Skip to main content

Table 4 Rank order (1 = most important, 16 = least important) and observed mean Relative Importance Scores for each cohort (n = 158)

From: Does the relative importance of the OxCAP-MH’s capability items differ according to mental ill-health experience?

Item

Question number

Label

Cohort (rank; RIS)

Primary care patients

Psychiatric patients

Mental health experts

p value*

   

n = 50

n = 53

n = 55

 

1

1

Limitation in daily activities

2 (11.99)

2 (9.44)

3 (10.11)

0.281

2

2

Social networks

9 (4.59)

7 (6.72)

8 (6.26)

0.180

3

3

Losing sleep over worry

14 (3.08)

15 (2.36)

14 (2.06)

0.210

4

4

Enjoying social and recreational activities

13 (3.09)

10 (4.81)

11 (3.28)

0.028

5

5

Having suitable accommodation

11 (3.68)

8 (5.96)

15 (1.98)

0.000

6

6

Feeling safe

8 (5.07)

14 (3.04)

10 (5.11)

0.002

7

7

Likelihood of assault

3 (10.00)

4 (8.04)

2 (11.67)

0.019

8

8

Likelihood of discrimination

4 (9.02)

5 (7.21)

4 (9.87)

0.091

9

9a

Influencing local decisions

16 (0.64)

16 (0.75)

16 (0.88)

0.013

10

9b

Freedom of expression

6 (7.90)

12 (4.64)

6 (7.77)

0.005

11

9c

Appreciating nature

12 (3.50)

13 (3.80)

12 (2.38)

0.194

12

9d

Respecting and valuing people

7 (6.54)

6 (7.15)

7 (6.95)

0.851

13

9e

Enjoying friendship and support

5 (8.38)

3 (9.40)

5 (9.24)

0.718

14

9f

Self-determination

1 (15.80)

1 (16.25)

1 (15.15)

0.271

15

9 g

Imagination and creativity

10 (3.71)

11 (4.69)

13 (2.08)

0.039

16

9 h

Access to interesting activities or employment

15 (3.01)

9 (5.74)

9 (5.22)

0.007

  1. Relative Importance Scores (based on HB estimation) in brackets; p values ≤ 0.05 are in bold; *Kruskal–Wallis equality-of-populations rank test