Skip to main content

Table 1 Parameter estimates for the five models which were used to predict the baseline EQ-5D scores.

From: Do estimates of cost-utility based on the EQ-5D differ from those based on the mapping of utility scores?

 

Model

 

A

B

C

D

E

Intercept

0.900‡

0.886‡

0.747‡

0.691‡

-0.347

total WOMAC

-0.009‡

 

0.001

 

-0.001

pain

 

-0.012

 

-0.009

 

stiffness

 

0.006

 

0.092†

 

functioning

 

-0.009‡

 

-0.005

 

pain* stiffness

   

-0.005

 

pain*functioning

   

-0.001

 

stiffness*functioning

   

0.001

 

pain2

   

0.002

 

stiffness2

   

-0.011

 

functioning2

   

0.000

 

total WOMAC2

  

-0.000‡

 

-0.000†

age

    

0.033*

age2

    

0.000

sex (if Female)

    

0.048

Range of predicted scores

0.086 to 0.900

0.086 to 0.900

-0.235 to 0.748

-0.111 to 0.852

-0.184 to 0.828

MAE

0.148

0.147

0.140

0.146

0.129

Adjusted r2

0.275

0.274

0.296

0.299

0.313

RMSE

0.189

0.187

0.185

0.190

0.180

  1. * = p < 0.05, † = p < 0.01, ‡ = p < 0.001, MAE = Mean Absolute Error, RMSE = Root Mean Squared Error. See Appendix 1 for full details of Model C and Model E.