Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub

Autism spectrum quotient, coping with stress and quality of life in a non-clinical sample – an exploratory report

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes volume 13, Article number: 173 (2015) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

It has been shown that autistic traits may be observed both in individuals with autism spectrum disorders and to a lesser extent in the general population. Since these traits are closely associated with limitations in social functioning, they make development of interpersonal relations difficult, and therefore may have a negative impact on an individual’s quality of life (QoL). The purpose of this study was to explore these links, including the mediating effects of coping styles.

Methods

A sample of 154 adults aged 19–38 years completed three questionnaires: Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ), Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations and World Health Organization Quality of Life—BREF. Pearson’s r correlation coefficients were analysed, followed by path analysis.

Results

All domains of QoL (Physical health, Psychological, Relationships and Environmental) were negatively correlated with AQ. The correlations were low or moderate (from −0.36 to −. 42). AQ was also correlated with two coping styles: positively with Emotion-oriented coping and negatively with Social diversion. Path analysis models showed the mediating effect of coping styles with respect to the relationships between autistic traits and QoL domains. Autistic traits and coping styles explained the greatest level of variance for the Psychological domain (41 %).

Conclusions

The results confirmed the relationship between autistic traits and QoL, mediated by two coping styles. Due to the small sample and narrow age range of participants, our findings should be treated as a preliminary report.

Background

Autism spectrum disorders (ASD) are life-long developmental disorders characterized by social and communication impairments and restricted patterns of behaviour and interests [1, 2]. Due to their specific characteristics, especially their highly negative impact on the ability to establish social relations, ASD often lead to poor social adjustment and poor long-term outcomes with respect to independent living [3, 4]. This is true even in high-functioning individuals with ASD, i.e. those without intellectual disabilities [5, 6].

Autistic characteristics affect the functioning of the individual in a way that may adversely influence subjective quality of life (QoL). The World Health Organization (WHO) defines subjective QoL as an individual’s perception of their position in life in the context of the culture and value systems in which they live and in relation to their goals, expectations, standards and concerns [7]. Subjective QoL is a multifaceted concept including, among other things, subjective perception of physical health and psychological state, social relationships and salient features of the environment. Thus defined, subjective QoL has been demonstrated to be lower in individuals with ASD than in the general population [8]. It has been also found that individuals with Asperger syndrome (one of the disorders grouped within ASD) were more likely to report depression, suicidal ideation, suicide plans and attempts compared not only to the general population, but also those with medical or psychic illnesses [9].

Many researchers share the view that certain behavioural and cognitive characteristics typically seen in autism, referred to as autistic traits or Broader Autism Phenotype [10, 11], are present not only in individuals with ASD and their first-degree relatives, but are also distributed throughout the general population [12–15]. The dimensional nature of ASD is still up for debate, and it is unclear whether autistic traits in individuals with ASD and those without such a diagnosis are the same phenomenon [16, 17]. Nevertheless, extensive research is being conducted in non-clinical groups to explore links between autistic traits and other aspects of human psychological functioning. These studies often utilize the Autism Spectrum Quotient questionnaire (AQ) developed by S. Baron-Cohen et al. [14].

Links between autistic traits and subjective QoL have not been fully elaborated yet, despite the arguments existing for undertaking such research. Autistic traits, by definition, may inhibit the development of satisfying social relationships. Specifically, it has been demonstrated that individuals with greater expression of autistic traits reported stronger feelings of loneliness [18, 19], depression and anxiety, as well as higher rates of being bullied [20]. In a study of newlywed couples, Pollmann, Finkenauer and Begeer [21] found that higher levels of autistic traits in males were associated with lower relationship satisfaction. Considering the importance of interpersonal relations for individual wellbeing [22], the relationships between autistic traits and QoL certainly deserve attention from researchers.

It has also been established that the relationships between personal characteristics and QoL are mediated by coping with stress [23–25]. Lazarus and Folkman [26] defined coping with stress as cognitive and behavioural efforts undertaken to meet specific external and internal demands that individuals perceive as stretching or exceeding their resources. Depending on an individual’s personality characteristics, certain coping styles may affect subjective QoL differently [23]. To our knowledge, there is currently no information about links between autistic traits and coping with stress in non-clinical samples. These traits may increase the risk of experiencing stress and impair the use of effective coping methods, since difficulties in social relations resulting from autistic traits may hinder the use of coping styles that involve seeking support from others. Furthermore, neuroticism, which is positively correlated with autistic traits [27, 28], is known to be strongly associated both with perceived stress [29] and coping with stress [30]. To date, however, the relationships between autistic traits, coping styles and QoL have not been specifically targeted in research. The aim of the present study is to identify and describe these relationships in a non-clinical sample of young adults. The concepts of autistic traits, as well as a Broader Autism Phenotype (BAP) or AQ, may imply slightly distinct theoretical notions, and as stand-alone constructs are deserving of detailed empirical analysis. However, due to preliminary nature of this study, we have decided to limit our analysis involving the measurement of autistic characteristics to the Autism Spectrum Quotient concept, reflected by the total score from the AQ questionnaire [14]. We expect to find negative correlations between AQ and QoL, and to confirm the mediating role of stress-coping styles in the relationships between these variables. Since our limited knowledge makes it impossible to specify the nature of these relationships more precisely, especially with respect to coping styles, this is an exploratory study in its nature.

Methods

Sample

The participants group consisted of 153 individuals (93 females, 60 males) aged 19–38 years (M = 22.11 years, SD = 2.10 years). They were university students of humanities, social sciences, economics and science.

Instruments

Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ)

AQ is a self-report survey to assess autistic traits in a general population. It consists of 50 statements to which participants respond on a 4-point Likert scale (1- definitely agree, 2- slightly agree, 3- slightly disagree, 4 - definitely disagree). One point is awarded for each diagnostic answer, which is “agree” in one half of the statements and “disagree” in the other half (irrespective of whether “slightly” or “definitely”), therefore reducing the four point scale to dichotomous one, as proposed by Baron-Cohen et al. [14]. The total score ranges from 0 to 50 points, with higher scores representing greater severity of autistic traits. It should be noted that using the conventional 0–1 scoring procedure and reducing the scale from a four-point to a two-point range may be questionable. We decided to do so out of a desire to make our data compatible with the vast majority number of previous studies.

AQ allows for the calculation of the total score and five subscale scores: Social skill, Communication, Attention switching, Imagination and Attention to detail. Some studies have shown that while reliability for the total score is acceptable, it is significantly lower for some of the subscales [13, 28, 31–33]. Furthermore, the hypothesized five-factor structure of AQ has yet to be confirmed empirically [13, 34–36]. As described earlier [30] the Polish version of the Autism-Spectrum Quotient was translated from English into Polish with the consent of Prof. Simon Baron-Cohen by Ewa Pisula, Ph.D., Agnieszka Rynkiewicz, MAT, M.D. and Izabela Łucka, M.D., Ph.D. Next, a different translator back-translated the Polish version AQ into English. The original English and back- translated versions were compared by a native English speaker. The text was edited according to comments received from a native English speaker, following which the reformulated items were translated into English by a translator unfamiliar with the content of the comments and original questionnaire then compared with the original by a native English speaker; the final Polish version of the AQ was then established (available at http:/www.psychologia.pl/rehabilitacja/, as well as from the first author upon request). The Polish version of AQ employs the same scoring system as the original. The psychometric properties of this instrument were analysed [32]. Reliability (AQ total score) measured using Cronbach’s alpha coefficient in a Polish sample (2819 individuals) has been found satisfactory, r = 0.71 [32], although—as in studies conducted in other countries cited above—the internal consistency coefficients for subscales (excepting social skill) were low. This is why only the total AQ score is analysed in the present study. It should be mentioned that the absence of the subscales in our analyses creates obvious limitations in interpretation of the results. However, given the exploratory nature of our study, sample size and unsatisfactory psychometric properties of the subscales [32], we chose not to conduct a detailed analysis involving AQ subscales.

Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations (CISS)

CISS measures coping styles [37]. It consists of 48 items comprising three scales: (1) Task-oriented coping—engaging in efforts aimed at solving a problem through cognitive restructuring or attempts to alter the situation and solve the problem; (2) Emotion-oriented coping—responding to stress with self-oriented emotional reactions, focusing activity on the reduction of emotional tension caused by the stressor; (3) Avoidance-oriented coping—tendency to avoid a stressful situation in one of two ways: avoidance by social diversion and avoidance by distraction.

Items are answered on a 1 (not at all) to 5 (very much) Likert scale. The Polish version of CISS was used, which features high reliability ranging from 0.78 to 0.9 for individual subscales [38].

World Health Organization Quality of Life—BREF (WHOQOL-BREF)

The subjective QoL measure was the WHOQOL-BREF, which is derived from the 100-item WHOQOL [7]. The instrument comprises 26 items, including two general questions regarding (1) subjective overall perception of QoL and (2) individual, overall perception of the subject’s health, as well as 24 belonging to four domains: physical health (7 items), psychological state (6 items), social relationships (3 items) and environment (8 items). Participants respond to each item on a 5-point scale (1 = very poor/very dissatisfied/not at all; 2 = poor/dissatisfied/a little; 3 = neither poor nor good/a moderate amount; 4 = good/satisfied/very much; 5 = very good/very satisfied/extremely). The study used the Polish version of WHOQOL-BREF prepared by Jaracz [39]. Scores in each of the four domains were analysed (the general questions were ignored). Scores for individual domains were calculated by computing the arithmetic mean for the items belonging to a given domain and multiplying the result by four (to obtain scores comparable with the full version of WHOQOL). The Polish version of WHOQOL-BREF measured by Cronbach’s alpha is satisfactory. The values for individual domains are 0.81 for Physical, 0.78 for Psychological, 0.69 for Relationships and 0.77 for Environmental [39].

Demographics survey

In the demographics survey the participants were asked to state their age, gender and field of study. They were also asked if they had ever been diagnosed with ASD. In addition, they were asked whether they had close relatives diagnosed with childhood autism, Asperger syndrome or pervasive developmental disorders not otherwise specified.

Data collection and ethics

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Psychology at the University of Warsaw. The study was administered in groups; all participants were informed about the purpose of the study, voluntary participation and anonymity. The order of scales in the sets distributed to students was randomized. Incomplete questionnaires (7 out of 160) were rejected before analysis. The number of participants given above (N = 153) includes only the sets qualified for analysis. None of the participants declared that they had ever been diagnosed with ASD. Three participants declared that members of their extended family (cousins) had been diagnosed with Asperger syndrome.

Statistical analysis

Statistical calculations were performed using SPSS/AMOS v. 21. Assessment of links between AQ, coping styles and QoL domains employed Pearson’s product moment correlation coefficients, followed by path analysis. The mediating effects of coping styles on the relationship between AQ and QoL were tested using path analysis models. The maximum likelihood estimation method was used. The adjusted level of significance, in general α/k for k tests, was used to conduct each of the individual k tests and was applied to tested models when there was at least two predictors of the same variable.

Results

Descriptive findings

The descriptive statistics of the scores obtained by the students in all scales used in the study are shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Descriptive statistics of AQ, QoL and coping styles. Means and Standard Deviations are shown both across gender groups and the total sample
Full size table

Correlation analysis

As the initial step for further analysis, Pearson’s product moment correlation coefficients were calculated. The results are shown in Table 2.

Table 2 Correlations of the AQ with the quality of life domains and coping styles
Full size table

All measured aspects of QoL were negatively correlated with total AQ score. The correlations were low or moderate (from −0.36 to −0.42). In addition, the AQ score correlated with two coping styles: positively with Emotion-oriented coping and negatively with Social diversion.

Path analyses

Possible mediators included in the path analysis models were Emotion-oriented coping and Social diversion, i.e. those coping styles for which statistically significant relationships with AQ were found. Each QoL domain was analysed in a separate model. For the sake of nonnormality of the Relationships domain distribution (Kolmogorov-Smirnow Z = 2.07, p < 0.001), this variable was log-transformed. The transformation was successful and facilitated proceeding with further analysis. The results of the path analysis models for each QoL domain are presented in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Path analysis models for QoL domains: (a) – Physical health domain; (b) – Psychological domain; (c) – Relationships domain, and (d) – Environmental domain

Full size image

As Fig. 1 shows, Emotion-oriented coping was a full mediator of the relationship between AQ and each of the QoL domains. AQ predicted Emotion-oriented coping, which in turn was negatively correlated with QoL.

In the model for the Physical health domain of QoL (see Fig. 1a), AQ explained 19 % of variance in Emotion-oriented coping, while Emotion-oriented coping in turn explained 35 % of Physical health domain variance. Bonferroni correction was applied to test the significance of the relationships between Emotion-oriented coping, Social diversion and QoL domains. There was no statistically significant association between Social diversion and Physical health, meaning that Social diversion was not a mediator of the relationship between AQ and the Physical health domain. One path with no significant relationship was dropped and it is presented in Fig. 1a for illustrative purposes only. Based on modification indices values and in order to achieve a better fit of the model, the path representing Social diversion as an effect of Emotion-oriented coping was added. Controlling for AQ revealed the association between Emotion-oriented coping and Social diversion. AQ was negatively related to Social diversion, while Emotion-oriented coping was positively correlated with Social diversion. Both predictors together explained 20 % of the variance in Social diversion.

There was no statistically significant difference between the tested model and data, χ2 (2) = 2.03, p > 0.05. The fit indexes had appropriate values, CFI = 0.99, RMSEA = 0.01. The Sobel test has shown that the effect of Emotion-oriented coping as a mediator of the relationship between AQ and Physical health domain was statistically significant, Z = − 4.67, p < 0.001. Emotion-oriented coping mediated 70.2 % of the total effect of AQ on the Physical health domain.

In the model presented in Fig. 1b, Social diversion was positively correlated with the Psychological domain of QoL. Emotion-oriented coping and Social diversion were two mediators of the relationship between AQ and QoL. AQ was positively correlated with Emotion-oriented coping and negatively related to Social diversion. The Psychological domain was negatively correlated with Emotion-oriented coping and positively related to Social diversion. Based on the modification indices values, in order to achieve a better fit of the model the path representing Social diversion as an effect of Emotion-oriented coping was added, the same as in the model for the Physical health domain. Emotion-oriented coping was positively related to Social diversion, which, when taken together with AQ, explained 20 % of Social diversion variance. The two mediators of Emotion-oriented coping and Social diversion explained 41 % of Psychological domain variance. There was no statistically significant difference between the tested model and the data, χ2(1) = 2.89, p > 0.05. The fit indexes had appropriate values for this model as well, CFI = 0.99, RMSEA = 0.11. The Sobel test has indicated that the effect of Emotion-oriented coping as a mediator of relationship between AQ and Psychological domain was statistically significant, Z = − 4.49, p < 0.001. The value of the Sobel test for Social diversion tested as mediator was not statistically significant, Z = − 1.30, p > 0.05. Emotion-oriented coping mediated 46.6 % of the total effect of AQ on the Psychological domain.

The results for the Relationships domain are presented in Fig. 1c. The model was very similar to that obtained for the Psychological domain, but both Emotion-oriented coping and Social diversion explained only 17 % of the Relationships domain. There was no statistically significant difference between the tested model and the data, χ2 (1) = 2.65, p > 0.05, and the fit indexes had appropriate values, CFI = 0.98, RMSEA = 0.01. The Sobel test has shown that the effect of Emotion-oriented coping as a mediator of relationship between AQ and the Relationships domain was statistically significant, Z = − 2.31, p < 0.01. The value of the Sobel test for Social diversion tested as mediator was not statistically significant, Z = −1.59, p > 0.05. Emotion-oriented coping mediated 26.7 % of the total effect of AQ on the Relationships domain.

The model for the Environmental domain is shown in Fig. 1d. This model was very similar to those obtained for the Psychological and Relationships domains. The relationship between Social diversion and the Environmental domain was weaker than for the Psychological and Relationships domains, however, both Emotion-oriented coping and Social diversion explained 33 % of the Environmental domain. There was no statistically significant difference between the tested model and the data, χ2 (1) = 3.48, p > 0.05, while the fit indexes had values of CFI = 0.98, RMSEA = 0.13. The increased RMSEA value is an effect of the weaker correlation between Social diversion and the Environmental domain. The Sobel test has shown that the effect of Emotion-oriented coping as a mediator of the relationship between AQ and Environmental domain was statistically significant, Z = − 4.24, p < 0.001. The value of Sobel test for Social diversion tested as mediator was not statistically significant, Z = − 0.09, p > 0,05. Emotion-oriented coping mediated 48.92 % of the total effect of AQ on the Environmental domain.

Equivalence of the causal structures between the groups of men and women was also tested. The χ2 differences were not statistically significant: for Physical health Δχ2 (4) = 0.01, p > 0.05, for the Psychological domain Δχ2 (5) = 0.01, p > 0.05, for Relationships Δχ2 (5) = 0.01, p > 0.05 and for the Environmental domain Δχ2 (5) = 0.01, p > 0.05, so it can be assumed that the regression paths operate equivalently across the two groups in each model.

Discussion

As expected, our study identified relationships between AQ and QoL. AQ was correlated with all QoL domains. While these correlations were low to moderate, any interpretations should take into account the small sample size. The anticipated direction of the relationship was confirmed: higher levels of AQ correlated with lower QoL. This is consistent with the results of studies on subjective QoL in individuals with ASD and their parents [8, 40]. Mugno et al. [40] showed that the parents of children with ASD tended to report lower QoL than the parents of children with cerebral palsy and intellectual disabilities. The authors of the paper cited above claim that their results may be interpreted not only in terms of specific difficulties experienced by parents raising children with ASD, but also as an effect of the genetic predispositions to develop both autistic traits and depression, and the impact of these factors on the reported QoL. It is possible that the relationship between autistic traits and susceptibility to depression, which other authors have also hinted at [41–43], has affected the results of the present study as well. This interpretation is supported by some empirical data [44] and opens up the interesting prospect of exploring neurobiological mechanisms common to autistic traits and depression, although this issue lies outside the scope of this paper. Since this controversy cannot be resolved on the basis of the data presented in the present study, we must leave this question open for future research. The negative correlation between AQ and QoL can result from the impairment of social relations caused by autistic traits. Autistic traits are associated with lower satisfaction with social relationships and with a sense of loneliness [18, 21]. There is evidence that individuals with higher levels of autistic traits are at a higher risk of rejection and aggression from others [27], which in turn can affect their subjective evaluation of QoL.

Correlation analysis revealed the presence of associations between AQ and two coping styles: Emotion-oriented coping and Social diversion. Autistic traits seem to be positively associated with a tendency to use coping styles focused on emotions and negatively with a tendency to cope by using Social diversion. In the case of the correlation between AQ and Emotion-oriented coping, we can hypothesize that autistic traits may lead to the use of less adaptive ways of coping, thereby making access to some effective stress-coping styles more difficult (e.g. enlisting the help of others). It has been established that emotional-oriented coping is less adaptive and associated with poor QoL [45]. It is also noteworthy that research on individuals with ASD and members of their families, i.e. along with the dimensional approach to ASD, has demonstrated that intense stress triggers stereotyped behaviour, rituals, self-stimulation and aggressive behaviour, as well as crying and anger, which is thought to reduce emotional arousal [46]. The positive correlation between AQ and emotion-focused coping may indicate that individuals with higher levels of AQ use emotion concentrated coping to reduce emotional arousal. It may be noted that some studies have shown a relationship between autism spectrum traits and alexithymia [47, 48]. Alexithymia, defined as difficulty in identifying and describing one’s emotional experience [49], is associated with poor ability to regulate emotional arousal efficiently, and therefore low adaptive coping [50]. Positive correlations between alexithymia and repressive coping style, denial and disengagement have been already identified (eg. [51, 52]). Given the above, the positive correlation between AQ and emotion-oriented coping seems to be consistent with the outcomes of previously cited studies.

The link between AQ and Social diversion seems rather straightforward. This subtype of Avoidant coping implies engaging in social contact in order to avoid stressors. In people who tend to be significantly less involved in social relationships, this type of coping with stress is by definition less likely. Less frequent Social diversion coping was also observed in parents of children with ASD [53]. It remains unclear whether this is due to time constraints that prevent these parents from spending time in the company of others, or whether it is somehow related to the level of autistic traits in parents. We could expect people with higher levels of autistic traits to make less frequent use of coping styles that require involvement in social contacts, such as seeking social support. This issue, however, is beyond the scope of the present paper. It should be emphasized, moreover, that we found no correlations between AQ and other measured coping styles, including Task-oriented coping or the other subtype of the Avoidant style—Distraction.

An interesting aspect of the present study is the presence of the mediatory effect of Emotion-oriented coping and Social diversion on the relationship between autistic traits and QoL. The direction of the relationship with QoL is not surprising in the case of Emotion-oriented coping. Consistently with the findings of previous studies that demonstrated a negative correlation of this coping style with QoL [54, 55], it is negative for all QoL domains. The findings regarding Social diversion are less straightforward. The style turned out to be a predictor for all QoL domains except Physical health. In each of the remaining domains, the correlation between Social diversion and QoL was positive, i.e. the higher participants scored for that style, the higher QoL they reported. The developed models indicate that autistic traits lower the probability of using Social diversion as a coping style, and the style mediates the relationship between autistic traits and QoL. The avoidant style involving Social diversion proved to be beneficial in the context of QoL (although the correlation was weak). Avoidant coping is widely regarded as disadvantageous in terms of QoL [56–58]. Our findings suggest that it may be beneficial for the three measured areas of QoL. This could mean that for individuals with higher levels of autistic traits, coping by avoiding stressors through intensified socializing enhances their subjective QoL. It is noteworthy that a similar relationship between Avoidant coping and QoL has been found by other researchers, for example in patients after coronary angioplasty [59].

The percentage of variance explained by the analysed models differed across QoL domains. It was the highest (41 %) in the case of the Psychological domain. This domain includes, among others, acceptance of one’s bodily appearance, presence of negative feelings, overall satisfaction with oneself and self-esteem. The fact that the level of autistic traits reported by participants combined with coping styles explains a relatively high proportion of variance of QoL may reflect the significance of autistic traits in the context of various aspects of self-esteem. This issue, however, requires further research. The magnitude of the total effect of AQ on the QoL domains mediated by Emotion-oriented coping (from 26.7 % in Relationships to 70.2 % in Physical health) proved the validity of the coping styles input within the models of the AQ and QoL relations.

A relatively high proportion of QoL variance was explained by autistic traits and coping styles also with respect to the Physical health and Environmental domains (35 and 33 %, respectively). Physical health includes, among others, necessary medical treatment, assessment of one’s energy, ability to get around, pain and discomfort, assessment of sleep and ability to work. These are the key elements of the overall assessment of one’s health and physical condition. The scope of the Environmental domain is very broad: it includes, among other elements, financial resources, sense of freedom, physical and psychological safety, health and healthcare, living conditions, availability of new information and skills, opportunities for leisure and physical environment. The smallest proportion of QoL variance (17 %) was explained by AQ and coping styles in the case of the Relationships domain. This domain appears to be the one most directly linked with autistic traits, since it encompasses satisfaction with personal relationships, support from friends and sex life. Since in WHOQOL-BREF it consists of only three items, it provides very little information about subjects’ perceptions of their relationships with others. The limited scope of social relationships in the questionnaire may have affected the results in terms of variance in this QoL domain explained by autistic traits.

Conclusions and limitations

Our findings have revealed links between autistic traits, coping styles and QoL, but they have also shown that variability of autistic traits in a general population sample is not a decisive factor when it comes to QoL. It is obvious that the latter is affected to a significant extent by other variables not measured in the present study. Any interpretation of the findings must take into account the limitations of the study, such as the size and characteristics of the sample: all participants were students of universities in large cities aged from 19 to 38 years. The study used exclusively self-report measures, which means that the participants themselves declared how many autistic traits they had, which coping styles they used and what their QoL was like. Any interpretation must also be limited to a non-clinical population only, since the relationship between autistic traits in the general population and in people with ASD has not yet been established, and our study did not involve participants with ASD.

It should also be noted that this study did not involve measurement of exposure to stress. This should be taken into account in future research, since autistic traits may affect perceived stress levels. Moreover, the possible role of neuroticism in shaping the links among AQ, coping with stress and QoL is worthy of analysis. Since neuroticism is associated with autistic traits [27, 28], as well as with perceived stress [29] and coping with stress [30], including all these variables into a tested model seems to be a promising idea.

Due to these limitations the present study should be treated as a preliminary report. Nevertheless, our findings can provide cues for further investigation of the factors that determine the relationships between autistic traits and perceived QoL. This may be especially important due to the rising incidence of ASD [60], which in turn may lead to new circumstances affecting the QoL of individuals who express those traits and their social partners.

References

  1. World Health Organization. International classification of diseases: diagnostic criteria for research (10th edition). Switzerland, Geneva: Author; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  2. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington: Author; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Billstedt E, Gillberg C, Gillberg C. Autism after adolescence: population-based 13- to 22-year follow-up study of 120 individuals with autism diagnosed in childhood. J Autism Dev Disord. 2005;35:351–60. doi:10.1007/s10803-005-3302-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Howlin P, Goode S, Hutton J, Rutter M. Adult outcome for children with autism. J Child Psychol Psychiatry Allied Discip. 2004;45:212–29. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00215.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tsatsanis KD. Outcome research in Asperger syndrome and autism. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2003;12:47–63. doi:10.1016/S1056-4993(02)00056-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Barnhill GP. Outcomes in adults with Asperger syndrome. Focus Autism Other Dev Disabl. 2007;22:116–26. doi:10.1177/10883576070220020301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. The World Health Organization Quality of Life assessment (WHOQOL): position paper from the World Health Organization. Soc Sci Med. 1995;41:1403–9. doi:10.1016/0277-9536(95)00112-K.

  8. Kamio Y, Inada N, Koyama T. A nationwide survey on quality of life and associated factors of adults with high-functioning autism spectrum disorders. Autism. 2012. doi:10.1177/1362361312436848.

  9. Cassidy S, Bradley P, Robinson J, Allison C, Mchugh M, Baron-Cohen S. Suicidal ideation and suicide plans or attempts in adults with Asperger ’ s syndrome attending a specialist diagnostic clinic: a clinical cohort study. Lancet Psychiatry. 2014;1(2):142–7. doi:10.1016/S2215-0366(14)70248-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Piven J. The broad autism phenotype: a complementary strategy for molecular genetic studies of autism. Am J Med Genet. 2001;105:34–5. doi:10.1002/1096-8628(20010108)105:1<34::AID-AJMG1052>3.0.CO;2-D.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ingersoll B, Wainer A. The broader autism phenotype. In: Volkmar FR, Rogers SJ, Paul R, Pelphrey KA, editors. Handbook of autism and pervasive developmental disorders, vol. 1. 4th ed. New Jersey: Wiley & Sons; 2014. p. 28–56.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Constantino JN, Todd RD. Intergenerational transmission of subthreshold autistic traits in the general population. Biol Psychiatry. 2005;57(6):655–60. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.12.014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hoekstra RA, Bartels M, Verweij CJH, Boomsma DI. Heritability of autistic traits in the general population. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007;161(4):372–7. doi:10.1001/archpedi.161.4.372.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Baron-Cohen S, Wheelwright S, Skinner R, Martin J, Clubley E. The Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ): evidence from asperger syndrome/high-functioning autism, males and females, scientists and mathematicians. J Autism Dev Disord. 2001;31:5–17. doi:10.1023/A:1005653411471.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sucksmith E, Roth I, Hoekstra RA. Autistic traits below the clinical threshold: re-examining the broader autism phenotype in the 21st century. Neuropsychol Rev. 2011;21:360–89. doi:10.1007/s11065-011-9183-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Murray AL, Booth T, McKenzie K, Kuenssberg R, O’Donnell M. Are autistic traits measured equivalently in individuals with and without an autism spectrum disorder? An invariance analysis of the autism spectrum quotient short form. J Autism Dev Disord. 2014;44:55–64. doi:10.1007/s10803-013-1851-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Frazier TW, Youngstrom EA, Sinclair L, Kubu CS, Law P, Rezai A, et al. Autism spectrum disorders as a qualitatively distinct category from typical behavior in a large, clinically ascertained sample. Assessment. 2010;17:308–20. doi:10.1177/1073191109356534.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lamport D, Zlomke KR. The broader autism phenotype, social interaction anxiety, and loneliness: implications for social functioning. Curr Psychol. 2014;33:246–55. doi:10.1007/s12144-014-9210-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jobe LE, Williams WS. Loneliness, social relationships, and a broader autism phenotype in college students. Pers Individ Dif. 2007;42:1479–89. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2006.10.021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kunihira Y, Senju A, Dairoku H, Wakabayashi A, Hasegawa T. “Autistic” traits in non-autistic Japanese populations: relationships with personality traits and cognitive ability. J Autism Dev Disord. 2006;36(4):553–66. doi:10.1007/s10803-006-0094-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Pollmann MMH, Finkenauer C, Begeer S. Mediators of the link between autistic traits and relationship satisfaction in a non-clinical sample. J Autism Dev Disord. 2010;40:470–8. doi:10.1007/s10803-009-0888-z.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Baumeister RF, Leary MR. The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychol Bull. 1995;117:497–529. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wrosch C, Scheier MF. Personality and quality of life: the importance of optimism and goal adjustment. Qual Life Res. 2003;12:59–72. doi:10.1023/A:1023529606137.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Van De Ven MOM, Engels RCME. Quality of life of adolescents with asthma: the role of personality, coping strategies, and symptom reporting. J Psychosom Res. 2011;71:166–73. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2011.03.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Poppe C, Crombez G, Hanoulle I, Vogelaers D, Petrovic M. Mental quality of life in chronic fatigue is associated with an accommodative coping style and neuroticism: a path analysis. Qual Life Res. 2012;21:1337–45. doi:10.1007/s11136-011-0048-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lazarus RS, Folkman S. Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer; 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wakabayashi A, Baron-Cohen S, Wheelwright S. Are autistic traits an independent personality dimension? A study of the Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ) and the NEO-PI-R. Pers Individ Dif. 2006;41(5):873–83. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2006.04.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Austin EJ. Personality correlates of the broader autism phenotype as assessed by the Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ). Pers Individ Dif. 2005;38:451–60. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2004.04.022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Otonari J, Nagano J, Morita M, Budhathoki S, Tashiro N, Toyomura K, et al. Neuroticism and extraversion personality traits, health behaviours, and subjective well-being: The Fukuoka Study (Japan). Qual Life Res. 2012;21:1847–55. doi:10.1007/s11136-011-0098-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Vollrath M, Alnaes R, Torgersen S. Differential effects of coping in mental disorders: a prospective study in psychiatric outpatients. J Clin Psychol. 1996;52:125–35. doi:10.1002/jclp.10200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ingersoll B, Hopwood CJ, Wainer A, Brent DM. A comparison of three self-report measures of the broader autism phenotype in a non-clinical sample. J Autism Dev Disord. 2011;41:1646–57. doi:10.1007/s10803-011-1192-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Pisula E, Kawa R, Szostakiewicz Ł, Łucka I, Kawa M, Rynkiewicz A. Autistic traits in male and female students and individuals with high functioning autism spectrum disorders measured by the Polish version of the autism-spectrum quotient. PLoS One. 2013;8(9):e75236. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0075236.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Murray AL, Booth T, McKenzie K, Kuenssberg R. What range of trait levels can the Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ) measure reliably? An item response theory analysis. Psychol Assess [Internet]. 2015; Available from: doi: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26302097.doi: 10.1037/pas0000215.

  34. Hurst RM, Mitchell JT, Kimbrel NA, Kwapil TK, Nelson-Gray RO. Examination of the reliability and factor structure of the Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ) in a non-clinical sample. Pers Individ Dif. 2007;43:1938–49. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2007.06.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kloosterman PH, Keefer KV, Kelley EA, Summerfeldt LJ, Parker JDA. Evaluation of the factor structure of the Autism-Spectrum Quotient. Pers Individ Dif. 2011;50:310–4. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.10.015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Stewart ME, Austin EJ. The structure of the Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ): evidence from a student sample in Scotland. Pers Individ Dif. 2009;47:224–8. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2009.03.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Endler NS, Parker JD. Multidimensional assessment of coping: a critical evaluation. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1990;58:844–54. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.58.5.844.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Strelau J, Jaworowska A, Wrześniewski K, Szczepaniak P. Kwestionariusz Radzenia Sobie w Sytuacjach Stresowych CISS. Podręcznik: Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych PTP; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Jaracz K, Kalfoss M, Górna K, Baczyk G. Quality of life in Polish respondents: psychometric properties of the Polish WHOQOL - Bref. Scand J Caring Sci. 2006;20:251–60. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6712.2006.00401.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Mugno D, Ruta L, D’Arrigo VG, Mazzone L. Impairment of quality of life in parents of children and adolescents with pervasive developmental disorder. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007;5:22. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-5-22.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Smalley S, McCracken JTP. Autism, affective disorders, and social phobia. Am J Med Genet. 1995;60:19–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Piven J, Landa R, Gayle J, Cloud D, Chase GFS. Psychiatric disorders in the parents of autistic individuals. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1991;30:471–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Murphy M, Bolton PF, Pickles A, Fombonne E, Piven J, Rutter M. Personality traits of the relatives of autistic probands. Psychol Med. 2000;30(6):1411–24. doi:10.1017/S0033291799002949.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Asano R, Tsuchiya KJ, Takei N, Harada T, Kugizaki Y, Nakahara R, et al. Broader autism phenotype as a risk factor for postpartum depression: Hamamatsu Birth Cohort (HBC) Study. Res Autism Spectr Disord. 2014;8:1672–8. Elsevier Ltd. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1750946714002025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Hesselink AE, Penninx BWJH, Schlösser MAG, Wijnhoven HA, van der Windt DA, Kriegsman DM, et al. The role of coping resources and coping style in quality of life of patients with asthma or COPD. Qual Life Res. 2004;13:509–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Groden J, Cautela J, Prince S, Berryman J. The impact of stress and anxiety on individuals with autism and developmental disabilities. In: Schopler E, Mesibov GB, editors. Behavioral issues in autism. New York: Plenum Press; 1994. p. 177–94.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  47. Aaron RV, Benson TL, Park S. Investigating the role of alexithymia on the empathic deficits found in schizotypy and autism spectrum traits. Pers Individ Dif. 2015;77:215–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Berthoz S, Lalanne C, Crane L, Hill EL. Investigating emotional impairments in adults with autism spectrum disorders and the broader autism phenotype. Psychiatry Res. 2013;208(3):257–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Lane RD, Ahern GL, Schwartz GE, Kaszniak AW. Is alexithymia the emotional equivalent of blindsight? Biol Psychiatry. 1997;42:834–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Berthoz S, Hill EL. The validity of using self-reports to assess emotion regulation abilities in adults with autism spectrum disorder. Eur Psychiatry. 2005;20:291–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Lane RD, Sechrest L, Reidel R, Shapiro DE, Kaszniak AW. Pervasive emotion recognition deficit common to alexithymia and the repressive coping style. Psychosom Med. 2000;62:492–501.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Swart M, Kortekaas R, Aleman A. Dealing with feelings: characterization of trait alexithymia on emotion regulation strategies and cognitive-emotional processing. PLoS One. 2009;4:e5751.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Dabrowska A, Pisula E. Parenting stress and coping styles in mothers and fathers of pre-school children with autism and Down syndrome. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2010;54:266–80. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2788.2010.01258.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Ritsner M, Farkas H, Gibel A. Satisfaction with quality of life varies with temperament types of patients with schizophrenia. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2003;191:668–74. doi:10.1097/01.nmd.0000092176.87288.2e.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Koedoot C, Bouwmans C, Franken M-C, Stolk E. Quality of life in adults who stutter. J Commun Disord. 2011;44(4):429–43. doi:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2011.02.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Botchkovar EV, Tittle CR, Antonaccio O. Strain, coping, and socioeconomic status: coping histories and present choices. J Quant Criminol. 2013;29:217–50. doi:10.1007/s10940-012-9177-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Brandt CP, Zvolensky MJ, Vujanovic AA, Grover KW, Hogan J, Bakhshaie J, et al. The mediating role of anxiety sensitivity in the relation between avoidant coping and posttraumatic stress among trauma-exposed HIV+ Individuals. Psychol Trauma Theory Res Pract Policy. 2014. doi:10.1037/a0037236.

  58. Steeger CM, Gondoli DM, Morrissey RA. Maternal avoidant coping mediates the effect of parenting stress on depressive symptoms during early adolescence. J Child Fam Stud. 2013;22:952–61. doi:10.1007/s10826-012-9657-2.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Echteld MA, van Elderen T, van der Kamp LJT. Modeling predictors of quality of life after coronary angioplasty. Ann Behav Med. 2003;26:49–60. doi:10.1207/S15324796ABM2601_07.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. CDC. Prevalence of autism spectrum disorder among children aged 8 years — autism and developmental disabilities monitoring network, 11 Sites, United States, 2010. Surveill Summ. 2014;63:1–21.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Marta Kuligowska and Anna Kościan for their assistance in data collection and Katarzyna Trędota for her help in database preparation. The study was supported by a grant from the Polish National Science Centre (#UMO-2011/03/B/HS6/03326) and by the University of Warsaw.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland

    Ewa Pisula & Rafał Kawa

  2. Institute of Applied Psychology, The Maria Grzegorzewska College for Special Education, Warsaw, Poland

    Dorota Danielewicz

  3. Institute of Psychology, Polish Academy of Science, Warsaw, Poland

    Wojciech Pisula

Authors
  1. Ewa Pisula
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dorota Danielewicz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rafał Kawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Wojciech Pisula
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ewa Pisula.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

EP designed the study and provided the theoretical hypotheses. DD and RK organized the process of data collection. WP analyzed the collected data. All authors contributed to the discussion section. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pisula, E., Danielewicz, D., Kawa, R. et al. Autism spectrum quotient, coping with stress and quality of life in a non-clinical sample – an exploratory report. Health Qual Life Outcomes 13, 173 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-015-0370-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-015-0370-x

Keywords

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

ISSN: 1477-7525

Contact us