Open Access

Health status of adolescents in the Tibetan plateau area of western China: 6 years after the Yushu earthquake

  • Xu Liu1,
  • Hongyang Yang2,
  • Bihan Tang1,
  • Yuan Liu1 and
  • Lulu Zhang1Email author
Contributed equally
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes201715:152

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-017-0727-4

Received: 11 November 2016

Accepted: 21 July 2017

Published: 29 July 2017

Abstract

Background

An earthquake struck Yushu in Qinghai province of China on April 14, 2010, causing 2698 deaths and 12,135 injuries.The present study aimed to assess the health status, and associated determinants, of child survivors in the epicenter of the Yushu earthquake 6 years after the event.

Methods

A cross-sectional survey was performed among students from two junior schools in Yushu County. Descriptive statistics, t-tests, ANOVA, Wilcoxon rank sum tests, Kruskal-Wallis H tests and stepwise linear regression analysis were used for data analysis.

Results

The mean scores onmental component summary (MCS)and physical component summary (PCS) were 42.13 (SD 7.32) and 42.04 (SD 8.07), respectively. Lower PCS in the aftermath of an earthquake was associated with being trapped/in danger, injured to self, receiving no escape training while lowerMCS in the aftermath of an earthquake was associated with a lower grade level, not living with parents, fear during the earthquake, death in the family, and not receiving psychological counseling after the earthquake.

Conclusions

In conclusion, the results of the present study help to expand our knowledge regarding the health status of child survivors 6 years after the Yushu earthquake. Our study provides evidence-based suggestions for specific long-term health interventions in such vulnerable populations.

Keywords

Health status Earthquake Child Risk factor

Background

Not only can natural disasters cause a devastating loss of life, homes, and livelihoods in an instant, they can also impose lingering threats to the physical and mental health of the survivors who must cope with post-disaster adversities for many years [1, 2]. Moreover, earthquakes are one of the most severe forms of natural disaster. Among developing countries, China is one of the most affected by natural disasters. A catastrophic earthquake, registering 7.1 on the Richter scale, struck Yushu, China, at 7:49 am on April 14, 2010, causing 2698 deaths and 12,135 injuries. The epicenter of the earthquake, Yushu, is a county in the Yushu Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture in the southernmost Qinghai province, with an average elevation of 4493 m. The total population of Yushu has been reported to be 311,000 (in 2007), of which Tibetans accounted for 97%, and the agricultural and animal husbandry population accounted for 70% [3].

There is an emerging literature on the health status of earthquake survivors [47], with some studies contending that severe earthquakes/disasters can cause long-lasting physical and mental health problems [8]. Previous studies have assessed the impact of disasters in terms of mortality, morbidity, depression, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) within a 1–36-month period following the disaster [915]. Most of these studies have focused on adults; only a few have examined the health status of child survivors [16, 17]. Moreover, no previous study has evaluated the health status of child survivorsseveral years after an earthquake.

Child survivors are a vulnerable population whose health status is sensitive to external adverse events such as earthquakes. Several studies focusing on child survivors have shown that the HRQoLdecreases over time. Enabling children who have survived disasters to achieve and maintain the same standards of health as other children and adolescents is a goal of the international community [18].

In particular, for relatively remote plateau areas like Yushu, the health status of child and adolescent survivors should be continuously considered. Therefore, the present study aimed to assess the health status, and associated determinants, of child survivors in the epicenter of the Yushu earthquake(the undeveloped Tibetan plateau area, Northwest China) 6 years after the event, to provide evidence-based suggestions for specific long-term health interventions in such vulnerable populations.

Methods

Study design and participants

A cross-sectional survey was conducted in August 2016, at which time 6 years had passed since the event [19]. The capital of Yushu Autonomous Prefecture is Jiegu, which has 8 junior/middle schools and one vocational school. In China, mostjunior schoolshave3 grades (grades 1–3), which are equivalent to the grades 6–8in occidental education systems;senior grades 1–3 are similar to grades 9–12 in occidental education systems. Chinese junior school students are12–16 years of age. The local summer vacation in Yushu is May through June, 2 months earlier than most of China. May through June is also the harvest season for cordyceps (Yushu is the hometown of cordyceps) and the junior students provide the major labor force in their family in unearthing cordyceps. One of the 8 junior schools, Nang Qian No. 2 Middle School, was randomly selected for our study sample. In addition, we investigated the students from the vocational junior middle school, Limin Vocational Middle School. In contrast to Nang Qian No. 2 Middle School, the junior students educated at Limin Vocational Middle School typically work directly after graduation instead of going to a junior middle school for further study. The initial study sample was comprised of all junior students (grades 1–3) present at the time of our evaluation who had personally experienced the Yushu earthquake. A total of 709 junior students were approached; 103 were excluded as they did not personally experience the Yushu earthquake and 3 refused to participate in the investigation. Thus, a total of 603 junior students completed the questionnaire; however, 12 questionnaires were excluded due to missing items. Therefore, the total number of participants was 591.

Data collection

The survey was conducted by 12 undergraduates from the Second Military Medical University. The Project Leader conducted a centralized training in Shanghai for the 12 investigators on August 12, 2016, briefed the prospective respondents about the details of the study, and answered questions related to the study. The 12 researchers were divided into 6 groups and were dispatched to Yushu County to conduct the investigation from the 13th to the 26th of August, 2016. The survey took place in the school classrooms. Given the limited comprehensive ability of the middle school students, each groupof researchers briefed the prospective respondents, providing details of the study, and answered related questions. Approval was obtained from the school principal who made an announcement regarding the study to the students. The study also obtained approval from the ethics committee of Second Military Medical University, and all participants voluntarily agreed to participate in our survey.

Measurements

The collected social and demographic information included sex, age, ethnicity, religious faith, chronic disease history, residential area, family resident population, main source of income for the family, whether living with parents or not, whether an only child or not, and family type. Students “not living with parents” refer to the left-behind children (i.e., the biological parents wentto the city to work, leaving the child behind tostay with grandparents or other living relatives).

Earthquake-related experiences were assessed using an inventory adapted from a commonly used earthquake exposure scale. The items included ‘being trapped or in danger’, ‘house damaged’, ‘family property damaged’, ‘injured’, ‘family member injured’, ‘lost family member or friend’, degree of fear during the earthquake, degree of fear, etc. [20].

The health status of the students was assessed using the acute version of the Chinese version of the Short Form-12 (SF-12), which is a practical, reliable, and valid scale adapted from the 36-item Short Form health survey (SF-36). The Chinese version of the SF-12 has been validated for Chinese adolescents [21]. The participants were asked to complete the SF-12 by recalling their personal experience for the previous 4 weeks. The SF-12 has been used in numerous studies worldwide, and includes one item from each of the bodily pain, general health, vitality, and social functioning scales, and two items from each of the physical functioning, role-physical, role-emotional, and mental health scales of the SF-36 [22].In addition, the SF-12 assesses the overall physical and mental functioning using two summary scores: the physical component summary (PCS) score and mental component summary (MCS) score [23].The MCS and PCS scores were calculated usingthe methods proposed by Ware et al. [24] The SF-12 takes only two to 3 min to complete and higher scores reflect better health [6].

Data analysis

All analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) Version 11.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, USA). Descriptive statistics (frequencies, percentages, means, and standard deviations [SD]) were first calculated. Subsequently, t-tests (for two-group comparisons) and analyses of variance (ANOVAs; for multi-group comparisons) were used to evaluate differences in continuous variables when the data were normally distributed and in accordance with assumptions regarding the homogeneity of variance; otherwise, non-parametric methods were used (Wilcoxon rank sum tests for two-group comparisons and Kruskal-Wallis H tests for multi-group comparisons).For ANOVAs with a p values <0.05, multiple comparison tests were conducted using the least significant difference(LSD) test. A multiple linear regression including all the variables was used to find the factors independently associated with PCS and MCS scores [25]. Meanwhile, a stepwise linear regression analysis with 0.05 for entry and 0.1 for staying was performed to identify the predictors of PCS and MCS scores, and the beta coefficients (B), standardized error of the coefficient (SEB), and statistics are reported. The PCS and MCS scores of the Yushu adolescent survivors were compared to those of the general adolescent population in China using a one sample t-test [21]. A p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Social-demographic characteristics and earthquake-related experiences

Social-demographic characteristics and earthquake-related experiences are presented in Table 1. Of the 591 participants, 297 (50.25%) were male, and 459 (77.67%) were in Grades 1 or 2. The participants’ ages at the time of the survey ranged from 11 to 18 years, with an average age of 15.49 years. The vast majority of students (570, 96.45%) were of Zang descent (the major ethnic population in Yushu County) and 586 (99.15%) had a religious faith. In terms of residence, only 72 students (12.18%) lived in the downtown area while 207 (35.03%) lived in the country and 312 (52.79%) lived in the pasture. A total of 488 (82.57%) students lived with their parents. During the earthquake, 502 participants (84.94%) felt fearful; 426 (72.92%) reported that no family members were injured; and 325 (54.99%) reported that no family members were killed due to the earthquake. Furthermore, 484 (81.9%) participants were not personally injured, but 219 (37.06%) reported being in danger or trapped during the earthquake. Just under half of the participants (n = 252, 42.64%) reported that their houses had been damaged during the earthquake. Similarly, less than half of the students (n = 222, 37.56%) reported that their family experienced property loss due to the earthquake. A total of 318 participants (53.81%) had received psychological escape training and counseling.
Table 1

Demographics and earthquake-related experiences among adolescent survivors of the Yushu earthquake, China

Variable

N

Percentage

(%)

PCS

MCS

Mean

p

Mean

p

Total

591

-

42.13(7.32)

 

42.04(8.07)

 

Gender

   

0.6531

 

0.1602

 Male

297

50.25

42.26(7.5)

 

42.5(8.12)

 

 Female

294

49.75

41.99(7.14)

 

41.57(8.01)

 

Grade

   

0.0724

 

<0.0001*

1

202

34.18

42.8(7.36)

 

40.28(7.83)

 

2

257

43.49

41.35(6.99)

 

42.2(8.12)

 

3

132

22.34

42.63(7.78)

 

44.39(7.77)

 

Religious belief

   

0.8200

 

0.9621

 Yes

586

99.15

42.12(7.35)

 

42.03(8.08)

 

 No

5

0.85

42.67(2.44)

 

42.21(7.9)

 

Residence

   

0.4415

 

0.4284

 Downtown

72

12.18

42.46(7.79)

 

42.96(7.73)

 

 Country

207

35.03

41.6(7.83)

 

41.56(8.59)

 

 Pasture

312

52.79

42.4(6.85)

 

42.14(7.79)

 

Living with parents

   

0.2408

 

0.0021

 Yes

488

82.57

41.97(7.42)

 

42.5(7.81)

 

 No

103

17.43

42.9(6.82)

 

39.82(8.92)

 

Trapped or in danger

   

<0.0001

 

0.9316

 Yes

219

37.06

39.99(7.18)

 

42.07(8.1)

 

 No

372

62.94

43.39(7.12)

 

42.01(8.07)

 

House damage due to earthquake

   

0.0314

 

0.3900

 Yes

252

42.64

41.38(7.09)

 

42.3(7.93)

 

 No

339

57.36

42.69(7.44)

 

41.84(8.18)

 

Property loss due to earthquake

   

0.1509

 

0.3900

 Yes

222

37.56

41.57(7.42)

 

42.4(7.92)

 

 No

369

62.44

42.46(7.25)

 

41.81(8.16)

 

Fear during the earthquake

   

0.0615

 

0.6183

 No

40

6.77

41.91(8.29)

 

40.99(8.11)

 

 A little

110

18.61

42.88(7.23)

 

41.81(7.58)

 

 Much

127

21.49

42(7.99)

 

41.48(8.17)

 

 Extremely

265

44.84

41.46(6.91)

 

42.35(8.12)

 

 Unclear

49

8.29

44.58(6.6)

 

43.12(8.7)

 

Injury to self due to earthquake

   

0.0002

 

0.5664

 Yes

107

18.1

39.78(7.92)

 

42.44(8.7)

 

 No

484

81.9

42.65(7.08)

 

41.95(7.93)

 

Injury in the family due to earthquake

   

0.0442

 

0.7103

 Yes

165

27.92

41.16(7.02)

 

41.84(8.32)

 

 No

426

72.92

42.51(7.41)

 

42.11(7.98)

 

Death in the family due to earthquake

   

0.5614

 

<0.0001

 Yes

266

45.01

42.32(7.25)

 

40.4(7.66)

 

 No

325

54.99

41.97(7.38)

 

43.38(8.16)

 

Escape training

   

0.0002

 

0.0563

 Yes

318

53.81

43.17(7.03)

 

41.45(8.11)

 

 No

273

46.19

40.92(7.47)

 

42.72(7.99)

 

Psychological counseling

   

0.9913

 

0.0320

 Yes

318

53.81

42.13(7.43)

 

42.7(7.66)

 

 No

273

46.19

42.13(7.43)

 

41.27(8.47)

 

* multiple comparison tests:Grade 1 versus Grade 2: p < 0.05; Grade 1 versus Grade 3: p < 0.05; Grade 2 versus Grade 3: p < 0.05

Factors associated with the physical component summary score

The mean PCS score was 42.13 (SD 7.32),which was significantly lower than the PCS of the general adolescent population in China (42.13 vs. 49.8, P < 0.0001).In bivariate analyses (Table 1), PCS scores were negatively and significantly associated with the following factors: ‘being trapped or in danger’ (p < 0.001), ‘house damaged’ (p = 0.0314), ‘injured’ (p = 0.0002), ‘family member injured’ (p = 0.0442), and not receivingescape training (p = 0.0002). Multiple stepwise regression analyses (Table 2) revealed that PCS scores 6 years after the earthquake were negativelyassociated with ‘being trapped or in danger’ (p = 0.0001), ‘injured’ (p = 0.0323), and not receiving escape training before the earthquake (p < 0.0001).
Table 2

Multiple stepwise regression analysis of factors independently associated withPCS scores

Label

Initialmodela

regression modelb

 

β coefficients

P value

β coefficients

P value

Degree

-0.35036

0.4365

  

Gender(Male(1), Female(2))

-0.70773

0.2667

Religious belief(Yes (1),No (2))

2.72113

0.4034

Residence c

 Country

-1.44545

0.1602

  

 Pasture

-0.90759

0.3572

Living with parents(Yes (1),No (2))

0.99805

0.2224

  

Trapped or in danger(Yes (1),No (2))

2.75754

0.0005

2.5594

0.0001

House damage due to earthquake (Yes (1),No (2))

-0.13789

0.8549

  

Property loss due to earthquake (Yes (1),No (2))

-0.53195

0.466

Fear during the earthquake (No(1), A little(2),Much(3),Extremly(4),Unclear(5))

-0.19195

0.5319

Injury to self due to earthquake (Yes (1),No (2))

2.14019

0.0159

1.7709

0.0323

Injury in the family due to earthquake (Yes (1),No (2))

0.39888

0.605

  

Death in the family due to earthquake (Yes (1),No (2))

-0.5046

0.444

Escape training(Yes (1),No (2))

-2.51614

0.0001

-2.5272

<0.0001

Psychological counseling (Yes (1),No (2))

0.40026

0.5262

  

a initial model included all variables listed in Table 1

b The inclusion criteria of the stepwise regression was p = 0.05; exclusion criteria was p = 0.10

c referencegroup=Downtown

Factors associated with the mental component summary score

The mean MCS score was42.04 (SD 8.07), which was significantly lower than the MCS of the general adolescent population in China (42.04 vs. 45.4, P < 0.0001).In bivariate analyses (Table 1), MCS scores were negatively associated with death in the family (p < 0.0001) and were positively associated with a higher grade level (p < 0.0001), living with parents (p = 0.0021), and receiving psychological counseling (p = 0.0320). Multiple stepwise regression analyses (Table 3) revealed that lower MSC scores 6 years after the earthquake were associated with a lower grade level (p = 0.0006), not living with parents (p = 0.0084), fear during the earthquake (p = 0.0081), death in the family (p = 0.0005), and not receiving psychological counseling after the earthquake (p = 0.0275).
Table 3

Multiple stepwise regression analysis of factors independently associated with MCSscores

Label

Initialmodela

regression modelb

 

β coefficients

P value

β coefficients

P value

Degree

1.53198

0.0019

  

Gender(Male(1), Female(2))

-0.13103

0.8501

1.6025

0.0006

Religious belief(Yes (1),No (2))

-1.24924

0.7246

  

Residence c

 Country

-0.47612

0.6708

  

 Pasture

0.11338

0.9159

Living with parents(Yes (1),No (2))

-2.41344

0.0069

-2.3023

0.0084

Trapped or in danger(Yes (1),No (2))

-0.13443

0.875

  

House damage due to earthquake (Yes (1),No (2))

-0.34196

0.6771

Property loss due to earthquake (Yes (1),No (2))

-0.63483

0.4243

Fear during the earthquake (No(1), A little(2),Much(3),Extremly(4),Unclear(5))

-0.91053

0.0066

-0.8737

0.0081

Injury to self due to earthquake (Yes (1),No (2))

-0.52918

0.583

  

Injury in the family due to earthquake (Yes (1),No (2))

-0.72773

0.3864

Death in the family due to earthquake (Yes (1),No (2))

2.69157

0.0002

2.3567

0.0005

Escape training(Yes (1),No (2))

0.73534

0.2979

  

Psychological counseling (Yes (1),No (2))

-1.64898

0.0168

-1.4770

0.0275

a initial model included all variables listed in Table 1

b The inclusion criteria of the stepwise regression was p = 0.05; exclusion criteria was p = 0.10

c referencegroup=Downtown

Discussion

Experiencing a disastrous earthquake can result in long-term mental and physical impairment among adolescent survivors [17, 26].The present study examined the health status, both in terms of physical and mental health, of adolescent survivors 6 years after the Yushu earthquake. We found that adolescent survivors of the Yushu earthquake had worse PCS and MCS scores compared to those for the general adolescent population in China [21].

With regard to the physical health status of adolescent survivors, being trapped and injured during the earthquake were found to be risk factors with a strong negative association to physical health. While a large number of studies have focused on the mental health problems of survivors [2730], research on the relationship between exposure to disaster events and survivors’ physical health is relatively limited. A previous study found that post-earthquake rescue policies could directly affect the promotion of PCS scores in survivors [31]. However, additional studies have suggested that disaster events have little impact on survivors’ physical health [27].For example, the results of the study by Adams and Boscarino suggested that exposure to the World Trade Center disaster did not have severe consequences for the physical well-being of adults 1 year after the attacks [32]. In other previous studies, poor housing conditions (such as living in temporary shelters and a lack of clean water and food) were reported to have a negative association with physical health 1-18 months after the disaster [6, 33, 34]. Our findings surprisingly show that even after a fairly long period of 6 years, being trapped and injured during the earthquake still had a strong negative association with physical health. These results may be related to dysfunction and movement disorders caused by the earthquake injury, such as amputations, becoming crippled, and so on. Overall, the results suggest that long-term follow-up for earthquake-related injuries and relevant measures should be developed to promote recovery.

In the present study, earthquake escape training was shown to have a positive association with physical health. Community emergency preparedness/engagement is critical for effective rescue, and earthquake escape training an important measure to enhance community emergency preparedness/engagement [35, 36]. Earthquake-related health education and promotion can bring positive changes to populations in areas at high risk for earthquakes. An improved level of knowledge and consequent preparedness are far more promising than the “treat when sick” strategy [37].

With regard to the psychological health status of adolescent survivors, being afraid and losing family members during the earthquake corresponded to lower MCS scores. These negative factors have been identified in previous cross-sectional studies with greater exposure to the events surrounding the disaster associated with poorer psychological well-being [5, 17]. Moreover, the results of the present study are consistent with previous studies demonstrating that children who felt intensely scared during a disaster were more likely to have poor psychological health status and were more likely to develop symptoms of PTSD, depression, and anxiety [38, 39]. In addition, our results indicated that although 6 years had passed, the students’ emotional memory of the Yushu earthquake was still clear. As suggested in previous studies, experiencing the loss of family members as a result of the earthquake may have aroused intense fear, which was closely related to negative psychological changes [4043]. Since disaster-related psychological sequelae may last for many years, appropriate actions should be taken to minimize potential negative impacts. A regular, long-term psychological intervention program should be established to improve the mental health conditions of survivors in earthquake-affected areas.

On the other hand, we found that receiving psychological counseling was associated with higher MCS scores. This result provides a comforting message, suggesting that appropriate psychological interventions can be effective in improving the mental health of survivors. In the presentstudy, psychological counseling included counselingimmediately after the disaster or several days tomonths later, either in individual or group settings, and to any extent. A wide variety of studies have appealed for more attention to the mental health of survivors [4446]. However, few studies exist on how to implement and assess the effectiveness of psychological interventions.

It is noteworthy that, in addition to the above earthquake exposure factors, two demographic characteristics also had a strong association with the MCS score: the adolescents’ grade level and whether they were living with their parents. A higher grade level and living with parents were positively associated with MCS scores. A previous study focusing on resilience reported the opposite result (i.e., junior grade 1 students hadnotably higher resilience scores compared to those of senior grade 1 students, which was attributed to senior grade 1 students facing great pressure to perform well in academics and meet the high expectations of parents) [47]. Since the population living in the Yushu area is scattered, the two investigated schools were boarding schools; thus, the students were usually living in the school. The lower grade students had just started the school’s collective life. Therefore, we speculate that the impact of grade level on the MCS score might be due to low-grade students not yet adapting to the school atmosphere and living situation. Regarding the association between living with parents and MCS scores, China has been undergoing rapid urbanization in the past few decades and one out of ten individuals is a migrant, moving from rural to urban areas to seek employment opportunities. Therefore, a considerable number of participants had left the rural area, and were not living with their parents. Evidence from studies in various countries suggests that a stable family environment contributes to the healthy development of children [4853]. In addition, negative impacts such as unhealthy behaviors [54], adverse emotions [55], and poorer psychosocial health [56] have been documented in left-behind children.

Limitations

The current study has a few limitations to discuss. First, due to the study’s exploratory cross-sectional nature, it is difficult to conclude to what extent the earthquake had an effect on those who experienced it, as no pre-disaster or short-term after-disaster comparison data was available. Second, although the study was conducted adequately by trained investigators, data collection relied solely on the retrospective self-reports of the survivors 6 years after the Yushu earthquake, which can be subject to recall and desirability biases. Despite these limitations, the present study is one of only a few cross-sectional studies focusing on the long-term health status and associated risk factors in child survivors following an earthquake in rural China.

Conclusions

In conclusion, the results of the present study help to expand our knowledge regarding the health status of child survivors 6 years after the Yushu earthquake. The results suggest the importance of greater vigilance and long-term attention to the children who lived in the rural plateau area and were most affected by the earthquake. This study provides important information regarding monitoring the long-term course of physical and mental health recovery of adolescents after earthquakes, and is of great significance for public awareness and the sensitivity towards those who were the most affected. Specific care, earthquake escape training, and long-term psychological interventions should be provided to adolescent survivors with relatively low health status, including those who were injured in the earthquake and those who were not living with parents.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to warmly thank the survey respondents for their participation in the study and the academic departments who provided funding for this study.

Funding

Work on this manuscript was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (X. L., grant number 71303249, Y. L., grant number 71573270, L. Z, grant number 91224005); the National Defense Science Technology Fund (X. L., grant number 3605021); and the Important Disease Joint Research Project in Health Systems of Shanghai (L.Z. grant number 2013ZYJB0006).

Availability of data and materials

The dataset supporting the conclusions of this article may be available upon request from the first author to ensure any changes to the project do not invalidate the project’s ethical approval in accordance with the Second Military Medical University Ethics Committee approval letter.

Authors’ contributions

XL,HY and LZ conceived the idea and the designed the study. XL, HY, BT, YL and LZ collected the data. BT and XL cleaned the data. XL, HY and BT draft the manuscript. All authors critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Authors’ information

XL, HY and BT are co-first authors of this article.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Approval was obtained from the principals of Nang Qian No. 2 Middle School and Limin Vocational Middle School, who made the announcement regarding our study to the students. The study also obtained approval from the ethics committee of Second Military Medical University, and all participants voluntarily agreed to participate in our survey.

Consent for publication

All participants gave informed consent.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of HealthService, Faculty of HealthService, Second Military Medical University
(2)
Department of Medical Affairs, The General Hospital of the PLA Rocket Force

References

  1. Dorn T, Yzermans JC, Spreeuwenberg PM, Schilder A, van der Zee J. A cohort study of the long-term impact of a fire disaster on the physical and mental health of adolescents. J Trauma Stress. 2008;21:239–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Reijneveld SA, Crone MR, Verhulst FC, Verloove-Vanhorick SP. The effect of a severe disaster on the mental health of adolescents: a controlled study. Lancet. 2003;362:691–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Yushu earthquake. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yushu_earthquake.(accessed November 7, 2016).
  4. Ceyhan E, Ceyhan AA. Earthquake survivors' quality of life and academic achievement six years after the earthquakes in Marmara, Turkey. Disasters. 2007;31:516–29.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Zhang W, Duan G, Xu Q, Jia Z, Bai Z, Liu W, Pan X, Tian W. A cross-sectional study on posttraumatic stress disorder and general psychiatric morbidity among adult survivors 3 years after the Wenchuan earthquake, China. Asia Pac J Public Health. 2015;27:860–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Kun P, Wang Z, Chen X, Le H, Gong X, Zhang L, Yao L: Public health status and influence factors after 2008 Wenchuan earthquake among survivors in Sichuan province, China: cross-sectional trial.Public Health 2010, 124:573-580.Google Scholar
  7. Sudaryo MK, Besral EAT, Rivany R, Phalkey R, Marx M, Guha-Sapir D. Injury, disability and quality of life after the 2009 earthquake in Padang, Indonesia: a prospective cohort study of adult survivors. Glob Health Action. 2012;5:1–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Zhang B. A cross-sectional study on the current prevalence of post-traumatic stress disorder in adults orphaned by Tangshan earthquake in 1976. Chin Ment Health J. 2008;22:469.Google Scholar
  9. Tanaka H, Oda J, Iwai A, Kuwagata Y, Matsuoka T, Takaoka M, Kishi M, Morimoto F, Ishikawa K, Mizushima Y, et al. Morbidity and mortality of hospitalized patients after the 1995 Hanshin-Awaji earthquake. Am J Emerg Med. 1999(17):186–91.Google Scholar
  10. Nagata S, Teramoto C, Okamoto R, Koide K, Nishida M, Suzuki R, Nomura M, Tada T, Kishi E, Sakai Y, et al. The tsunami's impact on mortality in a town severely damaged by the 2011 great East Japan earthquake. Disasters. 2014(38 Suppl 2):S111–22.Google Scholar
  11. Liang Y. Depression and anxiety among elderly earthquake survivors in China. J Health Psychol. 2016;Google Scholar
  12. Cerda M, Paczkowski M, Galea S, Nemethy K, Pean C, Desvarieux M. Psychopathology in the aftermath of the Haiti earthquake: a population-based study of posttraumatic stress disorder and major depression. Depress Anxiety. 2013;30:413–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Hashmi S, Petraro P, Rizzo T, Nawaz H, Choudhary R, Tessier-Sherman B, Kasl S, Nawaz H. Symptoms of anxiety, depression, and posttraumatic stress among survivors of the 2005 Pakistani earthquake. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2011;5:293–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Gigantesco A, D'Argenio P, Cofini V, Mancini C, Minardi V. Health-related quality of life in the aftermath of the L'Aquila earthquake in Italy. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2016;10:11–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Ke X, Liu C, Li N. Social support and quality of life: a cross-sectional study on survivors eight months after the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:573.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Goenjian AK, Roussos A, Steinberg AM, Sotiropoulou C, Walling D, Kakaki M, Karagianni S. Longitudinal study of PTSD, depression, and quality of life among adolescents after the Parnitha earthquake. J Affect Disord. 2011;133:509–15.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Tang B, Ge Y, Xue C, Kang P, Liu Y, Liu X, Liu Z, Yu W, Zhang L. Health status and risk factors among adolescent survivors one month after the 2014 Ludian earthquake. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015(12):6367–77.Google Scholar
  18. UNICEF. A Treasure Chest of Hope for Children Impacted by Disastersand War, 2009.http://www.unicef.org/media/media_50668.html. (accessed November 7, 2016).
  19. Prefecture YA. Yushu Autonomous Prefecture. http://baike.baidu.com/view/112247.htm?fromtitle=%E7%8E%89%E6%A0%91&fromid=24322&type=syn. (accessed November 7, 2016).
  20. Roussos A, Goenjian AK, Steinberg AM, Sotiropoulou C, Kakaki M, Kabakos C, Karagianni S, Manouras V. Posttraumatic stress and depressive reactions among children and adolescents after the 1999 earthquake in Ano Liosia, Greece. Am J Psychiatry. 2005;162:530–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Fong DY, Lam CL, Mak KK, Lo WS, Lai YK, Ho SY, Lam TH. The short form-12 health survey was a valid instrument in Chinese adolescents. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63:1020–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Xu J, He Y. Psychological health and coping strategy among survivors in the year following the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2012(66):210–9.Google Scholar
  23. Liang Y, Cao R. Is the health status of female victims poorer than males in the post-disaster reconstruction in China: a comparative study of data on male victims in the first survey and double tracking survey data. BMC Womens Health. 2014;14:18.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Ware JE, Kosinski MA, Keller SD. How to score the SF-12 physical and mental health summary scales. Lincoln, RI: Quality Metric; 1998.Google Scholar
  25. McShane LM, Altman DG, Sauerbrei W, Taube SE, Gion M. Clark GM:RESPONSE: reporting recommendations for tumor marker prognostic studies (REMARK). J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97:1180–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Tian W, Jia Z, Duan G, Liu W, Pan X, Guo Q, Chen R, Zhang X. Longitudinal study on health-related quality of life among child and adolescent survivors of the 2008 Sichuan earthquake. Qual Life Res. 2013;22(4):745–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Spittlehouse JK, Joyce PR, Vierck E, Schluter PJ, Pearson JF. Ongoing adverse mental health impact of the earthquake sequence in Christchurch, New Zealand. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2014;48:756–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Chen CH, Tan HK, Liao LR, Chen HH, Chan CC, Cheng JJ, Chen CY, Wang TN, Lu ML. Long-term psychological outcome of 1999 Taiwan earthquake survivors: a survey of a high-risk sample with property damage. Compr Psychiatry. 2007(48):269–75.Google Scholar
  29. Neria Y, Olfson M, Gameroff MJ, Wickramaratne P, Gross R, Pilowsky DJ, Blanco C, Manetti-Cusa J, Lantigua R, Shea S, Weissman MM. The mental health consequences of disaster-related loss: findings from primary care one year after the 9/11 terrorist attacks. Psychiatry. 2008;71:339–48.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Abramson D, Stehling-Ariza T, Garfield R, Redlener I. Prevalence and predictors of mental health distress post-Katrina: findings from the Gulf coast child and family health study. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2008;2:77–86.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Liang Y, Wang X. Developing a new perspective to study the health of survivors of Sichuan earthquakes in China: a study on the effect of post-earthquake rescue policies on survivors' health-related quality of life. Health Res Policy Syst. 2013;11:41.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Adams RE, Boscarino JA. Stress and well-being in the aftermath of the world trade center attack: the continuing effects of a communitywide disaster. J Community Psychol. 2005;33:175–90.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Thomson H, Petticrew M, Morrison D. Health effects of housing improvement: systematic review of intervention studies. BMJ. 2001;323:187–90.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Lefante JJ Jr, Harmon GN, Ashby KM, Barnard D, Webber LS. Use of the SF-8 to assess health-related quality of life for a chronically ill, low-income population participating in the Central Louisiana medication access program (CMAP). Qual Life Res. 2005;14:665–73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Roces MC, White ME, Dayrit MM, Durkin ME. Risk factors for injuries due to the 1990 earthquake in Luzon, Philippines. Bull World Health Organ. 1992;70:509–14.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Noji EK. The 1988 earthquake in soviet armenia: implications for earthquake preparedness. Disasters. 1989;13:255–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Adhikari B, Mishra SR, Raut S. Rebuilding earthquake struck Nepal through community engagement. Front Public Health. 2016;4:121.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Jia Z, Tian W, He X, Liu W, Jin C, Ding H. Mental health and quality of life survey among child survivors of the 2008 Sichuan earthquake. Qual Life Res. 2010(19):1381–91.Google Scholar
  39. Fan F, Zhang Y, Yang Y, Mo L, Liu X. Symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder, depression, and anxiety among adolescents following the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake in China. J Trauma Stress. 2011(24):44–53.Google Scholar
  40. Zhang Z, Shi Z, Wang L, Liu M. One year later: mental health problems among survivors in hard-hit areas of the Wenchuan earthquake. Public Health. 2011;125:293–300.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Xu J, Liao Q. Prevalence and predictors of posttraumatic growth among adult survivors one year following 2008 Sichuan earthquake. J Affect Disord. 2011(133):274–80.Google Scholar
  42. Liu M, Wang L, Shi Z, Zhang Z, Zhang K, Shen J. Mental health problems among children one-year after Sichuan earthquake in China: a follow-up study. PLoS One. 2011;6:e14706.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Pan X, Liu W, Deng G, Liu T, Yan J, Tang Y, Dong W, Cui Y, Xu M. Symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder, depression, and anxiety among junior high school students in worst-hit areas 3 years after the Wenchuan earthquake in China. Asia Pac J Public Health. 2015;27:NP1985–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Zhang L, Liu X, Li Y, Liu Y, Liu Z, Lin J, Shen J, Tang X, Zhang Y, Liang W. Emergency medical rescue efforts after a major earthquake: lessons from the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake. Lancet. 2012;379:853–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Fukunaga H, Kumakawa H: Mental health crisis in Northeast Fukushima after the 2011 earthquake, tsunami and nuclear disaster.Tohoku J Exp Med 2015, 237:41-43.Google Scholar
  46. Messiah A, Acuna JM, Castro G, de la Vega PR, Vaiva G, Shultz J, Neria Y, De La Rosa M. Mental health impact of the 2010 Haiti earthquake on the Miami Haitian population: a random-sample survey. Disaster Health. 2014;2:130–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Guo X, Liu Q, Wang H, Huang K, Lei X, Zhang F, Wang Y. Resilience and its influential factors in left-behind middle school students in Yunyang County of rural three gorges areas in China: a cross-sectional survey. Public Health. 2015;129:1479–87.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Riesch SK, Anderson LS, Krueger HA. Parent-child communication processes: preventing children's health-risk behavior. J Spec Pediatr Nurs. 2006;11:41–56.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Spear HJ, Kulbok PA. Adolescent health behaviors and related factors: a review. Public Health Nurs. 2001;18:82–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Capron C, Therond C, Duyme M. Brief report: effect of menarcheal status and family structure on depressive symptoms and emotional/behavioural problems in young adolescent girls. J Adolesc. 2007;30:175–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Piko BF, Fitzpatrick KM. Socioeconomic status, psychosocial health and health behaviours among Hungarian adolescents. Eur J Pub Health. 2007;17:353–60.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Griesbach D, Amos A, Currie C. Adolescent smoking and family structure in Europe. Soc Sci Med. 2003;56:41–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Wang J, Hughes J, Murphy GT, Rigby JA, Langille DB. Suicidal behaviours among adolescents in northern Nova Scotia. Can J Public Health. 2003;94:207–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Gao Y, Li LP, Kim JH, Congdon N, Lau J, Griffiths S. The impact of parental migration on health status and health behaviours among left behind adolescent school children in China. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:56.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  55. Tao S, Yu L, Gao W, Xue W. Food preferences, personality and parental rearing styles: analysis of factors influencing health of left-behind children. Qual Life Res. 2016;25:2921–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Wickramage K, Siriwardhana C, Vidanapathirana P, Weerawarna S, Jayasekara B, Pannala G, Adikari A, Jayaweera K, Peiris S, Siribaddana S, Sumathipala A. Risk of mental health and nutritional problems for left-behind children of international labor migrants. BMC Psychiatry. 2015;15:39.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement