Skip to main content

Table 3 Adjusted model of factors associated with poor quality of life in the physical and psychological domains

From: Psychosocial work conditions and quality of life among primary health care employees: a cross sectional study

 

Physical domain

Psychological domain

 

Prevalence of poor quality of life

ORadjusted1(95% CI)

Prevalence of poor quality of life

ORadjusted2(95% CI)

Effort-reward imbalance

    

 Low Effort, High Reward

26.7

1

-

-

 High Effort, High Reward

35.7

0.93 (0.53-1.63)

-

-

 Low Effort, Low Reward

39.6

1.28 (0.72-2.27)

-

-

 High Effort, Low Reward

54.6

1.65 (1.04-2.66)*

-

-

Overcommitment

    

 Low

29.0

1

  

 High

49.2

1.51 (1.03-2.19)*

-

-

Individual characteristics

    

Sex

    

 Male

-

-

15.7

1

 Female

 

-

27.5

2.04 (1.20-3.46)**

Age

-

-

-

1.04 (1.01-1.06)**

Years of study

-

-

-

0.90 (0.86-0.96)***

Marital status

    

 With partner

36.9

1

-

 

 Without partner

37.5

1.46 (1.00-2.13)*

-

 

Job characteristics

    

Job satisfaction

    

 Satisfied

22.1

1

18.1

1

 Moderately satisfied

39.2

2.12 (1.32-3.38)***

25.2

1.68 (1.02-2.77)**

 Dissatisfied

50.6

2.32 (1.30-4.14)**

33.3

1.96 (1.10-3.51)**

Health condition

    

Self - perceived health x presence of common mental disorders

    

 Positive, Absent

27.0

1

18.2

1

 Positive, Present

64.4

3.91 (2.48-6.17)***

38.5

2.87 (1.82-4.52)***

 Negative, Absent

72.4

3.97 (1.45-10.90)***

51.7

2.70 (1.09-6.70)**

 Negative, Present

60.7

1.63 (0.67-3.95)

57.1

4.96(1.96-2.59)***

Biological function

    

Presence of systemic disease

    

 No

 

1

  

 Yes

0.000

1.61 (1.10-2.35)**

-

-

  1. 1Final model adjusted by sex and age. Hosmer-Lemeshow Goodness of fit: X2 = 2.568; p value = 0.958. 2Final model adjusted by marital status and presence of systemic disease. Hosmer-Lemeshow Goodness of fit: X2 = 5.755; p value = 0.68. * < 0.05; ** < 0.01; *** < 0.001.