucoma. 2014;23(5):293–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Chan HH, Wong TT, Lamoureux E, Perera S. A survey on the preference of sustained glaucoma drug delivery systems by Singaporean Chinese patients: a comparison between subconjunctival, intracameral, and punctal plug routes. J Glaucoma. 2015;24(7):485–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Foo RC, Lamoureux EL, Wong RC, Ho SW, Chiang PP, Rees G, et al. Acceptance, attitudes, and beliefs of Singaporean Chinese toward an ocular implant for glaucoma drug delivery. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53(13):8240–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Zhou C, Qian S, Wu P, Qiu C. Quality of life of glaucoma patients in China: sociodemographic, clinical, and psychological correlates-a cross-sectional study. Qual Life Res. 2014;23(3):999–1008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Lee BO, Chaboyer W, Wallis M. Illness representations in patients with traumatic injury: a longitudinal study. J Clin Nurs. 2010;19(3–4):556–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Chaboyer W, Lee BO, Wallis M, Gillespie B, Jones C. Illness representations predict health-related quality of life 6 months after hospital discharge in individuals with injury: a predictive survey. J Adv Nurs. 2010;66(12):2743–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Preacher KJ, Hayes AF. SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2004;36(4):717–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Hayes AF. Beyond Baron and Kenny: statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Commun Monogr. 2009;76(4):408–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Hayes AF, Scharkow M. The relative trustworthiness of inferential tests of the indirect effect in statistical mediation analysis: Does method really matter? Psychol Sci. 2013;24(10):1918–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Steca P, Greco A, Monzani D, Politi A, Gestra R, Ferrari G, et al. How does illness severity influence depression, health satisfaction and life satisfaction in patients with cardiovascular disease? The mediating role of illness perception and self-efficacy beliefs. Psychol Health. 2013;28(7):765–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. De Gucht V. Illness perceptions mediate the relationship between bowel symptom severity and health-related quality of life in IBS patients. Qual Life Res. 2015;24(8):1845–56.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references


Not applicable.


This study was supported by Nursing Project of the Eye Hospital Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University (Grant No. YNHL2201908 to Wenzhe Zhou), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2020YFC2008200) and the Zhejiang Provincial Program for the Cultivation of High-level Innovative Health Talents (Grant No. 2016025).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



QZ and WZ contributed equally to this work and share first authorship. QZ performed material preparation, data collection, data analysis and drafted the manuscript. WZ contributed to the study conception, literature search, drafted and revised the manuscript. DS participated in the literature search and construction of the database, and revised the manuscript. YX, HL, YL (Youping Liang) and YR participated in data analysis. YL (Yuanbo Liang) provided study design guidance and supervised the entire study. YC was responsible for the study design and provided essential assistance. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yuanbo Liang or Yanyan Chen.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of the Affiliated Ophthalmology and Optometry Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University (Project Number: 2020–180-K-163–01). Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Results of the mediating effect analysis.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Q., Zhou, W., Song, D. et al. Vision-related quality of life in patients with glaucoma: the role of illness perceptions. Health Qual Life Outcomes 20, 78 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: