Skip to main content

Table 2 Common issues that arose with the Short-WORC (n = 26)

From: Interpretation and content validity of the items of the numeric rating version short-WORC to evaluate outcomes in management of rotator cuff pathology: a cognitive interview approach

Item

Comprehension

Perspective Modifiers

Reference Point

Calibration Across Items

Inadequate Response definition

Relevance

 1. Sleeping

Understood well

    

Overall, found to be relevant (73%)

Few participants felt it was only relevant if the injured arm was slept on.

 2. Styling your hair

Understod well

Gender issues arose (30%). E.x. men who were bald found this inapplicable

 

Some participants calibrated this answer with the item of sleeping (19%)

 

Overall, relevant to 79% of participants

 3. Dressing or undressing

Understood well

Some gender issues arose, i.e. men who did not rate this item as important (19%)

 

Some participants calibrated this answer with the item of sleeping and styling hair (19%)

 

Overall, relevant to 70% of participants

 4. Daily activities about the house or yard

Some comprehension issues with defining daily activities and yard work

    

Overall was relevant for 80% of participants

12% found work in the yard irrelevant to their Qol

 5. Working above the shoulder

Understood well

    

Overall, 90% of participants found it was relevant to their QoL

 6. Compensate with unaffected arm

Understood well

    

88% of participants found this relevant to their QoL.

12% found if the injury was on the non-dominant hand it was not relevant.

 7. Lifting heavy objects at or below shoulder level

Understood well

    

92% of participants found this to be relevant to QoL