Skip to main content

Table 2 Factors associated with QoL (N = 266)

From: Perceived quality of life in partners of patients undergoing treatment in somatic health, mental health, or substance use disorder units: a cross-sectional study

Variables

Block 1b

Block 2b

Block 3b

Socio-demographic variables

B (95% CI)

p valuea

B (95% CI)

p valuea

B (95% CI)

p valuea

Groupc

0.02 (−0.01/0.05)

0.141

0.02 (−0.01/0.04)

0.242

0.00 (−0.02/0.03)

0.715

Gender

−0.02 (−0.07/−0.02)

0.279

−0.03 (−0.07/0.01)

0.141

−0.01 (−0.04/0.03)

0.758

Education

0.01 (−0.02/0.04)

0.431

0.01 (−0.02/0.04)

0.498

0.00 (−0.02/0.03)

0.760

Work/school activityd

0.00 (0.00/0.00)

0.050

0.00 (0.00/0.00)

0.241

0.00 (−0.00/0.00)

0.669

Incomee

0.01 (0.00/0.01)

0.030

0.00 (−0.00/0.01)

0.180

0.00 (−0.00/0.01)

0.437

Social / familial variables

 Family cohesion (FACES-III)f

  

0.05 (0.02/0.08)

0.003

0.05 (0.02/0.07)

0.001

 Social support (ISEL)g

  

0.07 (0.03/0.10)

0.001

0.03 (−0.00/0.06)

0.091

 Concern about child

 Family capacity

  

−0.03 (−0.05/−0.01)

−0.01 (−0.04/0.01)

0.002

0.186

−0.01 (−0.03/0.01)

−0.01 (−0.02/0.01)

0.206

0.558

Health variables

 Psychological distress (SCL-10)

    

−0.16 (−0.20/−0.13)

<0.001

  1. a p value obtained from multivariate linear regression, presented as beta and 95% confidence interval (CI)
  2. bExplained variance (R2): Block 1 (socio-demographic variables) = 6%; Block 2 (social/familial variables) = 33%; Block 3 (health variables) = 56%
  3. cGroups: Partners of patients in three domains – somatic or mental illness or substance use disorders
  4. dPercentage engaged in work/school activity
  5. eIncome in NOK 100,000
  6. f,gMean scores were used to facilitate interpretation of the coefficients