Table 2 Rating of each EMPRO items and attribute for OHRQoL in Elderly
ATTRIBUTES | DSQ | EORTC QLQ-OH15 | GOHAI | IPQ-RDE | LORQ | OIDP | OHAI | OHIDL | OHIP | OHQoL-UK-W | ORHQL | PQL | QoLDAS-9 | QoLIP-10 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CONCEPT AND MEASUREMENT MODEL | NI | 97.6 | 92.9 | 85.7 | 17.9 | 69.0 | 63.1 | 86.9 | 85.7 | 52.4 | 47.6 | 66.7 | 90.5 | 85.7 | |
1 | concept of measurement stated | + | ++++ | ++++ | ++++ | ++ | ++++ | ++++ | ++++ | ++++ | +++ | ++++ | ++++ | ++++ | ++++ |
2 | obtaining and combining items described | – | ++++ | ++++ | ++++ | + | ++++ | ++++ | ++++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | ++++ | ++++ | ++++ |
3 | rationality for dimensionality and scales | – | ++++ | +++ | ++++ | + | ++ | ++++ | ++++ | ++ | ++ | +++ | +++ | ++++ | +++ |
4 | involvement of target population | – | ++++ | +++ | +++ | + | ++++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | ++++ | +++ | ++++ | ++++ | +++ |
5 | scale variability described and adequate | + | ++++ | +++ | ++ | ++ | + | – | +++ | ++++ | ++ | – | + | ++ | +++ |
6 | level of measurement described | + | ++++ | ++++ | +++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | +++ | ++++ | ++ | + | – | ++++ | ++++ |
7 | procedures for deriving scores | – | +++ | ++++ | ++++ | – | ++++ | – | ++++ | ++++ | ++ | – | +++ | ++++ | +++ |
RELIABILITY - total score | – | 62.5 | 79.2 | 87.5 | 12.5 | 41.7 | – | 55.6 | 62.5 | 47.2 | 29.2 | 22.2 | 44.4 | 38.9 | |
Reliability: internal consistency | |||||||||||||||
8 | data collection methods described | + | ++++ | ++++ | ++++ | + | ++ | – | ++++ | ++++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | +++ | +++ |
9 | Cronbach’s alpha adequate | + | +++ | +++ | +++ | + | ++ | – | +++ | +++ | ++++ | +++ | ++ | +++ | ++ |
10 | IRT estimates provided | – | – | +++ | +++ | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
11 | testing in different populations | n.a. | – | ++++ | ++++ | + | n.a. | – | n.a. | +++ | n.a. | – | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. |
Reliability: reproducibility | – | ||||||||||||||
12 | data collection methods described | + | +++ | +++ | – | + | ++ | – | – | +++ | – | – | – | – | – |
13 | test-retest and time interval adequate | + | ++++ | ++++ | – | + | +++ | – | – | +++ | – | – | – | – | – |
14 | reproducibility coefficients adequate | + | +++ | +++ | – | + | ++ | – | – | ++++ | – | – | – | – | – |
15 | IRT estimates provided | + | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
VALIDITY | – | 80.6 | 88.9 | 75.0 | 13.9 | 63.9 | – | 83.3 | 86.2 | 40.3 | 46.7 | 52.8 | 86.7 | 94.4 | |
16 | content validity adequate | – | ++++ | ++++ | +++ | – | +++ | ++++ | +++ | +++ | ++ | ++ | ++++ | ++++ | ++++ |
17 | construct/criterion validity adequate | – | +++ | +++ | ++++ | ++ | ++++ | – | ++++ | +++ | +++ | ++ | ++ | +++ | +++ |
18 | sample composition described | – | ++++ | ++++ | +++ | + | – | – | ++++ | ++++ | +++ | +++ | ++++ | ++++ | ++++ |
19 | prior hypothesis stated | – | +++ | ++++ | +++ | + | +++ | – | ++ | +++ | +++ | + | ++ | +++ | ++++ |
20 | rational for criterion validity | n.a. | ++ | +++ | – | + | ++++ | – | n.a. | ++++ | – | n.a. | ++ | ++++ | ++++ |
21 | tested in different populations | – | ++++ | ++++ | ++++ | ++ | ++ | n.a. | n.a. | ++++ | – | +++ | + | n.a. | ++++ |
RESPONSIVENESS | – | 50.0 | 66.7 | – | – | 61.2 | – | 66.7 | 100 | – | – | – | – | – | |
22 | adequacy of methods | – | +++ | +++ | – | – | + | – | ++++ | ++++ | – | – | – | – | – |
23 | description of estimated magnitude of change | – | +++ | +++ | – | – | +++ | – | ++++ | ++++ | – | – | – | – | – |
24 | comparison of stable and unstable groups | – | + | +++ | – | – | ++++ | – | – | ++++ | – | – | – | – | – |
INTERPRETABILITY | – | 77.8 | – | 38.9 | – | – | – | 33.3 | – | – | – | – | – | 33.3 | |
25 | rational of external criteria | – | ++++ | – | +++ | – | – | – | +++ | ++++ | – | – | – | – | – |
26 | description of interpretation strategies | – | ++ | – | ++ | – | – | – | ++ | – | – | – | – | – | ++ |
27 | how data should be reported stated | – | ++++ | – | + | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | +++ |
OVERALL SCORE | – | 73.7 | 65.5 | 57.4 | 8.9 | 47.1 | – | 65.2 | 66.9 | 28.0 | 24.7 | 28.3 | 44.3 | 50.5 | |
BURDEN | |||||||||||||||
Burden: respondent | – | 72.2 | 83.3 | 11.1 | 16.7 | – | 83.3 | – | 33.3 | 22.2 | 11.1 | – | 88.9 | 33.3 | |
28 | skills and time needed | – | +++ | +++ | ++ | + | – | ++++ | ++ | +++ | +++ | – | – | +++ | ++ |
29 | impact on respondents | +++ | +++ | +++ | + | + | + | +++ | – | ++++ | + | ++ | + | ++++ | ++++ |
30 | not suitable circumstances | ++ | +++ | ++++ | + | + | – | +++ | – | – | + | + | – | ++++ | – |
Burden: administrative | – | 75.0 | 75.0 | 20.8 | 33.3 | – | 75.0 | 50.0 | 100.0 | 18.7 | – | 83.3 | 100.0 | 66.7 | |
31 | resources required | – | +++ | ++++ | + | +++ | – | ++++ | ++++ | ++++ | + | – | +++ | ++++ | ++++ |
32 | time required | n.a. | ++++ | ++ | +++ | n.a. | – | ++++ | – | n.a. | + | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | +++ |
33 | training and expertise needed | n.a. | ++ | +++ | + | n.a. | – | ++ | – | n.a. | ++ | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | – |
34 | burden of score calculation | – | +++ | ++++ | + | – | ++ | +++ | ++++ | ++++ | ++ | – | ++++ | ++++ | ++++ |
ALTERNATIVE MODES OF ADMINISTRATION | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 100.00 | – | – | – | – | – | |
35 | metric characteristics | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | ++++ | – | – | – | – | – | |
36 | comparability | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | ++++ | – | – | – | – | – |