Skip to main content

Table 3 Studies on relationship between quality of life data and survival in patients with breast cancer

From: Quality of life data as prognostic indicators of survival in cancer patients: an overview of the literature from 1982 to 2008

Author(s)

Year

Sample

HRQOL measure(s)*

Results*

Coates et al. [13]

1987

226 advanced breast cancer

LASA scores for physical well-being + mood, pain, and appetite (as QOL index)

Changes in QOL scores were independent prognostic of survival.

Coates et al. [46]

1992

226 advanced breast cancer

LASA scores for physical well-being + mood, nausea, vomiting, and appetite (as QOL index)

Both QOL index and physical well-being were independent prognostic factors of survival.

Fraser et al. [47]

1993

60 advanced breast cancer

DDC + LASA + NHP

The DDC provided accurate prognostic data regarding subsequent response and survival.

Seidman et al. [48]

1995

40 advanced breast cancer

MSAS + MSAS-GDI + FLI-C + RMHI + BPI + MPAC

Baseline global QOL and distress index scores independently predicted the overall survival.

Tross et al. [49]

1996

280 early stage breast cancer

SCL-90-R

No significant predictive effect of the level of depression on length of disease-free and overall survival observed.

Watson et al. [50]

1999

578 early stage breast cancer

MAC + CECS + HADS

Depression score of the HADS and helplessness and hopelessness category of the MAC had determinant effect on survival.

Coats et al. [51]

2000

227 metastatic and early stage breast cancer

Physical well-being + mood, appetite, and coping (as QOL index)

Disease-free survival was not significantly predicted by QOL scores at baseline or by changes in QOL scores. After relapse QOL scores were predictive for subsequent survival.

Kramer et al. [52]

2000

187 advanced breast cancer

EORTC QLQ-C30

Pain was prognostic for survival. However, fatigue and emotional functioning were significant in backward selection model.

Shimozuma et al. [53]

2000

47 advanced or end stage breast cancer

QOL-ACD

Physical aspects of QOL were significantly related to survival. The change in scores of both overall QOL and the physical aspects of QOL were also significant predictors of survival.

Butow et al. [54]

2000

99 metastatic breast cancer

Cognitive appraisal of threat + coping + psychological adjustment + perceived aim of treatment + social support + QOL

Minimization was associated with longer survival while a better appetite predicted shorter duration of survival.

Luoma et al. [55]

2003

279 advanced breast cancer

EORTC QLQ-C30

Baseline severe pain was predictive for a shorter overall survival. QOL scores had no great importance in predicting primary clinical endpoints such as time to progression or overall survival.

Winer et al. [56]

2004

474 metastatic breast cancer

FLI-C + SDS

Global QOL and symptom distress scores were prognostic for survival.

Efficace et al. [57]

2004

448 nonmetastatic breast cancer

EORTC QLQ-C30

Baseline QOL had no prognostic value in nonmetastatic breast cancer.

Efficace et al. [58]

2004

275 matastatic breast cancer

EORTC QLQ-C30 + QLQ-BR23

Loss of appetite was a significant prognostic factor for survival.

Goodwin et al. [59]

2004

397 early stage breast cancer

EORTC QLQ-C30 + POMS + PAIS + IES + MACS +ACS + CECS

QOL and psychological status at diagnosis and 1 year later were not associated with medical outcome.

Watson et al. [60]

2005

578 early stage breast cancer

MAC + HADS

Helplessness/hopelessness was a significant predictor of disease-free survival but depression was not.

Lehto et al. [61]

2006

72 localized breast cancer

Coping + emotional expression + perceived support + life stresses + QOL

Longer survival was predicted by a minimizing-related coping while shorter survival was predicted by anti-emotionality, escape coping, and high level of perceived support.

Gupta et al. [62]

2007

251 breast carcinoma

Ferrans and Powers QLI

Baseline patient satisfaction with health and physical functioning and overall HRQOL were significant prognostic of survival.

Groenvold et al. [63]

2007

1588 breast cancer

EORTC QLQ-C30 + HADS

Emotional functioning was predicted overall survival and fatigue was independent predictor of recurrence-free survival.

  1. Abbreviations: ACS: Adjustment to Cancer Scale; BPI: Brief Pain Inventory; CECS: Courtauld Emotional Control Scale; DDC: Daily Dairy Card; EORTC QLQ-C30: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire; FLIC: Functional Living Index-Cancer; HADS: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; IES: Impact of Events Scale; LASA: Linear Analog Self Assessment; MAC: Mental Adjustment to Cancer Scale; MPAC: Memorial Pain Assessment Card; MSAS: Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale; MSAS-GDI: Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale-Global Distress Index; NHP: Nottingham Health Profile; PAIS: Psychological Adjustment to Illness Scale; POMS: Profile of Mood States; QLI: Quality of Life Index; QOL: quality of life; QOL-ACD: Quality of Life Questionnaire for Cancer Patients Treated with Anticancer Drugs; RMHI: Rand Mental Health Inventory; SCL-90-R: Symptom Check List-90 items-Revised; SDS: Symptom Distress Scale.
  2. * All results obtained from multivariate analyses after controlling for one or more demographic and known biomedical prognostic factors.