Skip to main content

Table 1 Demographic characteristics of the participants (n = 4001) and mean utility scores

From: Health-related quality of life in the Brazilian Amazon: a population-based cross-sectional study

Variables

n

%a

Mean utility scores

p valuec

Sex

 Female

2113

52.8

0.872

Ref.d

 Male

1888

47.2

0.901

<0.001

Age group (years)

 18–24

838

20.9

0.912

Ref.

 25–34

1152

28.8

0.904

0.174

 35–44

843

21.1

0.891

0.004

 45–59

772

19.3

0.858

<0.001

 ≤60

396

9.9

0.822

<0.001

Marital status

 Single

2173

54.3

0.898

Ref.

 Separated/divorced

260

6.5

0.843

<0.001

 Widowed

159

4.0

0.825

<0.001

 Married

1409

35.2

0.881

<0.001

Pregnancy (last 12 months)

 No

1890

89.5

0.870

Ref.

 Yes

223

10.5

0.891

0.051

Ethnicity

 White

636

15.9

0.897

Ref.

 Black

300

7.5

0.904

0.196

 Asian

138

3.5

0.881

0.265

 Brown

2886

72.2

0.882

0.012

 Indigenous

41

1.0

0.863

0.148

Educational level

 Higher education or above

158

4.0

0.892

Ref.

 High school

1903

47.5

0.903

0.300

 Middle school

649

16.2

0.899

0.543

 Elementary school or less

1291

32.3

0.853

0.004

Work status

 Formal

761

19.0

0.907

Ref.

 Informal

1149

28.8

0.882

<0.001

 Retired

315

7.9

0.808

<0.001

 Unemployed

1199

29.9

0.890

0.034

 Does not work

577

14.4

0.899

0.957

Social classe

 A/B1

124

3.1

0.930

Ref.

 B2

505

12.6

0.921

0.456

 C1

862

21.5

0.905

0.032

 C2

1423

35.6

0.884

<0.001

 D/E

1087

27.1

0.852

<0.001

Health perception

 Very good

471

11.9

0.920

Ref.

 Good

2175

54.3

0.921

0.514

 Fair

1108

27.7

0.843

<0.001

 Bad

193

4.8

0.738

<0.001

 Very bad

54

1.3

0.607

<0.001

  1. aFrequency adjusted by sample complex design
  2. bHRQoL values were measured by European Quality of Life 5-Dimensions 3-Levels instrument and transformed as utility values based on values from a previous study in the Brazilian population [28]
  3. cTobit unadjusted regression analysis
  4. dRef., reference
  5. eSocial class according to the Brazilian criteria of economic classification [26]