Skip to main content

Table 2 Model indices for confirmatory factor analyses, and measurement invariance across language, ethnicity and chronic conditions

From: Confirmatory factor analysis and measurement invariance of the English, Mandarin, and Malay versions of the SF-12v2 within a representative sample of the multi-ethnic Singapore population

 

WLSMV χ2 (df)

RMSEA

CFI

TLI

SRMR

DIFF TEST χ2 (df), p

ΔRMSEAa

ΔCFIa

ΔTLI

ΔSRMR

Confirmatory factor analyses

          

Model 1

Unidimensional

3994.848 (54)

0.109

0.940

0.926

0.116

–

–

–

–

–

Model 2

Two–factor model

2304.272 (53)

0.083

0.965

0.957

0.082

554.73 (1), p < 0.001

− 0.026

 + 0.025

 + 0.031

− 0.034

Model 3

Two-factor model with correlated residuals

618.043 (48)

0.044

0.991

0.988

0.044

939.031 (5), p < 0.001

− 0.039

0.026

 + 0.031

− 0.038

Confirmatory factor analyses by language subgroupsb

English language only

          

Model 2

Two-factor model

3652.579 (53)

0.118

0.951

0.939

0.078

–

–

–

–

–

Model 3

Two-factor model with correlated residuals

1210.750 (48)

0.070

0.984

0.978

0.046

1422.088 (5), p < 0.001

− 0.048

 + 0.033

+0.039

− 0.032

Mandarin language only

          

Model 2

Two-factor model

543.064 (53)

0.129

0.962

0.953

0.097

–

–

–

–

–

Model 3

Two-factor model with correlated residuals

206.138 (48)

0.077

0.988

0.983

0.057

208.193 (5), p < 0.001

− 0.052

 + 0.026

 + 0.03

− 0.04

Malay language

          

Model 2

Two-factor model

566.189 (53)

0.123

0.987

0.983

0.074

–

–

–

–

–

Model 3

Two-factor model with correlated residuals

310.606 (48)

0.092

0.993

0.991

0.052

169.298 (5), p < 0.001

− 0.025

 + 0.006

 + 0.008

− 0.022

Measurement invariance (MGCFA)

          

Language

          

Configural

895.138 (144)

0.051

0.991

0.988

0.046

–

–

–

  

Metric

879.544 (164)

0.046

0.991

0.99

0.046

54.333 (20), p < 0.001

− 0.005

0

  

Scalar

1178.003 (222)

0.046

0.988

0.99

0.05

378.713 (58), p < 0.001

0

− 0.003

  

Ethnicity

          

Configural

1473.219 (195)

0.065

0.991

0.988

0.048

–

–

–

  

Metric

1354.748 (225)

0.057

0.992

0.991

0.048

33.096 (30), p = 0.32

− 0.008

+0.001

  

Scalar

1398.609 (312) 

0.048

0.992

0.993

0.049

231.257 (87) , p < 0.001

− 0.01

0

  

Chronic physical conditions

          

Configural

680.066 (97)

0.044

0.991

0.987

0.047

–

–

–

  

Metric

654.824 (107)

0.041

0.991

0.989

0.048

39.467 (10), p < 0.001

− 0.003

0

  

Scalar

666.124 (136)

0.036

0.991

0.992

0.053

87.085 (29), p < 0.001

− 0.005

0

  
  1. aOnly change in RMSEA and CFI were evaluated for MGCFA
  2. bThe CFAs within the language subgroups were not weighted using survey weights