Skip to main content

Table 3 CFA of factorial structure solution among different conditions for the PSQ

From: The Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire: development and validation amongst medical students and workers

 

Factors

Items

CMIN

DF

P

NC

TLI

CFI

WRMR

RMSEA [90% CI]

Subgroups

 Medical Workers

4

30

2665.430

399

< 0.001

6.680

0.934

0.940

1.913

0.068 [0.066, 0.071]

 Medicine Studentsa

5

30

3476.995

395

< 0.001

8.803

0.903

0.912

2.324

0.070 [0.068, 0.073]

Medical Workers*

2

13

543.294

64

< 0.001

8.489

0.957

0.965

1.637

0.078 [0.072, 0.084]

 Medicine Students

2

13

607.965

64

< 0.001

9.499

0.950

0.959

1.792

0.073 [0.068, 0.079]

Languages

 Chinese

1

13

1443.451

65

< 0.001

22.207

0.940

0.950

2.687

0.087 [0.083, 0.091]

Chinese

2

13

936.631

64

< 0.001

14.635

0.961

0.968

2.148

0.070 [0.066, 0.074]

 English

7

30

11,042.264

384

< 0.001

28.756

0.836

0.855

4.027

0.100 [0.098, 0.101]

 Spanish

6

30

9471.091

390

< 0.001

24.285

0.862

0.877

3.637

0.091 [0.090, 0.093]

 German

4

20

5069.364

164

< 0.001

30.910

0.873

0.890

3.693

0.103 [0.101, 0.106]

 Greek

5

30

8237.623

395

< 0.001

20.855

0.883

0.893

3.390

0.084 [0.083, 0.086]

 Swedish

5

21

5737.159

179

< 0.001

32.051

0.855

0.877

3.776

0.105 [0.103, 0.108]

 Cutoff value

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

> 0.05

< 2— < 3

> 0.90

> 0.90

< 1.0

< 0.05 or 0.08

  1. Note: CMIN chi-square; DF degrees of freedom; NC normed chi-square, CMIN/DF; TLI Tucker-Lewis index; CFI comparative fit index; WRMR weighted root mean square residual; RMSEA root mean square error of approximation; N/A not applicable
  2. *Best fitting model (in bold), a CFA in Medical Students was used to test a model derived using EFA in Medical Workers, extraction method: Principal Component Analysis; because of using the maximum likelihood method, there were 5 dimensions that can be obtained, one of which has only one item. Others extraction method: Maximum Likelihood
  3. The CFA of different languages used total sample (three samples, Using the data of sample A for the first time has to be merged into the total sample.); the Swedish version (Rönnlund et al., 2015), the Greek version (Karatza et al., 2014) and the German version (Fliege et al., 2005), the Spanish version (Sanz-Carrillo et al., 2002), the English/original version (Levenstein et al., 1993)