Table 4 Stepwise linear regression models of APHAB, GHQ and EORTC and models corrected for sex and age
Uncorrected | Corrected for sex and age | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model | Std. Beta | R2 change | Sig | Std. Beta | Sig | |||
APHAB | ||||||||
2 | PTA best ear | − .38 | 0.13 | .000 | PTA best ear | − .41 | .000 | |
Neuroticism | − .28 | 0.08 | .000 | Neuroticism | − .25 | .002 | ||
Age | − .03 | .66 | ||||||
Sex | .02 | .84 | ||||||
GHQ | ||||||||
3 | Neuroticism | .47 | 0.34 | .000 | Neuroticism | .47 | .000 | |
Positive Coping | − .46 | 0.04 | .003 | Positive Coping | − .21 | .005 | ||
PTA best ear | − .19 | 0.04 | .003 | PTA best ear | − .16 | .020 | ||
Age | .02 | .77 | ||||||
Sex | − .06 | .40 | ||||||
General QoL (EORTC) | ||||||||
3 | Helplessness | − .29 | 0.26 | .000 | Helplessness | − .35 | .000 | |
Neuroticism | − .58 | 0.08 | .000 | Neuroticism | − .38 | .004 | ||
Positive Coping | .17 | 0.02 | .040 | Positive Coping | .14 | .044 | ||
Age | .07 | .29 | ||||||
Sex | − .08 | .23 | ||||||
Functional QoL (EORTC) | ||||||||
2 | Neuroticism | − .33 | 0.21 | .000 | Neuroticism | − .33 | .000 | |
Helplessness | − .30 | 0.08 | .000 | Helplessness | .29 | .000 | ||
Age | − .02 | .76 | ||||||
Sex | − .08 | .29 | ||||||