Table 5 Discriminant validity of GOHAI and OHIP-14 in univariate and multivariate analysis using 25 th and 75 th percentile for ADD and SC scores respectively
From: Comparison of the OHIP-14 and GOHAI as measures of oral health among elderly in Lebanon
| Â | n | GOHAI | Â | OHIP-14 | Â | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Â | Â | ADD<39.75 | SC>7 | ADD<58 | SC>4 | |
Recruitment setting | Dispensary § | 122 | 41 (33.6%) | 42 (34.4%) | 39 (32.0%) | 32 (26.2%) |
| Â | Private | 84 | 10 (11.9%)* | 10 (11.9%)* | 16 (19.0%)+ | 15 (17.9%) |
| Â | ORcrude (95% CI) | Â | 3.75 (1.75; 8.00) | 3.89 (1.82; 8.30) | 2.00 (1.03; 3.88) | 1.64 (0.82; 3.26) |
| Â | ORadjusted (95% CI) | Â | 5.15 (1.87; 14.20) | 4.63 (1.78; 12.04) | 2.19 (0.97; 4.93) | 1.62 (0.72; 3.64) |
Age | ≥ 76 years | 50 | 17 (34.0%) | 18 (36.0%) | 18 (36.0%) | 16 (32.0%) |
| Â | 65-76 years | 156 | 35 (22.4%) | 35 (22.4%) | 37 (23.7%) | 32 (20.5%) |
| Â | ORcrude (95% CI) | Â | 1.78 (0.89; 3.57) | 1.94 (0.97; 3.90) | 1.81 (0.91; 3.59) | 1.82 (0.90; 3.71) |
| Â | ORadjusted (95% CI) | Â | 3.03 (1.03; 8.92) | 3.05 (1.12; 8.30) | 2.89 (1.10; 7.58) | 2.89 (1.08; 7.75) |
Gender | Women | 123 | 35 (28.5%) | 35 (28.5%) | 37 (30.1%) | 30 (24.4%) |
| Â | Men | 83 | 16 (19.3%) | 17 (20.5%) | 18 (21.7%) | 17 (20.5%) |
| Â | ORcrude (95% CI) | Â | 1.67 (0.85; 3.26) | 1.54 (0.80; 2.99) | 1.55 (0.81; 2.97) | 1.25 (0.64; 2.46) |
| Â | ORadjusted (95% CI) | Â | 1.23 (0.53; 2.87) | 1.23 (0.54; 2.81) | 1.01 (0.47; 2.16) | 0.87 (0.40; 1.88) |
Perception of TMJ pain | Present | 34 | 18 (52.9%) | 16 (47.1%) | 20 (58.8%) | 15 (44.1%) |
|  | Absent | 172 | 33 (19.2%)* | 36 (20.9%)§ | 35 (20.3%)* | 32 (18.6%)§ |
| Â | ORcrude (95% CI) | Â | 4.74 (2.19; 10.27) | 3.36 (1.56; 7.23) | 5.92 (2.57; 12.17) | 3.45 (1.58; 7.52) |
| Â | ORadjusted (95% CI) | Â | 5.35 (2.04; 14.03) | 3.54 (1.40; 8.96) | 6.01 (2.51; 14.42) | 3.28 (1.38; 7.81) |
Perception of dry mouth | Present | 141 | 41 (29.1%) | 40 (28.4%) | 41 (29.1%) | 36 (25.5%) |
| Â | Absent | 65 | 10 (15.4%)+ | 12 (18.5%) | 14 (21.5%) | 11 (16.9%) |
| Â | ORcrude (95% CI) | Â | 2.26 (1.05; 4.85) | 1.75 (0.85; 3.61) | 1.49 (0.75; 2.99) | 1.68 (0.79; 3.57) |
| Â | ORadjusted (95% CI) | Â | 1.63 (0.67; 4.00) | 1.39 (0.59; 3.30) | 1.11 (0.51; 2.43) | 1.40 (0.62; 3.18) |
Number of FUs | 0- 4 | 90 | 36 (40.0%) | 38 (42.2%) | 36 (40.0%) | 31 (34.4%) |
|  | 5- 8 | 114 | 15 (13.2%)* | 14 (12.3%)* | 19 (16.7%)* | 16 (14.0%)§ |
| Â | ORcrude (95% CI) | Â | 4.40 (2.21; 8.75) | 4.99 (2.48; 10.04) | 3.33 (1.74; 6.38) | 3.22 (1.62; 6.38) |
| Â | ORadjusted (95% CI) | Â | 2.73 (1.28; 5.82) | 2.56 (1.20; 5.60) | 2.15 (1.03; 4.51) | 2.38 (1.14; 4.95) |
Number of decayed teeth | 7- 28 | 46 | 19 (41.3%) | 19 (41.3%) | 16 (34.8%) | 15 (32.6%) |
| Â | 0- 6 | 158 | 31 (19.6%)# | 32 (20.3%)# | 38 (24.1%) | 31 (19.6%) |
| Â | ORcrude (95% CI) | Â | 2.88 (1.42; 5.84) | 2.77 (1.37; 5.60) | 1.68 (0.83; 3.42) | 1.98 (0.95; 4.12) |
| Â | ORadjusted (95% CI) | Â | 3.75 (1.39; 10.07) | 2.90 (1.13; 7.42) | 1.07 (0.44; 2.58) | 1.41 (0.59; 3.41) |
Number of teeth | 0- 21 | 163 | 47 (28.8%) | 47 (28.2%) | 47 (28.8%) | 41 (25.2%) |
| Â | 22- 28 | 43 | 4 (9.3%)# | 6 (14.0%)+ | 8 (18.6%) | 6 (14.0%) |
| Â | ORcrude (95% CI) | Â | 3.95 (1.34; 11.67) | 2.50 (1.01; 6.32) | 1.77 (0.76; 4.10) | 2.07 (0.82; 5.27) |
| Â | ORadjusted (95% CI) | Â | 5.78 (1.71; 19.57) | 3.32 (1.08; 10.22) | 1.90 (0.71; 5.07) | 2.46 (0.87; 6.97) |