From: What is the relevance of quality of life assessment for patients with attention impairment?
Attention_WMS | PASAT | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Construct validity | NI 75 | I 39 | NI 32 | I 73 |
% of identified factors | 88,9 | 88,9 | 88,9 | 100 |
% of well-projected items | 57,1 | 80,6 | 83,9 | 100 |
% of dimensions with IIC non exceeded 0,2 from ref | 44,4 | 77,8 | 77,8 | 44,4 |
% of dimensions with IDV non exceeded 0,2 from ref | 33,3 | 22,2 | 0 | 44,4 |
% of dimensions with IDV < IIC | 88,9 | 77,8 | 77,8 | 66,7 |
% of dimensions with Cronbach’s alpha coefficients > = 0,7 or > = ref | 77,8 | 66,7 | 77,8 | 77,8 |
% of dimensions with INFIT ranged [0,7-1,3] | 83,3 | 83,3 | 66,7 | 44,4 |
% of dimensions with MV < 10% from ref | 100 | 88,9 | 88,9 | 88,9 |
% of dimensions with Floor < 10% from ref | 77,8 | 33,3 | 77,8 | 55,6 |
% of dimensions with Ceiling < 10% from ref | 66,7 | 77,8 | 66,7 | 66,7 |
Total | 71,8 | 69,7 | 70,6 | 68,9 |
External validity | NI 75 | I 39 | NI 32 | I 73 |
SF36: % of dimensions meeting three conditions* | 88,9 | 88,9 | 55,6 | 88,9 |
Age: % of dimensions with correlation coefficient < 0,40 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
EDSS: % of dimensions meeting two conditions** | 100 | 88,9 | 88,9 | 88,9 |
MS duration: % of dimensions with correlation coefficient < 0,40 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Gender: % of dimensions with ES < 0,2 from ref | 88,9 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Educational level: % of dimensions with ES < 0,2 from ref | 55,6 | 44,4 | 66,7 | 44,4 |
Marital status: % of dimensions with ES < 0,2 from ref | 100 | 88,9 | 77,8 | 100 |
Occupational status: % of dimensions with ES < 0,2 from ref | 55,6 | 55,6 | 55,6 | 44,4 |
Total | 86,1 | 83,3 | 80,6 | 83,3 |