Skip to main content

Table 6 Test-retest analysis: changes in KCCQ scores among clinically stable patients

From: Psychometric properties of the Japanese version of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire in Japanese patients with chronic heart failure

KCCQ

N

Scores (mean ± SD)

ICC (95% CI)

Timepoint 1a

Timepoint 2b

Change in scores

Domains

 Physical limitations

56c

91.0 ± 11.9

93.1 ± 11.1

2.3 ± 8.9

0.69 (0.52–0.81)

 Symptom frequency

58

91.2 ± 14.9

90.7 ± 13.8

−0.5 ± 9.6

0.78 (0.65–0.86)

 Symptom severity

58

94.5 ± 9.6

95.5 ± 7.4

1.0 ± 6.8

0.68 (0.51–0.80)

 Symptom stability

58

60.3 ± 19.9

59.9 ± 19.3

−0.4 ± 25.0

0.19 (− 0.08–0.43)

 Self-efficacy

58

82.8 ± 19.6

80.6 ± 18.8

−2.2 ± 15.9

0.66 (0.48–0.78)

 Social limitations

52d

93.2 ± 13.9

92.9 ± 15.6

0.5 ± 10.1

0.76 (0.61–0.86)

 Quality of life

58

81.0 ± 13.5

85.2 ± 14.0

4.2 ± 11.1

0.65 (0.45–0.78)

Summary scores

 Total symptom score

58

92.9 ± 11.9

93.1 ± 10.0

0.3 ± 7.6

0.77 (0.63–0.85)

 Clinical summary score

58

92.0 ± 10.1

93.2 ± 9.0

1.1 ± 5.9

0.80 (0.69–0.88)

 Overall summary score

58

89.4 ± 9.9

91.1 ± 10.4

1.7 ± 5.5

0.84 (0.74–0.91)

  1. Test-retest analysis was conducted using data of 58 patients who were considered clinically stable, which was defined as no change in EQ-5D-3L scores, between the two timepoints
  2. aAt week 8 for the SOCRATES studies and at last day of treatment for the ARTS-HF Japan study
  3. bAt week 12 for the SOCRATES studies and at 30 days after the last treatment for the ARTS-HF Japan study
  4. cData of 56 patients were analyzed due to responses coded as missing data in question 1 (6 items)
  5. dData of 52 patients were analyzed due to responses coded as missing data in question 15 (4 items)
  6. KCCQ Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire; ICC intraclass correlation coefficient; CI confidence interval; SD standard deviation