Skip to main content

Table 3 Mean EQ-5D-5L indexes in the three groups

From: Impacts of the preceding cancer-specific health-related quality of life instruments on the responses to the subsequent EQ-5D-5L

 

Mean (95% CI)

Difference (95% CI; P-value)

vs Group 1

vs Group 2

Japanese value set

   

 Group 1

0.796 (0.776, 0.817)

–

–

 Group 2

0.760 (0.740, 0.781)

 − 0.036 (− 0.065, − 0.007; 0.015)

–

 Group 3

0.789 (0.769, 0.808)

 − 0.008 (− 0.036, 0.021; 0.597)

0.029 (0.000, 0.057; 0.049)

England value set

   

 Group 1

0.821 (0.797, 0.844)

–

–

 Group 2

0.791 (0.768, 0.814)

 − 0.030 (− 0.063, 0.003; 0.071)

–

 Group 3

0.822 (0.800, 0.844)

0.001 (− 0.031, 0.033; 0.948)

0.031 (− 0.001, 0.063; 0.056)

US value set

   

 Group 1

0.783 (0.754, 0.813)

–

–

 Group 2

0.744 (0.715, 0.773)

 − 0.039 (− 0.081, 0.002; 0.061)

–

 Group 3

0.779 (0.751, 0.807)

 − 0.005 (− 0.045, 0.036; 0.822)

0.035 (− 0.006, 0.075; 0.091)

  1. Groups 1, 2, and 3 comprised the two questionnaire types having the EQ-5D-5L in the first, second, and last places, respectively
  2. CI, confidence interval; US, the United States