Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub

Cross-cultural adaptation and measurement properties of the Nepali version of the DASH (disability of arm, shoulder and hand) in patients with shoulder pain

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes volume 17, Article number: 51 (2019) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are important tools in both clinical practice and research. However, no upper extremity PROM to assess physical disability is available in Nepali. The most commonly used and recommended questionnaire for the shoulder is the Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH). Therefore, the aim of the study was to translate and cross-culturally adapt the DASH into Nepali and determine its measurement properties.

Methods

The translation and cultural adaptation process followed international standard procedures. The translated Nepali version of the questionnaire (DASH-NP) was completed by 156 patients with shoulder pain from three Nepali hospitals at an initial assessment and by 121 at follow-up. A Nepali version of Global Rating of Change (GROC-NP) was completed at follow-up to dichotomise improved and stable participants. Measurement properties testing included: internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha), test-retest reliability (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient, ICC), Minimal Detectable Change (MDC), construct validity - factor analysis, hypothesis testing with the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) (Pearson Correlation = r) and responsiveness - Area Under the Curve with minimal important change.

Results

Significant adaptations such as changing measurement units, activities and terminology were incorporated to improve cultural relevance. Internal consistency (α = 0.92) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.94–0.98, p < 0.001) were excellent. The MDC was 11 out of 100 points. There were moderate-high positive correlations with the SPADI pain and disability items (rs = 0.63 and 0.81, P < 0.001). Four factor solution was retrieved for the DASH-NP. The Area Under the Curve was 0.69 (95% CI: 0.57 - 0.81, p < 0.001) with minimal important change of 11.2/100 points.

Conclusions

The Nepali translation of the DASH is comprehensible, easy to administer via self-report or interview. It is found to be a reliable, valid, and responsive measure in patients with shoulder pain in Nepal. The DASH-NP can be used to assess shoulder pain related disability in Nepal for clinical practice or research.

Introduction

Shoulder pain is a common musculoskeletal complaint, with lifetime prevalence in developed nations of up to 67% [1]. It accounts for approximately 10% of physiotherapy consultations [2] and is reported to have the longest median recovery time of all musculoskeletal injuries resulting in significant personal and economic costs through loss of functional capacity and employment [3].

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) form a critical part of the assessment and treatment of shoulder pain and disability. They provide reliable, valid, and responsive outcome measures that can be used to direct treatment and monitor progress, as well as primary outcome measures for research purposes. There are reported to be over 30 PROMs for the shoulder region alone [4].

The Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) is one of the most commonly used and tested upper limb PROMs [4, 5]. The DASH is a reliable and valid tool for the assessment of shoulder pain and disability both in clinical practice and research [6], and is reported to have among the best psychometric properties of all upper limb PROMs [4, 5, 7]. It is the preferred PROM if a variety of shoulder conditions and social and emotional function are to be assessed [5]. The DASH was originally developed in English, and has subsequently been cross-culturally adapted and validated into more than 50 different languages (http://www.dash.iwh.on.ca/available-translations).

Nepal is a developing nation with a large proportion (> 79%) of the population living in a rural setting and relying on subsistence farming [8]. Most of the tasks involved in the non-automated daily life and the labor-intensive agricultural practices of Nepal involve repetitive and often demanding use of the upper limb. Daily tasks may include; carrying water jugs, sweeping, collecting firewood, hand ploughing, fertilizing fields, manual planting, harvesting, and threshing, storage of crops, cutting fodder for domestic animals, milking buffalos and general care of livestock. There is an increasing number of Nepalese living in urban centers and engaging in more office-based activities, but they remain in the minority. Nepal has a growing health professional sector and anecdotal evidence suggests a high proportion of patients with shoulder complaints present to clinicians from both rural and urban areas. Clinical management of shoulder conditions and the development of health provision in Nepal could be improved if a reliable, valid, and responsive shoulder PROM to assess physical disability was available in the national language, Nepali. The availability of such an instrument would also facilitate clinical research related to shoulder and upper limb dysfunction in Nepal.

Therefore, the aim of this study was to translate and cross-culturally adapt the DASH into Nepali and to determine its reliability, validity and responsiveness. With Nepal’s poor literacy rate [8] and the difficulty of follow-up due to geographic remoteness, a secondary aim was to determine the reliability of the translated Nepali DASH (DASH-NP) when administered via an interview (face-to-face or phone) compared to the conventional self-reporting method.

Methods

The translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the DASH from the original English version Nepali was based on the internationally recognized guidelines developed by the American Association of Orthopedic Surgeons (AAOS) Outcomes Committee [9]. Approval to translate was obtained from the original developers and the translation was completed in close collaboration with them. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Committee of Kathmandu University School of Medical Sciences, Nepal.

Participants

To be included in this study, participants had to be over 18 years of age, be able to speak fluent Nepali, and have current shoulder pain. Shoulder pain was defined as; pain over the antero-lateral, proximal aspect of the shoulder and/ or upper arm, which was aggravated by shoulder movements. Participants were also required to test positive to one of the following; Hawkins-Kennedy test, Neer’s impingement test or maximally resisted isometric manual muscle tests (abduction, external/internal rotation). Participants were excluded if they presented with; cervical spine symptoms (pain on neck movements, pain in a dermatomal pattern and/or upper limb paraesthesia), pain of systemic or bioplastic origin. Participants were recruited from the physiotherapy outpatient department of three hospitals in Nepal; a not-for-profit rural, community-based hospital, a general urban hospital and a large orthopedic referral centre. These centers were chosen to provide a representative sample of both rural and urban participants. All volunteers were given verbal information about the study and provided with a participant information statement in Nepali to read if they were able or, if they were illiterate, to have it read to them. Literate participants provided a written consent and illiterate participants’ consent was obtained verbally and signed by a witness. A target of 150 participants was chosen to meet the requirements considered adequate to test the measurement properties of a PROM [10].

The DASH questionnaire

The DASH is a 30-item self-reported upper limb assessment scale measuring functional limitations, symptoms (pain, tingling, stiffness and weakness), and psychological factors. Each item task is scored on a five-point Likert scale with the left anchor being ‘no difficulty’ (score 1) through to the right anchor ‘unable to do’ or ‘extremely difficult’ (score 5). A minimum of 27 of the 30 items must be completed to allow a valid calculation. The score is recorded out of 100 with higher scores indicating greater disability [11].

Translation procedures and cross-cultural adaptation

The translation process involved five steps which are described below.

Forward translation

Three translators independently created a forward translation of the original version of the DASH into Nepali. All three translators were born in Nepal and bilingual in Nepali and English, with Nepali as their mother tongue. The translators included a health professional, a non-medical person, and a professional translator registered with and accredited by The National Accreditation Authority for Translators and Interpreters Ltd. (NAATI, Australia). The forward translators submitted a written report highlighting difficult phrases or items used in the original version that may not be common in Nepali or posed problems in the translation process.

Synthesis

The three forward translations were synthesized into a single version by three investigators, the project coordinator (SKC) and two university academics (DR and SS), all bilingual in English and Nepali and having one of these as their mother tongue. Differences in the translations were discussed among this group and the translators were consulted until a consensus on instructions, response options, and all items was reached. For items where several viable options were presented a majority choice was made between the translation options.

Back-translation

The Nepali synthesized version of the DASH was back translated by two native English-speakers, fluent in Nepali and naive to the purpose of the study. The first back translator held a Master’s degree in Nepali literature and the second translator was a medical professional. The back translators were requested to submit a written report highlighting any challenging or unclear phrases.

Expert committee review

All translators, the project coordinator (SKC) and two university academics (DR, SS), comprised the expert committee to discuss discrepancies identified in the translation process. A pre-final Nepali version of the DASH (DASH-NP) was produced.

Pre-testing

The first five participants completing the DASH-NP were interviewed to examine the questionnaire layout, the wording of difficult phrases identified by the expert committee in the forward and back translation process and the ease of understanding and completing the questionnaire. They reported that the DASH-NP was easy to understand and fill out. They identified Item 21 referring to sexual activity as a question that could possibly be left unanswered but gave no further suggestions regarding the 30 items in then DASH-NP. Following this process, the DASH-NP was finalized and subjected to further measurement properties testing.

Procedure

A physiotherapist was recruited as a research assistant to facilitate data collection. The research assistant and physiotherapists from the three hospitals were trained in the purpose of the study, administration of the DASH and data management procedures.

The DASH-NP and a Nepali version of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI-NP) were completed at an initial assessment at the outpatient clinics prior to physiotherapy treatment and again on a follow up occasion (within 3 weeks). Literate participants completed the DASH-NP and SPADI-NP as a self-reported questionnaire while illiterate participants completed the questionnaires by an interview process. In the interview, the questions were read out and the participants were asked to select the most appropriate response with no extra cueing from the interviewer. All participants unable to return to the hospital within 3 weeks due to living in remote areas completed the DASH-NP by a phone interview.

At the follow-up assessment, participants also completed a Nepali version of the Global Rating of Change (GROC-NP) questionnaire [12]. The GROC-NP uses a 7-point scale to assess the self-perceived change of the participant’s shoulder condition. The 7-point GROC is commonly used in research [13] and is the most common tool used to dichotomize individuals with shoulder pain into stable and improved groups [14, 15]. The middle marker ‘4’ indicates no change in symptoms, scores > 4 indicate progressive increments of improvement (small, moderate and large improvements) and scores < 4 worsening symptoms (small, moderate and large worsening). A change of one point is considered important change [13].

Measurement properties analyses

Data was entered into an excel spread sheet and later transferred to SPSS version 24 for statistical analyses.

Reliability

Internal consistency determines the homogeneity of the subscales within a questionnaire. The internal consistency of the DASH-NP was assessed by Cronbach’s alpha (α). Cronbach’s alpha scores of 0.50–0.69 were considered poor, 0.70–0.79 acceptable, 0.80–0.89 good and > 0.90 excellent [16].

Test–retest reliability was evaluated using Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC2,1) between the initial and follow up assessment of the DASH-NP scores of participants in the stable group. Secondary analysis was done on participants who completed the initial assessment by self-administration and follow-up by interview. Scores of < 0.40 were considered poor, 0.40–0.59 fair, 0.60–0.74 good and > 0.75 excellent [17].

Minimal detectable change (MDC), is a measure of the variation in a scale due to measurement error. A change score can only be considered to represent a real change if it is larger than the MDC [18]. The MDC of the DASH-NP was calculated using the following formula MDC = z x √2 x SEM, where z = 1.96 (z score for estimating a 95% confidence interval), √2 represents the two DASH-NP measurements and SEM is the standard error of measurement calculated using the formula; SEM = SD (1 - ICC)1/2 where SD is the standard deviation for the mean change of DASH-NP score from baseline to follow-up measurement and ICC is the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient of the stable group [18].

Validity

The construct validity of the DASH-NP was examined in three ways as described below.

  1. i)

    Comparing the pain and disability items of the DASH-NP with the corresponding construct items in the SPADI using Pearson correlations. Additionally, the difference between DASH-NP scores at baseline and follow up assessment with the score of the GROC-NP were compared. A value < 0.35 represents low, 0.36–0.67 moderate, 0.68–0.89 high and ≥ 0.90 very high correlation [19]. The priori hypothesis was that there would be a high positive correlation between the DASH-NP and SPADI-NP items testing the same construct and a moderate negative correlation to the GROC-NP scores.

  2. ii)

    Testing the mean change scores of DASH-NP within the improved group by using a one-sample t-test and then between groups using an independent sample t-test [18]. It was hypothesized that there would be a significant difference in the DASH score in the group that “improved” and secondly in the DASH scores between the stable group and the improved group at a significance level of p < 0.05.

  3. iii)

    By factor analysis with suitability of data determined by performing correlations between the scale items [20]. The Kaiser-Meyer-Oklin sample adequacy index was tested, with a threshold value greater than 0.60 considered acceptable [21]. Bartlett’s sphericity test was performed and checked for significance [22]. Principal component analysis was conducted to examine the component structure of the 30 items of the DASH-NP questionnaire. Components with high eigenvalues (> 1.0) were extracted and all eigenvalues plotted on a Cattell’s Scree plot [23]. A break point in the data, where the curve began to level was established by visual inspection of the graph. The number of data points above the break represented the components retained for extraction and rotation. These components were then rotated by the Varimax rotation [24]. Items with loadings above 0.32 were assumed to load on a given factor [25].

Responsiveness

Primary analysis for responsiveness was assessed by plotting Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves for the differences of DASH-NP scores at baseline and follow-up assessment between the stable (GROC 4) and improved groups (GROC 5–7). Secondary analyses were performed separately between the stable group and the small (GROC 5), medium (GROC 6) and large (GROC 7) improved groups [26]. ROC curves represent the optimal trade-off between sensitivity and specificity for detecting clinical improvement with an area under the curve (AUC) of < 0.5 indicating an instrument that does not discriminate for improvement and value of AUC = 1.0 indicating perfect discrimination between the two measures. The further the ROC curve is in the upper left corner of the graph, the higher the responsiveness of the instrument [14, 27]. The minimal important change (MIC) is the number of scores required to denote a clinically meaningful change and is extracted from the ROC curve.

Results

Participants

One hundred and sixty-one participants (85F:76M, 47.7 ± 13.5 yrs) were recruited from the three physiotherapy outpatient departments (52 from the community hospital, 77 from the large specialist hospital and 32 from the general hospital). The participants were engaged in the following occupations; business owner (18%), agriculture (11%), office worker (7%), students (4%) and other - including home duties (60%). Figure 1 summarizes the number of participants completing the DASH-NP at each assessment and by self-report and interview.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Participant flow diagram

Full size image

Thirty-one participants were classified as stable with a GROC-NP score of ‘4’ and 86 as improved with GROC-NP scores of 5, 6 or 7. No participants reported a score below 4. Of the stable group 15 completed the questionnaires at both assessments by interview, 15 by self-report then interview and one by self-reporting at both assessments.

Translation process and cross-cultural adaptation

Significant changes made to items in the translation and adaptation process fell into three main categories: i) measurement units converted to the metric system used in Nepal eg ‘10 lb’ to ‘5 kg’, ii) activities not common in Nepal modified to reflect local practice eg. ‘blow drying the hair’ was replaced with ‘drying hair with a towel’ as hair dryers are not used in rural areas and also uncommon in the urban areas, iii) terminology changed, eg ‘backyard’ was replaced with ‘field’ as even a small area of land at the back of house is referred to as a field and used as an area for planting crops in Nepal. After incorporating these changes, the final version of the DASH-NP was created which is available as online Additional file 1.

Three or more questions in the DASH-NP were left blank by 10 (3.5%) participants at either the initial or follow-up assessment and were excluded from further analysis. Question 18 and 19 describing recreational activities (in which you take some force or impact through your arm, shoulder or hand, e.g., batting in cricket and in which you move your arm freely, e.g., badminton) were both left blank by 10% of participants. Question 21 (Sexual activities) was left blank by 39% of all participants including 52% of those that were interviewed. Reasons given for omission included ‘uncommon activity in the rural areas’ for questions 18 and 19 and ‘culturally sensitive’ for question 21.

Psychometric properties

Reliability

Internal consistency

The overall Cronbach’s α for DASH-NP was 0.92 (self-reporting subgroup 0.90; interview subgroup 0.94).

Test-retest reliability

The mean time interval between the initial and follow-up assessments was 13 ± 10 days. The ICC for DASH-NP was 0.97 (95% CI: 0.94 – 0.98, p < 0.001, n = 31) with a MDC of 11 points out of 100. Similar ICCs were recorded, when the overall group was divided into those who completed the initial assessment by self-reporting and the follow-up by interview (0.96, n = 15) and when both were by completed by interview (0.94, n = 15).

Validity

Mean change scores between the stable group and improved groups and within the improved group are shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Responsiveness of the DASH-NP
Full size table

Construct validity

  1. i)

    There was a moderate positive correlation between the DASH and SPADI pain items r = 0.63, P < 0.001 n = 156 and a high positive correlation between the disability items; r = 0.81, P < 0.001, n = 132. The mean change of the DASH-NP scores demonstrated ‘moderate’ negative correlation with GROC-NP scores (r = − 0.40, p < 0.001).

  2. ii)

    The single sample t-test demonstrated a significant within sample difference of mean DASH-NP scores at baseline and follow-up in the improved group [t = 7.0 (df = 85, p < 0.001), Mean ∆X = 10.60, 95% CI 7.60–13.9]. The independent sample t-test also revealed a significant difference between the stable and improved groups [t = 2.90 (df = 115, p < 0.05), Mean ∆X = 7.70, 95% CI 2.90–12.90)].

  3. iii)

    Factor Analysis - An examination of the correlation matrix of DASH-NP items showed many items had correlation coefficients above the threshold of 0.32. The KMO sample adequacy index was > 0.88 and Bartlett’s sphericity test was statistically significant with p < 0.001 [28], indicating the data were suitable for factoral analysis. There were four components with eigenvalues > 1, explaining 35, 8, 6 and 5% of the variance. The Scree plot (Fig. 2) shows a break after the second component, resulting in two components being retained for the varimax rotation [23].

Fig. 2
figure 2

The Scree Plot of items of DASH-NP

Full size image

The rotated solution (Table 2) demonstrated the existence of a simple structure with the four rotated components explaining 55% of the variance. Item 21 (Sexual activities) was the only item not loaded in a category. The components contained items that could be categorised largely into:

  1. 1.

    Gross motor tasks (6–15, 25, 30) which explained 35% of the variance.

  2. 2.

    Symptoms (22, 24, 26–30) explaining 8% of the variance.

  3. 3.

    Fine motor tasks (1–5, 16–17, 20, 23) explaining 6% of the variance.

  4. 4.

    Recreational activities (18, 19) explaining 5% of the variance.

Table 2 Factor Analysis
Full size table

Responsiveness

Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves of the stable group (GROC 4) versus the improved groups (GROC 5, 6 and 7) and individually between the stable group and small (GROC 5), medium (GROC 6) and large (GROC 7) improved groups are shown in Fig. 3. The AUC and MIC with sensitivity and specificity for each of these analyses is shown in Table 1. The main analysis comparing the stable group with all improved groups demonstrated an AUC of 0.69 (95% CI: 0.57–0.81, p < 0.001) and MIC of 11.2 percentage points indicating that DASH-NP has acceptable responsiveness characteristics and is sensitive to detect meaningful change.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves of the stable group (GROC 4) versus the improved groups (GROC 5, 6, and 7)

Full size image

Discussion

The DASH was successfully translated into Nepali with significant cross-culturally adaptations and the translated version was readily understood by the participants in the current study. Cross-cultural adaptions are crucial in developing a clinically meaningful and culturally relevant translation in the target language. In the current study, adaptations included changing units of measurement to metric, changing activities to ones which were similar but more commonly used in rural dominated Nepal and replacing terminology to phrases easily understood by the majority of Nepalese. Despite these adaptations up to 40% of participants left one of three questions (18, 19, 21) blank. Item 21 referring to sexual activity, a culturally sensitive topic, was left unanswered by a significant proportion of participants (39%). Interestingly a larger number of those completing the DASH-NP by interview (52%) failed to answer this question, possibly indicating an increased reluctance to reveal such information in person to others. This result is not uncommon and has been reported in other translation studies of the DASH [29] and would justify removing this question from the DASH-NP. Sporting recreation (items 18 and 19) is not a common concept among the older generation or in the rural population in Nepal and despite cultural adaptations, these items were left blank by 10% of participants. Despite these item omissions only 3.5% of individuals were excluded from data analysis due to three or more unanswered DASH items.

The DASH-NP demonstrated excellent test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.97) and internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.92). These results are comparable to the values achieved on the original English version of the DASH (0.97 and 0.96 respectively) [6, 30] and in previous translations of the DASH [11, 29]. The DASH-NP was administered at the initial assessment by interview to 66 (44%) of the participants. This was deemed necessary to include the large illiterate population of Nepal which is estimated as high as 73% in some districts [8]. Cronbach’s α was computed separately for the subgroups of participants who completed the DASH-NP by self-administration and interview with excellent results for both (0.91 and 0.94 respectively), indicating that internal consistency is not affected by the method in which the DASH-NP is administered. Similarly, the ICC results when the DASH-NP was administered by self-administration and interview (0.96) or interview and interview (0.94) indicate excellent reliability of the DASH-NP regardless of the method of administration. Albeit using small sample sizes the results of this subgroup analysis indicate that the DASH-NP can be used by either self-administration or interview methods and still maintain excellent reliability.

Good construct validity of the DASH-NP was demonstrated in this study by moderate-high correlation between the corresponding pain and disability items on the DASH-NP and SPADI-NP and the overall scores of the DASH-NP with the GROC-NP. This confirmed the priori hypotheses and supports the ability of the DASH-NP to measure the constructs intended. Factor Analysis confirmed four broad categories within the DASH-NP: fine and gross motor tasks, recreational activities and symptoms. Some overlap was shown with items 9, 10, 13 referring to yard work, carrying a bag and washing hair primarily loading in the gross motor component but also in the fine motor component. This is a reasonable result considering the wide variety of tasks that could be referred to in these items and different techniques used to achieve them. Some items however, were unusually loaded including items 5 (opening a door), item 20 (transport activities) in the fine motor component and item 25 (pain during specific activity) into the gross motor component. Other studies have reported four factors for the DASH items [31, 32], but no studies have demonstrated exactly the same breakdown in the loadings, suggesting small variations are to be expected without compromising the validity of the questionnaire. Factor analysis also revealed that item 21 (sexual activity) did not load in any category and considering the tendency for this question to be left blank, it would seem reasonable to exclude this question from the Nepali DASH.

Responsiveness measured using ROC curves indicated a significant and acceptable AUC (0.69) and MIC (11.2 points) between the stable and improver groups. This is very similar to the MIC of the original English version of the DASH (10.8) [33]. More importantly, the MIC value in the current study is higher than the MDC indicating that it exceeds measurement error and gives a valid measure of clinically meaningful change over time [14, 15]. The 7- point GROC is commonly used as an outcome measure in clinical research [13] and is the most common tool used to dichotomize shoulder pain sufferers into stable and improver groups [14, 15]. Yet the ability of the GROC to differentiate small changes in symptoms has been questioned due to recall bias over time [14, 34] and its use may be viewed as a study limitation. However, the mean change scores and MIC incrementally increased with higher GROC scores and the validity evidence reported in this study suggests that the GROC was able to discriminate between the stable and improver groups. The absence of any participant recording a worsening score on the GROC-NP may indicate the inadequacy of the GROC-NP to differentiate worsening conditions perhaps due to a tendency in the Nepali culture to ‘please’ those in authority.

This study demonstrated excellent utility of the DASH-NP, with the inclusion of a wide age range (47.7 ± 13.5 yrs) of both literate and illiterate participants and equal representation of male and females (85F:76M). Occupational data was also representative of Nepal with only 29% of participants in sedentary occupations (such as office-workers, students or small business owners) while 71% were involved in agriculture or other activities such as home duties. Although not specified in data collection, in Nepal home duties often includes cooking, manually cleaning/ sweeping the house and surrounds, taking care of children and elderly, washing clothes by hand, working in a kitchen garden and in addition in more rural areas tending the fields and domestic animals (eg buffalo), collecting water and firewood.

Conclusion

The Nepali translation of the DASH is comprehensible, easy to administer via self-report or interview. It is found to be a reliable, valid, and responsive measure in patients with shoulder pain in Nepal. The study offers evidence that the DASH-NP can be administered via an interview (face-to-face or phone) or as conventional self-reporting method without compromising its reliability. The DASH therefore can be used in both clinical practice and research to assess physical disability in patients with shoulder pain in Nepal.

Abbreviations

AAOS:

American Association of Orthopedic Surgeons Outcomes Committee

AUC :

Area Under the Curve

DASH:

Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire

DASH-NP:

Nepali version of the Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire

GROC-NP:

Nepali version of the Global Rating of Change scale

ICC:

Intraclass correlation coefficient

MDC:

Minimal Detectable Change

MIC:

Minimal Importance Change

PROMs:

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures

ROC:

Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves

SD:

Standard Deviation

SEM:

Standard Error of Measurement

References

  1. Luime JJ, Koes BW, Hendriksen IJM, Burdorf A, Verhagen AP, Miedema HS, Verhaar JAN. Prevalence and incidence of shoulder pain in the general population; a systematic review. Scand J Rheumatol. 2004;33(2):73–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. van der Heijden GJMG. Shoulder disorders: a state-of-the-art review. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 1999;13(2):287–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bongers PM. The cost of shoulder pain at work. BMJ. 2001;322(7278):64–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Angst F, Schwyzer HK, Aeschlimann A, Simmen BR, Goldhahn J. Measures of adult shoulder function: disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire (DASH) and its short version (QuickDASH), shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI), American shoulder and elbow surgeons (ASES) society standardized shoulder assessment form, constant (Murley) score (CS), simple shoulder test (SST), Oxford shoulder score (OSS), shoulder disability questionnaire (SDQ), and Western Ontario shoulder instability index (WOSI). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011;63(Suppl 11):S174–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Roy J-S, MacDermid JC, Woodhouse LJ. Measuring shoulder function: a systematic review of four questionnaires. Arthritis Care & Research. 2009;61(5):623–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Beaton DE, Davis AM, Hudak P, McConnell S. The DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) outcome measure: what do we know about it now? Br J Hand Ther. 2001;6.

  7. Bot SDM, Terwee CB, van der Windt DAWM, Bouter LM, Dekker J, de Vet HCW. Clinimetric evaluation of shoulder disability questionnaires: a systematic review of the literature. Ann Rheum Dis. 2004;63(4):335–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. statistical year book 2015 http://www.cbs.gov.np

  9. Beaton D, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz M. Guidelines for the Process of Cross-Cultural Adaption of Self-Report Measures; 2001. p. 25.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, Bouter LM, De Vet HCW. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. In: Qual Life Res. Edn; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Am J Ind Med. 1996;29(6):602–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sharma S, Palanchoke J, Reed D, Haxby Abbott J. Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Nepali versions of numerical pain rating scale and global rating of change. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017;15:236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kamper SJ, Maher CG, Mackay G. Global rating of change scales: a review of strengths and weaknesses and considerations for design. The Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy. 2009;17(3):163–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chester R Fau - Jerosch-Herold C, Jerosch-Herold C Fau - Lewis J, Lewis J Fau - Shepstone L, Shepstone L: The SPADI and QuickDASH Are Similarly Responsive in Patients Undergoing Physical Therapy for Shoulder Pain. 2017(1938–1344 (Electronic)).

  15. Angst F, Goldhahn J, Drerup S, Aeschlimann A, Schwyzer HK, Simmen BR. Responsiveness of six outcome assessment instruments in total shoulder arthroplasty. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;59(3):391–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951;16(3):297–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cicchetti DV: Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. In., vol. 6. Us: American Psychological Association; 1994: 284–290.

  18. Cheryl AJH, Baxter GD, Arnold R. Outcome measurement in clinical practice: practical and theoretical issues for health related quality of life (HRQOL) questionnaires. Phys Ther Rev. 2011;16(3):155–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Taylor R. Interpretation of the correlation coefficient: a basic review. Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography. 1990;6(1):35–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Barbara G. Tabachnick LSF: Using multivariate Statistics 1989, 3rd Edition:746.

  21. Kaiser H. A second generation little jiffy. Psychometrika. 1970;35(4):401–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bartlett MS. A note on the multiplying factors for various Chi Square approximations. J R Stat Soc. 1954;16:296–8.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Catell R. The screen test for the number of factors. Multivar Behav Res. 1966;1:245–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Fabrigar LR, Wegener DT, MacCallum RC, Strahan EJ. Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychol Methods. 1999;4(3):272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tabachnick Barbara G. FLS: Using multivariate statistics, 4th edn. Needham heights, Mass. : Allyn and bacon, 2001.; 2001.

  26. Cheryl Hefford, MPhty, 1, • J. Haxby Abbott, PT P, FNZCP, 2, • Richard Arnold, PhD, 3, • G. David Baxter et al: the patient-specific functional scale: validity, reliability, and responsiveness in patients with upper extremity musculoskeletal problems. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2012, 42(2):56–65.

  27. van der Windt DAWM, van der Heijden GJMG, de Winter AF, Koes B, Deville W, Bouter L. The responsiveness of the shoulder disability questionnaire. Ann Rheum Dis. 1998;57(2):82–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Pallant J (ed.): SPSS survival manual. A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for windows (version 10): Open University Press, Buckingham; 2001.

  29. Lee JY, Lim Jy Fau - Oh JH, Oh Jh Fau - Ko Y-M, Ko YM: Cross-cultural adaptation and clinical evaluation of a Korean version of the disabilities of arm, shoulder, and hand outcome questionnaire (K-DASH). 2008(1532–6500 (Electronic)).

  30. Kennedy CA, Beaton DE, Solway S, McConnell S, Bombardier C. The DASH and QuickDASH Outcome Measure User’s Manual. Toronto: Ontario: Health; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Lehman LA, Woodbury M, Velozo CA. Examination of the factor structure of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire. Am J Occup Ther. 2011;65(2):169–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Forget NJ, Jerosch-Herold C, Shepstone L, Higgins J. Psychometric evaluation of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) with Dupuytren’s contracture: validity evidence using Rasch modeling. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014;15:361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Franchignoni F, Vercelli S Fau - Giordano A, Giordano A Fau - Sartorio F, Sartorio F Fau - Bravini E, Bravini E Fau - Ferriero G, Ferriero G: Minimal clinically important difference of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand outcome measure (DASH) and its shortened version (QuickDASH). 2014(1938–1344 (Electronic)).

  34. Lehman LA, Velozo CA. Ability to detect change in patient function: responsiveness designs and methods of calculation. J Hand Ther. 2010;23(4):361–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the contribution of all the translators and the three Nepali hospitals for enabling the recruitment of participants for this study.

Funding

None declared.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analysed during this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Discipline of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia

    Sudarshan KC, Tawfiq Almadi & Darren Reed

  2. Department of Physiotherapy, Kathmandu University School of Medical Sciences, Dhulikhel, Nepal

    Saurab Sharma & Hari Subedi

  3. Discipline of Anatomy & Histology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia

    Karen Ginn

  4. Center for Musculoskeletal Outcomes Research, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand

    Saurab Sharma

Authors
  1. Sudarshan KC
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Saurab Sharma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Karen Ginn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Tawfiq Almadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Hari Subedi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Darren Reed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Study was initiated and designed by SKC, DR, and SS. TT conducted the statistical analysis. The manuscript was drafted by SKC, supervised by DR and KG. All authors read, contributed and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saurab Sharma.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethics approval was received from Institutional Review Committee of Kathmandu University School of Medical Sciences (ref. no. 63/16) and consent form was signed by all participants.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The author(s) declare no potential competing interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Additional file

Additional file 1:

Nepali translation of DASH. (PDF 479 kb)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

KC, S., Sharma, S., Ginn, K. et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and measurement properties of the Nepali version of the DASH (disability of arm, shoulder and hand) in patients with shoulder pain. Health Qual Life Outcomes 17, 51 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-019-1105-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-019-1105-1

Keywords

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

ISSN: 1477-7525

Contact us