Association between healthy lifestyle factors and health-related quality of life among Chinese adolescents: the moderating role of gender

Table 3 Association between composite healthy lifestyle groups and adolescents’ HRQOL

		β (95% CI) by composite healthy lifestyle groups				P value for trend
		0–2	3	4	5–6	P value for trend
Emotional functioning
	Crude model	Ref	14.15 (12.40, 15.90) *	25.67 (24.05, 27.30) *	29.72 (27.78, 31.67) *	< 0.001
	Adjusted model ^a	Ref	13.82 (12.04, 15.60) *	25.75 (24.07, 27.43) *	28.71 (26.69, 30.73) *	< 0.001
Social functioning
	Crude model	Ref	8.04 (6.75, 9.32) *	13.20 (12.01, 14.40) *	14.86 (13.44, 16.29) *	< 0.001
	Adjusted model ^a	Ref	7.87 (6.53, 9.21) *	13.35 (12.09, 14.61) *	15.13 (13.62, 16.64) *	< 0.001
School functioning
	Crude model	Ref	9.47 (8.03, 10.91) *	18.43 (17.09, 19.76) *	21.40 (19.80, 23.00) *	< 0.001
	Adjusted model ^a	Ref	8.75 (7.26, 10.24) *	17.28 (15.88, 18.68) *	19.42 (17.73, 21.10) *	< 0.001
Physical functioning
	Crude model	Ref	5.86 (4.69, 7.02) *	10.50 (9.42, 11.58) *	13.33 (12.04, 14.63) *	< 0.001
	Adjusted model ^a	Ref	5.82 (4.65, 7.00) *	10.63 (9.53, 11.74) *	12.85 (11.52, 14.18) *	< 0.001
Psychosocial health summary score
	Crude model	Ref	10.55 (9.35, 11.76) *	19.10 (17.98, 20.22) *	21.99 (20.65, 23.33) *	< 0.001
	Adjusted model ^a	Ref	10.15 (8.90, 11.39) *	18.79 (17.62, 19.96) *	21.09 (19.68, 22.49) *	< 0.001
Total scale score
	Crude model	Ref	9.38 (8.28, 10.47) *	16.95 (15.93, 17.97) *	19.83 (18.61, 21.05) *	< 0.001
	Adjusted model ^a	Ref	9.07 (7.94, 10.19) *	16.75 (15.70, 17.81) *	19.03 (17.76, 20.30) *	< 0.001

Abbreviation: HRQOL, Health-related quality of life; CI, confidence interval
^a Adjusted models were controlled for adolescents’ characteristics (age, gender, single child status, primary caregiver, and boarding school attendance) and parental characteristics (age, marital status, and occupational status). * P value < 0.05

ISSN: 1477-7525