Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub

Health-related quality of life as measured with the Short-Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire in patients with recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes volume 14, Article number: 65 (2016) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis (RVVC) has a poor therapeutic outcome and a severe impact on women and their partners, both physically and psychologically. Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is significantly affected in patients with RVVC; however, little is known about HRQOL in patients with this disease. In this study, we aim to identify the clinical and mycological characteristics of women with RVVC and the effects of RVVC on women’s HRQOL.

Methods

We designed this study as a comparative cross-sectional study. The Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) was used to measure HRQOL in 102 patients with RVVC and 101 women seeking general health care (controls). RVVC was defined as four or more episodes of proven VVC in the previous 12-month period. VVC was defined as vulvar itching, burning, erythema, vaginal discharge, pseudohyphae or blastoconidia on a wet 10 % potassium hydroxide (KOH)-treated vaginal slide and a positive Candida culture. Group comparisons were conducted with independent samples t test. Correlation analysis was performed on the variables.

Results

The mean age at first diagnosis of the patients with RVVC was 30.96 years (SD 5.38), and the mean age of the controls was 29.75 years (SD 5.83; p > 0.05). The duration of the patients’ complaints varied from 6 months to 10 years, with a mean duration of 22.28 (±21.75) months. The most common complaints were increased vaginal discharge (102 cases, 100 %), itching (97 cases, 95.1 %), dyspareunia (65 cases, 63.7 %), burning (79 cases, 77.5 %) and erythema (25 cases, 24.5 %). C. albicans was the predominant Candida species (86 strains, 84.3 %) in the patients, followed by C. glabrata (12 strains, 11.8 %). C. parapsilosis (1 strain, 0.9 %), C. tropicalis (1 strain, 0.9 %), C. krusei (1 strain, 0.9 %) and C. lusitaniae (1 strain, 0.9 %). The mean SF-36 dimension scores for physical function, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role emotional, and mental health were significantly lower in the patients with RVVC than in the controls (85.20, 61.39, 77.79, 54.95, 53.17, 67.89, 52.48 and 59.17 vs. 90.20, 80.87, 87.08, 67.38, 59.69, 79.86, 68.01 and 65.38). The physical composite and mental composite scores of the patients with RVVC were 63.06 and 64.87, respectively, which were lower than those of the controls (75.01 and 74.87; p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Nearly all of the patients with RVVC had clinical symptoms. In our sample, RVVC was mainly caused by C. albicans. RVVC has negative effects on women’s HRQOL, as indicated by lower physical and mental composite scores among the RVVC group compared with controls.

Background

Recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis (RVVC) defined as four or more episodes of vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) in a 12-month period and is estimated to occur in up to 5–8 % of women of child-bearing ages [1–3]. RVVC have a poor therapy outcome and have a severe impact on women and their partners, both physically and psychologically [4–11]. The main symptoms of RVVC, which was mainly caused by C. albicans, are itching, an abnormal vaginal discharge and painful sexual intercourse [6, 10, 12]. The symptoms and therapy of RVVC seriously interfered with sexual and emotional relationships of the affected women [13, 14]. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is a study area that has attracted increasing interests over the past two decades. Short-form 36 questionnaire (SF-36), which is an instrument for assessing quality of life, has been used in study to assess the quality of life of general population and the population with special chronic diseases world-wide [15–25]. We use SF-36 questionnaire to investigate the impact of RVVC on the quality of life of the affected women [26–28].

Methods

Participants

A total of 102 consecutive patients with RVVC who attended the RTI clinic of Peking University Shenzhen Hospital from 2014 to 2015 were invited to participate in this study by completing data forms after their appointments. The participants who came for general health care that is not concerned about other diseases, which included as the following exclusions criteria, comprised the control group (n = 101). The inclusion criteria of patients were: aged 18–50 years-old, generally healthy women with RVVC. Patients were excluded from entry if they: (1) had any other sexually transmitted disease or gynaecological abnormality requiring treatment; (2) had serious health problems known to effect quality of life such as diabetes mellitus. The comparison group within the same age range was recruited from the same clinic, where they attended for health care, in order to represent women from a general population, not concerned about reproductive tract infection (RTI) or other diseases. RTI including bacterial vaginosis, trichomoniasis and vulvovaginal candidiasis, were examed for all patients with RVVC and controls. The study was approved by Peking University Shenzhen Hospital Medical Ethics Committee and all participants provided written informed consent prior to study.

We administered the questionnaires while the women were waiting for their laboratory test reports. All of the patients were seen in the clinic by one of the authors (YXZ or TL), who made the final RVVC diagnosis and prescribed treatment. Nearly all the patients with RVVC and the controls completed the SF-36 questionnaire on their own at one separate room by thinking back to their most recent VVC episodes. Only several participants completed the questionnaire under the help of the authors (YXZ or TL). Additional information about demographic and clinical characteristics, Candida species, and other information pertaining to the RVVC was also collected by use of a study form.

Case definition and Candida identification

VVC was defined as the presence of vulvar itching, vaginal discharge, blastoconidia and pseudohyphae on a wet 10 % KOH-treated vaginal slide and a positive Candida culture. The severity of each symptom such as itching, burning, erythema, and discharge was assigned a score on the following scale: 0 = absent; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe. Patients with a severity score of 7 or greater were designated as severe vulvovaginal candidiasis. RVVC was defined as four or more episodes of proven infection in the previous 12-month period. Specimens were plated on CHROMagar (Biocell Laboratory Ltd, Zhengzhou, China) for 24 to 48 h at 37 °C in ambient air. Strains were identified using the standardized API Candida system (bioMerieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France).

SF-36 questionnaire

The SF-36 questionnaire consists of 36 items, which are used to calculate eight subscales: physical functioning (PF), role physical (RP), bodily pain (BP), general health (GH), vitality (VT), social functioning (SF), role emotional (RE), and mental health (MH). The first four scores can be summed to create the physical composite score (PCS), while the last four can be summed to create the mental composite score (MCS). Scores for the SF-36 scales range between 0 and 100, with higher scores indicating a better HRQOL [25–27].

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences 21.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the patients’ baseline characteristics. The data are presented as number and percentage unless otherwise indicated. Group comparisons were conducted with independent samples t test. Pearson’s correlation was performed to test the correlation among continuous variables. Spearman’s correlation was performed to test the correlation among rank variables. All statistical tests were two-sided (α = 0.05). P < 0.05 was accepted as significant.

Results

The characteristics of the patients with RVVC and controls

The 102 patients with RVVC and 101 controls who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were admitted to the study. The mean age at first diagnosis of the patients with RVVC and the controls was 30.96 (SD 5.38) and 29.75 (SD 5.83) years, respectively. The duration of the patients’ complaints varied from 6 months to 10 years, with a mean duration of 22.28 (SD 21.75) months. The most common complaints were increased vaginal discharge (102 cases, 100 %), itching (97 cases, 95.1 %), dyspareunia (65 cases, 63.7 %), burning (79 cases, 77.5 %) and erythema (25 cases, 24.5 %). Of the 102 patients with RVVC who were recruited to participate, one patient had a history of drug allergies, one patient had diabetes mellitus complications, and one patient reported a male partner with symptoms of a genital Candida infection. No patients were infected with HIV. One hundred two Candida strains were recovered from the vaginal swabs of the patients with RVVC. C. albicans was the predominant Candida species (86 strains, 84.3 %), followed by C. glabrata (12 strains, 11.8 %), C. parapsilosis (1 strain, 0.9 %), C. tropicalis (1 strain, 0.9 %), C. krusei (1 strain, 0.9 %) and C. lusitaniae (1 strain, 0.9 %).

Health-related quality of life in patients with RVVC

The mean SF-36 dimension scores for physical function, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role emotional, and mental health were significantly lower in the patients with RVVC than in the controls (85.20, 61.39, 77.79, 54.95, 53.17, 67.89, 52.48 and 59.17 vs. 90.20, 80.87, 87.08, 67.38, 59.69, 79.86, 68.01 and 65.38), p < 0.05. The PCS and MCS of the patients with RVVC were 63.06 and 64.87, which were lower than those of the controls (75.01 and 74.87), p < 0.05, Table 1.

Table 1 Findings of SF 36 quality of life scale in patients with RVVC and controlsa
Full size table

The PCS and MCS scores of the patients with RVVC have no correlations with Candida species and VVC score, which were based on the severity of each symptom including itching, burning, erythema, and discharge, Tables 2 and 3. The SF 36 quality of life scale PCS and MCS score were lower in patients with RVVC caused by C. albicans and with high VVC score, p > 0.05.

Table 2 Bivariate correlations between SF 36 quality of life scale PCS and MCS with characteristics of patients with RVVC
Full size table
Table 3 Comparison of SF 36 quality of life scale PCS and MCS with VVC score and Candida species in patients RVVCa
Full size table
Table 4 Findings of SF 36 quality of life scale in patients and controls
Full size table

Discussion

Characteristics of the women with RVVC

The main symptoms of yeast infections are inflammation, itching, abnormal vaginal discharge and painful sexual intercourse and urination. Such symptoms cause variable but often severe discomfort and pain. Most of the patients with RVVC have no precipitating factor. All of our patients with RVVC had clinical symptoms. The mean duration of RVVC in our patients was 22.28 months. C. albicans was the predominant Candida species (86 strains, 84.3 %), followed by C. glabrata (12 strains, 11.8 %); these findings are consistent with previous reports [6, 10, 12].

Health-related quality of life

The clinical impression is that patients with RVVC, despite current treatment options, suffer from a substantially impaired HRQOL, but quantifiable evidence to support this impression is scarce. Nyirjesy et al. [14] applied several validated pain, stress and depression measurements to a population of physician-diagnosed patients (N = 38) and found that 29 % had clinical depression. Aballéa et al. [8] studied the health status and HRQOL of women with RVVC in Europe and the USA. A total of 620 women with RVVC were selected to complete the EQ-5D questionnaire and the SF-36 questionnaire. Of these women, 68 % reported depression/anxiety problems during acute episodes and 54 % reported depression/anxiety when they were not experiencing episodes, compared with less than 20 % for the general population. All SF-36 domain scores were significantly below the general population norms, but the mental health domains were the most affected. The results indicate that HRQOL is substantially diminished both during acute episodes and outside of these episodes in women with RVVC.

The SF-36 is commonly used as a generic measure to assess HRQOL. It has gained popularity as a means of evaluating outcomes in a wide variety of patient groups and surveys [15–25]. The findings of the SF-36 quality of life scale in patients and controls from previous study were shown on Table 4. Our current study results showed that PCS and MCS of patients with RVVC were 63.05 and 64.87, which were lower than those in controls (75.01 and 74.87). The PCS and MCS of control in our study are similar to those of normal controls from a Chinese study (PCS: 75.01 vs 77.5; MCS: 74.87 vs 73.4), however, are lower than those of normal controls from a Malaysia study (PCS: 75.01 vs 88.01; MCS: 74.87 vs 85.52) [17, 25]. The PCS of patients with RVVC in our study arelower than those of patients with type 2 diabetes (63.05 vs 67.4). The MCS of patients with RVVC in our study are similar to those of patients with type 2 diabetes (64.87 vs 64.9) [16]. The results of our study were consistent with findings by Aballéa et al., who also reported a stronger impact of RVVC on mental health than on physical health using SF-36, albeit to a somewhat lesser extent [8]. Our data support the impression that the subjective health status and HRQOL in women with RVVC are significantly worse than in the general population. An important question raised by the study (as well as previous studies) is whether the reduction in HRQOL among women with RVVC is attributable to RVVC or associated comorbidities. In our current study, the SF 36 quality of life scale PCS and MCS score were lower (but without significantly statistical difference) in patients with RVVC caused by C. albicans, which was more virulence, and with high VVC score [1]. This suggests the reduction in HRQOL among women with RVVC may be attributable to the comorbidities of the infection. The factor(s) which exactly affect the PCS and MCS scores of the patients with RVVC are unclear and should be further studied.

The limitations of this study were that for the SF-36 questions, we replaced “During the past 4 weeks …” with “Thinking back to your most recent VVC…” and the sample size was determined based on only previous studies.

Conclusions

Nearly all of the patients with RVVC had clinical symptoms, and most had no precipitating factor. RVVC was mainly caused by C. albicans. RVVC had negative effects on the women’s HRQOL.

Abbreviations

BP:

bodily pain

CI:

confidence interval

CVD:

cardiovascular disease

GH:

general health

HRQOL:

health-related quality of life

MCS:

mental component summary

MH:

mental health

PCS:

physical component summary

PF:

physical functioning

RE:

role emotional

RP:

role physical

RVVC:

recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis

SF:

social functioning

VT:

vitality

References

  1. Sobel JD. Recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214(1):15–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Workowski KA, Bolan GA, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2015. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2015;64(RR-03):1–137.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Foxman B, Muraglia R, Dietz JP, Sobel JD, Wagner J. Prevalence of recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis in 5 European countries and the United States: results from an internet panel survey. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2013;17:340–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mårdh PA, Rodrigues AG, Genç M, Novikova N, Martinez-de-Oliveira J, Guaschino S. Facts and myths on recurrent vulvovaginal candidosis–a review on epidemiology, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, pathogenesis and therapy. Int J STD AIDS. 2002;13:522–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Watson C, Calabretto H. Comprehensive review of conventional and non-conventional methods of management of recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2007;47:262–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sobel JD, Wiesenfeld HC, Martens M, Danna P, Hooton TM, Rompalo A, et al. Maintenance fluconazole therapy for recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:876–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Witt A, Kaufmann U, Bitschnau M, Tempfer C, Ozbal A, Haytouglu E, et al. Monthly itraconazole versus classic homeopathy for the treatment of recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis: a randomised trial. BJOG. 2009;116:1499–505.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Aballéa S, Guelfucci F, Wagner J, Khemiri A, Dietz JP, Sobel J, et al. Subjective health status and health-related quality of life among women with recurrent vulvovaginal candidosis (RVVC) in Europe and the USA. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013;11:169.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Donders G, Bellen G, Byttebier G. Individualized decreasing-dose maintenance fluconazole regimen for recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis (ReCiDiF trial). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199:613. e1-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fan S, Liu X, Wu C, Xu L, Li J. Vaginal nystatin versus oral fluconazole for the treatment for recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis. Mycopathologia. 2015;179:95–101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rosa MI, Silva BR, Pires PS, Silva FR, Silva NC, Silva FR, et al. Weekly fluconazole therapy for recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013;167:132–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Richter SS, Galask RP, Messer SA, Hollis RJ, Diekema DJ, Pfaller MA. Antifungal susceptibilities of Candida species causing vulvovaginitis and epidemiology of recurrent cases. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43:2155–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Irving G, Miller D, Robinson A, Reynolds S, Copas AJ. Psychological factors associated with recurrent vaginal candidiasis: a preliminary study. Sex Transm Infect. 1998;74:334–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Nyirjesy P, Peyton C, Weitz MV, Mathew L, Culhane JF. Causes of chronic vaginitis: analysis of a prospective database of affected women. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108:1185–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Clennin MN, Payne JP, Rienzi EG, Lavie CJ, Blair SN, Pate RR, et al. Association between cardiorespiratory fitness and health-related quality of life among patients at risk for cardiovascular disease in Uruguay. PLoS One. 2015;10, e0123989.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Hu F, Niu L, Chen R, Ma Y, Qin X, Hu Z. The association between social capital and quality of life among type 2 diabetes patients in Anhui province, China: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:786.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Ibrahim N, Moy FM, Awalludin IA, Ali Z, Ismail IS. The health-related quality of life among pre-diabetics and its association with body mass index and physical activity in a semi-urban community in Malaysia–a cross sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:298.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu C, Wang S, Shen X, Li M, Wang L. The association between organizational behavior factors and health-related quality of life among college teachers: a cross-sectional study. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015;13:85.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu C, Wang L, Zhao Q. Factors related to health-related quality of life among Chinese psychiatrists: occupational stress and psychological capital. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15:20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Lou Z, Li Y, Yang Y, Wang L, Yang J. Affects of anxiety and depression on health-related quality of life among patients with benign breast lumps diagnosed via ultrasonography in China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015;12:10587–601.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Moradi A, Ebrahimzadeh MH, Soroush MR. Quality of life of caregiver spouses of veterans with bilateral lower extremity amputations. Trauma Mon. 2015;20, e21891.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Olsson SJ, Börjesson M, Ekblom-Bak E, Hemmingsson E, Hellénius ML, Kallings LV. Effects of the Swedish physical activity on prescription model on health-related quality of life in overweight older adults: a randomised controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:687.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Pang J, Cao YL, Zheng YX, Gao NY, Wang XZ, Chen B, et al. Influence of pain severity on health-related quality of life in Chinese knee osteoarthritis patients. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8:4472–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang P, Chen C, Yang R, Wu Y. Psychometric evaluation of health related quality of life among rural-to-urban migrants in China. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015;13:155.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhu Y, Wang Q, Pang G, Lin L, Origasa H, Wang Y, et al. Association between body mass index and health-related quality of life: the “obesity paradox” in 21,218 adults of the Chinese general population. PLoS One. 2015;10, e0130613.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Ware Jr JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30:473–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ware JE. SF-36 physical and mental health summary scales: a user’s manual. Boston: Health Assessment Lab: New England Medical Center; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  28. RAND. Medical outcomes study: 36-item short form survey scoring instructions. 2009. http://www.rand.org/health/surveys_tools/mos/mos_core_36item_scoring.html. Accessed 24 Apr. 2016.

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a Shenzhen Science and Technology Grant JCYJ20140415162338813.

Author information

Author notes

    Authors and Affiliations

    1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, 518036, China

      Yu-Xia Zhu, Ting Li, Shang-Rong Fan, Yi-Heng Liang & Ping Liu

    2. Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong, 515041, China

      Ting Li

    3. Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Gynecological Diagnostic Technology Research, Shenzhen, 518036, PR China

      Shang-Rong Fan

    4. Department of Laboratory Science, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, PR China

      Xiao-Ping Liu

    Authors
    1. Yu-Xia Zhu
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    2. Ting Li
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    3. Shang-Rong Fan
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    4. Xiao-Ping Liu
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    5. Yi-Heng Liang
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    6. Ping Liu
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    Corresponding author

    Correspondence to Shang-Rong Fan.

    Additional information

    Competing interest

    The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

    Authors’ contributions

    SRF directed the study implementation, including quality assurance and control, analysis and interpretation of the data, and drafting the article. YXZ and TL collected data and drafted the manuscript. YHL and XPL cultured and identified Candida. PL analyzed the data. All of the authors read and approved the final manuscript.

    Rights and permissions

    Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

    Reprints and Permissions

    About this article

    Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

    Cite this article

    Zhu, YX., Li, T., Fan, SR. et al. Health-related quality of life as measured with the Short-Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire in patients with recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis. Health Qual Life Outcomes 14, 65 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-016-0470-2

    Download citation

    • Received:

    • Accepted:

    • Published:

    • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-016-0470-2

    Keywords

    • Recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis
    • Health-related quality of life
    • SF-36
    • Candida

    Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

    ISSN: 1477-7525

    Contact us