Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of the studies on the association between obesity phenotypes with mental health and quality of life

From: Mental health and quality of life in different obesity phenotypes: a systematic review

First author (Reference No)

Year of publication

Study design

No of participants (sex)

Age of participants

Exposure assessment

Outcome assessment

Main finding

Mehrabi [8]

2021

Cross-sectional

2469 (male and female)

46.2 ± 15.9

Obesity was defined as BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2, and MUH status based on having MetS or T2DM

Emotional states were assessed by the Persian version of DASS-21

Men and women with various obesity phenotypes experienced different anxiety and stress levels. While MUHO women and all MUH men experienced more anxiety and stress levels than MHNO individuals, none of the obesity phenotypes were associated with depression

Portugal-Nunes [24]

2021

Cross-sectional

101 (male and female)

64 ± 8.46

The anthropometric measures included weight (Kg), height (m), and abdominal perimeter (cm). FBG, fasting insulin, TG, and HDL were measured

Mood was assessed by the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS, long-version)

The association of metabolic dysfunction with depressive mood is influenced by age

Park and Lee [29]

2021

Cross-sectional

288,044 (male and female)

≥ 18 years

The MUH group was defined as those who have one of the following characteristics: FBG > 100 mg/dL or current use of hypoglycemic medication, BP ≥ 130/85 mmHg or current use of BP medication, TG ≥ 150 mg/dL or the use of antilipidemic medication, low HDL-C (< 40 mg/dL for men and < 50 mg/dL for women), and HOMA-IR score ≥ 2.5. MH was defined as those who do not meet the above criteria

Depression was assessed by the CES-D scale

The metabolic phenotype exerts a direct influence on emotional problems. Metabolic health may be used as an indicator of mental health

Kim [1]

2020

Cross-sectional

6057 (male and female)

≥ 20 years

Normal weight or obese was assessed by BMI. MUH status was defined as the presence of any three or more of the revised NCEP-ATP III definitions of MetS

Psychiatric symptoms including sleep time, stress, depression, suicide thoughts, were assessed by asking the related questions. Health related quality of life was evaluated by the EQ-5D

With or without metabolic abnormalities, obesity is associated with mental health problems and decreased quality of life

Seo [25]

2020

Longitudinal

3,586,492 adult individuals (male and female)

40–70 years

Obesity was defined as BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 and MH as MetS risk < 2

Depression was determined by a recording of ICD-10 codes F32.0 to F34.9 on health insurance data or the taking of antidepressant

MUHO has a higher risk of depressive symptoms than MHN. Furthermore, in women participants, MHO is also related to a higher risk of depressive symptoms. MHO is not a totally benign condition in relation to depression in women

Imbiriba [26]

2020

Cross-sectional

2371 (male and female)

49.6 ± 7.1 years

Metabolic profile classification was based on the Third NHANES criteria for anthropometric–metabolic profiles

Mental health data were collected through the Portuguese version of the CIS-R

There was a significant association between low skill discretion and an adverse metabolic profile in models adjusted for age, sex and race. No associations were significant between job stress domains and the metabolic profile of obese individuals in full models

Delgado [23]

2018

Cross-sectional

125 (100 obese, 25 non-obese) (male and female)

Obese subjects: 39.5 (10.5) years Non-obese subjects: 39.9 (10.4) years

MUO was defined as obesity associated with two or more metabolic alterations, including low HDL, hypertriglyceridemia, high FBG and hypertension

Depression was assessed using the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI)

Inclusion of inflammation in the definition of MUO drives the association found between poor metabolic health and depressive symptoms

Amiri [32]

2018

Cross-sectional

2880 (male and female)

> 19 years

Weight status was assessed by BMI. Based on the JIS definition, metabolic syndrome is defined as the presence of any 3 of the following five risk factors: (1) abdominal obesity; (2) reduced HDL-C < 50 mg/dl in women, < 40 in men or on drug treatment; (3) high TG levels ≥ 150 mg/dl or on drug treatment; (4) high BP or drug treatment; (5) high FBG ≥ 100 mg/dl or on drug treatment

HRQoL was assessed using the Short-Form 12-Item Health Survey version 2 (SF-12v2)

Compared to those with normal weight normal metabolic status, only obese dysmetabolic individuals were more likely to report poor physical HRQoL in both genders

Yosaee [27]

2018

Cross-sectional

157 adult subjects (male and female)

20–55 years

MUHO, MHO and non-obese metabolically healthy, diagnosed according to the NCEP-ATP III criteria and BMI

Depressive symptoms assessed by BDI

MHO was a benign phenotype in relation to depression

Truthmann [22]

2017

Cross-sectional

3298 subjects (male and female)

18–79 years

MHNO, MUNO, MHO, and MUO were defined by ATPIII criteria and BMI

Physical HRQoL was measured by the Short Form-36 version 2 PCS score

Obesity was significantly related to lower physical HRQoL, independent of metabolic health status, especially among women

Hinnouho [30]

2017

Longitudinal

14,475 subjects (male and female)

44–59 years

Obesity was defined as BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 and metabolic health as having none of the self-reported following CV risk factors: hypertension, T2DM and dyslipidemia

Depressive symptoms were assessed by the Center For CES-D scale

Poor metabolic health, irrespective of BMI was associated with more depression at the baseline, whereas a poorer course of depression over time was observed only in those with both obesity and poor metabolic health

Lopez-Garcia [5]

2017

Longitudinal

4397 individuals (male and female)

≥ 18 years

Weight was assessed by BMI. Two metabolic statuses 9 were defined: healthy (0–1 CA) and unhealthy (≥ 2 CA)

HRQoL was measured with the PCS and the MCS of the SF-12 questionnaire

Both obesity and CA should be addressed to improve HRQoL

Donini [4]

2016

Cross-sectional

253 subjects (male and female)

18–65 years

MHO and MUO were defined based on the absence or the presence of the MetS, respectively. PA was assessed by IPAQ questionnaire

HRQoL was measured with the SF-12 questionnaire

The metabolic comorbidity and the impairment of functional ability and psycho-social functioning may have a different timing in the natural history of obesity

Yang [12]

2016

Cross-sectional

6217 men and 8243 women

Over 30 years

Metabolic abnormality was defined by the criteria of the NCEP-ATP III

HRQoL was evaluated using the EQ-5D questionnaire

The MANW is the least favorable state of HRQoL for men. In women, the MUHO and MHO groups had the most adversely affected HRQoL

Phillips and Perry [7]

2015

Cross-sectional

2047 middle-aged male and female

50–69 years

MH was defined by three definitions based on a range of CA including MetS criteria, insulin resistance and inflammation

Depression, anxiety and well-being were assessed using the CES-D, the HADS and the WHO-5 Well Being Index

A favourable metabolic profile is positively related to mental health in obese middle-aged adults, but findings were dependent on MH definition

Hamer [28]

2012

Longitudinal

3851 subjects (male and female)

63.0 ± 8.9 years

Based on BP, HDL, TG, glycated haemoglobin, and CRP, subjects were classified as ‘MH’ (0 or 1 metabolic abnormality) or ‘MU’ (≥ 2 metabolic abnormalities)

Depressive symptoms were assessed using the 8-item CES-D scale

The association between obesity and risk of depressive symptoms seems to be partly dependent on metabolic health

Ul-Haq [31]

2012

Cross-sectional

5608 subjects (male and female)

≥ 20 years

Metabolic comorbidity was defined as the presence of one or more of these conditions: diabetes, HTN, hypercholesterolemia or CVD

HRQoL was evaluated using the Scottish Health Survey

The adverse impact of obesity on HRQoL is greater among individuals with metabolic comorbidity

Tsai [6]

2008

Cross-sectional

361 overweight and obese subjects (male and female)

No MetS: 44.9 ± 10.0 MetS: 48.2 ± 9.5

The presence of MetS was assessed using the NCEP criteria

HRQoL was measured with the SF-36 questionnaire. Depression was assessed using the BDI

Individuals with MetS reported lower HRQoL. This appeared to be an effect of increased weight, rather than a unique effect of MetS

  1. BMI, body mass index; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus; MetS, metabolic syndrome; MUH, metabolically unhealthy; MUHO, metabolically unhealthy obesity; DASS-21, depression, anxiety, and stress scale-21; MHNO, metabolically healthy non-obese; FBG, fasting blood glucose; TG, triglycerides; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; BP, blood pressure; MH, metabolically healthy; CES-D, Center for Epidemiologic studies depression; NCEP-ATP III, national cholesterol education program adult treatment panel; EQ-5D, EuroQol five-dimension; ICD, international classification of disease; NHANES, national health and nutrition examination survey; CIS-R, Clinical Interview Schedule-Revised; MUNO, metabolically unhealthy non-obese; HRQol, health related quality of life; BDI, beck depression inventory; PCS, physical component summary; CV, cardiovascular; CA, cardiometabolic abnormality; MCS, mental component summary; PA, physical activity; IPAQ, international physical activity questionnaire; HADS, hospital anxiety and depression scale; WHO, world health organization; MANW, metabolically abnormal but normal weight; CRP, C-reactive protein; MU, metabolically unhealthy; CVD, cardiovascular disease; HTN, hypertension; JIS, Joint Interim Statement