Skip to main content
Download PDF

The mediating role of perceived social support between anxiety symptoms and life satisfaction in pregnant women: a cross-sectional study

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes volume 18, Article number: 223 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Pregnancy can be stressful for women and families, so the life satisfaction of pregnant women may face significant challenges. This study aimed to identify the relationship among anxiety symptoms, perceived social support and life satisfaction, and to further explore whether perceived social support can play a mediating role.

Methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted from June to September in Shenyang City, China in 2019. 290 effective questionnaires were collected. The Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS), the Zung’s Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), the Multi-Dimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) as well as demographic variables were included in each questionnaire. Hierarchical multiple regression was conducted to explore the mediating role of perceived social support in the relationship between anxiety symptoms and life satisfaction. Then the mediation model was examined by the PROCESS macro for SPSS.

Results

After adjusting control variables, anxiety symptoms were negatively associated with life satisfaction and explained 14.7% of the variance. Higher level of perceived social support was related to higher level of life satisfaction, explaining 21.0% of the variance. Perceived social support partly mediated the relationship between anxiety symptoms and life satisfaction for pregnant women.

Conclusions

Perceived social support played a mediating role between anxiety symptoms and life satisfaction among pregnant women. Strategies and measures to improve perceived social support may be expected to buffer the impact of anxiety symptoms on pregnant women’s life satisfaction.

Background

Pregnancy is a critical and important period for women and families [1]. During pregnancy, in addition to feeling tired and suffering physical discomfort frequently, women are prone to experiencing huge emotional changes and even mental health problems [2]. Fear of childbirth, lack of effective coping strategies and support from partners may adversely affect pregnant women’s psychological state and lead to negative birth experience [3, 4]. Psychological problems were reported to be common in pregnant women and the prevalence was significantly higher than that in the general adult population [5]. The mental health of pregnant women in low- and middle-income countries is probably more worrisome [5]. Research has shown that experiencing one or more psychological disorders, such as depression, anxiety or perceived stress, during pregnancy is associated with an increased overall risk for prematurity [2]. Even a moderate level of sub-clinical mood disorders was likely to increase the risk of adverse outcomes [2]. Additionally, mental disorder during pregnancy was found to be positively associated with suicidal tendency [6], and might be a predictor of depression in postnatal period [7]. Previous studies mainly focused on the psychological problems of women in postnatal period [5]. With the deepening of related research, it was found that the incidence of mental health problems in women during pregnancy may be significantly higher than that in postnatal period [7]. The psychological health of women during pregnancy is significant and should be given enough attention.

Life satisfaction (LS) is an overall evaluation of a person’s living conditions for a certain period of time [8]. LS was often used as a synonym for happiness, quality of life and so on [9]. Moreover, it is regarded as a key indicator of quality of life and an important aspect of positive psychology [10]. Individuals with higher LS usually showed more positive mental states, which were associated with lower anxiety symptoms and less stress [11]. What’s more, a higher level of LS was associated with good health, better work performance and social development [12]. In recent years, people’s LS has received more and more attention both at home and abroad [13, 14]. However, the LS of pregnant women has not been fully studied. Worries about physical symptoms, parenting problems, bodily changes, relationship strains, and the health of the baby during pregnancy can pose a significant challenge to a pregnant woman’s LS [15]. Researches show that women who have negative birth experiences and are dissatisfied with their life during pregnancy are more likely to develop a wide range of disorders, which even affecting their desire to have another child [4]. Pregnant women, especially those who are pregnant for the first time, are prone to be worried, depressive and so on, which may negatively affect their LS and quality of life [16]. Related research also found that pregnant women tended to have lower level of LS [17]. The LS of pregnant women may face huge challenges and has important research value.

As an emotional reflection, anxiety symptoms often occur when one’s personal health is threatened [18]. Several studies reported that nearly 10–15% of all women during pregnancy experienced mild to moderate anxiety or depressive symptoms [16, 19, 20]. In addition, pregnant women show significantly higher anxiety symptoms than non-pregnant controls [21]. Moreover, research has found a strong correlation between anxiety symptoms during pregnancy and postpartum anxiety symptoms [18]. Anxiety symptoms during pregnancy can have negative influence on the gestation and delivery, such as premature and low birth weight children, even decrease baby’s head circumference and brain growth [2, 22]. What’s worse, it even could be bad for the psychological development of children [23]. A negative association between anxiety symptoms and LS has been reported. For example, A survey of the general population in Germany found that anxiety symptoms had a significant impact on domain-specific LS [24]. The negative association between anxiety symptoms and LS has also been reported in a study of caregivers of stroke patients [11]. Pregnancy is a special stage during which pregnant women face both physical and mental health challenges [2]. The inconvenience of movement and the fluctuation of mood are related to the more severe anxiety symptoms of pregnant women, which may pose a greater threat to their LS [4]. Negative emotional experiences might reduce the pregnant women’s satisfaction with the process of pregnancy and childbirth and affect the perception about life [25]. However, few studies have examined the relationship between anxiety symptoms and LS among pregnant women. Therefore, it is necessary to carry out relevant research.

The perinatal period is an experience full of challenges for women, and the pressure of playing a new role in the future may lead to a decrease in their physical and psychological functioning [3, 26]. One of the most effective means of coping with challenging life events is perceived social support (PSS), which determines a person’s health and well-being [27, 28]. The positive relationship between social support and LS has been repeatedly reported, but mostly aimed at students, the elderly or disease-related population [29,30,31]. A small number of studies discussed the impact of social support on pregnant women’s LS. For example, Gebuza et al. found that an important correlate of LS in the third trimester of pregnancy is social support received [17]. Social support can play a mediating variable in the relationship of depressive symptoms and LS for caregivers of Alzheimer’s disease patients [32]. Wang et al. reported the mediating role of social support between parenting stress and LS in mothers of children with cerebral palsy [33]. These literatures indicate that PSS may help pregnant women “buffer” the negative effects of stress, negative emotions, such as anxiety symptoms on LS. Based on the above literature, we assumed that PSS was an important factor to LS in pregnant women. Given that anxiety symptoms are common during pregnancy and may cause serious adverse consequences, if PSS is a mediator between anxiety symptoms and LS, it will provide an important intervention direction for buffering the adverse effects of anxiety symptoms on LS.

Considering that for pregnant women at the second trimester (13–28 weeks), the pregnancy reaction is basically over, the movement is more convenient and the mood is more stable than at the first and third trimester, this study is aimed at pregnant women at the second trimester [34, 35]. In summary, this article aims to verify the following three assumptions among pregnant women: 1) anxiety symptoms have a negative effect on LS, 2) PSS has a positive effect on LS, 3) PSS mediates the association between anxiety symptoms and LS.

Methods

Ethics statement

The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of China Medical University and the study process met the ethical standards. Each participant completed a written informed consent. The data obtained from all participants was kept confidential and anonymous to protect their privacy.

Study design and sample

This cross-sectional study was conducted from June to September in Shenyang City, China in 2019. We selected pregnant women in their second trimester (13–28 weeks) who went to Community Healthcare Service centers for pregnancy examination as our study subjects. Finally, a total of 347 pregnant women entered to our study. After obtaining the written informed consent of the participants, a self-administered questionnaire was given to them. Pregnant women who are unmarried and have a history of psychiatric disorders will be excluded (defined by past history of mental illness or use of antipsychotic drugs obtained from medical records) [36]. The process of collecting questionnaires had strict quality control to minimize the possibility of missing values. If there were still missing values of continuous variables, the sample mean would replace it. We collected 290 effective questionnaires and the effective rate was 83.6%.

Measurement of life satisfaction

We chose Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) which was designed by Diener et al. to measure pregnant women’s overall perception and judgement of LS [37]. This scale contains five items using a 7-point Likert scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). The total score is from 5 to 35, with a higher total score indicating a higher level of LS. This scale has been demonstrated to have satisfactory validity and reliability in previous studies for Chinese groups [38, 39]. In this study, the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.951.

Measurement of anxiety symptoms

The Zung’s Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) was utilized to assess anxiety symptoms [40]. This scale included 20 items, with each item scoring from 1 (never) to 4 (always). The standard total score was obtained from the raw total score by this formula: standard total score = int (1.25 * raw total score). The standard total score was used for analysis, with a higher score denoting a higher level of anxiety symptoms. Because of good reliability and validity, this scale was widely used at home and abroad [41, 42]. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for SAS in this study was 0.740.

Measurement of perceived social support

To evaluate PSS of pregnant women, we adopted the Multi-Dimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) [43], consisting of 12 items. The score of each item is from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). Higher total score means higher level of PSS. The Chinese version of this scale has been verified to have good reliability and validity [44, 45]. In our study, the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.963.

Demographic characteristics

Four demographic variables were obtained in this study, including age, educational degree, family per capita monthly income and employment status. Age was divided into two categories: “≤30” and “> 30”. Options for educational degree included “Below undergraduate” and “Bachelor and above”. Family per capita monthly income (income level) was categorized as “≤2000”, “2001–4000” and “> 4000”. Employment status was divided into “yes” and “no”.

Statistical analyses and methods

We used IBM SPSS Statistics 21.0 (IBM, Asia Analytics Shanghai) for statistical analysis. Statistically significance was considered as a two-tailed p-value < 0.05. The independent sample t-test and one-way ANOVA were used to examine group differences of continuous variables. Correlations among age, anxiety symptoms, PSS and LS were tested by Pearson’s correlation analysis. Hierarchical multiple regression analysis was performed to explore PSS as a potential mediating role on the association between anxiety symptoms and LS. In step 1, all demographic variables (age, educational degree, income level and employment status) were added as control variables; in step 2, anxiety symptom was added as an independent variable; in step 3, PSS was added as a mediator. In this study, it is considered that multicollinearity is not a problem if the VIF values are less than 10.

The PROCESS macro (version 3.0 by Andrew F. Hayes) for SPSS was used to examine PPS as a potential mediator in the association between anxiety symptoms and LS with 5000 bootstrap samples [46]. All demographic variables were treated as control variables. Anxiety symptoms was modeled as the independent variable, with LS as the dependent variable, and PSS as the mediator. Their total scores were standardized separately to account for differences in scale scores. The total effect (path c), the direct effect (path c’) and the indirect effects (path a*b) were examined. The bias-corrected and accelerated 95% confidence interval (BCa 95% CI) for indirect effect was calculated. If the confidence interval of the indirect effect does not contain zero, the mediating effect is considered to exist.

Results

Description of demographic characteristics

Demographic characteristics of pregnant women and group differences on LS, PSS and anxiety symptoms are presented in Table 1. The average age of the participants is 31.88 ± 3.83 (mean ± SD) and 56.9% (165) of them were above 30 years old. 56.2% (163) of the pregnant women received a bachelor or above educational degree. For 43.5% (126) of the participants, the per capita monthly income of the family is between 2001 and 4000 yuan. 78.3% (227) of the pregnant women had a job. Among the four variables, only employment status was found to be significantly correlated with LS, and pregnant women who had a job reported higher LS than those without a job (P < 0.05). And pregnant women with a bachelor degree or above showed significantly lower anxiety symptoms (P < 0.05). Pregnant women from families with different per capita monthly income also showed different levels of anxiety symptoms (P < 0.05).

Table 1 Relationship between demographic characteristics and LS, PSS as well as anxiety symptoms
Full size table

Correlations among continuous variables

Table 2 displayed the results of Pearson’s correlation analysis. Anxiety symptoms was negatively correlated with LS (r = − 0.401, P < 0.01) and negatively related to PSS (r = − 0.370, P < 0.01). And PSS was positively associated with LS (r = 0.576, P < 0.01).

Table 2 Correlations among age, anxiety symptoms, PSS and LS
Full size table

The results of hierarchical multiple regression

As shown in Table 3, after adjusting for age, educational degree, income level and employment status in step 2, anxiety symptoms showed negative association with LS (β = − 0.391, P < 0.01). Anxiety symptoms explained additional 14.7% of the variance of the dependent variable. In step 3, PSS was positively associated with LS (β = 0.494, P < 0.01), which accounted for additional 21.0% of the variance. When PSS was added, the absolute value of regression coefficient of anxiety symptoms on LS was decreased (from 0.391 to 0.211). Thus, PSS could probably function as a mediator in the association of anxiety symptoms with the LS in pregnant women.

Table 3 Hierarchical multiple regression analysis results for LS
Full size table

The mediating role of PSS in the relationship between anxiety symptoms and LS in pregnant women

Table 4 showed the results of the mediation analysis. Firstly, the association between anxiety symptoms and LS (c path) was examined. Anxiety symptoms has a negative relation with LS (c = − 0.391, P < 0.01). Then, the indirect effect of anxiety symptoms on LS via PSS was observed (path a*b, a = − 0.366, b = 0.494, a*b (BCa 95% CI) = − 0.180 (− 0.268, − 0.115)). The confidence interval for indirect effect did not contain zero, which suggested that PSS played a mediating role between anxiety symptoms and LS. In addition, when PSS was entered to the model as a mediator, the direct effect of anxiety symptoms on LS (path c’) was still significant (c’ = − 0.211, P < 0.01). Therefore, PSS had a partial mediating effect in the relationship between anxiety symptoms and LS for pregnant women. To understand the effect size of the mediating pathway, we calculated the proportion of the total effect of the anxiety symptoms on LS that was mediated by PSS with the formula (a*b)/c. The proportion of mediation of PSS was 46.04%. The visualization of the model was shown in Fig. 1.

Table 4 The results of the mediation analysis
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

Model of the mediating role of PSS between anxiety symptoms and LS. Note: **P < 0.01

Full size image

Discussion

The present study explored the associations of anxiety symptoms, PSS with LS, as well as examined the mediating effect of PSS between them among pregnant women. Firstly, there was a negative relationship between anxiety symptoms and LS, which was consistent with Daig’s research [24]. Some studies showed that there were gender differences in the degree of anxiety symptoms, and women tended to report higher level of anxiety or depressive symptoms [47]. Therefore, coupled with physiological and psychological changes during pregnancy, women become more sensitive to the surrounding environment, prone to anxiety and other emotional problems [18]. Anxiety is a normal emotional response, but excessive anxiety may increase the risk of emotional or physiological diseases [15]. Pregnant women with high levels of anxiety symptoms may show a sense of fear, out of control, etc., which may be accompanied by some physiological symptoms, such as insomnia, sweating, and so on [48]. If adverse emotional symptoms are not properly treated for a long time, it may hinder the quality of life, and reduce the LS of pregnant women [49, 50]. On the other hand, life is not smooth, lower LS may further aggravate the emotional state of pregnant women [4], which will form a vicious circle. Studies, aimed to explore how to relieve the effects of anxiety symptoms on LS, is crucial. We found that PSS may be qualified for this role.

From the perspective of positive psychology [51], we found that there was a positive correlation between the PSS and LS in pregnant women, which was consistent with the results of Gebuza et al. [52]. Additionally, we noted that the mean score of LS among pregnant women in this study was 29.01 ± 5.28 (mean ± SD), which is higher than the research results of Gebuza et al. in previous study [17]. In addition to the social and economic differences, this result may be related to the overall higher level of PSS among pregnant women in this study. The reasons were not to understand and might be as follows. Pregnant women are emotionally sensitive and vulnerable, and poor physical condition will limit their daily work or life to a certain extent [1]. During this period, providing women with sufficient emotional support and instrumental support will help them relieve physical and mental stress [17]. More emotional or financial support from friends, close partners or families may help improve a pregnant woman’s comfort and satisfaction with life [53]. On the contrary, Elsenbruch et al. proposed that pregnant women with a low sense of social support reported more severe physical or mental health and were prone to adverse effects on pregnancy outcomes [54]. However, pregnant women do not always receive satisfactory support [52]. It was reported that getting enough support from close partners could alleviate the fear of pregnant women and was more effective than support from others [55]. Hence, to keep family relationships harmonious and give pregnant women more care and understanding will be a protective factor to their LS.

More importantly, PSS could act as a mediator between anxiety symptoms and LS in pregnant women. This is similar to the findings that social support has a mediating effect between anxiety symptoms and quality of life among women living with breast cancer in Ghana [49]. Previous studies paid more attention to the impact of improving social support on reducing anxiety symptoms [45]. While the present study indicated that a higher level of anxiety symptoms may result in lower level of PSS and further lead to lower level of LS. The influence of anxiety symptoms on social interaction and social relation may explain this result. The inconvenience of movement and the shyness about body changes may cause pregnant women to feel anxious and embarrassed about social interaction [56]. Pregnant women may have symptoms of avoiding social situations and may experience anxiety and fear when facing public situations [57]. This is not conducive to the formation of a good social relationship and may bring about a reduction in the quality of interpersonal relationships [58]. However, good social relations are one of the important sources of social support [43]. Inadequate social support is associated with lower LS [17]. These findings suggested that we may improve LS of pregnant women by decreasing the level of anxiety symptoms and/or enhancing the level of PSS. However, it is worth noting that anxiety symptoms still had a significant direct impact on LS, which indicated that PSS was only a partial mediator and there may be other variables that were not taken into account in this study.

Based on the results of this study, we offer the following suggestions, hoping to help pregnant women improve the LS, physical and mental health. Firstly, doctors can encourage pregnant women to know more about the life process of pregnancy and childbirth as well as the health knowledge of pregnancy in order to reduce their fear and worry about pregnancy. Secondly, physical discomfort will directly affect the LS of pregnant women before delivery, so that it is more likely to have dependent psychology on their families [17]. Family support is an important part of the social support [43]. So, family members should provide necessary material and spiritual support for pregnant women to keep them in a good mood and ensure their health.

Some limitations of this study should be discussed. Firstly, cross-sectional study didn’t allow us to draw a causal relationship among anxiety symptoms, PSS and LS. Secondly, the study variables were evaluated using self-report questionnaires. But we have used the SWLS, SAS and MSPSS, whose good reliability and validity have been verified in Chinese, to reduce recall bias and response bias. Thirdly, this study did not distinguish pregnant women according to whether they were the first pregnancy, which may be a valuable question. Finally, this article is only concerned with pregnant women in the second trimester, we or other scholars may consider extending this study to the first and third trimester in the future.

Conclusions

In conclusion, for pregnant women, anxiety symptoms were negatively correlated with LS, while PSS was positively correlated with LS. And PSS played a mediating role between anxiety symptoms and LS. Strategies and measures to improve PSS may be expected to buffer the impact of anxiety symptoms on pregnant women’s LS.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

LS:

Life satisfaction

PSS:

Perceived social support

SWLS:

Satisfaction with Life Scale

SAS:

Zung’s Self-Rating Anxiety Scale

MSPSS:

Multi-Dimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support

References

  1. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (UK). Antenatal and postnatal mental health: clinical management and service guidance. 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Staneva A, Bogossian F, Pritchard M, et al. The effects of maternal depression, anxiety, and perceived stress during pregnancy on preterm birth: a systematic review. Women Birth. 2015;28(3):179–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pazzagli C, Laghezza L, Capurso M, et al. Antecedents and consequences of fear of childbirth in nulliparous and parous women. Infant Ment Health J. 2015;36(1):62–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Waldenström U, Hildingsson I, Rubertsson C, et al. A negative birth experience: prevalence and risk factors in a national sample. Birth. 2004;31(1):17–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dennis CL, Falah-Hassani K, Shiri R. Prevalence of antenatal and postnatal anxiety: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry. 2017;210(5):315–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Martini J, Bauer M, Lewitzka U, et al. Predictors and outcomes of suicidal ideation during peripartum period. J Affect Disord. 2019;257:518–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sidebottom AC, Hellerstedt WL, Harrison PA, et al. An examination of prenatal and postpartum depressive symptoms among women served by urban community health centers. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2014;17(1):27–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pavot W, Diener E, Colvin CR, et al. Further validation of the satisfaction with life scale: evidence for the cross-method convergence of well-being measures. J Pers Assess. 1991;57(1):149–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Campbell A, Converse PE, Rodgers WL. The quality of American life: perceptions, education and satisfaction. Russel Sage: New York; 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wu YT, Nelis SM, Quinn C, et al. Factors associated with self- and informant ratings of quality of life, well-being and life satisfaction in people with mild-to-moderate dementia: results from the improving the experience of dementia and enhancing active life programme. Age Ageing. 2020;49(3):446–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Oosterveer DM, Mishre RR, van Oort A, et al. Anxiety and low life satisfaction associate with high caregiver strain early after stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2014;46(2):139–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Prakash KC, Oakman J, Nygard CH, et al. Intention to retire in employees over 50 years. What is the role of work ability and work life satisfaction? Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(14):2500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cheung F, Lucas RE. Assessing the validity of single-item life satisfaction measures: results from three large samples. Qual Life Res. 2014;23(10):2809–18.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. The State Council [webpage on the Internet]. The Life Satisfaction of Residents in China. Available from: http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2016-11/23/content_5136300.htm.

  15. Affonso DD, Liu-Chiang CY, Mayberry LJ. Worry: conceptual dimensions and relevance to childbearing women. Health Care Women Int. 1999;20(3):227–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gavin NI, Gaynes BN, Lohr KN, et al. Perinatal depression: a systematic review of prevalence and incidence. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106(5 Pt 1):1071–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gebuza G, Kaźmierczak M, Mieczkowska E, et al. Life satisfaction and social support received by women in the perinatal period. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2014;23(4):611–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Heron J, O’Connor TG, Evans J, et al. The course of anxiety and depression through pregnancy and the postpartum in a community sample. J Affect Disord. 2004;80(1):65–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Dayan J, Creveuil C, Marks MN, et al. Prenatal depression, prenatal anxiety, and spontaneous preterm birth: a prospective cohort study among women with early and regular care. Psychosom Med. 2006;68(6):938–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Evans J, Heron J, Francomb H, et al. Cohort study of depressed mood during pregnancy and after childbirth. Bmj. 2001;323(7307):257–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Fatoye FO, Adeyemi AB, Oladimeji BY. Emotional distress and its correlates among Nigerian women in late pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2004;24(5):504–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hasanjanzadeh P, Faramarzi M. Relationship between maternal general and specific-pregnancy stress, anxiety, and depression symptoms and pregnancy outcome. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11(4):Vc04–vc07.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. de Weerth C, Buitelaar JK. Physiological stress reactivity in human pregnancy--a review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2005;29(2):295–312.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Daig I, Herschbach P, Lehmann A, et al. Gender and age differences in domain-specific life satisfaction and the impact of depressive and anxiety symptoms: a general population survey from Germany. Qual Life Res. 2009;18(6):669–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Asselmann E, Wittchen HU, Petzoldt J, et al. Peripartum changes in partnership quality among women with and without anxiety and depressive disorders prior to pregnancy: a prospective-longitudinal study. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2016;19(2):281–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Costa DD, Dritsa M, Rippen N, et al. Health-related quality of life in postpartum depressed women. Arch Women’s Mental Health. 2006;9(2):95–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Aktan NM. Functional status after childbirth and related concepts. Clin Nurs Res. 2010;19(2):165–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Stapleton LRT, Schetter CD, Westling E, et al. Perceived partner support in pregnancy predicts lower maternal and infant distress. J Fam Psychol. 2012;26(3):453–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bai X, Yang SY, Knapp M. Sources and directions of social support and life satisfaction among solitary Chinese older adults in Hong Kong: the mediating role of sense of loneliness. Clin Interv Aging. 2018;13:63–71.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Yang CY, Xia MF, Han MM, et al. Social support and resilience as mediators between stress and life satisfaction among people with substance use disorder in China. Front Psychiatry. 2018;9:436.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Jhang FH. Life satisfaction trajectories of junior high school students in poverty: exploring the role of self-efficacy and social support. J Adolesc. 2019;75:85–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Khusaifan SJ, Keshky MESE. Social support as a mediator variable of the relationship between depression and life satisfaction in a sample of Saudi caregivers of patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Int Psychogeriatr. 2017;29(2):239–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Wang YL, Huang ZM, Kong F. Parenting stress and life satisfaction in mothers of children with cerebral palsy: the mediating effect of social support. J Health Psychol. 2020;25(3):416–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. González-Mesa E, Kabukcuoglu K, Körükcü O, et al. Correlates for state and trait anxiety in a multicultural sample of Turkish and Spanish women at first trimester of pregnancy. J Affect Disord. 2019;249:1–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Fisher J, Tran T, La BT, et al. Common perinatal mental disorders in northern Viet Nam: community prevalence and health care use. Bull World Health Organ. 2010;88(10):737–45.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Li Y, Long ZT, Cao DF, et al. Social support and depression across the perinatal period: a longitudinal study. J Clin Nurs. 2017;26(17–18):2776–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Diener E, Larsen MR, Griffin M, et al. The satisfaction with life scale. J Pers Assess. 1985;49(1):71–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Bai XW, Wu CH, Zheng R, et al. The psychometric evaluation of the satisfaction with life scale using a nationally representative sample of China. J Happiness Stud. 2011;12(2):183–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Chan GW, Ungvari GS, Shek DT, et al. Hospital and community-based care for patients with chronic schizophrenia in Hong Kong--quality of life and its correlates. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2003;38(4):196–203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Zung WW. A rating instrument for anxiety disorders. Psychosomatics. 1971;12(6):371–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Zi J, Fan Y, Dong C, et al. Anxiety administrated by Dexmedetomidine to prevent new-onset of postoperative atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass graft. Int Heart J. 2020;61(2):263–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Umuziga MP, Adejumo O, Hynie M. A cross-sectional study of the prevalence and factors associated with symptoms of perinatal depression and anxiety in Rwanda. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20(1):68.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Zimet GD, Powell SS, Farley GK, et al. Psychometric characteristics of the multidimensional scale of perceived social support. J Pers Assess. 1990;55(3–4):610–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Kong F, Zhao JJ, You XQ. Social support mediates the impact of emotional intelligence on mental distress and life satisfaction in Chinese young adults. Personal Individ Differ. 2012;53(4):513–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Zhong YQ, Wang J, Nicholas S. Social support and depressive symptoms among family caregivers of older people with disabilities in four provinces of urban China: the mediating role of caregiver burden. BMC Geriatr. 2020;20(1):3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Hayes AF. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. J Educ Meas. 2013;51(3):335–7.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Lucht M, Schaub RT, Meyer C, et al. Gender differences in unipolar depression: a general population survey of adults between age 18 to 64 of German nationality. J Affect Disord. 2003;77(3):203–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Reich J, Noyes R, Yates W. Anxiety symptoms distinguishing social phobia from panic and generalized anxiety disorders. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1988;176(8):510–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Kugbey N, Oppong Asante K, Meyer-Weitz A. Depression, anxiety and quality of life among women living with breast cancer in Ghana: mediating roles of social support and religiosity. Support Care Cancer. 2020;28(6):2581–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Webster J, Nicholas C, Velacott C, et al. Quality of life and depression following childbirth: impact of social support. Midwifery. 2011;27(5):745–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Seligman MEP, Csikszentmihalyi M. Positive psychology: an introduction. Am Psychol. 2000;55(1):5–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Gebuza G, Kaźmierczak M, Mieczkowska E, et al. Adequacy of social support and satisfaction with life during childbirth. Polish Ann Med. 2016;23(2):135–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Gebuza G, Kazmierczak M, Mieczkowska E, et al. Social support as a determinant of life satisfaction in pregnant women and women after surgical delivery. Psychiatr Pol. 2018;52(3):585–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Elsenbruch S, Benson S, Rucke M, et al. Social support during pregnancy: effects on maternal depressive symptoms, smoking and pregnancy outcome. Hum Reprod. 2007;22(3):869–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Sapkota S, Kobayashi T, Takase M. Impact on perceived postnatal support, maternal anxiety and symptoms of depression in new mothers in Nepal when their husbands provide continuous support during labour. Midwifery. 2013;29(11):1264–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Katzman MA, Bleau P, Blier P, et al. Canadian clinical practice guidelines for the management of anxiety, posttraumatic stress and obsessive-compulsive disorders. BMC Psychiatry. 2014;14(Suppl 1):S1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Williams KE, Koleva H. Identification and treatment of Peripartum anxiety disorders. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am. 2018;45(3):469–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Wenzel A, Haugen EN, Jackson LC, et al. Anxiety symptoms and disorders at eight weeks postpartum. J Anxiety Disord. 2005;19(3):295–311.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all of the research assistants who undertook data collection and the participants for their selfless support of the study. Thanks to the Community Healthcare Service centers and related staff for their support of this study.

This article was written and revised during the COVID-19 pandemic. We were very grateful to the help and support from our families. Finally, I wish the world an early victory over the COVID-19.

Funding

This study was supported by Liaoning planning Program of Philosophy and Social Science (L19BSH014).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Mingli Yu and Tian Qiu contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Social Medicine, School of Public Health, China Medical University, Shenyang, 110122, China

    Mingli Yu, Tian Qiu, Qi Cui & Hui Wu

  2. Library, China Medical University, Shenyang, 110122, China

    Chunli Liu

Authors
  1. Mingli Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tian Qiu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Chunli Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Qi Cui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Hui Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

MY contributed to all the processes, including collecting the data, analyzing the data, writing the original draft, making figures and tables and revising the manuscript. TQ participated in the data collection and helped to make tables as well as write the paper. CL and QC helped to polish the manuscript and checking the data. HW provided guidance in study design, organized the investigation, and is the corresponding author. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hui Wu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of China Medical University and the study process met the ethical standards. Each participant completed a written informed consent.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yu, M., Qiu, T., Liu, C. et al. The mediating role of perceived social support between anxiety symptoms and life satisfaction in pregnant women: a cross-sectional study. Health Qual Life Outcomes 18, 223 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-020-01479-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-020-01479-w

Keywords

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

ISSN: 1477-7525

Contact us