Skip to main content

Table 2 The result of exploratory factor analysis

From: The use of the Multidimensional Condom Attitude Scale in Chinese young adults

Reliability and effectiveness

1

Condoms are an effective method of birth control

0.824

2

The condom is a highly satisfactory form of contraception

0.880

3

I think condoms are an excellent means of contraception

0.695

4a

Condoms are unreliable

0.692

5a

Condoms do not offer reliable protection

0.547

Variance

12.67%

Excitement

9

Condoms are a lot of fun

0.750

10a

The use of a condom is an interruption of foreplay

0.796

6b

The use of condoms can make sex more stimulating

0.382

Variance

4.32%

Displeasure

7a

Condoms ruin the sex act

0.651

8a

Condoms are uncomfortable for both partners

0.643

Variance

3.45%

Identity stigma

11a

Men who suggest using a condom are really boring

0.660

12a

If a couple is about to have sex and the man suggests using a condom, it is less likely that they will have sex

0.817

13a

Women think men who use condoms are jerks

0.720

14a

A woman who suggests using a condom does not trust her partner

0.646

15a

People who suggest condom use are a little bit geeky

0.642

Variance

11.26%

Embarrassment about negotiation

16a

When I suggest using a condom I am almost always embarrassed

0.606

17a

It is really hard to bring up the issue of using condoms to my partner

0.737

18

It is easy to suggest to my partner that we use a condom

0.701

19

I’m comfortable talking about condom with my partner

0.762

20ab

I never know what to say when my partner and I need to talk about condoms or other protection

0.245

Variance

6.41%

Embarrassment about purchase

21a

It is very embarrassing to buy condoms

0.764

22a

When I need condoms I often dread having to get them

0.788

23

I don’t think that buying condoms is awkward

0.503

24a

It would be embarrassing to be seen buying condoms in a store

0.670

25a

I always feel really uncomfortable when I buy condoms

0.615

Variance

12.56%

  1. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) using principal axis factoring with promax rotation of factors with eigenvalues of > 1.0 was used in the analysis
  2. aItems are reverse scored. The score of all reversed items were reordered in the EFA so that all items measured in the same direction
  3. bItem 6 and 20 were removed because the factor loading was < 0.5