Table 3 Methodological quality assessment of the generic instruments
References | PROM | Measurement property: methodological quality per study | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PROM development | Relevance | Comprehensiveness | Comprehensibility | Construct validity | Internal consistency | Cross‐cultural validity\measurement invariance | Criterion validity | Reliability | Hypothesis testing for construct validity | Responsiveness | ||
Akinboro et al. [63] | WHOQOL-BREF Nigerian version | Inadequate | NR | NR | NR | NR | Very good | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR |
Brown et al. [70] | PozQoL | Inadequate | NR | NR | NR | Very good | Very good | NR | NR | Doubtful | Very good | NR |
Bucciardini et al. [69] | ISSQoL Italian version | Inadequate | NR | NR | NR | Inadequate | Very good | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR |
Fang et al. [22] | WHOQOL Chinese version | Inadequate | NR | NR | NR | Adequate | Very good | NR | NR | Doubtful | Very good | NR |
Kaplan et al. [27] | QWB scale | Inadequate | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | Very good | NR | NR | NR |
Kohli et al. [23] | MOS Indic version | Inadequate | NR | NR | NR | Inadequate | Very good | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR |
Kusterer et al. [19] | SF-36v2 Brazilian-Portuguese version | Inadequate | NR | NR | NR | Very good | Very good | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR |
Namisango et al. [24] | MVQoLI Uganda version | Inadequate | Doubtful | Doubtful | Doubtful | Very good | Very good | Very good | Very good | Doubtful | Very good | NR |
Nosyk et al. [28] | HUI3 | Inadequate | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | Adequate | NR | Very good | NR |
Patel et al. [18] | SF-12 Kiswahili version | Inadequate | Doubtful | Doubtful | Doubtful | Very good | NR | NR | Very good | NR | NR | NR |
Pereira and Canavarro [75] | EUROHIS-QoL-8 Portuguese version | Inadequate | NR | NR | NR | Very good | NR | NR | NR | NR | Very good | NR |
Riley et al. [72] | SF-36 | Inadequate | NR | NR | NR | Very good | Very good | NR | NR | NR | Very good | NR |
Saddkia et al. [9] | WHOQOL Malay version | Inadequate | NR | NR | NR | Adequate | Very good | Adequate | NR | Doubtful | Very good | NR |
Schnall et al. [25] | PROMIS-29 | Inadequate | NR | NR | NR | Adequate | Very good | NR | NR | Doubtful | NR | NR |
Smith et al. [65] | MOS SF-20 | Inadequate | Doubtful | Doubtful | Doubtful | Inadequate | Inadequate | Adequate | Very good | Doubtful | Very good | NR |
Sousa et al. [26] | HAQ-DI | Inadequate | Doubtful | Doubtful | Doubtful | Adequate | Inadequate | Very good | Very good | Doubtful | Very good | NR |
Thompson et al. [64] | WHOQOL-BREF | Inadequate | NR | NR | NR | Very good | Inadequate | NR | NR | NR | Very good | NR |
Tran et al. [20] | EQ-5D-5L Vietnamese version | Inadequate | NR | NR | NR | Inadequate | Inadequate | Very good | Very good | NR | Very good | NR |
Turner-Bowker et al. [73] | SF-36 | Inadequate | NR | NR | NR | Inadequate | NR | NR | NR | NR | Very good | NR |
Wu et al. [21] | EQ-5D | Inadequate | NR | NR | NR | Inadequate | Inadequate | NR | Very good | NR | Very good | NR |
Liu et al. [62] | WHOQOL Chinese version | Inadequate | NR | NR | NR | Doubtful | Inadequate | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR |
Zhang et al. [74] | SF-36 Chinese version | Inadequate | NR | NR | NR | Very good | Inadequate | NR | Very good | NR | Very good | NR |