Skip to main content

Table 5 Association between the deterioration or no significant improvement in the SAQ subscales and MSIMI

From: Association between quality of life and mental stress-induced myocardial ischaemia in high-risk patients after coronary revascularization

 

Unadjusted OR

P

Adjusted OR f

P

Physical limitations

 Deteriorationa

0.483 [0.158–1.472]

0.200

0.453 [0.145–1.420]

0.174

 Improved < 8b

0.444 [0.201–0.979]

0.044

1.080 [0.992–1.175]

0.075

Angina frequency

 Deteriorationa

2.100 [0.942–4.680]

0.070

2.336 [1.029–5.301]

0.048

 Improved < 20c

2.100 [0.942–4.680]

0.070

1.078 [0.989–1.175]

0.086

Angina stability

 Deterioration a

0.970 [0.495–1.901]

0.930

0.898 [0.450–1.791]

0.760

 SAQ3 AR score < 100 d

0.805 [0.447–1.449]

0.470

1.073 [0.986–1.167]

0.103

Treatment satisfaction

 Deteriorationa

1.150 [0.600–2.203]

0.673

1.127 [0.581–2.188]

0.723

Quality of life

 Deteriorationa

2.019 [1.122–3.634]

0.019

1.968 [1.083–3.578]

0.026

 Improved < 16e

2.184 [1.199–3.979]

0.011

2.105 [1.145–3.873]

0.017

  1. SAQ: Seattle Angina Questionnaire; MSIMI: Mental Stress-induced Myocardial Ischaemia; OR: Odds Ratio; AR: after revascularization. P values < 0.05 are shown in bold
  2. aDeterioration vs. improvement in the SAQ results during the past 1 month
  3. bImprovement in physical limitations of < 8 vs. significant improvement of ≥ 8
  4. cImprovement in angina frequency of < 20 vs. significant improvement of ≥ 20
  5. dSAQ3 FU score of < 100, denoting angina in the past 1 month, vs. freedom from angina
  6. eImprovement in quality of life of < 16 vs. significant improvement of ≥ 16
  7. fAdjusted for drinking history, PHQ-9 baseline, rest EDV, rest ESV, and rest LVEF