Skip to main content

Table 3 Regression coefficients and odds ratios to rate the general health state as “good”b

From: Self-care time and rating of health state in persons with diabetes: results from the population-based KORA survey in Germany

 

Model (i)

Model (ia)

Model (ib)a

β (p-value)

95%-CI

OR

95%-CI

β (p-value)

95%-CI

OR

95%-CI

β (p-value)

95%-CI

OR

95%-CI

QoL: Physical score of SF12

0.2083 (< 0.0001)

(0.1374,0.2793)

1.23

(1.15,1.32)

0.2693 (< 0.0001)

(0.1748,0.3637)

 

0.2684 (< 0.0001)

(0.1747,0.3622)

 

QoL: Mental score of SF12

0.1270 (< 0.0001)

(0.0725,0.1816)

1.14

(1.08,1.20)

0.1350 (< 0.0001)

(0.0770,0.1930)

1.14

(1.08,1.21)

0.1341 (< 0.0001)

(0.0764,0.1918)

1.14

(1.08,1.21)

Patient time (hour per week)

0.1566 (0.0692)

(−0.0123,0.3255)

1.17

(0.99,1.38)

0.8844 (0.0018)

(0.3288,1.4400)

 

0.8375 (0.0025)

(0.2955,1.3795)

 

Interaction between Physical

score of SF12 and patient time

  

−0.0220 (0.0029)

(− 0.0365,-0.0075)

 

− 0.0211 (0.0040)

(− 0.0354,-0.0067)

 
  1. OR = exp.(β)
  2. Max-rescaled R-square was 0.64 in (i), 0.67 in (ia) and (ib)
  3. Area Under the Curve was 0.93 in (i), 0.94 in (ia) and (ib)
  4. aSensitivity analysis: missing values in time variables related to particular self-care activities were replaced by the corresponding medians
  5. bmodels with and without interaction term