Skip to main content

Table 7 One-month change in KCCQ scores among patients with improved health states

From: Psychometric properties of the Japanese version of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire in Japanese patients with chronic heart failure

KCCQ

N

Scores (mean ± SD)

Effect size

P valueb

Baseline

After one month of treatmenta

Change in scores

Domains

 Physical limitations

35c

66.4 ± 27.6

83.6 ± 18.2

17.2 ± 24.2

0.62

<  0.001

 Symptom frequency

44

55.1 ± 31.6

82.0 ± 16.9

26.9 ± 30.2

0.85

<  0.001

 Symptom severity

44

69.3 ± 25.5

87.5 ± 14.5

18.2 ± 24.4

0.71

<  0.001

 Symptom stability

44

61.9 ± 33.4

69.9 ± 21.3

8.0 ± 42.4

0.24

0.220

 Self-efficacy

44

66.5 ± 21.9

74.1 ± 23.9

7.7 ± 16.7

0.35

0.004

 Social limitations

30d

60.8 ± 31.4

81.2 ± 20.9

20.5 ± 28.4

0.65

<  0.001

 Quality of life

44

47.3 ± 26.0

68.0 ± 19.3

20.6 ± 26.4

0.79

<  0.001

Summary scores

 Total symptom score

44

62.2 ± 27.3

84.8 ± 15.0

22.5 ± 25.7

0.82

<  0.001

 Clinical summary score

44

62.0 ± 25.7

83.7 ± 13.9

21.7 ± 21.3

0.85

<  0.001

 Overall summary score

44

56.4 ± 25.3

78.5 ± 15.3

22.2 ± 20.7

0.88

<  0.001

  1. Responsiveness was analyzed using data of 44 patients who showed improvement in their health state, which was defined as improvement in at least one EQ-5D dimension by ≥1 point without worsening in any EQ-5D dimension
  2. aFor the assessment of this timepoint, the KCCQ scores at week 4 for the SOCRATES studies and at day 30 for the ARTS-HF Japan study were used
  3. bDifferences in scores between baseline and the second assessment were tested using a paired t-test with equal variances assumed
  4. cData of 35 patients were analyzed due to responses coded as missing data in question 1 (6 items)
  5. dData of 30 patients were analyzed due to responses coded as missing data in question 15 (4 items)
  6. Effect sizes: 0.2 = small; 0.5 = medium; 0.8 = large
  7. KCCQ Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire; SD standard deviation