FertiQoL Internal Consistency: Subscales Only | ||||
Authors | Sample | Subscale and Ranges | ||
Amiri, Brassard [51] | 185 couples (N = 370) with infertility seeking ART services in Canada | Emotional, mind–body, and relational subscales range from F = .73-.86 and M = .69-.85 | ||
Andrei, Salvatori [52] | 133 men and women with anatomical and non-anatomical infertility in Italy | Subscales range from .83—.86 | ||
Chan, Lau [36] | 151 women with infertility who did not get pregnant following IVF in Hong Kong | Subscales range from .76—.93 | ||
Gameiro, Canavarro [53] | 322 women, 111 men with infertility in Portugal | Relational subscale = .70 | Tolerability subscale = .75 | |
FertiQoL Internal Consistency: Totals and Subscales | ||||
Authors | Sample | Subscales | Treatment | Total FertiQoL |
Cheng, Stevenson [54] | 126 women seeking infertility treatment in Taiwan | Core Total = .91 | Total =.81 | .91 |
Cserepes, Bugán [55] | 270 couples (N = 540) attending their first fertility consultation in Germany and Hungary | Total and subscales range from .63—.88 |  | |
Domar, Gross [56] | 166 women undergoing their first homologous IVF cycle at a Boston-based U.S. infertility clinic | Total and subscale ranges from .75—.93 |  | |
Li, Long [57] | 108 women attending a fertility clinic in China for their first IVF treatment | Subscales range from .73—.92 (experimental) and .70 and .90 (Control) | Experimental = .94 Control = .93 | |
Li, Luo [58] | 253 women with infertility attending a fertility center in China | Subscales range from .74—.86 | .91 | |
Li, Jiang [59] | 262 women with RPL in China | Subscales range from .78—.85 | .81 | |
Renzi, Di Trani [60] | 93 childless women in Rome undergoing ART (IVF, IUI, or ICSI) | Total and subscale range from .70—.92 |  | |
FertiQoL Internal Consistency: Overall Tool Total | ||||
Authors | Sample | FertiQoL Total | ||
Kayabaşi and Yaman Sözbir [61] | 120 women in Turkey with primary infertility pregnant through ART in 2nd or 3rd trimester | .94 | ||
Kim, Shin [62] | 121 couples with infertility with one or more infertility treatments in South Korea | .93 | ||
Li, Zhang [63] | 498 women with infertility in China undergoing IVF-ET | .93 | ||
Shin, Lee [64] | 186 women with primary infertility receiving infertility treatment at least once in Korea | .93 | ||
Steuber and High [65] | 301 women with infertility in the U.S | .93 | ||
Ataman, Aba [66] | 797 women receiving infertility treatment in Turkey | .92 | ||
Kim, Hong [67] | 169 women undergoing IVF in Korea | .92 | ||
Ni, Tong [68] | 137 women with repeated implantation failure in China | .92 | ||
Çambel and Akköz Çevik [69] | 125 women receiving infertility treatment in Turkey | .91 | ||
Donarelli, Salerno [70] | 34 counseled and 34 matched non-counseled couples with primary infertility starting their first IUI, IVF, or ICSI in Italy measured before beginning the cycle (T1) and on day of ET (T2) | T1 = .91(F) & .90(M) T2 = .92(F) & .89 (M) | ||
Jing, Gu [71] | 768 women with infertility undergoing IVF-ET in China | .91 | ||
Jing, Gu [72] | 588 women with infertility undergoing IVF in China | .91 | ||
Maroufizadeh, Hosseini [73] | 180 couples with infertility in Iran | .91 | ||
Kahyaoglu Sut and Balkanli Kaplan [31] | 89 women with infertility in Turkey | .91 | ||
Haemmerli Keller, Alder [74] | 109 women with infertility undergoing NC-IVF and cIVF in Switzerland | .89 | ||
Ha and Ban [75] | 150 couples with infertility in South Korea | .88 | ||
Du and Dong [76] | 168 couples with infertility (N = 336), no children, and more than one ART cycle in China | .86 | ||
Yousefzade, Rezaiee Ahvanuiee [77] | 180 men and women with infertility in Iran | .86 | ||
Balsom and Gordon [78] | 58 women with infertility between 12 and 48Â months in the U.S. and Canada | .82 | ||
Pozza, Dèttore [79] | 226 individuals undergoing homologous and heterologous ART in Italy | .81 |