Skip to main content

Table 5 Comparison of mean changes and percentage changes between 6 months’ and 12 months’ follow-up for the three groups

From: Health related quality of life assessment in acute coronary syndrome patients: the effectiveness of early phase I cardiac rehabilitation

 

MCRP (n = 15)

CCRP (n = 15)

Control (n = 26)

Mean difference

(%)

Mean difference

(%)

Mean difference

(%)

Components

 PCS

3.95

8.90

4.26

9.69 a

3.69

9.12 b

 MCS

9.23

21.75 a,b

3.32

6.89

4.69

10.90

Domains

 PF

14.78

21.67 a

7.67

10.27

6.32

9.76

 RP

16.67

37.04

16.67

40.00

15.38

42.10 b

 BP

12.27

17.97 a

4.60

6.56

6.38

10.20

 GH

12.51

21.62 b

13.87

25.36 b

14.58

28.52 a,b

 VT

14.33

24.43

8.00

12.63

13.97

26.58 a,b

 SF

14.17

21.25 a

6.67

8.79

5.77

9.09

 RE

22.22 c

55.55 a

8.88

19.03

12.83

34.50

 MH

21.07 c

33.48 a,b

6.93

9.19 b

9.23

13.86

  1. aHighest percentage of mean differences among the three groups
  2. b p value for paired t-test is significant at p < 0.05
  3. cMCID with reference point as 20-points differences in changes over time with the SF-36 (Ware et al., 1993; Wyrwich et al., 2004; Kemmler et al., 2010)