Open Access

A longitudinal study on quality of life after injury in children

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes201614:120

DOI: 10.1186/s12955-016-0523-6

Received: 10 December 2015

Accepted: 18 August 2016

Published: 26 August 2016

Abstract

Background

In high income countries, injuries account for 40 % of all child deaths, representing the leading cause of child mortality and a major source of morbidity. The need for studies across age groups, and use of health related quality of life measures that assess functional limitations in multiple health domains, with sampling at specific post-injury time points has been identified. The objective of this study was to describe the impact of childhood injury and recovery on health related quality of life (HRQoL) for the 12 months after injury.

Methods

In this prospective cohort study parents of children 0-16 years old attending British Columbia Children’s Hospital for an injury were surveyed over 12 months post-injury. Surveys assessed HRQoL at four points: baseline (pre-injury), one month, four to six months and 12 months post injury. Generalized estimating equation models identified factors associated with changes in HRQoL over time.

Results

A total of 256 baseline surveys were completed. Response rates for follow-ups at one, four and twelve months were 74 % (186), 67 % (169) and 64 % (161), respectively. The mean age of participants was 7.9 years and 30 % were admitted to the hospital. At baseline, a retrospective measure of pre-injury health, the mean HRQoL score was 90.7. Mean HRQoL ratings at one, four and 12 months post injury were 77.8, 90.3 and 91.3, respectively. Both being older and being hospitalized were associated with a steeper slope to recovery.

Conclusions

Although injuries are prevalent, the long term impacts of most childhood injuries are limited. Regardless of injury severity, most injured children recuperated quickly, and had regained total baseline status by four month post-injury. However, although hospitalization did not appear to impact long term psychosocial recovery, at four and 12 months post injury a greater proportion of hospitalized children continued to have depressed physical HRQoL scores. Both older and hospitalized children reported greater impact to HRQoL at one month post injury, and both had a steeper slope to recovery and were on par with their peers by four month.

Keywords

Pediatrics Unintentional injury Health related quality of life

Background

Injuries account for 40 % of all child deaths in high-income countries, representing the leading cause of child mortality and a major source of morbidity [1]. In the United States, each year more than 9,000 children aged 19 and under die from unintentional injuries, and another 225,000 are hospitalized [2]. Although indicative of the enormous public health problem that injuries comprise, mortality and hospitalization statistics are inadequate to fully understand the burden of injury.

The World Health Organization’s definition of health includes physical, mental and social dimensions [3]. While physiologic measures of injury severity are important to clinicians, measures of functional capacity and wellbeing can be of greater importance to individuals [4]. Measuring health related quality of life (HRQoL) after injury facilitates quantifying the impact on multiple dimensions of health and the recovery process. As a multidimensional, patient centered outcome, HRQoL measures encompass a wide range of experiences to given health states, including physical and psychosocial function as well as spiritual wellbeing [5]. It is important to identify potential long-term impact of injuries on HRQoL in order to provide timely and ongoing support. Research following child injury on psychological outcomes, is currently investigating predictors and early intervention strategies, and the present study can help build towards these interventions [68].

Studies examining HRQoL after injuries in adult populations have found that the impacts of injury can vary in time and extent, and that injury severity is not the only predictive factor [9]. These studies typically focus on patients with severe injuries, limiting our understanding of outcomes for the majority of injuries which do not result in death or severe disability [10]. It has been estimated that for every individual who dies from an unintentional injury, there are approximately six other individuals who are hospitalized, 45 individuals with emergency department (ED) visits and 48 individuals with visits to primary healthcare providers [11]. Thus, it is important to consider the impact less severe injuries may have given the health care burden they represent.

Study methods used to assess post injury HRQoL vary widely with respect to sample population, measurement instruments used, and timing of measurements, and they rarely include a baseline HRQoL measurement for comparison to pre-injury state [10]. Further, studies with pediatric samples are rare despite the fact that the impact of childhood injuries can differ substantially from adults [9, 10]. Therefore, studies across age groups, and use of HRQoL measures that assess functional limitations in multiple health domains, with sampling at specific post-injury time points are needed [10]. Pediatric studies using generic measures of HRQoL with baseline measurements of health and wellbeing are required to understand the impact injuries have on this unique population. Available studies have found that the impact of injuries on HRQoL can extend well into the year following treatment. One study that examined the health status of children in the six months following admission to hospital for injury found that general health perceptions, physical functioning, social and physical roles, behavior, parental impact including emotional and family activities all remained lower at discharge, one month, and six months post-injury relative to a population of healthy children [12]. Although this study demonstrated that the impact of injuries can remain at six months post hospital admission for both the child and parents, they did not explore less severe injuries not requiring admission to hospital, nor did they explore factors, outside of severity, that may be used to predict depressed physical and emotional functioning. Other studies that included less severe injuries not requiring hospitalization, have found that a small proportion (8 %) of children still reported functional limitations at nine months post injury and that some injured children had depressed HRQoL scores up to two years post injury [13, 14], however these studies excluded very young children (< 5 years of age).

There are gaps in the literature regarding the immediate and long-term impacts of injury and recovery, particularly in pediatric populations. The objective of this research is to better understand the impact of a broad spectrum of childhood injuries of varying severity on HRQoL and to identify demographic and diagnostic variables associated with a significant relationship with HRQoL.

Methods

Study population

This study collected data longitudinally from a sample of parents of children aged 0 to 16 years who presented with a primary injury diagnosis at the British Columbia Children’s Hospital (BCCH) ED or were admitted to the hospital wards between February 2011 and December 2013. For children 0 to 5 years old, only parents completed surveys. For all other ages, both children and parents completed surveys. For consistency, the present paper presents only parents’ reports for all participants.

Data collection

A research assistant recruited directly from the ED and hospital wards on different days of the week and times of day. In addition, real time hospital admissions data were reviewed twice daily during regular office hours to identify children presenting with injury for study recruitment. Because most medically attended visits for injuries do not result in hospitalization, injuries requiring hospitalization were proportionately over-sampled to ensure a mix of patients with injuries of varying severity. Thirty percent of the study sample was hospitalized relative to only 10 % of the population of all children presenting to the hospital with an injury.

Before approaching parents in hospital wards, researchers gained permission from the nurse or physician responsible for the child’s care. In the ED, parents were approached in waiting rooms, after triage confirmed that the primary reason for the visit was injury. All participants gave written consent. Parents who did not speak English or did not have an address in British Columbia (BC) were excluded from the sample. Twenty four parents indicated their child suffered from a disability or long-term health problem before the injury. Since these children had relatively rare conditions that can increase risk of injury and hospitalization their parents’ data were excluded from analysis. While we did not begin the study deliberately excluding intentional injuries (e.g., self-harm, assaults), we recognized that there would be different impacts on HRQoL. Only three participants with intentional injuries agreed to participate, which was insufficient for meaningful analysis, thus, they were excluded from the analyses reported herein. See Fig. 1 for a flowchart outlining participant disposition. This study was reviewed and approved by the University of British Columbia/Children’s and Women’s Health Centre of British Columbia Research Ethics Board.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fs12955-016-0523-6/MediaObjects/12955_2016_523_Fig1_HTML.gif
Fig. 1

Study population disposition

A study specific survey instrument incorporating the Pediatric Quality of Life Questionnaire (PedsQL™) was administered to parents/guardians at baseline and one, four and 12 months post injury, as per guidelines outlined by van Beeck et al. [10]. At baseline, PedsQL™ was assessed as a retrospective measure of pre-injury health and asked about the child’s HRQoL in the month prior to injury. The questionnaire was piloted among a sample of 10 parents to ensure clarity and comprehension. Components of the questionnaire had previously been validated (the PedsQL [15, 16]) however, validity and reliability were not measured for questions related to demographics and the circumstances of the injury. Parents could complete a hard copy of the questionnaire and return in a stamped self-addressed envelope, or through an online link. Research shows, mode of administration (pen and paper, online or telephone) does not influence scores [17]. At the time of recruitment and with each subsequent follow-up, parents were offered a $2 gift card to a local coffee and pastries merchant for participating in the study, irrespective of whether they completed the survey or not.

Descriptive variables

At baseline, the survey instrument included questions about the circumstances around the injury and demographic information including the child’s age, and sex. Hospital records were used to determine each child’s length of hospitalization Pediatric Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (PaedCTAS) score. The PaedCTAS is a scale used to triage patients based on urgency. PaedCTAS has five ordinal categories ranging from 1 (requires resuscitation) to 5 (non-urgent), and it is assigned to all children presenting in Canadian EDs [18]. This score can be used to predict the nature and scope of care that is likely to be required. The scoring is highly standardized, as nurses assigning the score receive continuous training. Both PaedCTAS score and hospitalization status were used as independent proxies of injury severity. Research indicates the utility of the PaedCTAS as an alternate proxy of injury severity that is not as sensitive to extraneous factors that can influence hospitalization status [19]. Participants’ postal codes were used to derive a measure of socioeconomic status (neighbourhood income quintiles) using Statistics Canada’s Postal Code Conversion File Plus [20].

Health related quality of life

The PedsQL™ 4.0 Generic Core and the PedsQL™ Infant Scales were developed to assess HRQoL in children, ages 2 to 18 years and 0 to 24 months, respectively. The PedsQL™ 4.0 Generic Core is a 23 item scale and includes four subscales: physical functioning, emotional functioning, social functioning and school functioning [21]. The PedsQL™ Infant Scale is an instrument composed of 45 items and five subscales: physical functioning, physical symptoms, emotional functioning, social functioning and cognitive functioning [22]. Both PedsQL™ instruments use a five point Likert response scale ranging from “never” to “almost always” to assess the extent to which different items have affected the child in the previous month. For both measures, individual item scores have been obtained by reverse scoring items and linearly transforming them to a scale of 0 to 100, with 100 representing perfect health. Total scores have been obtained by adding the sum of items and dividing them by the number of items answered. Studies that have reviewed tools for the purpose of long-term follow-up and assessing outcomes in pediatric trauma populations have identified the PedsQL™ as one of very few that is appropriate for a large age range that also has robust psychometric properties [22, 23]. A difference of 4.5 for parent proxy have been previously established as the minimal clinically meaningful difference for this tool [24]. To better understand the true burden of injury overtime both the mean HRQoL score at each time point, as well as the proportion of children who continue to report depressed HRQoL scores at each time point (prevalence of outstanding impact) has been investigated.

Statistical analysis

Logistic regression was used to compare the final analytic sample, the children for whom at least one follow-up survey was available (n = 204), to the entire sample of children presenting with injury to BCCH wards or ED during the study period using administrative data obtained from BCCH. BCCH administrative data included postal code, sex, age, length of stay and hospitalization status. Statistics Canada’s Postal Code Conversion File Plus was used to assign neighbourhood income quintiles.

The HRQoL of study participants at baseline and follow-up points was measured using parent response to PedsQL™. The relationship between PedsQL™ score at each time point and demographic and injury related variables was explored using bivariable linear regression. To determine the proportion of children who continued to have depressed HRQoL scores relative to baseline, the “prevalence of outstanding impact”, on overall HRQoL as well as the physical and psychosocial domains independently at each time point, was defined as having a score that was at least 1 standard deviation of the baseline mean below the individual’s baseline score. The relationship between the prevalence of outstanding impact on HRQoL and injury severity was explored by investigating the relationship between “prevalence of impaired HRQoL” and hospitalization status and PaedCTAS scores using chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests, as appropriate. A Bonferroni correction was applied to determine the alpha used for statistical significance to account for multiple comparisons.

Bivariable associations between demographic and injury related variables were investigated with chi square tests for categorical comparisons and t-tests or ANOVA for continuous (age) variables. If variables were identified to be potentially collinear (p < 0.10) the variable with a stronger crude relationship with recovery in HRQoL over time was brought forward for model building. Bivariable generalized estimating equation (GEE) models using an exchangeable covariance matrix were built to explore the crude impact of demographic and injury related variables on HRQoL. To explore the impact of independent variables on recovery overtime an interaction term with time was included in all models. For the purpose of model building PaedCTAS scores were collapsed into 3 categories, PaedCTAS 1 and 2, 3 and 4 and 5, because there were not enough cases in the highest and lowest categories. A multivariable GEE model was built including all variables identified to be statistically or conceptually important. The model was run with all observations in the analytic sample (n = 204). Finally, a sensitivity analysis was run to assess the impact of exclusions due to missing data on our results. The mean HRQoL scores for the analytic sample at each time point were compared to the mean scores of the entire population of children who returned any data over the study period and no clinically or statistically significant differences were identified (results not shown).

Results

Study population

After exclusions there were 256 baseline surveys; of those individuals 204 returned at least one follow-up survey, making up the analytic sample. Table 1 provides demographic and injury information for study participants included in the analytic sample and a comparison of participants with complete data to those lost to follow-up. The analytic sample was not statistically significantly different than the sample of children who returned a baseline survey on any of the demographic of injury related variables collected (results not shown). Also, the analytic sample was not statistically different than the broader population of all injured children based on sex or age, however the children in our sample had higher odds of being hospitalized (a result of purposeful sampling) and lower odds of being in the lowest 2 income quintiles relative to all injured children presenting at the hospital during the study period (Table 2).
Table 1

Baseline characteristics

  

Attrition

Total n = 204

12 Month Complete n = 149

Lost to Follow-Up n = 55

ORa (95 % CI)

Baseline HRQoL

 Mean (SD)

90.7 (±8.9)

91.3 (±8.3)

89.0 (±10.3)

1.0 (0.9, 1.1)

Hospitalization Status n (%)

 Emergency Department

144 (70.6)

108 (72.5)

35 (66.0)

0.7 (0.4, 1.4)

 Hospitalized

60 (29.4)

41 (27.5)

20 (34.0)

 

Length of Stay (days)

 Median (25 %, 75 %)

2.7 (1.5, 6.8)

2.5 (1.5, 5.0)

3.8 (1.8, 10.6)

0.9 (0.8, 1.0)

 Range

0.2 – 43.4

0.2 – 14.9

0.2 – 43.4

Sex n (%)

 Male

127 (62.3)

96 (64.4)

31 (56.4)

1.4 (0.7, 2.6)

 Female

77 (37.7)

53 (35.6)

24 (43.6)

Ref

Age (years)

 Median (25 %, 75 %)

7.1 (3.6, 11.7)

7.3 (3.7, 11.9)

6.8 (3.0, 11.6)

1.0 (0.9, 1.1)

 Range

0.1 - 16.9

0.3 – 16.9

0.1 – 16.6

 

Age Category n (%)

 0 – 5 years

84 (41.2)

62 (41.6)

22 (40.0)

0.9 (0.4, 2.0)

 6 – 10 year

66 (32.4)

46 (30.9)

20 (36.4)

0.7 (0.3, 1.6)

 11 -16 years

54 (26.5)

41 (27.5)

13 (23.6)

Ref

PaedCTAS n (%)

 1 (requires resuscitation)

11 (5.4)

8 (5.4)

3 (5.5)

0.4 (0.0, 4.6)

 2

38 (18.6)

28 (18.8)

10 (18.2)

0.4 (0.0, 3.7)

 3

43 (21.1)

30 (20.1)

13 (23.6)

0.3 (0.0, 3.0)

 4

104 (51.0)

76 (51.0)

28 (50.9)

0.4 (0.0, 3.3)

 5 (non-urgent)

8 (3.9)

7 (4.7)

1 (1.8)

Ref

Income Quintile n (%)

 1 (lowest income quintile)

25 (12.3)

12 (8.1)

13 (23.6)

0.3 (0.1, 0.7)

 2

25 (12.3)

16 (10.7)

9 (16.4)

0.5 (0.2, 1.4)

 3

43 (21.1)

37 (24.8)

6 (10.9)

1.8 (0.6, 4.9)

 4

39 (19.1)

28 (18.8)

11 (20.0)

0.7 (0.3, 1.8)

 5 (highest income quintile)

72 (35.3)

56 (37.6)

16 (29.1)

Ref

Injury Type

 Head injury

18 (8.8)

12 (8.1)

6 (11.3)

1.2 (0.3, 4.9)

 Lower extremity fracture

25 (12.3)

15 (10.1)

10 (18.9)

0.9 (0.3, 3.3)

 Major trauma

16 (7.8)

13 (8.8)

3 (5.7)

2.6 (0.5, 13.0)

 Minor external injury

77 (37.7)

57 (38.5)

20 (37.7)

1.7 (0.6, 5.3)

 Upper extremity fracture

49 (24.0)

41 (27.7)

8 (15.1)

3.1 (0.9, 10.9)

 Otherb

18 (9)

10 (6.8)

6 (11.3)

Ref

 Missing

1 (0.5)

1 (1.0)

2 (2.3)

 

aOR from logistic regression, odds of returning 12 month survey

bCategories with cell size < 5 were collapsed into, other this category includes Major Burn, Hand or foot amputation, Head Trauma, Ingestion/chocking, Internal organ injury, Spinal fracture

Table 2

Study population compared to all children presenting to hospital with injury during study period

 

Study population

All injuries

OR (95 % CI)

Sex n (%)

 Male

127 (62.3)

8156 (58.3)

ref

 Female

77 (37.8)

5825 (41.7)

1.2 (0.9, 1.6)

Income Quintile n (%)

 1(lowest income quintile)

25 (12.3)

2,744 (19.8)

0.4 (0.3, 0.7)

 2

25 (12.3)

2,598 (18.8)

0.4 (0.3, 0.7)

 3

43 (21.1)

2,607 (18.9)

0.8 (0.5, 1.1)

 4

39 (19.1)

2,586 (18.9)

0.7 (0.5, 1.0)

 5(hightest income quintile)

72 (35.3)

3,305 (23.9)

ref

Hospitalized n (%)

 ED

144 (70.6)

12,419 (88.8)

ref

 Admitted

60 (29.4)

1,562 (11.2)

3.3 (2.4, 4.5)

Age (Mean ± SD) (range 0 – < 17 years)

7.87 ± 4.67

7.32 ± 5.02

1.0 (1.0. 1.1)

The mean age of analytic sample was 7.9 years, 62.3 % were male, and 89 % of respondents indicated English was the primary, or one of the primary languages spoken at home. Almost 30 % of participants were hospitalized for their injuries. The median length of stay for children who were hospitalized was 2.7 days, ranging from < 1 day to 43 days, with 40 % being hospitalized for 2 days or less. The majority of children included in this study were previously healthy with 87 % of parents indicating that their child had zero days of ill health in the four weeks preceding the injury. Most parents indicated their child was participating in leisure/entertainment activities (32 %), or sports/exercise either at school or at a club/gym (31 %) at the time of injury.

Table 3 presents HRQoL for participants based on PedsQL™ summary scores as reported by parents at each time point stratified by demographic and injury-related variables. The mean baseline total HRQoL score (representing pre-injury health) of participants was 90.66 (95 % CI (89.4, 91.9)). At one month the mean total health score dropped to 77.8 (95 % CI (75.2, 80.4)), by four months this mean returned to almost that of pre injury status (90.3 (88.9, 91.8)) and by 12 months the mean score was equal to pre injury status (91.3 (89.8, 92.8)). None of the demographic or injury related variables were statistically significantly associated with baseline or twelve month HRQoL summary scores. At one-month post injury having been hospitalized, having a lower PaedCTAS score and being over the age of 8 were all significantly associated with lower HRQoL summary scores (p < 0.001 due to Bonferroni correction). These relationships were no longer evident at four months post injury, except for age.
Table 3

PedsQL total health score, parent report at each follow-up pointa,*

 

Baseline

One Month

Four Months

Twelve Months

n

mean

sd

n

mean

sd

n

mean

sd

n

mean

sd

Sex

 

p = 0.31

 

p = 0.82

 

p = 0.47

 

p = 0.44

 Male

127

90.2

9.2

113

77.6

17.5

106

89.9

9.7

103

90.8

9.8

 Female

77

91.5

8.3

72

78.2

18.6

63

91

9.6

58

92.1

9.5

Age Category

 

p = 0.58

 

p  = 0.005

 

p  = 0.003

 

p = 0.22

 0 - 5

84

91.3

8.5

74

82.8

16.0

65

92.4

7.9

62

92.2

9.6

 6 -10

66

89.8

9.5

63

73.0

18.7

52

86.6

11.4

46

89.6

10.7

 11-16

54

90.7

8.8

48

76.5

17.9

41

91.3

8.5

41

92.9

7.2

Hospitalization Status

 

p = 0.77

 

p  < 0.001

 

p = 0.71

 

p = 0.82

 ED

144

90.5

8.9

132

82.6

14.8

126

90.2

10.1

113

91.4

9.2

 Hospitalized

60

90.9

8.9

53

65.9

19.6

43

90.8

8.4

48

91

10.8

PaedCTAS

 

p = 0.15

 

p  < 0.001

 

p = 0.72

 

p = 0.87

 1 (resuscitation required)

11

85.4

12.4

10

65.8

17

9

88

9.4

7

90.7

12

 2

38

91.1

8.6

33

68.2

19.9

30

90.1

8.5

33

91

9.1

 3

43

91.7

8.2

40

78

18.3

34

89.8

9.2

34

92.2

8.7

 4

104

90.3

8.9

94

82

15.9

90

90.5

10.5

79

91.3

9.7

 5 (non-urgent)

8

95.2

4.3

8

82

11.8

6

95

4.8

8

88.1

14.3

Income Quintile

 

p = 0.12

 

p = 0.16

 

p = 0.44

 

p = 0.27

 1 (lowest income quintile)

25

90.2

9.5

21

73.9

21.1

18

89

9.9

13

93

9.3

 2

25

88.3

11.7

23

74.8

18.6

20

87.4

10.2

18

88.2

10.6

 3

43

93

6.9

38

83.9

17.6

37

92.3

9.6

38

92.6

10.9

 4

39

88.6

9.4

35

75.6

17.5

31

90.8

10.8

33

89.1

10.8

 5 (highest income quintile)

72

91.4

8.1

68

77.8

16.5

63

90.2

8.9

59

92.2

7.6

Injury

 

p = 0.89

 

p  < 0.001

 

p = 0.99

 

p = 0.95

 Head injury

18

91.4

6.7

17

89.3

8.2

15

91.4

6.4

12

93.6

5.9

 Lower extremity fracture

25

92.9

9.2

22

58.6

19.9

16

88.7

9.4

15

90.2

10.2

 Major trauma

16

89.0

11.6

15

65.5

21.2

13

90.0

9.8

13

90.0

11.2

 Minor external injury

77

90.8

9.4

67

84.8

15.3

60

89.2

11.6

57

91.3

10.9

 Upper extremity fracture

49

89.6

8.5

46

77.9

12.2

41

91.5

8.8

41

92.6

7.3

 Other*

16

90.7

6.9

15

74.8

16.9

11

90.6

5.9

10

92.0

9.1

aVariable ranges from 0-100 with 100 representing perfect health; minimal clinically important difference is a 4 point change

*P values for differences in mean PedsQL scores across variables (within time points) from bivariable linear regression, < 0.001 considered significant with Bonferroni correction

At 12 months post injury the prevalence of outstanding impact on total HRQoL was 8 %, 10 % and 9 % for the total summary score, physical and psychosocial domains respectively (Table 4). No injury or demographic variables were associated with the prevalence of outstanding HRQoL impact overall at 12 months.
Table 4

Prevalence of impaired HRQoL (as defined > 1 standard deviation of baseline mean below baseline score) by injury severity

 

One Month

Four Months

Twelve Months

 

Total

Physical

Psycho-social

Total

Physical

Psycho-social

Total

Physical

Psycho-social

Full population n (%)

 

90 (44.1)

113 (55.4)

58 (28.4)

23 (11.3)

28 (13.7)

18 (8.8)

13 (6.4)

16 (7.8)

15 (7.4)

Hospitalization Status n (%)

 

p  < 0.001

p  = 0.001

p  < 0.001

p = 0.91

p = 0.03

p = 0.21

p = 0.87

p = 0.05

p = 0.83

 ED

49 (34.0)

69 (47.9)

30 (20.8)

16 (11.1)

15 (10.4)

15 (10.4)

11 (7.6)

11 (7.6)

13 (9.0)

 Hospitalized

41 (68.3)

44 (73.3)

28 (46.7)

7 (11.7)

13 (21.7)

3 (5.0)

5 (8.3)

10 (16.7)

6 (10.0)

PaedCTAS n (%)

 

p = 0.06

p = 0.18

p = 0.03

p = 0.84

p = 0.14

p = 0.85

p = 0.12

p = 0.11

p = 0.04

 1 (resuscitation required)

7 (63.6)

7 (63.6)

6 (54.5)

1 (9.1)

2 (18.2)

1 (9.1)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

1 (9.1)

 2

21 (55.3)

26 (68.4)

15 (39.5)

6 (15.8)

9 (23.7)

2 (5.3)

5 (13.2)

7 (18.4)

5 (13.2)

 3

21 (48.8)

24 (55.8)

13 (30.2)

5 (11.6)

7 (16.3)

4 (9.3)

1 (2.3)

2 (4.7)

1 (2.3)

 4

36 (34.6)

50 (48.1)

21 (20.2)

10 (9.6)

9 (8.7)

10 (9.6)

8 (7.7)

10 (9.6)

9 (8.7)

 5 (non-urgent)

5 (62.5)

6 (75.0)

3 (37.5)

1 (12.5)

1 (12.5)

1 (12.5)

2 (25.0)

2 (25.0)

3 (37.5)

*p values comparing prevalence of impaired HRQoL across groups from chi square test or Fisher’s where cell size < 5; < 0.001 considered significant with Bonferroni correction

Table 5 presents the results of the GEE model examining predictors of HRQoL over time (from 1-12 months) the QICu of the model with only time was 98 146 and the model with all covariates the QICu was 72 322. The model demonstrates that the only significant modifiers of HRQoL recovery following injury, after controlling for baseline HRQoL, were age and hospitalization status. Children who were hospitalized had a steeper slope to recovery as demonstrated by the fact that despite having lower HRQoL at one month post injury relative to children who were not hospitalized, HRQoL for both hospitalized and un-hospitalized children returned to baseline by four months post injury (Fig. 2). The parameter estimate for the adjusted model from Table 5 for the hospitalization and time interaction term can be interpreted as follows: during the time from 1-12 months post injury, in a one month period the average change in HRQoL score for children who were not hospitalized was 0.93 points less than children who were hospitalized controlling for baseline HRQoL, age, sex and PaedCTAS. Likewise, relative to children who were one year younger, older children experienced a 0.07 point greater increase in their HRQoL score in a month period, or the slope of HRQoL over time for children who were one year older was found to be 0.07 steeper than that of younger children.
Table 5

PedsQl Total score at 1, 4 and 12 months using Generalized Estimating Equation

 

Time only Model (95 % CI)

Crude Estimatea (95 % CI)

Adjusted Estimateb (95 % CI)

Intercept

81.47 (79.37, 83.56)

 

34.53 (17.88, 51.17)

Time in months

0.99 (0.79, 1.19)

 

0.54 (–1.37, 2.46)

Baseline HRQoL

 

0.52 (0.24, 0.79)

0.53 (0.29, 0.77)

Time*Baseline

 

0.01 (–0.01, 0.03)

0.01 (–0.01, 0.03)

Hospitalization Status

 

13.65 (8.38, 18.93)

11.95 (5.59, 18.30)

Time*Hospitalization (ref = hosp)

 

–1.17 (–1.67, –0.68)

–0.93 (–1.58, –0.29)

Age (yrs)

 

–1.03 (–1.46, –0.59)

–0.93 (–1.32, –0.54)

Time*Age

 

0.07 (0.03, 0.12)

0.07 (0.04, 0.11)

Sex (ref = Female)

 

–0.41 (–5.06, 4.25)

2.63 (–1.25, 6.5)

Time*Sex

 

–0.10 (–0.53, 0.33)

–0.29 (–0.67, 0.10)

PaedCTAS 1&2

 

Reference

 

PaedCTAS 3

 

7.51 (0.54, 14.49)

–0.59 (–8.33, 7.16)

PaedCTAS 4&5

 

11.87 (6.24, 17.51)

2.29 (–4.56, 9.16)

Time*CTAS3

 

–0.61 (–1.25, 0.02)

–0.02 (–0.73, 0.69)

Time*PaedCTAS 4&5

 

–1.07 (–1.58, –056)

–0.36 (–1.03, 0.32)

a“Crude” models include the covariate, time and the interaction between time and the covariate

bAdjusted for all other variables in table including interaction terms

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fs12955-016-0523-6/MediaObjects/12955_2016_523_Fig2_HTML.gif
Fig. 2

GEE estimates for injuries requiring hospitalization vs ED visit*.

*Holding all other variables in model constant as: female; PaedCTAS of 1 or 2; 7.1 years of age (median age of population) and baseline PedsQl of 90.7 (mean of population)

Although injury severity, as measured by hospitalization, increased the rate of recovery, it did not impact the state of recovery (a child’s HRQoL score at a given timepoint) beyond one month post injury. The mean HRQoL score for children who were hospitalized was significantly lower than those who presented to ED at one month post injury (65.9 vs 82.6, p <0.001) however this difference was no longer evident at four or 12 months (Table 3). Likewise children with lower PaedCTAS scores had significantly lower HRQoL scores one month post injury, a difference that again disappeared by four and 12 months. When broken down into psychosocial and physical components of HRQoL however, we found that a greater proportion of children who were hospitalized continued to have diminished scores for the physical component of the HRQoL measurement through to 12 months post injury (16.7 % of hospitalized children vs 7.6 % of children presenting to ED, p = 0.05) although there was not a significant difference in the psychosocial domain of HRQoL at four or 12 months between these two groups (Table 4).

Discussion

In accordance with previous work [13, 25], we found that most children’s summary HRQoL score had returned to within one standard deviation of baseline by four months post injury. Hospitalization status and age were the only variables associated with a significant change in the rate of recovery, with children who were admitted and older children having a faster rate (steeper slope) to recovery relative to those who were seen in the ED and younger children. This finding demonstrates that children with greater impact on HRQoL at one month post injury (those hospitalized and older children) recover at an accelerated rate and by four months post injury there is no difference in HRQoL impact relative to their ED and younger peers. Hospitalized children may have experienced a greater impact on HRQoL at one month relative to children seen in the ED due to time away from school/peers, and injuries that resulted in a greater impact on activities of daily living. Older children (those > 5 years of age) may have experienced a greater impact on HRQoL at one month post injury as they are more independent relative to younger children in activities of daily living and leisure activities. Thus, their injuries may have resulted in a greater loss of independence.

Our findings are consistent with the findings of the UK burden of injury multicenter study that recruited almost 300 hundred participants under 18 years of age. They found that admission status and injury severity were the only variables associated with recovery at one month post injury among 5-17 year olds, and that 91 % of participants had recovered by 12 months post injury [25]. In addition, Polinder et al., reported that less than 10 % of their study population of injured children 5-14 years had residual disability after nine months with girls and hospitalized children having higher odds of longer lasting disability [13]. Further, a 2012 systematic review on studies of children who have suffered traumatic brain injuries found that the odds of experiencing poor Quality of Life increased with more severe injuries (assessment time points ranged from three months to five years) [26]. However, even among children with TBI, a recent study found that by 18 months post injury parent ratings of children’s HRQoL returned to the normal range for most children, regardless of injury severity [27].

In the current study, at four and 12 months a higher proportion of hospitalized children, relative to their unadmitted counterparts, still had physical HRQoL scores that were at least one standard deviation lower than their baseline score while their total and psychosocial scores were on par with baseline. PaedsCTAS did not have a significant impact on recovery despite being a measure of severity. It is possible this result is due to the fact that although PaedsCTAS has been found to be associated with physical recovery, no relationship with psychosocial recovery has been observed [19]. Future analysis will explore predictors of physical and psychosocial functioning independently. The utility of providing targeted rehabilitation support, such as occupational and physical therapy, throughout recovery to injured children who were hospitalized to help diminish this impact could be investigated in future research.

Variables that could be used to predict and protect the subset of children at high risk of long-term or more serious impact, outside of lengthy hospitalization and possibly severe traumatic brain injury [28, 29] have not been consistently demonstrated across studies. Some studies have found that children involved in motor vehicle accidents [30] and burn victims [31] can have more psychological and/or longer lasting sequalae relative to other injuries; the sample size of children with these mechanisms of injury in the current study was too small to investigate this further.

Our findings can inform the debate regarding the tradeoff between the benefits of a physically active lifestyle versus potential impacts on HRQoL resulting from childhood injuries [3238]. Among our sample, 63 % were engaged in leisure/physical activity at the time of their injury, highlighting the high incidence of these injuries. Our data did not include information on exposure time, however, a systematic review calculated that the injury incidence rate during leisure/physical activity was between 0.15-0.27 medically attended injuries per 1,000 h of physical activity, indicating that while they may be prevalent, they are relatively rare when accounting for exposure [39]. In those relatively rare cases when injury does occur, our findings suggest that most children recuperate quickly, with HRQoL comparable to pre-injury levels by four-months post-injury.

The limitations of this study should be noted in interpreting the findings. Despite our best efforts, the study sample represents 30 % of the eligible population that was approached for study participation. Our response rates appear to be lower than other comparable longitudinal injury studies of children attending an ED or admitted to hospital for an injury. For example, Polinder et al.’s pediatric study had a response rate of 43 % [13], while Lyons et al.’s study of injured children and adults had a participation rate of 66 % [25, 40]. However, when we compared the study population to the broader population of children presenting at BCCH with an injury, we found that our sample matched all injured children, with the exception of income with our study population having a significantly lower proportion of individuals from the lowest two income quintiles. It is possible that being from a lower income bracket could be associated with a detrimental impact on HRQoL recovery, which may not have been captured in this study due to small sample size. The influence of income was not examined in Polinder et al. and Lyons et al.’s research, thus limiting our understanding of this issue. Our sensitivity analysis indicated no significant differences in HRQoL over time resulting from excluding participants due to missing data.

We were successful in sampling a breadth of injuries and over-sampling injuries that required hospitalization. As with any longitudinal research, there was attrition over the course of this study. Those lost to follow-up had a lower mean baseline HRQoL score relative to those who completed the study period; however, this difference was less than the minimal clinically important difference of 4.5 points [41]. Finally, baseline health prior to injury was based on a retrospective measure and it is possible that parents under- or over-represented child health prior to injury. It has been suggested that baseline measures collected at recruitment are more appropriate than healthy population norms for the purpose of determining the impact of injury on HRQoL in an adult population [42]. No study, to our knowledge, has examined this in a pediatric population.

Conclusions

This study examined the longitudinal recovery of children in the year following injury. Our findings indicate that very few injuries have a long lasting impact on children’s HRQoL, demonstrating children’s resilience to physical trauma. This research contributes to, and expands upon the current literature on recovery from childhood injury by including a wide age-range of children, looking at a longer time period post-injury, and using a pediatric tool to measure HRQoL. Older and hospitalized children experienced greater short-term impact to HRQoL and a steeper slope to recovery. On average, hospitalized children continued to experience greater impact to the physical domain of their HRQoL throughout the year post-injury. On-going rehabilitation support should be considered as a mechanism to reduce physical sequalae. Overall, the rapid recovery trajectory for most injuries encourages children’s participation in active healthy lifestyles.

Abbreviations

BC: 

British Columbia

BCCH: 

British Columbia children’s hospital

ED: 

Emergency department

GEE: 

Generalized estimating equation

HRQoL: 

Health related quality of life

PaedCTAS: 

Pediatric Canadian triage and acuity scale

PedsQL™: 

Pediatric quality of life questionnaire

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to extend their gratitude and acknowledgements to all study participants and study team members for their time and energy spent on this project.

Salary support for authors was provided by the BCCH (MB, JB) and by a Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research Scholar Award (MB).

Funding

This study was funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (Grant # TIR-104028), as well as the Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Availability of data and material

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

AS was involved with data collection, designed and carried out statistical analyses, drafted the initial manuscript and approved the final manuscript as submitted. MB conceptualized and designed the study, oversaw data collection, reviewed and revised the manuscript and approved the final manuscript as submitted. CM was involved with study conceptualization and design, reviewed and revised the manuscript and approved the final manuscript as submitted. JB was involved with developing the analysis plan, reviewed and revised the manuscript and approved the final manuscript as submitted. SK, TI, and EZ were involved with study implementation, data collection, reviewed and revised the manuscript and approved the final manuscript as submitted.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was reviewed and approved by the University of British Columbia/Children’s and Women’s Health Centre of British Columbia Research Ethics Board, reference number H09-01627. Informed and written consents were obtained from parents of all agreed participating children and assent from all participating children aged 7 and older. Participants were informed about their freedom from refusal and any decision which they may take would not affect their healthcare services. Anonymity and confidentiality were maintained throughout the research process.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
School of Population & Public Health, University of British Columbia
(2)
British Columbia Injury Research & Prevention Unit
(3)
British Columbia Children’s Hospital
(4)
Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia
(5)
Vaccine Evaluation Center, BC Children’s Hospital

References

  1. Peden M, Oyegbite K, Ozanne-Smith J, Hyder AA, Branche C, Rahman AKMF, Rivara F, Bartolomeos K. World Report on Child Injury Prevention. Geneva: World Health Organization Press; 2008.Google Scholar
  2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. National Action Plan for Child Injury Prevention. Atlanta: CDC, NCIPC; 2012.Google Scholar
  3. Grad FP. Preable to the Constitution of the World Health Organization. B World Health Organ. 2002;80:981–84.
  4. Guyatt GH, Feeny DH, Patrick DL. Measuring health-related quality of life. Ann Intern Med. 1993;118:622–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Patrick D, Erickson P. Assessing health-related quality of life for clinical decision-making. In: Walker SR, Rosser RM, editors. Quality of Life Assessment: Key Issues in the 1990s. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 1993. p. 11–64.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Kenardy JA, Spence SH, Macleod AC. Screening for posttraumatic stress disorder in children after accidental injury. Pediatrics. 2006;118:1002–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. March S, Kenardy JA, Cobham VE, Nixon RDV, McDermott B, De Young A. Feasibility of a Screening Program for At-Risk Children Following Accidental Injury. J Trauma Stress. 2015;28:34–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Kassam-Adams N, Bakker A, Marsac ML, Fein JA, Winston FK. Traumatic Stress, Depression, and Recovery. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2015;1.
  9. Polinder S, Haagsma JA, Belt E, Lyons RA, Erasmus V, Lund J, Van Beeck EF. A systematic review of studies measuring health-related quality of life of general injury populations. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:783.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. van Beeck Larson CF, Lyons RA, Meerding W, Mulder S, Essink-Bot M. EF. Guidelines for the conduction of follow up studies measuring injury-related disability. J Trauma. 2007;62:534–550.
  11. Polinder S, Haagsma JA, Toet H, van Beeck EF. Epidemiological burden of minor, major and fatal trauma in a national injury pyramid. Br J Surg. 2012;99 (Suppl 1):121.Google Scholar
  12. Aitken ME, Tilford JM, Barrett KW, Parker JG, Simpson P, Landgraf J, Robbins JM. Health Status of Children After Admission for Injury. Pediatrics. 2002;110:337–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Polinder S, Meerding WJ, Toet H, Mulder S, Essink-Bot M-L, van Beeck EF. Prevalence and prognostic factors of disability after childhood injury. Pediatrics. 2005;116:e810–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Davey TM, Aitken LM, Kassulke D, Bellamy N, Ambrose J, Gee T, Clark M. Long-term outcomes of seriously injured children: a study using the Child Health Questionnaire. J Paediatr Child Health. 2005;41:278–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Desai AD, Zhou C, Stanford S, Haaland W, Varni JW, Mangione-Smith RM. Validity and responsiveness of the pediatric quality of life inventory (PedsQL) 4.0 generic core scales in the pediatric inpatient setting. JAMA Pediatr. 2014;168:1114–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Varni JW, Seid M, Kurtin PS. PedsQL 4.0: reliability and validity of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory version 4.0 generic core scales in healthy and patient populations. Med Care. 2001;39:800–12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Kruse S, Schneeberg A, Brussoni M. Construct validity and impact of mode of administration of the PedsQL™ among a pediatric injury population. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014;12:168.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Gouin S, Gravel J, Amre DK, Bergeron S. Evaluation of the Paediatric Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale in a pediatric ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2005;23:243–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Yates M, Ishikawa T, Schneeberg A, Brussoni M. Pediatric Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (PasedsCTAS) as a Measure of Injury Severity. Int J Environ Res Public Heal. 2016;13.
  20. Statistics Canada. Postal Code Conversion File Plus PCCF+ Version 5 F User’s Guide. Ottawa: Minister of Industry. Statistics Canada Catalogue no 82-E0086-XDB; 2010.Google Scholar
  21. Varni JW, Seid M, Knight TS, Uzark K, Szer IS. The PedsQLTM 4.0 Generic Core Scales: Sensitivity, Responsiveness, and Impact on Clinical Decision-Making. J Behav Med. 2002;25:175–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Willis Gabbe BJ, Butt W, Cameron PA. CD. Assessing outcomes in paediatric trauma populations. Inj Int J Care Inj. 2006;37:1185–96.
  23. Janssens L, Gorter JW, Ketelaar M, Kramer WLM, Holtslag HR. Health-related quality-of-life measures for long-term follow-up in children after major trauma. Qual Life Res. 2008;17:701–13.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Varni JW, Burwinkle TM, Seid M, Skarr D. The PedsQL 4.0 as a pediatric population health measure: feasibility, reliability, and validity. Ambul Pediatr. 2003;3:329–41.
  25. Kendrick D, Vinogradova Y, Coupland C, Mulvaney CA, Christie N, Lyons RA, Towner EL. Recovery from injury: the UK burden of injury multicentre longitudinal study. Inj Prev. 2013;19:370–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Battista A Di, Soo C, Catroppa C, Anderson V. Quality of Life in Children and Adolescents Post-TBI: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Neurotraum. 2012;29:1717–27.
  27. Brown EA, Kenardy J, Chandler B, Anderson V, McKinlay L, Le Brocque R. Parent-Reported Health-Related Quality of Life in Children With Traumatic Brain Injury: A Prospective Study. J Pediatr Psychol. 2016;41:244–55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Stancin T, Drotar D, Taylor HG, Yeates KO, Wade SL, Minich NM. Health-Related Quality of Life of Children and Adolescents After Traumatic Brain Injury. Pediatrics. 2002;109:e34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. McCarthy ML, MacKenzie EJ, Durbin DR, Aitken ME, Jaffe KM, Paidas CN, Slomine BS, Dorsch AM, Christensen JR, Ding R. Health-related quality of life during the first year after traumatic brain injury. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006;160:252–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Winston FK, Kassam-Adams N, Vivarelli-O’Neill C, Ford J, Newman E, Baxt C, Stafford P, Cnaan A. Acute Stress Disorder Symptoms in Children and Their Parents After Pediatric Traffic Injury. Pediatrics. 2002;109:e90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. van Baar ME, Polinder S, Essink-Bot ML, van Loey NEE, Oen IMMH, Dokter J, Boxma H, van Beeck EF. Quality of life after burns in childhood (5-15 years): children experience substantial problems. Burns. 2011;37:930–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Langley J, Cryer C. A consideration of severity is sufficient to focus our prevention efforts. Inj Prev. 2012;18:73–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Brussoni M, Brunelle S, Pike I, Sandseter EBH, Herrington S, Turner H, Belair S, Logan L, Fuselli P, Ball DJ. Can child injury prevention include healthy risk promotion? Inj Prev. 2014;21:344-47.
  34. Rivara F. Counterpoint: minor injuries may not be all that minor. Inj Prev. 2011;17:149–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Brussoni M, Olsen LL, Pike I, Sleet D. Risky play and children’s safety: Balancing priorities for optimal child development. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2012;9:3134–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Molcho M, Pickett W. Some thoughts about “acceptable” and “non-acceptable” childhood injuries. Inj Prev. 2011;17:147–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Tremblay MS, Gray C, Babcock S, Barnes J, Bradstreet CC, Carr D, Chabot G, Choquette L, Chorney D, Collyer C, Herrington S, Janson K, Janssen I, Larouche R, Pickett W, Power M, Sandseter EBH, Simon B, Brussoni M. Position Statement on Active Outdoor Play. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015;12:6475–505.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Brussoni M, Gibbons R, Gray C, Ishikawa T, Sandseter EBH, Bienenstock A, Chabot G, Fuselli P, Herrington S, Janssen I, Pickett W, Power M, Stanger N, Sampson M, Tremblay MS. What is the Relationship between Risky Outdoor Play and Health in Children? A Systematic Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015;12:6423–54.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Nauta J, Martin-Diener E, Martin BW, van Mechelen W, Verhagen E. Injury risk during different physical activity behaviours in children: a systematic review with bias assessment. Sports Med. 2015;45:327–36.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Lyons RA, Kendrick D, Towner EM, Christie N, Macey S, Coupland C, Gabbe BJ, UK Burden of Injuries Study Group. Measuring the population burden of injuries--implications for global and national estimates: a multi-centre prospective UK longitudinal study. PLoS Med. 2011;8, e1001140.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Varni JW, Burwinkle TM. The PedsQL as a patient-reported outcome in children and adolescents with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: a population-based study. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006;4:26–36.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Watson WL, Ozanne-Smith J, Richardson J. Retrospective baseline measurement of self-reported health status and health-related quality of life versus population norms in the evaluation of post-injury losses. Inj Prev. 2007;13:45–50.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2016

Advertisement