Table 4 Mediation analyses for PIP difficulty as mediator
| Model | Predictor | Outcome Variable | β | p |
Criterion Met |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PC PPQ Frequency | PIP Difficulty | .48 | .002 | ||
| 1 | PC PPQ Frequency | CHQ PC Physical Functioning | -.48 | .001 |
z = -2.01 p = .022 |
| PC PPQ Frequency PIP Difficulty | CHQ PC Physical Functioning | -.40 | .017 | ||
| 2 | PC PPQ Frequency | CHQ PC Self-esteem | -.39 | .011 |
z = -1.94 p = .026 |
| PC PPQ Frequency PIP Difficulty | CHQ PC Self-esteem | -.38 | .022 | ||
| 3 | PC PPQ Frequency | CHQ Teen Physical Functioning | -.52 | < .001 |
z = -2.18 p = .014 |
| PC PPQ Frequency PIP Difficulty | CHQ Teen Physical Functioning | -.44 | .006 | ||
| Teen PPQ Frequency Risk Index | PIP Difficulty | .37 | .026 | ||
| 4 | Teen PPQ Frequency Risk Index | CHQ PC Physical Functioning | -.63 | < .001 |
z = -1.57 p = .057 |
| Teen PPQ Frequency PIP Difficulty Risk Index | CHQ PC Physical Functioning | -.31 | .040 | ||
| 5 | Teen PPQ Frequency Risk Index | CHQ Teen Physical Functioning | -.75 | < .001 |
z = -1.80 p = .036 |
| Teen PPQ Frequency PIP Difficulty Risk Index | CHQ Teen Physical Functioning | -2.83 | .008 | ||
| 6 | Teen PPQ Frequency Risk Index | CHQ Teen Self-esteem | -.30 | .063 | No |
| Teen PPQ Frequency PIP Difficulty Risk Index | CHQ Teen Self-esteem | -.06 | -.344 |