Utility value estimates in cardiovascular disease and the effect of changing elicitation methods: a systematic literature review

Betts, Marissa Blieden; Rane, Pratik; Bergrath, Evelien; Chitnis, Madhura; Bhutani, Mohit Kumar; Gulea, Claudia; Qian, Yi; Villa, Guillermo

doi:10.1186/s12955-020-01407-y

Table 2 Estimated median (IQR) average utility values by method, type of disease, and publication year

From: Utility value estimates in cardiovascular disease and the effect of changing elicitation methods: a systematic literature review

	MI		Stroke		Stable angina		Unstable/unspecified angina^a		PAD		Revascularization
	Pre-2013 n = 38	Post-2013 n = 32	Pre-2013 n = 86	Post-2013 n = 113	Pre-2013 n = 8	Post-2013 n = 9	Pre-2013 n = 23	Post-2013 n = 8	Pre-2013 n = 29	Post-2013 n = 13	Pre-2013 n = 54	Post-2013 n = 40
Total	0.71 (0.64–0.76)	0.79 (0.73–0.86)	0.63 (0.45–0.72)	0.64 (0.44–0.78)	0.83 (0.68–0.94)	0.72 (0.66–0.78)	0.70 (0.62–0.82)	0.69 (0.62–0.85)	0.76 (0.69–0.85)	0.71 (0.63–0.78)	0.76 (0.67–0.82)	0.81 (0.74–0.85)
EQ-5D	0.72 (0.68–0.76)	0.79 (0.73–0.85)	0.63 (0.48–0.71)	0.65 (0.44–0.78)	0.75 (0.61–0.81)	0.75 (0.67–0.78)	0.67 (0.61–0.73)	0.71 (0.63–0.86)	0.68 (0.61–0.73)	0.72 (0.64–0.78)	0.75 (0.67–0.81)	0.80 (0.73–0.84)
HUI	0.64 (0.54–0.67)	0.87 (0.85–0.89)	0.59 (0.44–0.68)	0.64 (0.34–0.71)	NR	NR	NR	NR	0.77 (0.70–0.82)	NR	0.76 (0.64–0.81)	NR
SF-6D	0.78 (0.73–0.83)	0.78 (0.74–0.80)	0.66 (0.64–0.69)	0.64 (0.63–0.67)	0.68 (0.68–0.68)	0.68 (0.67–0.68)	0.65 (0.64–0.71)	NR	0.72 (0.70–0.74)	0.64 (0.63–0.66)	0.65 (0.62–0.69)	0.81 (0.78–0.83)
SG	0.59 (0.50–0.68)	0.45 (0.45–0.45)	0.66 (0.45–0.86)	0.50 (0.08–0.65)	0.94 (0.88–0.96)	0.89 (0.89–0.89)	0.93 (0.73–0.97)	NR	0.93 (0.89–0.96)	NR	0.93 (0.92–0.98)	NR
TTO	0.87 (0.75–0.90)	0.49 (0.47–0.51)	0.55 (0.32–0.85)	0.33 (0.33–0.52)	1.00 (0.98–1.00)	0.52 (0.52–0.52)	0.82 (0.72–0.86)	0.56 (0.56–0.56)	0.84 (0.74–0.90)	NR	0.85 (0.70–0.94)	NR
Others^b	0.64 (0.61–0.98)	0.90 (0.90–0.91)	0.48 (0.47–0.66)	0.68 (0.64–0.73)	0.78 (0.68–0.86)	0.75 (0.70–0.80)	0.90 (0.88–0.96)	NR	0.78 (0.73–0.80)	NR	0.80 (0.80–0.80)	0.89 (0.86–0.90)

^aFour studies reported utilities for unstable angina, whereas the majority of studies in this group did not specify the type of angina
^bOther methods include Quality of Well-Being, Utility Based Quality of life-Heart questionnaire, Assessment of Quality of Life, and Preference-based Stroke Index
Abbreviations: EQ-5D EuroQol Five Dimensions Questionnaire, HUI Health Utilities Index, IQR Interquartile range, MI Myocardial infarction, PAD Peripheral artery disease, NR Not reported, SF-6D Short-Form Six Dimensions, SG Standard gamble, TTO Time trade-off

Back to article page

ISSN: 1477-7525

Contact us

Submission enquiries: journalsubmissions@springernature.com

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

Contact us