Skip to main content

Table 3 Relationships between different forms of victimisation and six health domains of the DHP-A among Vietnamese high school students - multiple linear regressionsa,b (all forms of victimisation were entered simultaneously into the same models)

From: Victimisation, poly-victimisation and health-related quality of life among high school students in Vietnam: a cross-sectional survey

 

Physical health

Mental health

Social health

Perceived health

General health

Self esteem

Adjusted β (95 % CI)

Adjusted β (95 % CI)

Adjusted β (95 % CI)

Adjusted β (95 % CI)

Adjusted β (95 % CI)

Adjusted β (95 % CI)

Girls

Boys

Girls

Boys

Girls

Boys

Girls

Boys

Girls

Boys

Girls

Boys

Any property victimisation (yes vs no)

−6.2 (−9.4; −3.0)

−1.7 (−4.6; 1.1)

−1.2 (−4.7; 2.2)

−2.7 (−6.0; 0.6)

−0.1 (−3.3; 3.2)

−1.6 (−4.6; 1.3)

−4.2 (−10.1; 1.7)

−1.3 (−6.8; 4.2)

−2.5 (−4.8; −0.2)

−2.0 (−4.1; 0.1)

−0.3 (−3.6; 3.0)

−2.7 (−5.6; 0.1)

Any physical assault (yes vs no)

−0.2 (−3.3; 3.0)

−1.3 (−4.2; 1.7)

−2.0 (−5.4; 1.4)

−3.8 (−7.1; −0.4)

−1.3 (−4.5; 2.0)

−3.6 (−6.7; −0.6)

2.2 (−3.6; 8.0)

−0.5 (−6.1; 5.1)

−1.1 (−3.4; 1.1)

−2.9 (−5.1; −0.7)

−1.3 (−4.6; 1.9)

−2.6 (−5.5; 0.4)

Any child maltreatment (yes vs no)

−0.7 (−4.1; 2.6)

−5.0 (−7.8; −2.2)

−4.0 (−7.7; −0.3)

−4.5 (−7.7; −1.3)

−5.3 (−8.8; −1.9)

−2.7 (−5.5; 0.2)

2.6 (−3.6; 8.8)

−0.9 (−6.2; 4.3)

−3.4 (−5.8; −0.9)

−4.1 (−6.1; −2.0)

−5.7 (−9.1; −2.2)

−4.8 (−7.5; −2.0)

Any peer or sibling victimisation (yes vs no)

−0.1 (−3.2; 3.0)

−1.8 (−4.7; 1.1)

−0.2 (−3.6; 3.3)

−4.8 (−8.2; −1.5)

−0.6 (−3.8; 2.6)

−1.6 (−4.7; 1.4)

5.0 (−0.7; 10.8)

−5.6 (−11.1; −0.1)

−0.3 (−2.5; 2.0)

−2.8 (−4.9; −0.6)

−0.3 (−3.6; 2.9)

−3.8 (−6.8; −0.9)

Any sexual victimisation (yes vs no)

0.2 (−2.9; 3.3)

−0.4 (−3.7; 2.9)

−1.1 (−4.5; 2.3)

−2.9 (−6.7; 1.0)

0.2 (−3.0; 3.5)

−2.0 (−5.5; 1.4)

−2.9 (−8.6; 2.9)

4.9 (−1.4; 11.2)

−0.2 (−2.5; 2.0)

−1.8 (−4.3; 0.7)

−0.4 (−3.6; 2.9)

−2.3 (−5.6; 1.0)

Any witnessing of family violence (yes vs no)

−1.8 (−5.1; 1.4)

−0.7 (−3.5; 2.1)

−3.0 (−6.6; 0.6)

−1.5 (−4.8; 1.7)

−3.5 (−6.9; −0.02)

−2.4 (−5.3; 0.5)

−2.2 (−8.4; 4.0)

0.7 (−4.6; 6.0)

−2.8 (−5.2; −0.4)

−1.6 (−3.7; 0.5)

−5.9 (−9.4; −2.5)

−3.2 (−6.1; −0.4)

Any witnessing of community violence (yes vs no)

1.8 (−2.1; 5.6)

1.8 (−1.3; 4.8)

1.6 (−2.6; 5.9)

3.8 (0.2; 7.4)

5.9 (2.0; 9.9)

2.8 (−0.4; 6.0)

3.7 (−3.3; 10.8)

2.2 (−3.7; 8.1)

3.1 (0.3; 5.9)

2.8 (0.5; 5.1)

0.5 (−3.5; 4.5)

2.6 (−0.5; 5.8)

Any cyber victimisation (yes vs no)

−6.9 (−10.2; −3.7)

−2.3 (−5.2; 0.7)

−7.2 (−10.7; −3.7)

−4.7 (−8.1; −1.4)

−2.5 (−5.8; 0.8)

0.7 (−2.3; 3.8)

−4.6 (−10.5; 1.3)

−2.3 (−7.8; 3.2)

−5.6 (−7.9; −3.2)

−2.1 (−4.3; 0.1)

−3.8 (−7.1; −0.4)

−2.6 (−5.6; 0.3)

  1. aModel adjusted for age, rural/ urban residence, family composition, socio-economic status, presence of a chronic disease or disability, school type and number of adverse life events experienced
  2. bSignificant results are in bold