Skip to main content

Table 7 Impact of special health care need and obesity on HRQoL children self reports and parents proxy report

From: Measuring adolescents' HRQoL via self reports and parent proxy reports: an evaluation of the psychometric properties of both versions of the KINDL-R instrument

 

Special Health Care Needs (CSHCN)

Weight statusa

 

Yes

no

d-effect size

normal

over-weight

Obese

d-effect sizeb

   

all

(11–13/14–17 years)

   

all

11–13/14–17 years

N

1136

5917

  

5908

1227

438

  
 

Mean

Mean

  

Mean

Mean

Mean

  

Self Report

         

Total

70.73

73.20

-0.23**

-0.16/-0.29

72.92

71.81

70.31

0.25**

0.26/0.07

Physical

68.23

71.05

-0.27**

-0.08/-0.24

71.07

69.35

68.03

0.18**

0.31/0.11

Psychological

78.96

81.69

-0.21**

-0.21/-0.22

81.23

80.79

80.41

0.06 ns

0.13/0.02

Self-Esteem

56.75

58.76

-0.11**

0.01/-0.19

58.81

57.05

55.36

0.19**

0.05/0.28

Family

80.02

82.25

-0.14**

-0.11/-0.17

81.96

81.94

81.25

0.05 ns

0.08/0.02

Friends

74.46

78.07

-0.24**

-0.19/-0.29

77.77

77.07

73.62

0.28**

0.33/0.24

School

66.01

66.77

-0.04 ns

-0.08/-0.03

66.70

64.68

62.78

0.23**

0.15/0.27

Parent Report

         

Total

69.53

75.22

-0.56**

-0.62/-0.52

74.68

73.18

71.48

0.31**

0.41/0.25

Physical

68.97

75.15

-0.36**

-0.36/-0.36

74.91

72.19

69.59

0.31**

0.58/0.15

Psychological

73.89

80.45

-0.50**

-0.54/-0.47

79.60

78.04

77.07

0.19**

0.22/0.06

Self-Esteem

62.81

68.34

-0.37**

-0.38/-0.37

67.71

66.30

64.87

0.09**

0.04/0.12

Family

72.15

77.13

-0.33**

-0.38/-0.30

76.61

75.59

75.51

0.07*

0.15/0.01

Friends

70.60

78.80

-0.55**

-0.63/-0.50

77.56

76.13

73.44

0.08**

0.17/0.02

School

68.79

71.99

-0.20**

-0.30/-0.16

71.76

70.89

67.86

0.05**

0.08/0.08

  1. Standard errors (SE) for the means: normal weight = 0.13 – 0.24 (self) vs. 0.13 – 0.23 (parent); overweight = 0.29 – 0.53 (self) vs. 0.31 – 0.52 (parent); obese = 0.57 – 1.02 (self) vs. 0.52 – 0.86 (parent); 95% confidence intervals = mean +/- 1.96*SE)
  2. a Weight classification according to IOTF Cole et al. [26]
  3. b "d"-effect size for comparison between normal weight and obese (0.2 = small; 0.5 = medium; 0.8 = large effect)
  4. * statistical significant (p < 0.05) F-value in ANOVA; ** statistical significant (p < 0.01) F-value in ANOVA
  5. No statistically significant interaction was observed for mode * socio-economic status
  6. All statistical interactions between mode (parent versus self) and CSHCN were statistically significant
  7. All statistical interactions between mode (parent versus self) and weight status were statistically non-significant except for KINDL Psych (p = 0.011; "f" = 0.04 [marginal effect]).