Skip to main content

Table 3 Characteristics of the identified instruments*

From: Quality of Life instruments and their psychometric properties for use in parents during pregnancy and the postpartum period: a systematic scoping review

Instrument full name (Short name)

Period for measurement

Evaluated in following studies:

Language

evaluated in

Number of items (domains)

Scored by

Domains/subscales

Interpretation of scores

[reference to instrument developer**] Version

 

Author, publication year

     

Generic instruments (n = 12)

Short Form 36-item Health Survey (SF-36) [82,83,84,85]

All versions

Pregnancy

Alzboon and Vural, 2019[57], Jomeen and Martin, 2005[41], Kugahara and Ohashi, 2006 [58],

Li et al., 2012[61], RezaeiNiaraki et al., 2019[63]

Arabic

English (UK)

Japanese

Chinese

Iranian

36 (8/2)

Domain scores

Component summary scores

Physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health

Two component summaries: physical component summary (PCS-36) and mental component summary (MCS-36)

Higher score indicates better health

 

Postpartum

Jansen et al., 2007[40], Lau Wong and Chan, 2008 [59],Leroy and Lopes, 2012 [60], Parsa et al., 2019 [62], Trivino-Juarez et al., 2017 [64]

Dutch

Chinese

Portuguese

Iranian

Spanish

   

RAND 36-item Health Survey (RAND-36) [86]

Version 1.0

Pregnancy

Dalmida et al., 2010 [87]

Spanish

36 (8/2)

Domain scores

Component summary scores

Physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health

Two component summaries: physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS)

Higher score indicates better health

Short Form 12-item Health Survey (SF-12) [88, 89]

All versions. Abbreviated version of SF-36

Pregnancy

Bai et al., 2016 [66], Hirose et al., 2020 [69], Lau, 2013 [70], Ngai and Ngu, 2013 [71], Tsai et al., 2016 [73]

Dutch

Japanese

Chinese

Chinese

Chinese

12 (8/2)

Component summary scores

Physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health

Two component summaries: physical component summary (PCS-12) and mental component summary (MCS-12)

Higher score indicates better health

 

Postpartum

Ayers et al., 2018 [65], Desouky Mora and Howell, 2013 [67], Noor and Aziz, 2014 [72]

English (UK)

English (USA)

Malay

    
 

Pregnancy + postpartum

Emmanuel and Sun, 2014 [68]

English (Australia)

    

Short Form 8-item Health Survey (SF-8) [90]

Abbreviated version of SF-36

Pregnancy

Nakamura et al., 2018 [91]

Japanese

8 (8/2)

Component summary scores

Physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health

Two component summaries: physical component summary (PCS-8) and mental component summary (MCS-8)

Higher score indicates better health

World Health Organization Quality of Life Questionnaire Brief version (WHOQOL-BREF) [4, 92]

Short version of WHOQOL-100

Pregnancy

Brandão et al., 2020 [37], Daglar, Bilgic, & Ozkan, 2020 [74], Khwepeya et al., 2020 [75], Vachkova et al., 2013 [45]

Portuguese

Turkish

Chichewa

Czech

26 (4)

Domain scores

Physical health (7), Psychological (6), Social relationships (3), Environment (8). Two items on overall QoL and general health

Higher score indicates higher QoL

 

Postpartum

Fonseca Nazare and Canavarro, 2012 [38], Khwepeya Monsen and Kuo, 2020 [76], Webster et al., 2010 [55]

Portuguese

Chichewa

English (Australia)

    
 

Pregnancy + postpartum

Chen et al., 2019 [25], Mortazavi et al., 2014 [77]

Taiwan

Farsi (Iranian)

    

EUROHIS-QoL-8

[93, 94]

Abbreviated version of WHOQOL-BREF

Pregnancy + postpartum

Guedes and Canavarro, 2015 [39]

Portuguese

8 (1)

Total score

Overall score of QoL

All items represent the four domains of WHOQOL-BREF (physical health, psychological, social relationships, environment)

Higher score indicates higher QoL

Quality of life Scale (QOLS)

[95, 96]

Postpartum

Akyn et al., 2009 [81]

Turkish

16 (3)

Total score

Relationships and material well-being (5), health and functioning (5), personal, social and community commitment (6)

Higher score indicates higher QoL

Nottingham Health Profile (NHP)

[97, 98]

Postpartum

Baghirzada Downey and Macarthur, 2013 [51]

English (Canada)

38 + 7 (6)

Domain scores

Part one: Physical mobility (8), social isolation (five), emotional reactions (9), pain (8), sleep (5), energy (3)

Part two: seven statements about areas of life

Low score indicates higher QoL

EQ-5D-3L + EQ VAS

[99, 100]

Postpartum

Jansen et al., 2007 [40], Mahumud et al., 2019 [80]

Dutch

Bengali

5 + 1 (5)

Index score and value sets

Mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression

Three severity levels (none, some, extreme/unable to)

Sixth item is global evaluation of own health on a visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS)

1 (best state) to -0.594 (worst state)

EQ VAS: 0 (worst state) to 100 (best state)

Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System – 43 (PROMIS-43)

[101,102,103]

Profile version 2.0

Pregnancy

MoghaddamHosseini et al., 2020 [104]

Hungarian

43 (7)

Domain scores

Physical function, Anxiety, Depression, Fatigue, Sleep disturbance, Ability to participate in social roles and activities, Pain interference. (Six items per domain)

One item on pain intensity

Higher score represents more of the concept being measured

Pain intensity: 0–10

Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global Short Form (PROMIS-GSF)

[105, 106]

Pregnancy

Lundsberg et al., 2018 [53]

English (USA)

10 (2)

Factor scores

Global Physical health (GPH) (4), Global Mental Health (GMH) (4), and two single items on general health and social role

Higher score represents more of the concept being measured

 

Pregnancy + postpartum

Slavin et al., 2019 [54]

English (Australia)

    
 

Pregnancy + postpartum

(9-item version)

Slavin et al., 2019 [54]

English (Australia)

9 (2)

Factor scores

Physical Health—Pregnancy Postpartum (PH-PP) (5) and Mental Health—Pregnancy Postpartum (MH-PP) (4)

Higher score indicates better physical/ mental health

Duke Health Profile (DUKE)

[107, 108]

Pregnancy

Wang Liou and Cheng, 2013 [109],

Chinese

17 (5)

Domain scores

Physical, mental, social, general and perceived health

Higher score indicates better health

Specific instruments (n = 7)

Maternal Quality of Life Index (M-QLI)

Maternal version, partly self-developed as a revised version of the Quality of Life Index

Pregnancy + postpartum

Adams, 2016 [110]

English (USA)

38 + 38 (4)

 

Health and functioning, psychological and spiritual, social and economic, and family

Addition in this maternal version: 4 items on challenges related to motherhood

Two parts with identical items. Part one: satisfaction with each item. Part two: level of importance with each item

NA

Mother Generated Index (MGI)

[43] [42]

Antenatal and postnatal version

Pregnancy

Symon and Dobb, 2008 [43], Symon and Dobb, 2011 [44]

English (Scotland)

NA

Index scores

Three-step questionnaire

Step 1: specifying up to eight areas of life affected by the pregnancy/having had a baby, and identifies these as positive, negative or neither. Step 2: to give a score from 0 to 10 for each area in step one, based on how the areas have affected the mother over the previous month. Step 3: allocating 20 “spending points” to the areas most important to the responder

NA

 

Postpartum

Gomes Ribeiro et al. 2015 [56], , Khabiri et al. 2013, Symon MacDonald and Ruta 2002 [42], Symon and Dobb 2011 [44]

Brazilian-Portuguese

Iranian

English (Scotland)

English (Scotland)

    

Quality of Life Gravidarum (QOL-GRAV)

[45]

Pregnancy

Effati-Daryani et al. 2017 [79], Mirghafourvand et al. 2016 [47], Vachkova et al. 2013 [45]

Persian

Persian

Czech

9 (1)

Overall score

One domain on pregnancy QoL

A two-factor structure have been tested by Mirghafourvand et al., 2016

Lower score indicates higher QoL

Maternal Postpartum Quality of Life Questionnaire (MAPP-QOL)

[52]

Postpartum

Hill et al. 2006 [52], Gökşin and Ayaz-Alkaya 2018 [111]

English (USA)

Turkish

40 (5)

Total score

Domain scores

Psychological/baby (9), socioeconomic (9), relational/spouse-partner (5), relational/family-friends (9), health and functioning (8)

Two parts. Part one: satisfaction with each item. Part two: level of importance with each item

Highest scores for combinations of high satisfaction/ high importance responses

Rural Postpartum Quality of Life (RPQOL)

(self-developed, not validated)

Postpartum

Huang et al. 2012 [112]

Chinese

20 (6)

Total score

Domain scores

Physical complaints and pain (1), sleep and energy (2), sex satisfaction (3), interpersonal communication (4), self-evaluated living stress (5) and perceived life satisfaction (6)

Lower score indicates higher QoL

Postpartum Quality of Life (PQOL)

[50]

Postpartum

Zhou et al. 2009 [50], Nikan et al. 2016 [49], Nikan et al. 2018 [48]

Chinese

Iranian

Iranian

40 (4)

Total score

Domain scores

Child care (8), Physical function (12), Psychological function (8), Social support (12)

0 indicates poorest QoL and 100 indicates best QoL

Short Form Postpartum Quality of Life Questionnaire (SF-PQOL)

Short version of PQOL

Postpartum

Nikan et al., 2018 [48]

Iranian

13 (4)

Total score

Domain score

Child care (4), Physical functioning (4), Psychological functioning (3), Social support (2)

0 indicates poorest QoL and 100 indicates best QoL

  1. *In order to describe each of the instruments included we obtained information from the original developer of the instrument
  2. **Reference to original developer of the instrument as found by the authors of this scoping review