Skip to main content

Table 5 Study 1: changes in frequencies of chosen response option—cancer patients

From: Investigating the response scale of the EORTC QLQ-C30 in German cancer patients and a population survey

 

Optimized questionnaire (ziemlich)

Total

1

not at all

2

a little

3

quite a bit (ziemlich)

4

very much

Conventional questionnaire (mäßig)

1 not at all

 n

2628

447

59

10

3144

 %

83.6%

14.2%

1.9%

0.3%

100%

2 a little

 n

433

950

177

22

1582

 %

27.4%

60.1%

11.2%

1.4%

100%

3 quite a bit (mäßig)

 n

83

392

438

57

970

 %

8.6%

40.4%

45.2%

5.9%

100%

4 very much

 n

15

58

178

202

453

 %

3.3%

12.8%

39.3%

44.6%

100%

Total

 n

3159

1847

852

291

6149

 %

51.4%

30.0%

13.9%

4.7%

100%

  1. The EORTC QLQ-C30 was presented in two versions. The conventional version used mäßig and the optimized version used ziemlich as response option 3 of the 4-point Likert scale
  2. A total of N = 229 patients responded to both questionnaire versions and reported no changes in health as well as quality of life between both assessments. A total of N = 6149 responses to items 1–27 (missing responses n = 34 [0.5%]) were gained. Responses to each response option (1–4) are presented for the total sample. Bold numbers indicate no change in chosen response option between both questionnaire versions