Skip to main content

Table 2 Criteria for rating the overall quality of the body of evidence by outcome of interest

From: Social and behavioral interventions for improving quality of life of HIV infected people receiving antiretroviral therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Rating

Description

1 = Good

Evidence includes consistent results from well-designed well-conducted studies in representative populations that directly assess effects on health outcomes

2 = Fair

Evidence is sufficient to determine effects on health outcomes, but the strength of the evidence is limited by the number, quality, or consistency of the individual studies, generalizability to routine practice, or indirect nature of the evidence on health outcomes

3 = Poor

Evidence is based on consensus, usual practice, opinion, or case series. Additionally evidence is insufficient to fully assess the effects on health outcomes because of limited number, or power of studies, important flaws in design or conduct, gaps in the chain of evidence, or lack of information on importance on the key health outcomes