From: Mapping and direct valuation: do they give equivalent EQ-5D-5L index scores?
Health indicator | Effect size (standard error) | Difference in effect size (90 % confidence interval) | |
---|---|---|---|
Valuation-derived index score | Mapping-derived index score | ||
Reported a change in performance status (N = 78) | |||
Change in self-assessed performance status | 0.064 (0.016) | 0.071 (0.025) | −0.007 (−0.025 to 0.011)a |
Change in FACT-B total score (per 20-point increment) | 0.106 (0.024) | 0.109 (0.038) | −0.003 (−0.030 to 0.024)a |
Change in FACT-G total score (per 20-point increment) | 0.119 (0.027) | 0.126 (0.042) | −0.007 (−0.037 to 0.024)a |
Change in EQ-VAS (per 20-point increment) | 0.097 (0.022) | 0.108 (0.034) | −0.011 (−0.035 to 0.014)a |
Reported a change in health status (N = 129) | |||
Patient’s self-rated change in health status | 0.044 (0.007) | 0.055 (0.011) | −0.010 (−0.019 to −0.002)a |
Change in FACT-B total score (per 20-point increment) | 0.081 (0.018) | 0.081 (0.029) | 0.001 (−0.019 to 0.020)a |
Change in FACT-G total score (per 20-point increment) | 0.101 (0.020) | 0.107 (0.029) | −0.007 (−0.029 to 0.015)a |
Change in EQ-VAS (per 20-point increment) | 0.114 (0.017) | 0.142 (0.026) | −0.028 (−0.048 to −0.008)a |