Skip to main content

Table 7 Hypotheses 9 and 10 (responsiveness): correlations between PC-PART scales’ change scores and FIM change scores, between admission and discharge

From: Responsiveness, construct and criterion validity of the Personal Care-Participation Assessment and Resource Tool (PC-PART)

 

Spearman correlations

Hypothesis supported?

r s (95%CI)a

r s  ≤ .49?b

Whole sample

n = 891

  

Self Care and FIM change scores

.40(.34-.45)

 

Yes

Domestic Life and FIM change scores

.22(.16-.30)

 

Yes

by Sex

Women n = 569

Men n = 321

 

Self Care and FIM change scores

.40(.32-.47)

.39(.28-.50)

Yes: Women and Menc,

Domestic Life and FIM change scores

.22(.13-.30)

.23(.13-.34)

Yes: Women and Men

by Age

≤59 yrs

60 to 79 yrs

≥80 yrs

 

n = 118

n = 427

n = 346

 

Self Care and FIM change scores

.56(.41-.68)

.40(.31-.48)

-.32(.21-.43)

Yes: 60 to 79 yrs & ≥ 80 yrs

No: ≤59yrsd

Domestic Life and FIM change scores

.44(.27-.58)

.23(.13-.33)

-.14(.02-.24)

Yes: 60 to 79 yrs & ≥ 80 yrs

Yes: ≤59yrsc

by Impairment

Orthopaedic n = 530

Neurological n = 176

Other Impairmentsn = 185

 

Self Care and FIM change scores

.31(.22-.39)

.48(.34-.60)

.42(.29-.53)

Yes: Orthopaedic.

Yes: Neurologicalc & Other Impairmentc

Domestic Life and FIM change scores

.19(.10-.28)

.21(.06-.35)

.24(.09-.38)

Yes: all groups.

  1. aAbsolute magnitude of the negative correlation values are represented
  2. bUsing Cohen’s definition [44]: r s  = .10 to .29 (small); r s  = .30 to .49 (medium); r s  = .50 to 1.0 (large)
  3. cUpper bound 95 % confidence interval suggests true value potentially lies above the range specified
  4. dLower bound 95 % confidence interval suggests true value potentially lies in the range specified