Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparisons of Arabic-COHIP-SF 19 and subscale scores by participants, caries status and oral health satisfaction, rating and perceived treatment need (n = 876)

From: The development and psychometric properties of the Arabic version of the child oral health impact profile-short form (COHIP- SF 19)

 

A-COHIP-SF 19 Overall scale, subscales

Overall (19)

Oral health well-being

Functional well-being

Socio-emotional well-being

Clinically assessed dental caries

Mean (SD)

 Caries free(n = 406)

62.13 (12.42)

15.37 (4.30)

14.51 (3.03)

32.25 (8.19)

 Caries active (n = 355)

60.28 (13.38)

14.36 (4.76)

14.13 (3.04)

31.78 (8.67)

  P value

0.033*

0.002**

0.031*

0.569

Participants’ satisfaction with oral health

Mean (SD)

 Satisfied (n = 665)

62.91 (11.56)

15.09 (4.43)

14.63 (2.67)

33.17 (7.57)

 Not satisfied (n = 211)

55.56 (15.41)

13.98 (4.94)

13.27 (3.85)

28.31(9.94)

  P value

≤0.001***

0.005**

≤0.001***

≤0.001***

Participants’ perceived oral health treatment needs

 Yes (393)

56.81 (14.54)

13.41(4.80)

13.58 (3.61)

29.81 (9.66)

 No (483)

64.65 (10.29)

15.81 (4.05)

14.89 (2.35)

33.78 (6.83)

  P value

≤0.001***

≤0.001***

≤0.001***

≤0.001***

Self-rated oral health

 Excellent/good (n = 584)

64.51 (9.84)

15.61 (4.03)

14.78 (2.43)

34.12 (6.54)

 Poor (n = 292)

54.39 (15.60)

13.35 (5.18)

13.35 (3.73)

27.76 (10.10)

  P value

≤0.001***

≤0.001***

≤0.001***

≤0.001***

  1. Man-Whitney U test was used to compare the subgroups, * P ≤ 0.05, ** P ≤ 0.01, *** P ≤ 0.001