Skip to main content

Table 2 Generalised estimating equations results of HPLP-C and six dimensions scores between control and intervention group

From: The effectiveness of the “SMG” model for health-promoting lifestyles among empty nesters: a community intervention trial

 

Baseline

Follow-up

Follow-up

Control (Mean, SD)

Intervention (Mean, SD)

Control

(Mean, SD)

Intervention (Mean, SD)

Mean difference (95%CI)

P

N

183

167

183

167

  

HPLP-C

107.34 (18.32)

106.93 (19.99)

106.96 (16.64)

115.39 (13.27)

8.838(6.369, 11.306)

< 0.001

Self-realization

37.30 (6.52)

37.03 (7.53)

36.98 (6.28)

38.16 (5.39)

1.443(0.352, 2.534)

0.01

Health responsibility

20.75 (4.99)

20.36 (5.50)

21.02 (4.53)

22.33 (4.68)

1.492(0.477, 2.508)

0.004

Physical activity

7.00 (2.20)

6.90 (2.19)

7.2 (2.01)

8.14 (2.08)

1.031(0.572, 1.491)

< 0.001

Nutrition

14.21 (2.74)

14.44 (2.76)

14.15 (3.47)

15.2 (2.17)

0.827(0.177, 1.476)

0.013

Interpersonal relations

12.65 (2.72)

12.82 (3.00)

12.54 (2.38)

15.62 (1.78)

2.917(2.365, 3.469)

< 0.001

Stress management

15.42 (3.03)

15.17 (3.43)

15.46 (2.76)

15.94 (2.71)

0.729(0.131, 1.327)

0.017

  1. Model were adjusted for Education and Employment. The coefficient of the interaction term Time * Group estimates the mean difference in the change of the outcome variables over time between the two treatment groups