Skip to main content

Table 4 PROs implementation perspectives

From: Patient reported outcomes in oncology: changing perspectives—a systematic review

 

N (%)

Perspectives

N (%)

Critical success factors

23 (27.7%)

Staff involvement

17 (73.9%)

  

Institution approval

11 (47.8%)

  

Clear workflows

18 (78.3%)

  

Team continuous formation

12 (52.2%)

  

Data analysis

16 (69.6%)

Implementation methodology

22 (26.5%)

Research intervention

12 (54.5%)

  

Clinical interventions

20 (90.9%)

  

Medical interventions

13 (59.1%)

  

Physiological interventions

8 (36.4%)

  

Social interventions

2 (9.1%)

Routine clinical practice

62 (74.7%)

Use for clinical purposes

46 (74.2%)

  

Use for research purposes

19 (30.6%)

  

Use for economical purposes

8 (12.9%)

  

Quality of care

49 (79.0%)

  1. The percentages’ sum can be higher than 100% since some articles addressed several domains