Table 8 Acceptability and feasibility (10 studies)
From: Assessing the psychometric performance of EQ-5D-5L in dementia: a systematic review
Study references (author, year) | Analysis | % EQ-5D data missing | Acceptability and feasibility observed |
|---|---|---|---|
Easton, 2018 [14] | Not reported | NA | Yes partly |
Engel, 2020 [12] | Interviews | NA | Yes |
Griffiths, 2020 [27] | Missing data |  < 1% (PwD) | Yes |
Handels, 2018 [23] | Missing data |  < 8% (PwD) | Yes |
Harrison, 2018 [16] | Proportion of people in the study not able to self-complete assessments therefore proxy was used |  < 1% (for proxy) | No (only proxy was used) |
Hurley, 2020 [42] | Ability to complete | NA | No for self-complete; Yes for proxy |
Janssen, 2018 [24] | Missing data | Not clear | Yes for proxy |
Martin 2019 [28] | Missing data | 44% (PwD) | No for self-report |
Meads, 2020 [29] | Missing data | 77% (PwD) | No for self-report |
Toh, 2020 [21] | The feasibility criteria for missing data and ceiling/floor effects were ≤ 5% and ≤ 15% respectively | 2.6% (PwD) | Yes |