Skip to main content

Table 3 Methodological quality of studies assessing the PROMIS-PF item bank and subdomains per measurement property

From: Measurement properties of the Dutch–Flemish patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) physical function item bank and instruments: a systematic review

References

Study population

Item bank

Content validity

Structural validity

Hypothesis testing

Cross-cultural validity/measurement invariance

Internal consistency/measurement precision

Score

Score

(Convergent) Score

(Known-groups) Score

Score

Score

Terwee et al. [24]

General population

PF item bank

Doubtful

     

Oude Voshaar et al. [41]

RA patients

PF item bank

    

Doubtful

 

Oude Voshaar et al. [37]

RA patients

PF item bank

Doubtful

 

Adequate

Doubtful

 

Very good

Crins et al. [42]

Patients with chronic pain

PF item bank

 

Very good

Very good

 

Inadequate (CC validity)/Doubtful (MI)

Very good

Crins et al. [43]

Physical therapy patients

PF item bank

 

Adequate

Very good

 

Doubtful

Very good

Crins et al. [44]

Chronic pain; OA; Physical therapy; General population

PF item bank

    

Inadequate

 

van Bruggen et al. [45]

Upper extremity injury

UE subdomain

 

Very good

Very good

  

Inadequate

Haan et al. [27]

Upper extremity disorder

UE subdomain

Doubtful

 

Very good

 

Inadequate

 

Lameijer et al. [46]

Upper extremity disorder

UE subdomain

 

Very good (for FA)/Adequate (for bifactor model)

  

Doubtful

Very good

  1. CC validity, cross-cultural validity; OA, osteoarthritis; FA, factor analysis; MI, measurement invariance; PF, physical function; RA, rheumatoid arthritis; UE, upper extremity