Skip to main content

Table 2 Multivariable linear regression model on utility index and VAS score among patients

From: The influencing factors of health-related quality of life among rural hypertensive individuals: a cross-sectional study

Variable

Utility index

VAS score

Coe

SE

P

Coe

SE

P

Gender (ref. = Men)

      

Women

− 0.02

0.08

0.004

0.22

0.20

0.271

Age (ref. = 18 ~)

      

45 ~ 

− 0.04

0.02

0.014

− 2.79

0.26

 < 0.001

65 ~ 

− 0.10

0.02

 < 0.001

− 4.96

0.32

 < 0.001

Education status (ref. = Primary school or below)

      

Middle school

0.03

0.01

0.001

0.68

0.22

0.002

High school or above

0.05

0.01

 < 0.001

1.70

0.29

 < 0.001

Marital status (ref. = Married/cohabiting)

      

Widowed/divorced/separated/single

− 0.02

0.01

0.04

0.09

0.32

0.771

Per capita monthly income (ref. < 500)

      

500 ~ 

0.05

0.01

 < 0.001

2.09

0.22

 < 0.001

1000 ~ 

0.06

0.01

 < 0.001

2.97

0.25

 < 0.001

2000 ~ 

0.07

0.02

 < 0.001

3.42

0.36

 < 0.001

Physical activity (ref. = Low)

      

Moderate

0.05

0.01

 < 0.001

1.62

0.22

 < 0.001

High

0.04

0.01

 < 0.001

2.15

0.23

 < 0.001

Sleep quality (ref. = Good)

      

Poor

− 0.12

0.01

 < 0.001

− 6.44

0.23

 < 0.001

BMI (kg/m2) (ref. =  < 18.5)

      

18.5 ~ 

0.02

0.04

0.504

2.45

0.63

 < 0.001

24.0 ~ 

0.02

0.04

0.555

3.04

0.64

 < 0.001

28.0 ~ 

0.01

0.04

0.818

2.92

0.66

 < 0.001

NCDs (ref. = Non)

      

One

− 0.01

0.01

0.088

− 1.16

0.20

 < 0.001

Two

− 0.08

0.01

 < 0.001

− 5.40

0.33

 < 0.001

Three or more

− 0.18

0.02

 < 0.001

− 12.97

0.72

 < 0.001

  1. Tobit regression model was utilized to estimate the potential influencing factors of Utility index
  2. Generalized linear model was utilized to assess the potential influencing factors of VAS-score